- Joined
- May 31, 2021
Erin Reed / Anthony Reed II / @ErinInTheMorn / @ErinInTheMorning / @ErinInTheNight / _supernovasky_ / beholderseye / realitybias / AnonymousRabbit - post-op transbian Twitter/TikTok "activist" with bad fashion, giant Reddit tattoo. Former drug dealer with felony. Married to Zooey Simone Zephyr / Zachary Todd Raasch.
- Thread starter garbage cake
- Start date
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2021
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2022
Hopefully he's been sent to American Auschwitz.
Not Dr. Evil
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2022
Wonderful news!
Stamp out the perversion at the source.
I wouldn't be surprised if Zack got himself kicked out a second time.
This is an obvious man in a dress
Kate Strangio wants to file a frivolous lolsuit
Stamp out the perversion at the source.
I wouldn't be surprised if Zack got himself kicked out a second time.
This is an obvious man in a dress
Kate Strangio wants to file a frivolous lolsuit
Last edited:
Candidate No 7
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2023
No matter what he is saying, the tone is always "you are my child and I love you but you disappointed me so you are sleeping in the garage again".
Not Dr. Evil
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2022
You are doing a great job Zack! Keep it up.
"Montana Republican lawmakers advanced a bill Wednesday over Democratic opposition that would subject parents and medical providers to criminal penalties if they help transgender minors obtain health care treatments for gender dysphoria.
The legislation, Senate Bill 164, is one of several strategies Republican lawmakers in Montana and other states have advanced in recent years to prohibit transgender minors from receiving medical treatments that help align their appearance with their gender identity.
The effort, widely opposed by transgender people, their families and major U.S. medical organizations, has become a cornerstone of GOP politics in Montana and nationwide.
The current version of the proposed legislation passed by the Senate Judiciary Committee on a 6-3 party-line vote would expand Montana’s child endangerment statute to make an adult criminally liable if the person “knowingly procures or provides” puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones or surgical procedures to youth under the age of 16 “for the purpose of altering the appearance of the child or affirming the child’s perception of the child’s sex when the appearance or perception is inconsistent with the child’s biological sex.”
The bill, sponsored by Sen. John Fuller, R-Kalispell, would apply to adults “whether or not the person is supervising the welfare of the child.”
Some of the lawmakers who endorsed the legislation Wednesday said it would help curb the specifically listed medical services for minors who cannot legally consent to health care treatment. They did not reflect on the bill’s repercussions for parents directing other types of medical care for their children.
“I believe that any life-altering decision should not be made by, or to the effect of, a child under 16,” said Sen. Sue Vinton, R-Billings..
Criminal liability bill for parents of trans minors advances in Montana Senate
"Montana Republican lawmakers advanced a bill Wednesday over Democratic opposition that would subject parents and medical providers to criminal penalties if they help transgender minors obtain health care treatments for gender dysphoria.
The legislation, Senate Bill 164, is one of several strategies Republican lawmakers in Montana and other states have advanced in recent years to prohibit transgender minors from receiving medical treatments that help align their appearance with their gender identity.
The effort, widely opposed by transgender people, their families and major U.S. medical organizations, has become a cornerstone of GOP politics in Montana and nationwide.
The current version of the proposed legislation passed by the Senate Judiciary Committee on a 6-3 party-line vote would expand Montana’s child endangerment statute to make an adult criminally liable if the person “knowingly procures or provides” puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones or surgical procedures to youth under the age of 16 “for the purpose of altering the appearance of the child or affirming the child’s perception of the child’s sex when the appearance or perception is inconsistent with the child’s biological sex.”
The bill, sponsored by Sen. John Fuller, R-Kalispell, would apply to adults “whether or not the person is supervising the welfare of the child.”
Some of the lawmakers who endorsed the legislation Wednesday said it would help curb the specifically listed medical services for minors who cannot legally consent to health care treatment. They did not reflect on the bill’s repercussions for parents directing other types of medical care for their children.
