Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 62 16.3%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.0%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 95 24.9%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 65 17.1%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 155 40.7%

  • Total voters
    381
How long do you think before they go from "giving drugs to children that are mature enough" to "sex with children is ok if they are mature enough"?

Really concerning opinions for parents.

Some parents can overestimate their children, using vague qualifiers like "good grades" to indicate maturity or the like. These parents can even mistake learned behaviors/language for something more intrinsic (conflating imitation with understanding). These parents might agree on boundaries regarding children in general... but their kid is exceptional.

Couple that with the parent being tired of living in a child-friendly environment and it becomes easy for a situation where the needs of the child are overlooked ("they can take care of themselves") and/or the child is abused (exposure to harmful people/material).

Nick praising his exceptional kids, good grades and all, despite what he's done to them is par for the course for this kind of deluded parent.
 
Nick praising his exceptional kids, good grades and all, despite what he's done to them is par for the course for this kind of deluded parent.
Obviously what Nick and Kayla have been subjecting their children to cannot have been abuse, because look how well they are doing still.
The live-in nanny fucking bailed because of the conditions in that house, that tells you everything you need to know.

When the paid help decides to just pack her shit and leave, things must be really dire.
 
What does he think the word NEAR means?
The only thing the cocaine can be considered near to is proximate to his nasal cavity :tumblr:👃. The cocaine is only far when he has to drive his kids 4 hours to zero g welding class to acquire cocaine.
I imagine Nick's delicate effete back-hand slaps would bounce harmlessly off

:gunt: The Gunt:gunt:
:gunt:
 
The damages associated with revenge porn are usually associated with uncontrolled public dissemination of an image on something like the internet. That the images get out in an uncontrolled way on the internet and thus do damage that is not easy to address. That didn't happen in this case.
This actually where Aaron fucked up. There are two ways to look at his decision to stream the sharing of Kayla's image.
1) A goof that just happened to share the image during a stream. The stream just captured two bros broing live.

or

2) A malicious dickwad that pretends to care about his soulmate while shaming her with details of their relationship including bragging about the nakey pics he has live on stream.

#2 is why there is still a felony. The damages to Kayla would stem from all of the shame he's dumping. Aaron could be in either category above but I don't see how his behavior has ruled out either. Ironically, his extremely well-disciplined approach to Kayla after the RO as well as his approach to first wife before the Kayla RO makes me lean toward #2. This wasn't his first rodeo.

Kayla might have a sympathetic case if she ties in Aaron's radio firing, 1st wife RO, April abuse allegation and revenge porn.
 
How long do you think before they go from "giving drugs to children that are mature enough" to "sex with children is ok if they are mature enough"?

Really concerning opinions for parents.
Well, he's always been a lolbert and it seems like lolberts always eventually end up in the "what if the child consents" camp.
Obviously what Nick and Kayla have been subjecting their children to cannot have been abuse, because look how well they are doing still.
It's practically a stereotype for bright children who are abused and neglected to cope by succeeding academically because it's something they can actually control in their lives which are blighted by worthless, psychopathic parents like Nick and Kayla.
 
Having your private attorney interact with a key witness in a criminal case involving yourself or your family is a really terrible idea in any number of ways. All these people are insane and the prosecutor in this case - if they had any sense at all - would have walked away from all these crazy people a long time ago.

But sending your wife's attorney to go harangue a witness in a criminal case is exactly the sort of nitwit legal theory I would see Nick coming up with.

A different spin: I'd bet Kayla's attorney was probably attempting to schedule a deposition after testimony but while they were in MN so they could take care of it all at once. Keanu and Geno likely took it as presumptuous that they would comply with the court order and got mad. IANAL and don't know whether that is feasible or ethical but I personally would rather deal with everything at once. Neither Keanu or Geno are smart enough to know when someone is doing them a favor.

Nick praising his exceptional kids, good grades and all, despite what he's done to them is par for the course for this kind of deluded parent.
Nick's a narcissist. He's praising himself. Their accomplishments are nothing more than a reflection on his outstanding parenting.

