His supporters act like he did for the most altruistic reasons. In reality he did for the most selfish reason and changed absolutely nothing in regards to the insurance industry, it was just rich on rich violence. I hope he gets raped with a broom handle in the penitentiary. he'd probably enjoy it if rumors are true. Its why I cant take the sentiment of "the elites need to fear the plebs" seriously that stemmed from the whole situation.
lol, is this jeet even a US citizen?
I did support him, even as right winger i can see how that company was bad. But i do not venerate him. He is just a murderer to me.
Those are absolutely real because we had a similar situation at my school when a dumbass guy I knew wrapped his car around a pole and some kid that didn't even know him showed up to the vigil and made it all about him and cried in some interview with the press. Everyone said the exact same things the people in those texts were saying.
You're acting like a blackpilling pussy. Calm down.
"Wow a rich kid who never had to struggle for money in his life killed a dude who made it to CEO after 17 years with the company but was just a CEO of that one specific branch and his murder did nothing but leave children without a father so based!" The Luigi worship is fucking pitiful.
I don't think I am though the first hypothetical I gave is an example of violent speech which I never argued wasn't allowed. Specifically that you are allowed to advocate for the woodchippering of certain groups or even individuals as long as that woodchippering is unlikely to lead to imminent lawlessness. I might not have gone to the absolute extremity which is allowed but that I feel is besides the point. The second example I gave is the widely used movie cliché which is understood as "we are in the mob and if you don't pay us we will be burning your building down" now granted that might in the most pedantic sense legally not be threat but it is widely understood as onePlease read this page which will explain why you are wrong about violent speech.
Brandenburg v. Ohio - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
thats fair. I shouldve also mentioned the thing just glows imo.
He was. He was a leftist darling. Had cameos in Big Bang Theory and was at all the leftist events.
He was, until he started talking about buying twitter and "maybe orange man.....NOT LE BAD?" Then they all did a complete 180 from tounging his rectal passage to him being a turbo nazi who's stealing data from USAID to take all your money and make you pick cotton or whatever
It’s the easiest thing to bait with right now, you can literally just type “I look forward to Luigi being found guilty, justice must be served.” And you’ll get death threats lol
I don't remember because I normally don't read Reddit, except for when I rarely go to links from R/drama and see fat people get upset over the dumbest shit of all time.
It's very odd logic. The same people who are like "UhHHHHH YOU SAID THE WORD TRANNY, THATS A PERMA BANNED AND THE SUB NEEDS TO GO" don't really care about a colossal platform promoting nonstop death threats to random kids and a CEO? I'm shocked someone hasn't made a wall of death threat posts, screen caps, and ultra-max reports by sending it directly to corporates tied with Reddit for ultimate fun times. Typically, reporting is for faggots and retards, but just having the Reddit council live one day as Josh "Let me put the pork in a fat chick" Moon would perhaps cause a tremendous amount of introspection on Reddit users, and it's a massive bot problem.
I was excited for it but then I realized it'll be shit like Grok is. Well, there'll be alternatives once the tech is proven.