“I believe that any life-altering decision should not be made by, or to the effect of, a child under 16,” said Sen. Sue Vinton, R-Billings..
Criminal liability bill for parents of trans minors advances in Montana Senate
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2023
As if US presidents (ok, their staff) spend dozens of hours drafting and then formalising these documents for no real reason at all.
Works fine for me?
Candidate No 7
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2023
Oh to be a fly on the chair and hear the whisper.
Not Dr. Evil
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2022
Go for it Tony. I am sure that chimping out at hospitals will TOTALLY work out in your favor.
No, he did not dumbass. The troon is going to lose on the merits.
The court merely issued a 14 day TRO to give the Trump amin and the DOJ a chance to respond to the frivolous lolsuit. The merits have never been addressed.
"BOSTON, Jan 30 (Reuters) - A U.S. judge has temporarily blocked federal prison officials from transferring a transgender woman to a men's facility and denying her access to gender-affirming care in accordance with an executive order issued by President Donald Trump, her lawyers said on Thursday.
The temporary restraining order was issued by U.S. District Judge George O'Toole in Boston on Sunday while the inmate's case was sealed in what appeared to be the first lawsuit challenging an order Trump signed on his first day back in office on Jan. 20, targeting what he called "gender ideology extremism."
US judge blocks Trump administration from transferring transgender inmate
This is from just one week ago in Washington State
"Courts have held that prisoners generally do not have a liberty interest in avoiding being transferred to another prison, or in being housed in a particular institution. See Olim v. Wakinekona, 461 U.S. 238, 245 (1983); Meachum v. Fano, 427 U.S. 215, 225–27 (1976). A prisoner has no constitutional right to incarceration at a prison of their choice. Williams v. Wood, 223 F.App'x 670, 671 (9th Cir. 2007); see also Rizzo v. Dawson, 778 F.2d 527, 530 (9th Cir. 1985) (in general due process is not implicated when prison officials change an inmate's place of confinement, “even though the degree of confinement may be different and prison life may be more disagreeable in one institution than in another”); and see Aliahmed v. Troxler, 839 F.App'x 675, 677 (3d Cir. 2021) (holding that because transgender plaintiff lacked a cognizable liberty interest in being confined in a particular institution, she was unlikely to succeed on her claim for injunctive relief seeking transfer to a women's prison).
Courts have also held that a plaintiff has no due process right to be housed with an inmate of their choice. Allen v. Figueroa, 56 F.3d 70 at *7 (9th Cir. 1995) (citing Hoptowit v. Ray, 682 F.2d 1237, 1246 (9th Cir. 1982)); see also Guy v. Espinoza, No. 119CV00498WIEPGPC, 2020 WL 309525, at *11 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 21, 2020), report and recommendation adopted, No. 119CV00498AWIEPGPC, 2020 WL 949556 (E.D. Cal. Feb. 27, 2020) (“an inmate does not have a due process right to be housed with compatible inmates, and housing circumstances that are viewed as less favorable to an inmate do not implicate or infringe on the inmate's liberty interest.”); Williams v. Reynoso, No. 1:15-CV-00785-MJS, 2015 WL 3795033, at *2 (E.D. Cal. June 17, 2015) (“Plaintiff has no right to a particular housing arrangement, and the refusal to house him with someone with whom he shares interests or proclivities cannot be said to have inflicted unnecessary pain or disproportionate punishment.”).
Accordingly, because Plaintiff has no liberty interest in being housed in a particular prison or with specific cellmates, she fails to state a due process claim here. See Gordon v. Inslee, No. 3:21-CV-5802-BJR-DWC, 2023 WL 2874062, at *8–9 (W.D. Wash. Feb. 6, 2023), report and recommendation adopted, No. 21-5802-BJR-DWC, 2023 WL 2864187 (W.D. Wash. Apr. 10, 2023) (Granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment on transgender prisoner's due process claim based on the failure to transfer her to a women's prison on the grounds that plaintiff had no liberty interest in being housed in any particular prison or with any particular cellmate.). Defendants’ motion to dismiss should be granted with respect to Plaintiff's Fourteenth Amendment Due Process claim and the claim should be dismissed with prejudice
The Court is not aware of any case holding that a transgender male-to-female prisoner, such as Plaintiff, has a free-standing constitutional right to be housed in a women's prison.