It's clear his drugs never endangered his kids because he kept bleach in a cabinet that had no door - and DCS said nothing about it. That alone should tell everyone what a great and watchful parent he is: Not a single bleach death in all the years he's had children in the home.
 
Last edited:
A different spin: I'd bet Kayla's attorney was probably attempting to schedule a deposition after testimony but while they were in MN so they could take care of it all at once. Keanu and Geno likely took it as presumptuous that they would comply with the court order and got mad. IANAL and don't know whether that is feasible or ethical but I personally would rather deal with everything at once. Neither Keanu or Geno are smart enough to know when someone is doing them a favor.


Nick's a narcissist. He's praising himself. Their accomplishments are nothing more than a reflection on his outstanding parenting.

It's clear his drugs never endangered his kids because he kept bleach in a cabinet that had no door - and DCS said nothing about it. That alone should tell everyone what a great and watchful parent he is: Not a single bleach death in all the years he's had children in the home.
I would not be surprised to learn that Nick lied to get them on-board with this in the first place, explaining it as his way to get an HRO against Aaron so he stops talking about them on his show. Which I admit would have been a non-retarded move on his part.

"Help me make Aaron shut up, you will never have to testify" or something along those lines.
I do not seriously believe Geno or Keanu would have wanted to be involved in a case that could actually settle "their friend Aaron" with a felony.
 
I also can't think of a single reason why'd they'd have any problem with Kayla's attorney, but for a situation where she causes a problem for them.

I think they're telling the truth.
I actually watched the video of what Geno and Keanu said and on reflection I don't actually think Geno is claiming to have been contacted by Kayla's attorney. I think he just doesn't understand the legal system and the distinctions between a criminal and civil case and heard that Kayla had a female attorney and assumes that Kayla's attorney and the prosecutor are the same person.

I am going to need a specific statement from him that he was contacted before I conclude anything.

 
Nick just goes around creating maximum drama for himself and others. That’s what he does as a father of five. It’s absolutely pathetic. Fathers who have to deal with real shit forced on them — like, say, a child’s serious illness or disability — look at a garbage fag like Nick and can only feel disgust. And that’s before he starts showing off his womanly tattoos.

It’s impossible to alog this sack of shit.
 
I actually watched the video of what Geno and Keanu said and on reflection I don't actually think Geno is claiming to have been contacted by Kayla's attorney. I think he just doesn't understand the legal system and the distinctions between a criminal and civil case and heard that Kayla had a female attorney and assumes that Kayla's attorney and the prosecutor are the same person.
That would be about par for the course. It's often difficult to figure out what tards are thinking because you're looking at it like a rational person of normal intelligence. Instead, whatever they're thinking is some tard shit.
 
What exactly would Nick sue Aaron for that would actually win him anything in court? Defamation? ... Revenge porn for his wife?

A third likely possibility could be petitioning for an HRO to silence him. Nick surely regrets failing to get the NDA that he had April ask Aaron for, and even the existing prohibition against indirectly referring to Kayla (and thus effectively her Qover) is not strictly speaking a proper restraining order as it is just a pretrial release condition. Violating it would only run the risk of release being revoked until trial and wouldn't support a new charge per se like violating Ashley's actual HRO did, the pretrial release condition's content and scope wouldn't be absolutely certain to end up incorporated into his probation terms after conviction, and even such a probation term wouldn't extend beyond the probation period (likely only a year), so Nick would understandably be concerned about the risk of Aaron shooting his mouth off at some point in the future. A proper HRO would be needed to eliminate that risk, with the added benefit of protecting Nick directly which the pretrial release conditions as to Kayla do only to a limited extent, as seen in Aaron continuing to shit on Nick for months so long as he avoids implicating Nick's relationship to Kayla.

Other reasons that an HRO petition is exceedingly likely include the fact that it is a summary proceeding with none of the risk of more dirt coming out in an extensive discovery process or full trial like a defamation suit and/or revenge porn suit would entail, and the fact that an HRO proceeding could potentially resolved on the basis of affidavits or even a stipulation without progressing to a contested evidentiary hearing necessitating testimony from Kayla. From everything known about her it's a safe bet that she is begging Nick to never put her fragile mental state through the stress of cross-examination about the Qover days, and the HRO process would have a decent chance of avoiding that.

