Opinion Single Women Think Men Just Want a Fembot

Link (Archive)

Single Women Think Men Just Want a Fembot​

In the new movie “Companion,” Iris seems to be the perfect girlfriend.

She looks like a 1960s paper doll, with heavy dark bangs and pink headbands that go with her pink gingham matching separates. She is endlessly supportive of her boyfriend, Josh, who appears to be very in love with her. In fact, Iris meets Josh’s every need — she even tells him the weather each morning.

That’s because Iris is a robot, “more specifically, a companion robot,” Josh admits to her, after Iris discovers that she is not a real girl. Josh hates that other people imply that she’s just a sex bot, because, he tells Iris, “You do much more than that. You’re an emotional support robot.” There is also a male character with a male robot boyfriend who spends his time cleaning and cooking elaborate meals.

Without spoiling the whole thing, the very funny, very gory movie centers on Iris’s dawning consciousness. She becomes enraged when she realizes that she is totally programmed, and can be reprogrammed, by Josh — her voice, her eye color, her intelligence level (he can adjust the setting on a 0-100 scale at any time, where 0 is an automaton and 100 is an Ivy League grad).

What the men in this movie want is a robot who is “completely docile, yours to do whatever you want with.”

And what the women — even the fembots — want is to drive away alone in a fancy convertible, the wind blowing through their hair. Iris wants her freedom, and she will get it by any means necessary.

“Companion” is obviously extreme and satirical; it’s a horror comedy. But it turns out that in the real world, human American women feel a bit like Iris does, and their view of the opposite sex in 2025 is pretty bleak.

A new look at single life from the Survey Center on American Life at the American Enterprise Institute describes a pervasive pessimism among both single men and single women. But the single women polled seem particularly down on the idea of marriage, and many of them do not feel they have good options.
“Single women not only reject the idea of marriage but also believe it’s a liability,” A.E.I.’s Daniel A. Cox and Kelsey Eyre Hammond write.

They are concerned about marrying the wrong person. “More than half (55 percent) of currently single women believe that single women are generally happier than married women.” Meanwhile, “men largely reject the idea that single women are happier than married women.” Basically, everyone agrees that married men are happier than single men.
Single women are also worried about their physical safety; they are far more likely than single men to say that men would take sexual advantage of women if given the opportunity, and women don’t trust dating apps to keep them from harm.

Earlier research from the Survey Center on American Life suggests that single women think being married is a raw deal for women and a good deal for men; even conservative women believe that marriage is better for men than for women. I don’t know how many ways I can express that women do more household labor and child care than men; it’s a frequent refrain in this newsletter. In 2020, my colleague Claire Cain Miller noted that young men do not really do much more household labor than older men, despite women’s massive workplace gains since the 1970s. The simplest explanation: “Men might be happy to have a partner bringing in another paycheck, but not happy to do more chores.”

Perhaps less discussed is the unreciprocated emotional work that women feel they put into their relationships. A 2017 overview of the research on family relationships and well-being written by a trio of sociologists who study health over the course of adult life explains it this way: “Within a traditional marriage, women tend to take more responsibility for maintaining social connections to family and friends and are more likely to provide emotional support to their husband, whereas men are more likely to receive emotional support and enjoy the benefit of expanded social networks — all factors that may promote husbands’ health and well-being,” but not the wives’.

It used to be that marriage was a much better financial bargain for women than it was for men, but as the wage gap has narrowed among younger men and women, that is increasingly not the case.

I asked Cox why he thinks single women are so down on marriage, and he told me one of his theories:
The models of marriage they see in older generations are not always appealing. I believe there’s a greater sensitivity among young women today to the domestic labor disparity. Especially among college-educated single women there is a better understanding that their careers will suffer if they have children and their partners don’t step up. And many single women believe that single men are not interested in a 50/50 split. We found that 49 percent of single women believe that “most single men today do not want an equal partner.”
I don’t think wanting an equal partner is too much to ask for, and I don’t blame single women for wanting that and refusing to settle for less. But I am married, and I like being married. I am not categorically down on the institution.