See Gordon, 2023 WL 2874062, at *8–9 (“The Eighth Amendment does not impose any such blanket requirement [for a transgender male-to female prisoner to be housed in a women's prison], because a prisoner does not have a constitutional right to a particular prison placement.”) (citing Olim, 461 U.S. at 245). Moreover, even recognizing the “ever-present, generalized risk of sexual assault that transgender inmates face,” courts that have addressed this issue have generally declined to impose categorical rules requiring specific prison assignments or cell placements. See id. (quoting Richardson v. D.C., 322 F. Supp. 3d 175, 184–85 (D.D.C. 201
(“Farmer does not hold that transgender female inmates, notwithstanding their own housing preferences, may never be celled with male inmates.”)); Minor v. Dilks, No. CV1918261KMWAMD, 2022 WL 3369707, at *6 (D.N.J. Aug. 16, 2022) (“Here, the alleged violation in question is Defendants’ failure to immediately transfer Plaintiff to a female prison or housing with other transgender inmates ....
What few cases do exist on the issue of the appropriate prison placement of transgender inmates suggest that no such clearly established right exists.”) (citing Guy v. Espinoza, No. 119CV00498AWIEPGPC, 2020 WL 309525, at *5 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 21, 2020), report and recommendation adopted, No. 119CV00498AWIEPGPC, 2020 WL 949556 (E.D. Cal. Feb. 27, 2020)); Bradley v. Price, No. 20-CV-48-JDP, 2021 WL 1895062 (W.D. Wis. May 11, 2021) (“I have found no case holding that single-cell confinement is required for any transgender female inmate housed in a male prison.”).
No, he did not dumbass. The troon is going to lose on the merits.
The court merely issued a 14 day TRO to give the Trump amin and the DOJ a chance to respond to the frivolous lolsuit. The merits have never been addressed.
"BOSTON, Jan 30 (Reuters) - A U.S. judge has temporarily blocked federal prison officials from transferring a transgender woman to a men's facility and denying her access to gender-affirming care in accordance with an executive order issued by President Donald Trump, her lawyers said on Thursday.
The temporary restraining order was issued by U.S. District Judge George O'Toole in Boston on Sunday while the inmate's case was sealed in what appeared to be the first lawsuit challenging an order Trump signed on his first day back in office on Jan. 20, targeting what he called "gender ideology extremism."
US judge blocks Trump administration from transferring transgender inmate
This is from just one week ago in Washington State
"Courts have held that prisoners generally do not have a liberty interest in avoiding being transferred to another prison, or in being housed in a particular institution. See Olim v. Wakinekona, 461 U.S. 238, 245 (1983); Meachum v. Fano, 427 U.S. 215, 225–27 (1976). A prisoner has no constitutional right to incarceration at a prison of their choice. Williams v. Wood, 223 F.App'x 670, 671 (9th Cir. 2007); see also Rizzo v. Dawson, 778 F.2d 527, 530 (9th Cir. 1985) (in general due process is not implicated when prison officials change an inmate's place of confinement, “even though the degree of confinement may be different and prison life may be more disagreeable in one institution than in another”); and see Aliahmed v. Troxler, 839 F.App'x 675, 677 (3d Cir. 2021) (holding that because transgender plaintiff lacked a cognizable liberty interest in being confined in a particular institution, she was unlikely to succeed on her claim for injunctive relief seeking transfer to a women's prison).