At this point the only question mark is why Nick didn't already pull the trigger on this option long ago, as it would appear to be too little too late with Aaron having already blown his wad with little to no Qover goss left to dish at this point, other than perhaps any legally disclosable non-RP portion of Signal DMs that Aaron can't admit to having preserved after committing to his "tragic boating accident" story anyway. Outside of that, what else is there that Nick fears Aaron could say that he hasn't already?

Maybe Nick's still worried about Aaron's past allusions to unspecific suspected conduct pertaining to the children that was supposedly being investigated, but given that whatever that was never rose to the level of being prosecuted or even resulting in an extraordinarily adverse CHIPS outcome, it's hard to imagine how Aaron would ever have the balls to follow through on his promise to "bring it back to ya" "when this is all said and done" now that the risk of lawfare over purported defamation bankrupting him should be foremost on his mind. Same goes for any risk that Aaron might blab about anything Keanu told him about anything April had said that Keanu claims she is still holding back, since Aaron dare not dive headlong into the gaping maw of lawfare he can ill afford over something heard thirdhand that he can't independently verify. So what on earth could Nick even be so worried about?

Having ruled that out, the Occam's Razor explanation for Nick's excruciatingly long wait may simply be that he realizes how even HRO petitions are not immune to difficult First Amendment obstacles and he thinks his best shot would be after the petition can incorporate by reference a prior conviction, which at best should make the petition a slam-dunk with the felony count's harassment element already established in advance, or at worst could help to throw in as a kitchen sink even in the case of a gross misdemeanor.

there's something really weird going on here. Sean is correct that this is being pursued farther than makes any logical or economic sense.

7:00 mark:

Aaron, of course, isn't helping matters any if he decides to take this to trial. He needs to pull his head out his ass.

This Kluver situation could also offer an explanation as to why Aaron hasn't already copped a plea to the gross misdemeanor like lawtubers were so sure he would: not because the state never offered it, not because the state wouldn't accept if his attorney spontaneously offered it, and not even because of some "muh google hack" distraction that doesn't change his guilt even if true, but instead perhaps because the state wouldn't accept Aaron's insistence that conviction of the gross misdemeanor must be in the nature of an Alford/Goulette plea with no express admission of guilt that could be put to use in later civil litigation.

Since his recent reconciliation with Keanu and Geno would have put him and his attorney in in a position to have learned precisely what Kluver's bizarre direct contacts with the Biscontes were trying to accomplish, it makes sense that he'd have become fixated on how a straight guilty plea's collateral consequences in future civil lawfare would punish him in ways far more devastating than the criminal conviction itself ever could, and this may have left him with the Hobson's Choice to push all-in for any chance of an Alford/Goulette plea all the way to the eve of trial if that's what it takes. Even that strategy's landing him a trial conviction could have seemed worth the risk compared to a straight plea voluntarily handing Kluver a pre-packaged slam-dunk lolsuit that an Alford/Goulette plea could have forced her to start from scratch.
 
Last edited:
I think he just doesn't understand the legal system and the distinctions between a criminal and civil case and heard that Kayla had a female attorney and assumes that Kayla's attorney and the prosecutor are the same person.

That would be about par for the course. It's often difficult to figure out what tards are thinking because you're looking at it like a rational person of normal intelligence. Instead, whatever they're thinking is some tard shit.
We need a tard whisperer to interpret what they're trying to say.
 
MN is anti-SLAPP but it's very narrowly defined IIRC
Minnesota has NO anti-SLAPP. NONE. That was the entire point of Nick hiring Randazza, to the tune of tens of thousands of dollars. To try and force Minnesota to apply Colorado's Anti-SLAPP provisions to Monty's case. It did not work.

Anyway, I would argue that Nick has a case.
I would argue that's ridiculous.

But if he does press the issue, few people here will complain. It'll be an shitshow of biblical proportions. So much tea will be spilled on both sides.

TEN THOUSAND PAGES, HERE WE COME!

I don't follow ralph too closely, but I am going to take a wild guess that 3 week "rehab" didn't work.
Whatever in the world made you think that?
 
Back