Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

When will the Judge issue a ruling regarding the Motion to Dismiss?

  • This Month

    Votes: 67 14.4%

  • Next Month

    Votes: 56 12.1%

  • This Year

    Votes: 73 15.7%

  • Next Year

    Votes: 155 33.4%

  • Whenever he issues an update to the sanctions

    Votes: 113 24.4%
  • Total voters
    464
Russell is a malicious retard, and I'm inclined to think his malicious retardation backfired spectacularly here. We know that when he doesn't hear what he wants to hear, he ignores it (like he wrote in his book: he thought the judge wasn't listening to him, so he didn't have to listen to the judge.) In this case, because the judge refused to sanction Hardin for being a meanie poop head, he felt he didn't have to read the filings.

But now, months after the fact (and after several terse replies from the judge), it's occurred to Gourdhead that maybe he ought to look into this SPO. I don't know why it suddenly occurred to him now. Maybe Hardin brought it up in an email. Maybe he had a flash of insight. Maybe he remembered those words, didn't see it in the docket, and is demanding a copy as something to use against Hardin. Hence, this filing.

I don't spend much time in court, but I don't think judges like it when people ignore what they say, and it definitely looks like Russ ignored the judge's response.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: Himedall All-seeing Waifu, ConSluttant, SpiceyHuman and 28 others
You can really tell how smug and confident he is in this filing that the SPO thing will get him out of having to pay up. He really believes he's found a slam-dunk way to punish Josh/Hardin and that it's simply that the magistrate has overlooked the violation.

What's even funnier is how it's literally been explaaaaaaained to him by both Hardin and the magistrate in such basic terms. It makes me think Russell is fully aware he's wrong but trying to wish a violation into existence through his denial.
 
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Agree
Reactions: Himedall All-seeing Waifu, ConSluttant, Winsome Whimsical Waif and 25 others
In fact, the SPO was specifically mentioned in that November 18 scheduling order, with reference to designating things as confidential, and the rules where you can find its full text and read it.
1737996380624.png
 
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: Himedall All-seeing Waifu, ConSluttant, SpiceyHuman and 28 others
and six goriilion others said:
The judge linked him some videos on how to do discovery right? Did those include something about the SPO, because I can only assume that would piss the judge off.
Click to expand...
He didn't give him the link, but told him where to find it and that he had to watch them. It did include stuff on SPO, per people who watched it.
Harvey Danger said:
So the court entered the SPO on 11-18-2024, and Russ doesn't ask the court for a copy until 12-30-2024. In the intervening month and a half, he was the one sending sensitive information under the SPO and filing complaints about its violation. Then when he didn't get a copy on 12-30, he waited 4 weeks to file this request for a copy of this super important SPO.

Does this sound like someone actively pursuing his case? Or does it sound like the same lazy asshole from the Gilman suit, who checks his mail every 2 weeks and doesn't read motions until the day he thinks a response is due?
Click to expand...
Hope Mr. Hardin files sanctions over this. Doubt he will, but here's to hoping.
Sexy Senior Citizen said:
Maybe Hardin brought it up in an email.
Click to expand...
He has been consistently doing that for like two months now, because Russ keeps bringing it up. Mr. Hardin included those convos as exhibits, IIRC.
StinkySnack said:
You can really tell how smug and confident he is in this filing that the SPO thing will get him out of having to pay up. He really believes he's found a slam-dunk way to punish Josh/Hardin and that it's simply that the magistrate has overlooked the violation.
Click to expand...
God willing, this will backfire on him massively.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Optimistic
Reactions: semitooth, Kongou Posting, Himedall All-seeing Waifu and 38 others
StinkySnack said:
Even the damn troll who emailed Russell about the SPO and witness names explained to him exactly why the information didn't need to be redacted.
Click to expand...
"Your honor, those dang dirty trolls tricked me by telling me exactly what I did wrong, so naturally I didn't believe them. Please, please, execute Kiwifarms (a website) and Johnus Moon after making them pay me."
 
  • Like
  • DRINK!
  • Feels
Reactions: Himedall All-seeing Waifu, ConSluttant, Poop Shoot and 17 others
Useful_Mistake said:
Hope Mr. Hardin files sanctions over this. Doubt he will, but here's to hoping.
Click to expand...
We need microtransaction IOLTAs. I want to pay for exactly 1 hour of Hardin's time to file a 1 page motion for sanctions. All it has to say is "he's calling me unethical for violating an Order he never read. WTF judge"
 
  • Feels
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: The Howlers of Mars, Himedall All-seeing Waifu, ConSluttant and 23 others
Useful_Mistake said:
God willing, this will backfire on him massively.
Click to expand...
Perhaps I'm more 🌈 than Noah's ark, but in the Judge's mind has to be that the SPO even if it had been applied would have covered absolutely nothing of consequence.

You could argue, maybe, that an address can be covered by an SPO (and there are cases, sure, but I don't think this is one) but this faggot didn't even provide the addresses. Hardin had to find them himself. (I forget if he supplied one.

"I asked for a useless thing, failed to apply it to useless things, and now two months later want to use it as a gotcha against serious sanction discussions" is .... probably going to work out just fine for our retard.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: ConSluttant, Clovis, Drunkensailor and 11 others
Dizzyuntildeath said:
Why is he always butchering the most common phrases and sayings?
Click to expand...
It's one of his trademarks, and one of the funniest things about him.

Some of my past favorites:

"It's in your ballcourt now"
"A picture is a thousand words"
"Dance to my own drum"
"You can't call the kettle black when you're acting crazy yourselves"
 
  • Like
  • Feels
  • Agree
Reactions: Pocket Sulfur, Atomic Ant, parsnip and 37 others
Dizzyuntildeath said:
I know I'm nitpicking here, but who says easy and quick. Isn't the prevailing syntax quick and easy? Why is he always butchering the most common phrases and sayings? A whore in the hand is worth an apple a day!
Click to expand...

The judge certainly did not say "easy and quick" or even "quick and easy" in the December 9 order that Greer references. What it says is that the SPO was entered "to expedite the exchange of discovery material and preserve the confidentiality of information." Dipshitforlips is CONSTANTLY putting words in other people's mouths, including the judge. It's wild that he can just keep acting like the rules everyone else has to follow do not apply to him.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Peace Or Love, Poop Shoot, Pedophobe and 14 others
reptile baht spaniard rid said:
You could argue, maybe, that an address can be covered by an SPO
Click to expand...
You could argue that and probably be right, but you have to inform everyone involved that it is information you want protected by marking it as such. If you don't, it isnt protected. Everyone, from trolls to the judge, told Russell that very clearly.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Pee Cola, CEO of Gay, Neo-Nazi Rich Evans and 8 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back