Courts have also held that a plaintiff has no due process right to be housed with an inmate of their choice. Allen v. Figueroa, 56 F.3d 70 at *7 (9th Cir. 1995) (citing Hoptowit v. Ray, 682 F.2d 1237, 1246 (9th Cir. 1982)); see also Guy v. Espinoza, No. 119CV00498WIEPGPC, 2020 WL 309525, at *11 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 21, 2020), report and recommendation adopted, No. 119CV00498AWIEPGPC, 2020 WL 949556 (E.D. Cal. Feb. 27, 2020) (“an inmate does not have a due process right to be housed with compatible inmates, and housing circumstances that are viewed as less favorable to an inmate do not implicate or infringe on the inmate's liberty interest.”); Williams v. Reynoso, No. 1:15-CV-00785-MJS, 2015 WL 3795033, at *2 (E.D. Cal. June 17, 2015) (“Plaintiff has no right to a particular housing arrangement, and the refusal to house him with someone with whom he shares interests or proclivities cannot be said to have inflicted unnecessary pain or disproportionate punishment.”).
Accordingly, because Plaintiff has no liberty interest in being housed in a particular prison or with specific cellmates, she fails to state a due process claim here. See Gordon v. Inslee, No. 3:21-CV-5802-BJR-DWC, 2023 WL 2874062, at *8–9 (W.D. Wash. Feb. 6, 2023), report and recommendation adopted, No. 21-5802-BJR-DWC, 2023 WL 2864187 (W.D. Wash. Apr. 10, 2023) (Granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment on transgender prisoner's due process claim based on the failure to transfer her to a women's prison on the grounds that plaintiff had no liberty interest in being housed in any particular prison or with any particular cellmate.). Defendants’ motion to dismiss should be granted with respect to Plaintiff's Fourteenth Amendment Due Process claim and the claim should be dismissed with prejudice
The Court is not aware of any case holding that a transgender male-to-female prisoner, such as Plaintiff, has a free-standing constitutional right to be housed in a women's prison.
See Gordon, 2023 WL 2874062, at *8–9 (“The Eighth Amendment does not impose any such blanket requirement [for a transgender male-to female prisoner to be housed in a women's prison], because a prisoner does not have a constitutional right to a particular prison placement.”) (citing Olim, 461 U.S. at 245). Moreover, even recognizing the “ever-present, generalized risk of sexual assault that transgender inmates face,” courts that have addressed this issue have generally declined to impose categorical rules requiring specific prison assignments or cell placements. See id. (quoting Richardson v. D.C., 322 F. Supp. 3d 175, 184–85 (D.D.C. 201
(“Farmer does not hold that transgender female inmates, notwithstanding their own housing preferences, may never be celled with male inmates.”)); Minor v. Dilks, No. CV1918261KMWAMD, 2022 WL 3369707, at *6 (D.N.J. Aug. 16, 2022) (“Here, the alleged violation in question is Defendants’ failure to immediately transfer Plaintiff to a female prison or housing with other transgender inmates ....What few cases do exist on the issue of the appropriate prison placement of transgender inmates suggest that no such clearly established right exists.”) (citing Guy v. Espinoza, No. 119CV00498AWIEPGPC, 2020 WL 309525, at *5 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 21, 2020), report and recommendation adopted, No. 119CV00498AWIEPGPC, 2020 WL 949556 (E.D. Cal. Feb. 27, 2020)); Bradley v. Price, No. 20-CV-48-JDP, 2021 WL 1895062 (W.D. Wis. May 11, 2021) (“I have found no case holding that single-cell confinement is required for any transgender female inmate housed in a male prison.”).
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2020
It’s so interesting to watch Tony read the “no more troons in the military” EO. He is so clearly enraged by the language used in that EO to characterize trannies as morale-deteriorating liars who suck up government resources without ever intending to fulfill their commitments to their country. Meanwhile, all normal people are like, “FUCKING FINALLY WE CAN OPENLY CALL THEM WHAT WE HAVE ALWAYS BELIEVED THEM TO BE!”
