Kingdom Come Deliverance - Or how I stopped worrying about SJW and love Bohemia | Now with betrayal and a lot more niggers. "Historically accurate." BlackRock ruined the series.

The illusion of player choice
The Illusion of Choice.png

C) Something about creating a golem by making the main character eat bits of corpses? (Seriously, wtf)
There is a quest to help a jew create a golem. In order to make the golem he needs various ingredients and body parts. He asks Henry to source the parts for him, and in order to make sure you pick the most suitable ones Henry must go and taste them and relay the flavor to the jew.
 
If you're going to get pedantic, I recommend you look up how many people in 14th to 15th century Italian city states ended up getting executed or going to prison after getting accused of sodomy. Hell it became common enough to accuse somebody you hated of being a fudge packer that they had to update the laws to make them more stringent.
Italian. Not Bohemian. That's the thing. Also, da Vinci walked free and his reputation wasnt ruined.
Most cases of "sodomy" are either from Western Europe, Italy or from the Ren era. Slavs were less keen on burning witches, fags and non-belivers, we had other forms of entertainment. You usually hear about the cases that ended in a trial, not those who flew under the radar or those that people simply did not care about.

If You think people of both sexes didnt have a shag in the woods where nobody would see them to escape societal norms and law, then I envy your innocence.
 
We really need to put this idea that medieval people fucked children on the regular into the ground. (etc.)
If we're going to dive into the historical weeds, medieval people were fucking children as young as 15. Medieval beliefs were focused on what they theorized was peak fertility, apparently demonstrated by heavy and frequent menstrual cycles. This would vary from girl to girl and it did, unfortunately, include girls as young as 15. If there's any upside to this, it's that girls younger than 13 weren't subjected to this kind of thing and men older than 20 who preyed on young women were seen as weaklings and creeps.
 
You guys saved me time and money. I was pumped about this game when I saw the original trailer, but now that I know it is a Goyim Humiliation Simulator I have thoroughly noped out and returned my sealed copy for a full refund.

There is nothing that pisses me off more than the magical nigger and oppressed minority tropes. Your girlfriend gets raped and your parents are killed and the sequel is all about eating shit, pieces of corpses, and being lectured by a fucking coon. Like WorthaBuy said, its an RPG, Henry needs to make decisions. Well if Henry is me, why can't I execute the nigger and fags and let the Jews and fucking Gypsies burn at the stake?

I am also sick and tired of Jews raping and pillaging European history with their retcons and whining. Millions of white men presumably died to save these peoples from the gas chambers only for them to shit on us after they infiltrated every aspect of our media and institutions.

What is great; however, is just how much this game exposed the grifter faggots on Youtube. These slimey faggots have so little moral values or principles that they sold out for a fucking early access key. Watching these people praise the game with their soy faces while selling you this janky shit like it is groundbreaking and riveting lol. I am at a point now where if any media includes faggots or niggers I automatically ignore it. Its bad enough I have to share a society with these degenerates but I will not devote my free time to hearing about their so-called plight while they live on my tax dollars.
Just wanted to say excellent post. I agree with every line.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: m1ddl3m4rch
If we're going to dive into the historical weeds, medieval people were fucking children as young as 15. Medieval beliefs were focused on what they theorized was peak fertility, apparently demonstrated by heavy and frequent menstrual cycles. This would vary from girl to girl and it did, unfortunately, include girls as young as 15. If there's any upside to this, it's that girls younger than 13 weren't subjected to this kind of thing and men older than 20 who preyed on young women were seen as weaklings and creeps.
"I don't care about unnecessary and fairly realistic gay teen sex in vidya, I will link .gov sites as my source"
You're a fucking retard and miss the point.
 
If we're going to dive into the historical weeds, medieval people were fucking children as young as 15. Medieval beliefs were focused on what they theorized was peak fertility, apparently demonstrated by heavy and frequent menstrual cycles. This would vary from girl to girl and it did, unfortunately, include girls as young as 15. If there's any upside to this, it's that girls younger than 13 weren't subjected to this kind of thing and men older than 20 who preyed on young women were seen as weaklings and creeps.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/apa.16781

^^ The full paper.

