Chapalapachapa
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Oct 9, 2024
They haven't improved the graphics right. Why the fuck this game is so demanging. 32 of ram? Get the fuck out of here Vavra you faggot
Kingdom Come Deliverance - Or how I stopped worrying about SJW and love Bohemia | Now with betrayal and a lot more niggers. "Historically accurate." BlackRock ruined the series.
- Thread starter RomanesEuntDomus
- Start date
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2024
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2019
if you do you most likely get fired, either because you go against the political grain, HR suddenly receives made up reports of you looking at a women's ankle without getting written consent agreement or saying nigger 60 years ago, the beancounters get salty you wasted millions of dollars and have to push back the release date to get that work done, which fucks with marketing and other arrangements. unless the order comes from very up high, you're fucked.
there's a reason publishers are openly against "rockstar" devs, besides the usual drama most of the project hinges on them. much easier to employ a committee of easily replaceable cogs.
you just need enough cub porn to distract the discord admins, just like cp for reddit mods.
regalterry
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2024
They're all getting fired anyway when the game tanks because, shocker, the vast majority of humans has no wish to see ugly women, faggots, troons or niggers in their escapism.
That's funny, since they let moronic devs run their mouths at the audience all the time. We've seen the same pattern of "don't like it don't play it bigot" repeat with EA, Ubisoft, MicroSoft, Sony etc.
A competent CEO would remind these fuckwits who is in charge and where the money comes from, but competent CEOs are severely lacking in the industry.
Potatoherder
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 28, 2020
Can't make this shit up. See! Blackrock doesn't own us! What about Vangguard? Its only 1.8%!
edit: full thread
edit: full thread
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2024
I am dumb when it comes to economics, but how does Blackrock/Statestreet/Vanguard achieve shoving DEI policies?
Do they bribe the other smaller shareholders to do their way, so they actually influence more than 1.8%?
>IMPLYING
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 14, 2022
My understanding is that if you acquiesce, they'll increase their share guaranteed, which is more money in the company. They can also provide loans to the business at very generous interest rates, which the business can use to further increase their revenue. I could be retarded though. My understanding is definitely amateur.
Potatoherder
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 28, 2020
They basically make it clear if you want more investment you need to enforce certain social policies. Investment into a company at this level means they know of you and if you don't comply you will be blacklisted. Vanguard has $10.4 trillion in assets and Blackrock $11.5 trillion. They have tons of sway.
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2024
Ah so they do it because Blackrock promises they will own more of their companies? Like 10%? 30%?
Potatoherder
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 28, 2020
Yes, this gives company a safety net and also access to loans on better terms. Wonder why Sony thought it was a good idea to drop $200 million plus on Concord?
Bilibin
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 19, 2020
First impressions reviewers didn't really have any major problems with bugs or performance. But pop off, queen.
Potatoherder
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 28, 2020
They are already running on high end systems. The average steam user has at best a 3000 series gpu with 8GiB of vram. Most youtube people have 4090s and a high end cpu.
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2014
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2024
Its a social engineering project. I don't follow Embracer investor news, but 1.8% typically is not a highly influential stake, but its enough to make some noise. The most likely explanation is that Embracer already agrees with ESG, Vanguard doesn't have to force anything. Most western elites have adopted social progressivism/intersectional marxism to shield themselves from criticism for their avarice. They will not be able to understand that this will not save them from Luigi until a few more Luigis do their thing. Additionally, large swathes of the western public have been turned against intersectional marxism to the point where there is no reconciliation. The money-changers will be pivoting on this pretty hard in the next couple years. You can see this in how all the tech CEOs bent the knee to Trump in the past few months.
The part about better interest rates is absolutely true, and one of the biggest reasons why Vavra cucked if you look from a pure monetary perspective. For example, when compounding monthly, if you borrow $100 million in a 10 year loan with 7% interest, you will owe $200 million. if you knock it down to 5%, that becomes $164 million. With how much game dev costs these days that stacks up very quickly. If a big investment bank will give you 1% off your loan for making the main character a sodomite and sticking a nigger in it, the business dicks will do it in a heartbeat, because thats 20 million bucks in their pocket. The problem here is that the business dicks answer answer to the shareholder, not the customer, which causes them to take the cheaper loan because the shareholders either dont have the wisdom to understand driving off customers with noxious faggotry is a poor idea, or they are social engineers who are willing to spend money to acheive their social goals. This causes the problem you've seen in western entertainment over the past decade - in the vast majority large projects, the customer doesnt even become an afterthought. This results in slop.
It is not possible to have a competent CEO in a publicly traded company. Shareholders are the most retarded, short sighted, mongoloid subhumans to walk this earth - they demand growth at all times, ESPECIALLY when it's not feasible. Any CEO with the wisdom and foresight to not slaughter the goose that lays golden eggs will be fired and replaced by one who will, because the shareholders demand limitless growth, and they want it NOW. Game developers becoming publicly traded has doomed the industry, as it makes it functionally impossible to not treat the customer as an endlessly extractable resource. We all know how well this goes over with our crowd.
Last edited:
EscapeVorkuta
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 11, 2024
Someone mentioned it already in this thread: The drastic difference between how the original game and this sequel have been received by the gaming media. The first game was largely boycotted by the major gaming websites and their journos while the sequel is being astroturfed all over Youtube a month before its release. It is quite clear Embracer and Warhorse are botting as well. Many bought and paid for Youtube shills are already saying this is an early candidate for "Game of the Year" lmao.....
It was only a matter of time before Youtubers became just as scummy and corrupt as mainstream game journos.
It was only a matter of time before Youtubers became just as scummy and corrupt as mainstream game journos.
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2019
and it only took EA what, 10-15 years? it was a pretty good trick until recently
remember those devs are on the right side of history, protected by HR and DEI departments
Bilibin
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 19, 2020
Seems to run well enough on Steam Deck
The CEO of Embracer guaranteed Warhorse creative freedom during the acquisition and that tracks with what Dan says about the lack of investor influence over the game.
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2024
I find it very difficult to believe these statements are not bald-faced lies based on the behavior we have observed so far.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2024
Press (X) to doubt. Do you notice there aren't any journos criticizing the game anymore? That's because they expect the game to have the gay shit in the game.
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2024
