The most damning thing about it, though, the thing that reveals he is just an AGP fetishist, and I think the bottom line in all of this, is that he is completely unable to consider a masculine sense of being sexually attractive. He can't be sexy without being female. Only females are sexy. In his head, the word 'sexualised' is a synonym for 'feminised', and he makes this such a sizeable part of his thesis that he dedicates an entire embarrassing subchapter of the video to his own faulty logic. He claims that if you sexualise a male character it just ends up making that character 'gayer', because he's sexualising a male character the way you would sexualise a female one. It's a testament to his underlying heterosexual maleness underneath all this gender shit, because he can't comprehend how a woman would find a man sexually attractive or how a woman would sexualise a man. His idea of being sexy is being a sexualised woman - he has no idea what a sexually attractive man would look like.
He can't differentiate between the concepts of 'sexy', 'sexualised' and 'objectified', and these three concepts are entirely different and separate.
