- Joined
- Mar 17, 2019
What's your point?I looked at the wikipedia page for Henry Ford one day and I could seriously not believe my fucking eyes
View attachment 6996157
Ford would have shat on a filthy traitor like Trump, obviously.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What's your point?I looked at the wikipedia page for Henry Ford one day and I could seriously not believe my fucking eyes
View attachment 6996157
Why is Trump concerned about a non American?Lol so how will the "At least my side doesn't shield child groomers" Magatards
cope with this one?
View attachment 6995726
I wondered that as well but according to a Financial Times article, they're dual US/UK nationals. Maybe Romania could do a deal wherein they hand them over to the US and bar them from entering Romania, maybe even the whole EU. That wouldn't affect their citizenship.Why is Trump concerned about a non American?
Trump was friends with Epstein and went to his island over ten times, of course he’s okay with right wing pedos.Lol so how will the "At least my side doesn't shield child groomers" Magatards
cope with this one?
View attachment 6995726
He did this shit during his las time. Said he will “help with bills/give money for bills” and take it back. He does this to get the public to like him, once people are happy and forgot he did it, he’ll stop it.
You can access it on your browser if you have the Bypass Paywalls plugin.if anyone can access the Financial Times article
Republicans think it's totally cool when it's one of their fellow conservatives doing itYeah, it's lawfare, never mind that he bragged about committing the crimes on livestream and that no normal person thinks grooming minors into prostitution is okay.
Nah, they applaud it. Soros is balls deep in the Trump admin through Scott Bessent as Secretary of the Treasury.I bet they would be seething if Bill Gates or George Soros was doing what Elmo is doing
Where can I read more about this?To be clear, Bessent's mandate from Trump to create a sovereign wealth fund for the US exists solely to support Soros Fund Management/Capital.
Kind of funny that TMT kicked down Rogan. The fact that people get this political/science views from a failed celebrity is depressing
9/10 options being subhumans and the other one Candace Owens sure looks like TES to me.
For information about US' sovereign wealth fund:Where can I read more about this?
What's more, I love how he correctly identified the role of policy in cockblocking poor speculators like Soros from murdering economies:So you were running the Soros London office when the pound fell out of the ERM. Can you talk a bit about what happened on that famous trade?
We’d been thinking about it for a while. The trade is a good example of what made Soros a different sort of macro fund in that we did a lot of bottom-up research. Stan and George believed that if you can find out what’s going on at a micro level, you can figure out the big picture. My very minor contribution to the breaking of the pound was an analysis I had done on the UK housing and property market. In the United Kingdom at the time, about 90 percent of mortgages were linked to the overnight rate. If the Bank of England raised rates on Wednesday, mortgages went up on Friday. I had been short UK housing stocks for a while and George was chewing on me to cover the position because they were going up. I said, “George, I have done my work. These property stocks are going under.” George likes it when you argue with him if you’re right, which is why I think I did well there. Anyway, the housing stock trade was overshadowed by the pound trade, and rightly so. What is most interesting to me about the breaking of the pound was the combination of Stan Druckenmiller’s gamesmanship—Stan really understands risk/reward—and George’s ability to size trades. Make no mistake about it, shorting the pound was Stan Druckenmiller’s idea. Soros’s contribution was pushing him to take a gigantic position. With the pound, we realized that we could push the Bank of England up against the trading band where they had to buy an unlimited amount of pounds from us. The plan was to trade the fund’s profits and leverage up at the band’s boundary. The fund was up about 12 percent for the year at the time, so we levered the trade up to the point where if they pushed us back up against the other side of the trading band, we would lose the year’s P&L but not more. The UK economy was already weak, so when they raised interest rates to defend the currency, the average person’s mortgage went up. They basically squeezed everyone in the United Kingdom with a mortgage. When they raised rates from 7 percent to 12 percent with the stated goal of defending the pound, we knew it was unsustainable and that they were finished.
I am glad that Trump chose such an experienced man to control US' monetary policies.There have been numerous instances where policy makers have blamed speculators for their country’s problems. What is your view on money managers forcing policy change versus policy mistakes attracting capital?
Occasionally, there can be short-term moves as a result of speculators, but I don’t think they can drive underlying fundamentals. On the other hand, when locals want to get out and you see capital flight, there is a fundamental problem—Russia being a classic example of locals getting out. So as long as the locals maintain faith, the speculators usually can’t break a system. The problem is, with the amount of capital out there today, a small currency block can get pushed around temporarily. In general, though, if you have the proper policies, speculators can’t do anything over the medium term. A good example of this was the Hungarian forint currency band recently when there was a big speculative push to actually strengthen the currency. The Hungarian central bank started printing forints and pushed it all the way back. It was a wide band so speculators got cleaned out.
This is the beginning of China’s decade. We’re beginning to see China flexing its muscles, and the United States is probably where the United Kingdom was around World War I in terms of world dominance.
Rogan's podcast went from having interesting guests who talked about their area of interest to just Trump and Republican and Elon propaganda. Them dropping 25% in a month is pretty shocking though given that's a huge amount
I cannot express my hatred for these intellectual dark web types. They act like they're so smart and on the cutting edge of knowledge, but when you listen to them talk it's clear they're not very interesting thinkers and they have very little to say. The only people who take these schizos seriously are even bigger schizos and retards.Kind of funny that TMT kicked down Rogan. The fact that people get this political/science views from a failed celebrity is depressing
That's what I thought, but apparently the Tates are British-American, and hold dual citizenship. American father. That's the only slight saving grace for anyone in a US admin taking an interest in the case, but Grenell at least seems to have a personal, partisan interest in it.Why is Trump concerned about a non American?
Because le based and redpilled empty platitudes that get continually replayed on conservative media, le super trad $1,000-a-month course on how to become aGrenell at least seems to have a personal, partisan interest in it.
Note also: Grenell is gay, as in, married to a man. Gay men can be insensitive to misogyny, to put it mildly.Because le based and redpilled empty platitudes that get continually replayed on conservative media, le super trad $1,000-a-month course on how to become asex traffickerreal man, and because he knows how to put those uppity bitches in their place which really turns on the nazi larper incels on /pol/. Oh and because anyone on the right who gets accused of sex crimes is clearly a victim of cancellation by the libs