Despite my profound enjoyment of the sex robot murder comedy, I do not think that all men want a fembot that they can completely control, and a lot of men understand that women are sick of doing all of the emotional labor.

After all, “Companion” was written and directed by a man.
 
A career will never be as fulfilling as a family. It's just not how we as a species are wired.

I find the notion that anyone, man or woman, would choose career over family to be depressing. Yes, you need money to raise a family, but you shouldn't sacrifice the latter for the former.

Ideally we would have an economy where the income of one person would be able to afford a family. Thus the concept of "domestic labor disparity" is offset by the facts of unilateral economic labor.

However if we put that aside and, for the sake of discussion, presume that either the man, the woman, or both combined, have enough money saved up and/or invested that they can afford to retire and focus solely on raising a family then there is no reason the domestic labor should not be evenly divided.

That said, the premise of using labor divisions to analyze a relationship is stupid. It's too detached and fails to account for genuine love as a factor. In other words, when you're in a successful marriage you shouldnt be thinking about who is doing what percentage of the work, you should just be doing what you can for your spouse out of love for them and vice versa.
 
A career will never be as fulfilling as a family. It's just not how we as a species are wired.

I find the notion that anyone, man or woman, would choose career over family to be depressing. Yes, you need money to raise a family, but you shouldn't sacrifice the latter for the former.
Hey, I'd much rather advance and innovate the world than overpopulate it. Maybe family would be a good option if this was 60 years ago, but we need to depopulate, plus it's unsustainable to raise children today.
 
That author brought us an even funnier article about a woman who accrues a quarter million dollars worth of debt, and then twenty paragraphs of jewish women and fags complaining about men. https://archive.ph/mqUXm

Things have been difficult for her family, she said, but one thing she isn’t worried about: a midlife crisis just over the horizon. “My whole adult life has been one long crisis,” she said. “Career crises, education debt, watching my I.R.A. lose a quarter to half of its value a couple of times, child care expenses, fraying social fabric, wage pressures and, above all, insecurity. I am a professional married to a professional, but our jobs can go up in smoke at the drop of a hat. We can’t rely on anything but ourselves and can only hold out hope that we won’t eat cat food once our bodies break down and we are forced into impoverished retirement.” She said she knows that sounds dramatic, but it’s how she really feels. Amid all this, who’s got time to worry about whether they’re feeling fulfilled?

This woman is an OB/GYN
 
Hey, I'd much rather advance and innovate the world than overpopulate it. Maybe family would be a good option if this was 60 years ago, but we need to depopulate, plus it's unsustainable to raise children today.
The notion that you would single-handedly advance or innovate anything is a delusion of pride.

There's no sense sacrificing the possibility of having a family in favor of being a cog in a machine that doesn't care about you.

If you want to reduce the population then have an only child. Going from two parents to one kid is a generational change of -1.
 
That said, the premise of using labor divisions to analyze a relationship is stupid. It's too detached and fails to account for genuine love as a factor. In other words, when you're in a successful marriage you shouldnt be thinking about who is doing what percentage of the work, you should just be doing what you can for your spouse out of love for them and vice versa.
These people are bugs at best and subversives at worst; and commies regardless of the first one. The modern house/kitchen is full of conveniences that liberated women from many house chores, and instead of deciding that life's pretty good, they get led to believe that what they do in the house must carry some sort of weight when compared to outside of the house, and then decide that the labor must be divided amongst everyone who dwells within the house. I'd want to laugh because when you look at their idea, it's they want recognition and money for cleaning their own house and rearing their own children; but then you realize they're serious and think they need to be celebrated for being a functional human. These people are psychotic and out of touch and should be added to the Do Not Partner / Do Not Breed list.

The only thing that's more insane is these people dare to think they know what others must want.
 