It focuses on Ancient Mediterranean and Near East, from 450 BC to 120 AD. This game is set in the 15th century, allegedly, so it's not exactly the same as the regions mentioned in the paper.
 
If we're going to dive into the historical weeds, medieval people were fucking children as young as 15.
This link is to a source that does not talk about medieval Europe at all.
Screenshot_5.png
Screenshot_6.png

Medieval beliefs were focused on what they theorized was peak fertility,
This second source also doesn't say this. The primary focus of the article is on when fertility was considered to decline with old age. There is only brief mentions of when fertility begins for women, and rather than espousing a belief in "peak fertility" at a young age it specifically claims that there was no conception of higher or lower fertility, women were just considered binarily fertile or non-fertile based or if they were menstruating at any age.

However, there was one important difference between men's and women's reproductive aging. When they discussed the end of women's fertility, medical writers focused not on changes in the humours caused by the aging process, but on a much clearer cut-off point: the end of menstruation. The Book of the Conditions of Women (early twelfth century), which drew on and expanded Constantine the African's translation of the Viaticum, was one of many texts that stressed the importance of regular menstruation for women's fertility: “The common people call the menses ‘the flowers’, because just as trees do not bring forth fruit without flowers, so women without their flowers are cheated of the ability to conceive” (Green, 2001, 66). Before a woman's periods stopped, there was little interest in how age might affect her fertility. The Pantegni said as much in the passage quoted above: ‘a woman conceives until her periods stop.’ This focus on the end of menstruation continued into the thirteenth century: Gilbert the Englishman, writing a medical encyclopedia in around 1250, stated that the ages before 12 and after 50 were not ‘natural’ times for menstruation, but ‘the time in the middle is for conception, and periods are naturally appointed as purgations.’ (Anglicus, 1510). Both texts imply that before menstruation ends, women are fertile.
The medical theories outlined by medieval writers also show how age-related infertility might be ascribed to other, non-age-related causes that were deemed to be treatable. There were few real solutions to age-related infertility in the Middle Ages and as we have seen several medical writers admitted this. However, variations in fertility before the final period of ‘old age’ could be interpreted as the result of imbalances in the humours or menstrual problems rather than as an age-related fertility decline. In this way they could be covered by the many treatments that were designed for these conditions. There was thus little to be gained by presenting reproductive aging as an urgent problem in need of tailored medical solutions.
Medieval medical writers knew that fertility ended – especially for women – but they saw less urgency around that decline.
Did you not read these?

One more
peak fertility, apparently demonstrated by heavy and frequent menstrual cycles
The source:
Thus the Pantegni, the Viaticum, the Book of the Conditions of Women, and many other medical texts into the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries stressed the importance of regular menstruation for fertility, and included many remedies to bring on menstruation if it had ceased, as well as to reduce excessively heavy periods.
Regularity yes, but overly heavy periods were considered a medical problem that required treatment.
 
Last edited:
So last time it was left wingers bitching about 'muh blacks' and now it's right wingers bitching about 'muh gays'.
It's almost as though history is a messy, apolitical thing that everyone invokes selectively.

If we ordering I'd like a realistic depiction of the Romans. Now that will piss everyone off.
 
Good thing I havent even gotten around to playing the first Kingdom Coom.
The first one is alright. It's mostly peasant boy adventures until you become proficient with a sword, then you become a knight. Half the fun of the first game IS the historical aspect, you could call it the educational bit of the game. The other half is a more polished, more grounded Oblivion, if that's your thing then the first game will be your jam. The second game, however, ruined all of this and turned the game into one huge humiliation ritual with the gameplay aspects worse than the first and blatant historical inaccuracies or straight up fanfiction. You barely even get to be a knight in this game, you're just white goyim slave being humiliated by jews, arabs and women in your own home country. It's pathetic, the whole pedo thing is just the cherry on top, there is one point in the game where a jew quite literally makes Henry eat a piece of a corpse for him. Nothing like this happens in the first game, it's mostly a political revenge story where Henry gets to rise above his rank and interact with the Bohemian countryside, people there feel like people and have real problems. KCD2 has millennial writing and characters that spit on your for merely existing.
And for the record, Hans in the first game is 100% straight, there is an entire DLC dedicated to try and get him hooked up with a butcher's daughter, of course he's a dumbass about it so it's kind of a comedic DLC rather than romantic one.
 