He must be shocked by the whiplash tone shift, especially because of the echo chamber in which all troons insulate themselves. But out here in the real world, the new administration is just “affirming” what all sensible people already knew to be true. Must be quite a shock to find out just how many people loathe you now that they are allowed to be honest again.
It reminds me of the trannies that claim they “pass” because they forced us all to play pretend or lose our jobs. They removed the real-world honest feedback as much as they possibly could and then drew conclusions based on their false, enforced fiction.
He must be shocked by the whiplash tone shift, especially because of the echo chamber in which all troons insulate themselves. But out here in the real world, the new administration is just “affirming” what all sensible people already knew to be true. Must be quite a shock to find out just how many people loathe you now that they are allowed to be honest again.
It reminds me of the trannies that claim they “pass” because they forced us all to play pretend or lose our jobs. They removed the real-world honest feedback as much as they possibly could and then drew conclusions based on their false, enforced fiction.
Not Dr. Evil
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2022
That does not say what you claim it does Gap Tooth.
Your_deadname_here
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2024
I'm not sure how you parse that to get tonys output. It sounds like,..."we are going to just do our best", it's not a defiant tone at all.
Not Dr. Evil
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2022
What do you think about another round of WINNING folks?
Removing Gender Ideology and Restoring the EEOC’s Role of Protecting Women in the Workplace
Removing Gender Ideology and Restoring the EEOC’s Role of Protecting Women in the Workplace
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2019
Tony is assuming that the hospitals are doing this under some sort of duress and pressure from the Trump administration. I'm willing to bet there's a lot of doctors that are very dubious about "trans healthcare" as it is, are more than happy to comply and are actually breathing a sigh of relief that they can just blame Big Bad Daddy Trump.Go for it Tony. I am sure that chimping out at hospitals will TOTALLY work out in your favor.
Last edited:
Your_deadname_here
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2024
***putting this on top... The subject did a podcast :
Guess what he recently studying (((?)))
Podcast makes reference to the following screed by jo:
The musings of an apparent kamakazetroon:
So this is breaking :
Amazing. Not one mention of this on bluesky. Searching Jo Ellis returns a result a day ago :
There is no mention of Jo in the MSM in the context of this event as of 3:35am EDT. So they would probably justify the censorship in context of spreading rumors. But I can't believe nobody is posting about Jo bluesky.
Went to Tony's page. Went to the latest thread and posted these caps and asked if anyone could confirm. Completely professional, no ouvert trolling.
Astoundingly, 2 mins later...
Tonys dick swings at bluesky. They wrote about a previous account. This was my only account. This was one of a handful of posts in total. I just lurked, the platform is so eggshelled and I have heavy feet so I just stayed on the fray. The content there is entirely soft. If I were to express an unfiltered take on any given post chances are a ban. It is comically the exact inverse of X. The equal opposite reaction.
So kiwifags... Which is it... Their solopism or is it that censored? I can't find any references to Jo + crash.
And our Boy is definitely awake at 3am. He and Zak are probably wearing a track in the carpet from pacing. Tony out of his mind in a blind rage, dried spit corners completely chimp-buck-chernsniggering.
"WHY CAN'T THESE FUCKING FAGGOTS JUST STOP ZAK!!!"
((("for this I should cut my dick?")))
<throws Warhammer diorama into wall>
Zak standing there with that vacant stare... "Honey, the trolls... There will be so many mean posts..."
Tony, "Then we will fight in the bluesky."
Meanwhile at X... it was trending in the USA.
The lone reference to jo
1 post total
What a tender platform
It's pretty sobering to see how information is curated... In comparing the flow of the two, it's nothing short of bizzaro world. So fucked up. We've hit the Reboonked Post Modern Info Era.
"No sense makes sense"
-Charles Miles Manson... And if this is a happening... It's going to be a wild day. Eat up boys, for tonight we dine in hell.
Late edit... Checked bluesky :
I'd tell you what it says, but it's Greek to me.
Edit 6:30 am to add Pravda hits with the news...
