[February 13th, 2025 @ 10PM EST] DSP gets "interviewed" by Steven Cambian a.k.a. Truthseekers

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Phil was claiming that his local PD wouldn't investigate the bank leaks because the police were only interested in investigating online child trafficking or some shit.

So an ex-police officer the streamers a friend with did a FOIA request and found everything, including the investigators name and spoke to them.

This is a good summary of the stream, it's worth watching:

Everytime Phil got found out for lying he had the standard response.

"I don't care about any of this"
Very interesting - still watching so I'll edit if I have additional shit to say, but this Steven Cumbian nigger (obviously related to famous documentary filmmaker Mike Cum) is legit.
This guy is pressing him even harder than the side scrollers and obviously opens up yet another new way of seeing DSP. I don't know what word to use but the way he effortlessly lies and tries to make it look like Sir Cumbian doesn't know his shit when he clearly does leaves me with few words in my vocabulary that are as appropriate as the word sociopath. I don't know about medical grade sociopathy and aren't that familiar with them but there has to be some kind of a word for what DSP is trying and failing to do here.

As always, DSP should've refused this interview because he looks terrible in it.
 
It's done. Because I'm a fucking retard who doesn't know how to get something on the KF Archives even after looking around, (and I don't want to bother Null this early) I threw it on archive.org.
Link: https://archive.org/details/intervi...-the-internet-darksydephil-interview.-encoded
The original 8GB file is also uploading and will take about 6 4 hours.
If you want, you can upload it to Odysee or Rumble if the file is under 16 GB (Odysee) or 15 GB (Rumble).
 
Watched the interview, some parts had me laughing like crazy when Steven went ultra mode.


I have to say, I am not the biggest fan of the polygraph test (due to false positives), nor I am about that whole thing with the female officer/worker DSP talked with (due to human error).

What I am on board is with him showing the receipts of his bank account in that timeframe, in order for Steven to match them with the leaks, assuming when done with due diligence.


Also, remember this:

Last year, someone stole my identity. They found a way to get access to a site they shouldn't have access to, they then decided to take money from me. Okay?

Thousands of dollars! This was not like, Oh! You know, we fucked around... 3 thousand dollars, 3 thousand dollars, 3 thousand dollars, oh fuck. Now I have no money.

So now I have to contact my financial institution, I have to contact everyone around me, every account has to be closed, everything has to be done from scratch, and it took a long time, it took 2 to 3 months of work! And extra thousands of dollars to repair the damage that they did, okay?
 
have to say, I am not the biggest fan of the polygraph test (due to false positives), nor I am about that whole thing with the female officer/worker DSP talked with (due to human error).
Brosydephil has said on Twitter already that they're going to address DSPs claims that they're a liar in an upcoming stream or video. It sounds like they'll release the FOIA paperwork.

DSP is clearly lying.
 
i liked the part where steven used the words "factually fucking based" and phail let out this awkward laugh. piggy is still embarrassed about having coined these magic words
That was Brosyde, not Steve. There’s no way someone who got the details about the wedding scam wrong would know meme Phil phrases.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Big Brown Schlub
Brosydephil has said on Twitter already that they're going to address DSPs claims that they're a liar in an upcoming stream or video. It sounds like they'll release the FOIA paperwork.

DSP is clearly lying.
I saw your post that you believe there is no police woman. During the interview, DSP seemed like he was going to send the name privately (could be foolish of my part), like right there (when he said: that's why I'm going to give it to you (inaudible)), but you can see how that went:

* Timestamp at 2:02:31
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U5RG8zOXbCQ&t=7351s

Love that clip with Steven by the way, but it seemed like on that instant a name could have been provided through Discord or email. The situation got a bit out of hand & on a tangent, if it went smoother, I cannot see an easy way out if they just said "Ok, don't say it publicly, send it now to us like you just said", but that's not entirely what happened, it got derailed.

If it did, DSP would have to send an actual name of an existing female officer, which obviously cannot be faked on his part or he would insta-blow his claim.

