Why Taylor Swift Getting Booed at the Super Bowl was Even More Chilling Than You Think - Donald Trump and his 'distinctly male' FootballGaters threaten to derail the new, inclusive NFL that Taylor and feminism are building. "(I, honestly, could have cared less about the actual game play from a journalistic standpoint)"

https://www.glamour.com/story/why-t...er-bowl-was-even-more-chilling-than-you-think
https://archive.is/95Vvy

Why Taylor Swift Getting Booed at the Super Bowl was Even More Chilling Than You Think

From my seat at Super Bowl LIX, the crowd’s disparate reactions to Swift and Trump felt like a chilling microcosm of our culture.
By Stephanie McNeal
February 10, 2025


taylor2.webp
Since Donald Trump took office, there have been several times I felt chilled by the rapid increase in misogyny seeping in our culture. But watching Taylor Swift at Super Bowl LIX booed by a crowd of thousands on Sunday night was a new low.

It was just a football game, people might say. Or Swift— who is famously dating Kansas City Chiefs tight end Travis Kelce—got heckled by some rowdy Eagles fans excited to be at the biggest sporting event of the year. So? Don’t take it so seriously.

But I was there at the game. When Swift’s face appeared on the Jumbotron, an almost instant—and distinctly male—dissent erupted from around me. Swift, of course, was there to support her boyfriend, and was far from the only celebrity in attendance. In fact, the screen showed a new famous person—from Paul McCartney to Anne Hathaway and Lady Gaga—nearly every time there was a break in the play with virtually no response from the crowd.

WATCH THIS
The Journey of My Abortion


1739288153442.png

Swift was different. As soon as she appeared on screen, the crowd seemed to delight in jeering and heckling her, and the mood shift was palpable. I watched in real time as Swift, alongside her friend Ice Spice, took in the response, her brow furrowing in confusion and then apparent discomfort.

Looking at the camera, she distinctly said, “What is going on?” And girl, same, because we were all wondering what the hell was happening.

1739288042163.png
Perhaps the moment would have felt less visceral if not for the fact that less than an hour earlier the crowd had exploded—this time with applause—to see Trump on that same screen. As an image of the president, stonefaced and standing in a salute, was shown to the crowd during Jon Batiste’s national anthem performance, the roar of approval and cheers was deafening (of course, there were those in the crowd who booed the president and cheered for Swift as well, but from my vantage point, it was clear what the overall sentiment was).

To me, the disparate reactions felt like a message. That the Super Bowl, one of the biggest cultural events in the country, has been reclaimed by Trump and the type of toxic masculinity he appears to be the beacon of. And he and his supporters seem to be living for it.

Just look at the president’s response shortly after he left the game. Not only did he acknowledge that Swift was booed by the crowd, he delighted in it. As he had many, many times before (including saying he “hated” Swift after she endorsed his 2024 rival Kamala Harris) the president weaponized his massive following against her.

“The only one that had a tougher night than the Kansas City Chiefs was Taylor Swift," Trump the president wrote on Truth Social. "She got BOOED out of the Stadium. MAGA is very unforgiving!"

By calling her out, Trump looked to play by the now-standard internet misogyny playbook. It wasn’t enough that Swift was publicly mocked, now he needed to troll her about it, attempting to humiliate her even further. We all got normalized to this sort of conduct in 2016, when the president mocking his apparent enemies on Twitter became a near daily occurrence (surely he has something better to do, right?). But it's still worth calling out how gross—and frankly ridiculous—this sort of conduct is. And when the Twitter rant becomes real life, in the form of a stadium full of thousands and thousands of people, it's chilling. The online bullies of 2016 are now, in 2025, very real.

It’s important to place these two moments in the context in which they exist. Though there are nuances to both, Trump and Swift exemplify two factions of American culture currently struggling for dominance.

Ever since Swift started dating Kelce in 2023 and started coming to his NFL games, our cultural conversation around the sport has shifted radically. Suddenly, football—especially the Chiefs—was for the girls. Women’s interest in the sport skyrocketed, and a spokesperson for the NFL told me the league grew its following among women by 21% from 2023 to 2024. Women began to watch the game, follow the players and WAGs (sports content by women creators has grown 40% year on year, according to YouTube) and buy merch (you couldn’t walk through the street this weekend in New Orleans without being enticed to buy a “go Taylor’s boyfriend” or “in my Chiefs era” T-shirt).