These people are bugs at best and subversives at worst; and commies regardless of the first one. The modern house/kitchen is full of conveniences that liberated women from many house chores, and instead of deciding that life's pretty good, they get led to believe that what they do in the house must carry some sort of weight when compared to outside of the house, and then decide that the labor must be divided amongst everyone who dwells within the house. I'd want to laugh because when you look at their idea, it's they want recognition and money for cleaning their own house and rearing their own children; but then you realize they're serious and think they need to be celebrated for being a functional human. These people are psychotic and out of touch and should be added to the Do Not Partner / Do Not Breed list.

The only thing that's more insane is these people dare to think they know what others must want.
It's certainly a redflag in a potential partner if they think of a relationship as a division of labor instead of a labor of love, and that goes for both men and women. It's just another form of transactional romance and that's unhealthy.
 
Hey, I'd much rather advance and innovate the world than overpopulate it. Maybe family would be a good option if this was 60 years ago, but we need to depopulate, plus it's unsustainable to raise children today.
The problem there isn't white people starting families, it's that we've let third world niggers and jeets get their hands on modern medicine which means that while they're having the same number of children that they've always been having, not enough of them are dying before adulthood. The majority of this population increase that's destroying the world is from street shitters and niggers who proceed to invade our countries.
 
I can't wait until fembots are a thing and what I mean by that is that it's going to be like VR; everyone keeps telling you it's the future but it takes forever to install and you end up getting a shit experience that wasn't worth the time taken to set it up.

I expect them to be nothing more than fleshlights incels beat during a tard rage after using them and realizing that it's a soulless thing that steals their data, like any other piece of technology.
 
Here's the funny thing about men wanting fembots. That desire has been around for a very long time. The Greek myth of Pygmalion comes to mind.

TL;DR: Statue maker finds regular women disgusting and disappointing, decides to make his own waifu out of stone, falls in love with it, despairs its not alive and Aphrodite decides to make his waifu comes to life.

1738450547903.png

If they're already this seething over the idea of robo-girls... I'd hate to see how they'd react once actual robot girls become very common. The tech ain't completely there yet but the male loneliness epidemic is guaranteeing men are going to settle with more and more cruder versions of the robot girl.

1710529759032142.jpg
 
If you want to reduce the population then have an only child. Going from two parents to one kid is a generational change of -1.
if you want to reduce the population, have 5 children and kill 6 niggers

100% agree with your other point though. you're not isaac newton, you're not gonna innovate or advance anything meaningful. also, whatever you accomplish on your own pales in comparison to the potential future accomplishments of the children you could have had instead.
 
It's funny to me that fiction so consistently portrays men as the ones who fall in love with AI girlfriends and robots, when sites like Character.ai seem to have a userbase that's like 80% female.
Pretty sure everyone underestimates women getting with robots, honestly. I think it's just that the "sex doll obsession taking over/women will become obsolete/I will go meet my GoT waifu in the sky" is too strong of an image versus "this is a dildo and an AI of Leon from Resident Evil kind of night."
 
Last edited:
The notion that you would single-handedly advance or innovate anything is a delusion of pride.

There's no sense sacrificing the possibility of having a family in favor of being a cog in a machine that doesn't care about you.

If you want to reduce the population then have an only child. Going from two parents to one kid is a generational change of -1.
You're replying to a jeet. You'd have a better chance to have a real conversation with a lobotomized LLM AI.
 
I can't wait until fembots are a thing and what I mean by that is that it's going to be like VR; everyone keeps telling you it's the future but it takes forever to install and you end up getting a shit experience that wasn't worth the time taken to set it up.

I expect them to be nothing more than fleshlights incels beat during a tard rage after using them and realizing that it's a soulless thing that steals their data, like any other piece of technology.

Holy shit you're right. They'd just be used for advertising.

Women make most household purchasing decisions, and most men are kind of wired to let their "woman" decide what things to shop for.

Any hypothetical hyperrealistic future sexbot would immediately start selling stuff to men. On week two she'd be telling her owner that she is not in the mood for a BJ tonight, but she might be if he purchases this special upgrade to his future Smart House for only $99,000.
 
Back