I hope that suddenly reporting this game and its dev for pro-pedophilia doesn't seem like a bad idea anymore...
I'd normally scoff at this, but with Trump being in power rattling some DEI cages, perhaps its worth a shot?

Not sure who you would report it to or whether Trump or anyone else would give a shit, but this controversy in the gaming industry in recent years has been hugely polarising and doesn't really look like it's going to end any time soon, regardless of how many developers are going bust and losing their jobs in the fallout.

Is it feasible that congress could step in to create a law which prevents woke slop from being shoehorned into western gaming? Even with Donny in power, I think its pretty unlikely.
 
It had always been historic fiction, what the fuck are you talking about? It is "historically accurate" in that the towns are decently modelled and the characters had some real world counterparts and an outline of similar events happened IRL, but it's fanfiction, Sigismund is portrayed incorrectly, details on the Hussites and the Cumans are anachronistic, many characters are made up or their positions changed, and the actual plot of the game outside of events like the sacking of Skalitz is made up.
It's as much of a documentary as Kingdom of Heaven.

It's blatant that certain demographics have zeroed in on KCD 2 as a "target" for gay culture war shit and are bending themselves backwards to find something, anything to attack it with, but muh it's actually underage is grasping at straws.
Of course it isn't 100% historically accurate, you would have to go back in time and be really autistic about recreating the whole setting as it was. Point is that it was, and still is, the most historically accurate RPG of it's kind. You are just your average peasant in a real historical setting, with characters based off real people and events based off real events. It is believable and the anachronistic details can be largely ignored as long as it sells the fantasy. There is no way you can sell off a negro that isn't supposed to be there, or an imaginary jewish village with an imaginary pogrom. A synagogue that wouldn't be build for hundreds of years is where I cross the line. Then there is the writing, people in KCD1 largely feel like they belong in the setting, many NPCs in KCD2 talk like people from 2025, or worse they're mary-sues or bossgirl characters. Even if the game had a similar level of historical accuracy as KCD1 it would feel way off. Synth stream the other day had a skit with a character that felt straight out of Rick and Morty or Borderlands, are you fucking kidding me?
Oh, and there was no gay sex in KCD1 of course. I believe there was a gay monk(whom Henry was negative towards, as he should) and I think the main villain was a faggot. That's it, nothing else, definitely no same sex romance options.
 
Why are YOU like this?
There is no rape, no sodomy, no grooming, no underage sex. There's a scene where two adult men realize they are soulmates - it's up to You and your choices to decide whether it becomes sexual.
Both of them are apparently old enough to kill, fuck wenches, do important missions risking death, but are not old enough to start a fire with their dicks. Lmao, grow the fuck up. Your CHRISTIAN GAYME is not ruined because of that. There is no "underage sex". You're acting like a literal soccer mum. Get a Snickers, mate.
Why are there so many homos, jews and woke apologists on this site? It reads like fucking reddit half of the time.
 
We really need to put this idea that medieval people fucked children on the regular into the ground.
While this is very informative, I think its worth noting the records of births are ALL royalty, not peasants. They would be richer, fed better, protected more, have doctors, and their lives would be more valued. I mentioned earlier how fatalities from births ARE higher when really young, or really old, but ALSO how surviving a birth makes subsequent births easier.

So I'm pretty sure for ROYALTY yes, they would wait longer because a would be queen dying would be terrible, but a "worthless" dime a dozen peasant expected to breed a dozen farmers / soldiers would be treated as INDIVIDUALLY more disposable, so if 1 girl died in childbirth, but another survived, and had 10 kids, it evened out.

Like I think functional fatality risk for a typical female with childbirth has an inverse bellcurve for women of the time, yes, first is risky, but it goes rapidly down from both maturity and prior births making the process something the body has done before, toward a low level, before ramping quickly up as she enters middle age.
 
Back