🐷 Ethan Ralph's Twitter / Tweets - A collection of thoughts, insights and musings from the internet's favorite gunted hobbit

Will the "MMA" fight between Gabe Hoffman and Ethan Ralph 🐷 happen?

  • YES!

    Votes: 26 7.1%
  • lol no

    Votes: 339 92.9%

  • Total voters
    365
Ah, I see. He's convicted, not registered. Easy mistake to make.

Not sure how Ralph is going to argue that it's provably hurt his income or reputation though. Even if he could afford a team of lawyers, he's vaporised so many fucking braincells he'll forget he even brought a lawsuit part way through.

His team are going to be tearing their hair out trying to get any sense (or pictorial ebbuhdance) through his xanny haze.
 
I know that everyone is giving Ralph :optimistic: for saying he knows tons of lawyers, but I think it true, Ralph knows;
  • Divorce attorneys,
  • child support/family law lawyers
  • sexual assault attorneys
  • debt collection attorneys,
  • Lawyer specializing in aggravated assault against a police officer…

I mean granted, none of those attorneys are on his side but still…
 
Isn't he still trying to collab with Nicky Rackets? If you can convince him to:
  • Recertify by completing his necessary training hours and paying any fees to reinstate his law licence
  • Be your friend again
You could have a really affordable setup. I'm not sure how competent your representation will be, but it's definitely in region of the Ralphamale budget.
 
While RationalWiki is full of lies and lolcows and we have a thread on them for a reason, this seems ill-advised. RW is irrelevant today and nobody gives a shit what they have to say, so it's not like his RW article is an ongoing problem. Proving damages from defamation will be a huge hurdle.
I believe that his problem with RW specifically is that it's the first result that comes up when searching for his full name
On his stream last evening, Steve Cambian briefly touched on his reasons for unfollowing and blocking Ethan, which is what provoked Ethan's hours-long Twitter meltdown yesterday. Steve said that he didn't want to get entangled with people who have done the things that Ethan has done in the past and that, paraphrasing, even quickly perusing "his Wikipedia article" made it clear that Ethan was somebody he would not willingly be interacting with anymore.

Ethan does not have a Wikipedia article, and has not for some time, so (as I remarked in chat at the time) it's my guess that Steve saw the Rational Wiki article as the #1 result upon searching for Ethan, mistook it for Wikipedia, and believed the lede's inaccurate statement that Ethan's a registered sex offender rather than a convicted sex offender. He has alluded to similar incidents in the past with prospective guests.

I'm not sure how much of a difference it would have made in the end, though, because this mild dismissal by Steve caused Ethan to go full rage pig in his chat and makes it pretty clear something else would have happened sooner or later anyway. Here are the screencaps of Ethan seething and making limp threats in Steve's chat, which I posted to the KC thread as it took place (these are the exact same screenshots, just crossposted). 'bob smith' is Ethan's ban evasion Youtube sock that he uses to comment in chats:

feb_15_bob.png
feb_15_bob_2.png
feb_15_bob_3.png
feb_15_bob_4.png
 
Even if Ethan were to win, how much does he think his damages would be? He's literally the scum of the internet. You'd just have to show the jury some clips of him talking about his baby mamas and him being high on xanax and they'd immediately realize his reputation can't be damaged.

I encourage him to go ahead though. A Rackets/Ethan Ralph lawsuit would bring milk a-plenty.
 
Several lawyers are so angry that Piggertits' good name is dragged through the mud on the highly important website Rational Wiki!
Is there any chance at all this could be like the Greer situation where he got pro bono representation from some ambulance chasers because they saw it as an easy win for their portfolio?

This lawsuit would be incredibly dumb, (so perfect for Ralph,) but I am sure there are plenty of sleazy lawyers down in Mexico who see it as an easy shake down.
 
Ralph is sperging about muh evil wammanz on Twitter in regards to Elon's new babymomma.

ralph1.png

ralph3.png

ralph2.png

ralph4.png

Yes, this woman is truly EVIL an CRAAAAZYYYY for trying to get in contact with the father of her 5 month of baby who ghosted her. It's definitely not the guy who pumped and dumped her and already is a deadbeat dad to several other kids who is evil. Women are just soooooo crazy for expecting a man take some responsibility for the offspring he deliberately created.

Of course Ralph knows all about evil and crazy bitches because a woman leaving a drunken junkie who laid hands on her multiple times and failed to provide for her and her child to the point where they were hungry and dirty living in a house with pills and piss bottles scattered on the floor is definitely evil and also crazy.
 
While I enjoy the jokes, Nick rekieta is sadly not an option for Ralph.
  • Nick has a "heat" allergy, so he can't go to Mexico
  • Nick is also allergic to work
  • Nick's ghosting the gunt at present, likely due to Ralph's interference in court matters in MN
  • Nick can't practice law because he failed to keep up on his CLE, so his license with the MN bar is suspended
Hopefully Ralph's Mexican lawyer/plumber/landlord/electrician/driver is licensed in the US.
 
Holy Streisand Batman no one remembers that Rational Wiki exists.
I believe that his problem with RW specifically is that it's the first result that comes up when searching for his full name
View attachment 6988451
All RW has to do is change "registered sex offender" to "convicted sex offender" and Ralph won't have a case. Though Ralph will swear up and down that pleading no contest is not the same as pleading guilty.
Also here is an archive of the page today with its last edit January 1st 2025. It had been archived five months before this with a total of five snapshots taken of the last three years.
 
Back