Did it though? Or did it examine enough data to generate a response based on responses other humans wrote that they said would pass the Turing Test? Is the Turing Test even worth anything? It's literally "if a human can't tell the difference, it passes." That's philosophy, ie opinion, and kinda depends on the human, doesn't it?
No I just don't live on this website because I have a fabulous life forcing men to become my consort
afaik Turing Test was meant more to be a general idea and not some ISO certification standard within a three millimeter margin of error
The main thing would be finding information quickly, or formatting documents. If I want a will, I can tell an LLM the basics of how I want my estate divided. All the other legal stuff could be filled in by the LLM. LLMs could also help with medical mistakes. Having a computerized set of eyes of all cat-scans, pet-scans, and x-rays would be great, even if it doesn't fully replace doctors. AI even helps people program, especially in rust. This isn't even mentioning the military applications, including drones, missiles, and anti-missile systems.
In your dreams.
Mama warned me about women like you! I was hoping she was right.
Looks like bartowski put out a GGUF of Deepseek-R1, maybe I'll give it a try.
Nothing on the stock market is real though.
You reminded me how Ross Perot was one of the major investors for Steve Jobs’s Next Computers and lamented at one point that it was a giant mistake because Next only made niche workstation PC that only a few turbonerds in the 90s used. I have no idea if he sold his shares but if he did it was a huge mistake since Apple acquired Next and everyone knows what happened after.
I wish he was anywhere near the dictator you think he is.
Deepseek's impressive comparatively, for how much cheaper and faster it was put together while still outperforming the big boys. And the fact they open sourced it on top of that. Anybody hyping it up as massively more intelligent is a midwit.
That's kinda how it goes. Nobody gives an absolute fuck about petty dealers but authorities like to keep tabs on them because it's easier to wait until someone dies of an overdose before charging the dealer with for a higher crime than simply dealing. It works out great for everyone, the scum of the earth can keep doing their degenerate shit and when a bad batch is inevitably distributed then it takes out dozens of them in one fell swoop AND the dealer.
The conservatives I know try to eat less goyslop. It's ironically the liberals that like to pose next to Starbucks cups/whatever the new trendy food item is.
Those are the more targeted things I alluded to. And in the end I wouldn't trust an LLM to spit out a will conforming to all my particulars, I'd still have a human lawyer check it. At the end of the day, modern "AI" basically function as expensive calculators, but the topics are usually less precise than mathematics, so they don't even have the accuracy of a TI SR-10 from 1973 across all or even most their applications yet
Using an LLM for math is a great mistake, math, ironically, is it's worst use case. Creative work, general writing is it's strong suit.