So it mainly comes down to that moment in the timestamp, do you believe that at that moment DSP was completely lying and the "that's why I'm going to give it to you (...)" was a way to deflect? If they simply said "Sure, send it through email right now", what would he have done?

I know how much he (actually enjoys) to lie, but this is an instance where miscommunication & error could have played a factor, in my view. Which doesn't take away from the main important point (to me), the actual leaks and statements; i.e: I can see this police officer thing being a red herring against the bigger holes on this topic.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BlastMonk
I saw your post that you believe there is no police woman. During the interview, DSP seemed like he was going to send the name privately (could be foolish of my part), like right there (when he said: that's why I'm going to give it to you (inaudible)), but you can see how that went:

* Timestamp at 2:02:31
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U5RG8zOXbCQ&t=7351s

Love that clip with Steven by the way, but it seemed like on that instant a name could have been provided through Discord or email. The situation got a bit out of hand & on a tangent, if it went smoother, I cannot see an easy way out if they just said "Ok, don't say it publicly, send it now to us like you just said", but that's not entirely what happened, it got derailed.

If it did, DSP would have to send an actual name of an existing female officer, which obviously cannot be faked on his part or he would insta-blow his claim.

So it mainly comes down to that moment in the timestamp, do you believe that at that moment DSP was completely lying and the "that's why I'm going to give it to you (...)" was a way to deflect? If they simply said "Sure, send it through email right now", what would he have done?

I know how much he (actually enjoys) to lie, but this is an instance where miscommunication & error could have played a factor, in my view. Which doesn't take away from the main important point (to me), the actual leaks and statements; i.e: I can see this police officer thing being a red herring against the bigger holes on this topic.
I'm not going to give him the benefit of the doubt/gout.

Same thing happened when he was on side scrollers and "considering" to send over info privately for vetting. It ended up how we all know: he was lying through his teeth and he was always down from the rafters. "My wife wouldn't let me send it". "There's details on there that could endanger me"

DSP lost any charity when it comes to shit like this already.

Keep in mind the whole police department thing happened 2 entire years ago: https://kiwifarms.st/threads/darksy...ell-general-discussion-2.105216/post-10910721

We all know DSP lies or misremembers or entirely fabricates totally trivial details. It is totally viable that DSP simply believes he talked to a female police officer because its been so long. (this fabrication shit of his has gone on for so long and so frequently that there are 2 pages of results for the word "Korsakoff" in this subforum, "Korsakoff Syndrome" is when severe alcoholics forget stuff and confabulate/invent shit. Mentions of "Korsakoff" go back to 2017, so people have been pointing this shit out for 7-8 years by now)

Keep in mind, as others have already said:
BSP lied about everything!

Nigga, he gave you the correct police case number. How would he have Phil's case number unless he actually contacted the Seattle police department?

If they have the correct police case number then they obviously did their homework and I'm more inclined to trust them than DSP. He's already done this shit before: stall and pretend he is on the edge of sending irrefutable proof or a name or something over and then come up with some excuse about harassment.
 
Last edited:
its amazing how dsp never learns....what was he thinking agreeing to this???
lolcow gonna lolcow I suppose /catch 22/egg or chicken first etc etc...

one hilarious point is that he kept repeating that hes changed and doesnt spend that money on wwe anymore but from the updates we can see hes still spending thousands weekly. WHen he says he used to be out of control etc talking about his past self,when u know nothing has changed,it makes the whole thing even more funny.

also the police guy is super cringe,no police officers arent super honest/honorable people.most people in the police are power tripping people looking for power. While its obvious dsp lied about the police officer story , I could totally believe a police telling him to fuck off with his internet drama and denying saying that to him later on.
 
The whole police report for the online threats is completely irrelevant anyway and doesn't get around the fact that his bank would have needed a police report to get his "identity theft" problem fixed. It doesn't matter what some random police officer told him in passing about paypal chargebacks while discussing a completely different case. The bank would have told him he needed a police report even if phil was too dumb to think of doing it himself. No police report for identity theft = no identity theft occurred. He can't get around this missing police report no matter how hard he lies about it. Not a single cent was ever stolen from any of his accounts.
 
Back