According to Market Watch, Swift is estimated to have brought nearly $1 billion in brand value to the league since she started dating Kelce, and has elevated other women in the NFL in the process. As I wrote last year, interest in the wives and girlfriends of NFL players has also become a huge part of the sport (one which the league, by the way, enthusiastically embraces), and several WAGs like Chanen Johnson and Chariah Gordon have become bonafide internet stars. In fact, the entire reason I traveled to the Super Bowl in the first place was to cover the WAGs and Swift for Glamour and YouTube, from the game day fashion to the cultural moments during the game and the surrounding events (I, honestly, could have cared less about the actual game play from a journalistic standpoint).

Taylor Swift at Super Bowl LIX, therefore, is a representation of a new NFL—one that isn’t just for men. This NFL is one that’s about the entire experiences of the league, one that anyone can enjoy whether or not they care about the sport. In this new, inclusive NFL, both the men and the women by their side are the stars. Those interested in football and those interested in fashion can enjoy the league together. In this sense, Swift is a true NFL star—one that’s certainly worthy of being shown during the game.

Of course, there are those who hate this.

2008557096.webp
When Swift was first being embraced by many in the NFL, a large and vocal contingent of the league’s (male) fans came out in fierce opposition. They complained online that Swift was “ruining football” and was a “distraction.” The backlash grew so big during Swift’s first season as a WAG in 2023 that the NFL put out a statement defending their choice to capitalize on the insanely good marketing opportunity of having one of the most famous women in the world at their events. I know, what a concept!

In the stands last night, though, it felt like the bros were winning. As they jeered and booed, I could hear the undercurrent of hatred and felt the real-life manifestation of the trolling I had previously only seen virtually. Trump is president, they seemed to say, and the era of inclusivity in the NFL is over. Swift, and all of us who have had fun watching her in her WAG era, need to be put in our place. It felt gross and mean. It also felt significant.

In an era where Trump is singlehandedly dismantling decades of diversity, equity, and inclusion that generations of women, people of color, and queer people have fought for, the Super Bowl felt like a microcosm of a larger problem. Not only does it feel like Trump and his ilk want Swift out of football, it’s like they want to return our entire country to a time when they were in control, had all the power, and could say whatever they wanted without repercussions.

And if it seems scary online, it’s even more chilling when you’re forced to confront it face to face.
 
I'm sure that's most girl girlbosses lolol. A girlboss I know just recently got caught up for fraud during the PPP loans thing and her business either never opened or she closed it soon after opening, and deals with her court case by getting fucked up out of her mind and repeatedly wrecking her car.
Any time you see a girl boss, remember that they would want to be hospitalized if you simply pinched them as hard as you could
 
What makes her an asshole?

Idk like in America you can get rich selling $2 hamburgers to fat fucks. That's something to be applauded.
Funny thing: her politics are completely anodyne Basic White Woman and yet people get upset over her safe, boilerplate endorsement of Joe and the Hoe, riddled with caveats like 'but you should choose who you want to be president!' The real dark side of Taylor Swift is that she's made a killing off of FOMO and massively upsold merch. Chinese sweatshop sweater that says 'Forevermore'? Fifty dollars. Premade friendship bracelet? Twenty-five. Don't forget to purchase all four variant copies of her latest album in order to get all the bonus tracks, oh and there's a new re-recorded vinyl up for pre-order...

Word on the street is there is some kind of dirt on Taylor Swift. She may be manipulated
I keep hearing this shit with zero evidence. What 'dirt' could you have on Taytay anyway? Lesbian? She'd have come out by now, it doesn't hurt her brand at all. Racist? She's already oppressing blacc bodies by being more popular than niggernoise musicians or whatever. Diddy associate? There's pictures of them together but Diddy was a star and a big force in the music world so of course they'd meet at functions. I don't see her busting down the door to his mansion, puffing WHERE'S THE UNDERAGE KIDS AT DIDDY, MOMMA WANTS TO FUCC.