Still crickets abound
Interesting to note the "misgender". Will bluesky do a Silverstein & pull it?
Alright guys. Who is writing this shit? This season is insane as the YouTube says. If this is TROON Hawk Down DJT is going 1488.
TTD will be on the menu.
OK... Starting to drip. I'll let it run. Thanks for reading my little post.
BREAKING NEWS BREAKING NEWS
NOTHING EVER HAPPENS
here we go guys
Sorry for posting raw link... Phone about to die
Guess what he recently studying (((?)))
Podcast makes reference to the following screed by jo:
The musings of an apparent kamakazetroon:
So this is breaking :
Amazing. Not one mention of this on bluesky. Searching Jo Ellis returns a result a day ago :
There is no mention of Jo in the MSM in the context of this event as of 3:35am EDT. So they would probably justify the censorship in context of spreading rumors. But I can't believe nobody is posting about Jo bluesky.
Went to Tony's page. Went to the latest thread and posted these caps and asked if anyone could confirm. Completely professional, no ouvert trolling.
Astoundingly, 2 mins later...
Tonys dick swings at bluesky. They wrote about a previous account. This was my only account. This was one of a handful of posts in total. I just lurked, the platform is so eggshelled and I have heavy feet so I just stayed on the fray. The content there is entirely soft. If I were to express an unfiltered take on any given post chances are a ban. It is comically the exact inverse of X. The equal opposite reaction.
So kiwifags... Which is it... Their solopism or is it that censored? I can't find any references to Jo + crash.
And our Boy is definitely awake at 3am. He and Zak are probably wearing a track in the carpet from pacing. Tony out of his mind in a blind rage, dried spit corners completely chimp-buck-chernsniggering.
"WHY CAN'T THESE FUCKING FAGGOTS JUST STOP ZAK!!!"
((("for this I should cut my dick?")))
<throws Warhammer diorama into wall>
Zak standing there with that vacant stare... "Honey, the trolls... There will be so many mean posts..."
Tony, "Then we will fight in the bluesky."
Meanwhile at X... it was trending in the USA.
The lone reference to jo
1 post total
What a tender platform
It's pretty sobering to see how information is curated... In comparing the flow of the two, it's nothing short of bizzaro world. So fucked up. We've hit the Reboonked Post Modern Info Era.
"No sense makes sense"
-Charles Miles Manson... And if this is a happening... It's going to be a wild day. Eat up boys, for tonight we dine in hell.
Late edit... Checked bluesky :
I'd tell you what it says, but it's Greek to me.
Edit 6:30 am to add Pravda hits with the news...
Still crickets abound
Interesting to note the "misgender". Will bluesky do a Silverstein & pull it?
Alright guys. Who is writing this shit? This season is insane as the YouTube says. If this is TROON Hawk Down DJT is going 1488.
TTD will be on the menu.
OK... Starting to drip. I'll let it run. Thanks for reading my little post.
BREAKING NEWS BREAKING NEWS
NOTHING EVER HAPPENS
here we go guys
Sorry for posting raw link... Phone about to die
Last edited:
Nero Fiddled
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2022
Interestingly, I can find reference to the names of only two of the three people aboard the helicopter so far.
Nobody Important
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2021
She says it wasn’t her, but you know how they lie.
behindyourightnow
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- May 17, 2021
Go read the dedicated thread, the tranny angle has been debunked. Mostly by me because people are faggots and don't know the different between the Army and the National Guard.
I hope Trump just keeps signing these executive orders every day of his presidency. Even after he runs out of important troon-related things to address and is just signing executive orders declaring that trannies have ugly moobs and man-jaws.
Chickenpolar
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2023
Nobody Important
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2021
“Mental healthcare without gender affirming medical care is conversion therapy.” says someone who has no idea what any of those three things are.
And then these same assholes will turn around and talk about how “nobody gets blockers or hormones without a vetting process.”
And then these same assholes will turn around and talk about how “nobody gets blockers or hormones without a vetting process.”