She's definitely manipulated in terms of being ran like a business by a board of directors. Probably only gets to do everything her way when she's in bed in pyjamas
 
What makes her an asshole?
In my case, I've never found any of her songs to be good, and I don't consider her very attractive.

As for others, a ladyfriend told me she used to like her until she realised that she didn't earn any of her fame through hard work, and it was all set up for her by her wealthy parents pulling favours and having connections. I don't waste my time on tabloid celebrities, so I just assumed it to be true.
 
As for others, a ladyfriend told me she used to like her until she realised that she didn't earn any of her fame through hard work, and it was all set up for her by her wealthy parents pulling favours and having connections. I don't waste my time on tabloid celebrities, so I just assumed it to be true.
Yes and no. She (Taylor Swift the Brand) has been very careful about cultivating this image of doing it all herself, including using legal muscle to quash stories from the people that actually taught her all the skills she uses. She does use every modern trick in the book (backing vocals, heavy studio editing, etc) to make her appear to be pure talent, but everyone in the industry does that so I don't think it's a crippling blow to her. She can sing and play a guitar, there are some small-studio performances of her on YT from NPR, so she's not quite talentless, but she did not make even half of her money by talent alone.
 
she did not make even half of her money by talent alone.
She did if you include business talent. The way she managed to jew record company jews was very impressive. She sold the rights to a collection of her songs, saying she believed in what she was still going to make, not what she already had made. And then later she turned around and leveraged her fans against the "evil producer that held her songs hostage". And she also got around to it by recording new versions of the same songs and selling those.
 
"Chilling"

If this is how you react to manufactured crises? How on Earth are you going to have a hope of surviving a real one?
This is my reaction when I hear someone like Jesse Singal describe someone else saying the Gamer Word as "horrific."
Paul McCartney is the only person with any actual talent mentioned in this entire article.
Anne Hathaway is very talented according to my penis.
 
I don't understand why Swift jumped onto the anti-Trump bandwagon in 2024. She very carefully and deliberately avoided politics before (and probably doesn't personally give a shit either way). Wonder what changed, the time for going orangemanbad would've been 2020 rather than 2024 by any practical calculation.
 
She's a mediocre talent at best, which I suspect deep down she knows because she's spent the last two years basically being an attention whore bilking money out of her fans so she could become a billionaire.
Tangential: ever seen her without whore paint? It's jarring. There's a reason she's never seen without it. Even when she pretends to be au naturel in pictures she still has -some- makeup on.

Taylor Swift without makeup.jpg
 
I don't understand why Swift jumped onto the anti-Trump bandwagon in 2024. She very carefully and deliberately avoided politics before (and probably doesn't personally give a shit either way). Wonder what changed, the time for going orangemanbad would've been 2020 rather than 2024 by any practical calculation.
Soros owns her back catalog and has been holding it over her head for the last couple of years to make her go liberal.
 
But alas, the NFL had to obey the HR scolds and distract from football with racebaiting and politics.

The NFL's marketing efforts towards women have been part of a looooong ass effort and just comes down to your typical big corporate reason of 'number must go bigger.'

Part of that was due to ratings that were dwindling, which means revenue is going down. Part of it was the whole concussions scandal that was dogging the NFL for a while.

I don't think they were expecting Taylor Swift to clamber aboard, but they sure leveraged the fuck out of that little beady eyed rodent.

I keep hearing this shit with zero evidence. What 'dirt' could you have on Taytay anyway?

She's 'controlled' in the sense that everything about her is phony as fuck. Her parents basically did a Rebecca Black for her, but since they were rich and connected they were able to craft this image of this 'genuine' songwriter who just appeals to a certain demographic and it just sort of continued to the point where she's like N Sync or Backstreet Boys levels of saturation.

She's about as authentic as the Sex Pistols are punk.
 
Philly Philth have booed Santa Claus and thrown batteries at their own players. What makes you think they'd treat the annoying astroturfed product princess any better?

Schrodinger's Girlboss: an unstoppable force that breaks down at the slightest pushback.
They also destroyed that one hitch hiker robot that made it across Europe and Canada.
 
Back