US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Trump's share of the black vote is about to hit 80+%
It would certainly shut up a lot of the plebeian complainers up. There are A LOT of people crying over the internet and hurting because of the government bloat cuts who will begrudgingly take the money from Trump and quiet up for a bit. I suspect people on the fence will actually change their minds too
. A big complaint that many, black Kamala Harris drones had was that their (ghetto,) less informed (male) friends were going to vote for Trump because "He gave me a stimulus check." I personally never heard ANYONE use that argument except for maybe one person on youtube, but If this is indeed the case, then a lot of blacks (particularly black men who are) on the fence might change their tune if they get life changing money into their pockets. Maybe a few of the black women still crying about the loss of DEI and pretending to boycott Target will change their minds too.

I recall a Kiwi saying that Trump wants this presidential run to define his Legacy. I think there is a non-zero chance that he actually might do it. A lot of people will like him for it, especially if done so it doesn't cause massive inflation.

I just need no federal tax on overtime and tips. That's my wish list for the people and I will be very pleased if he does it. (I also need them to remove Obama's egregious taxes for expats and the Dems stupid $600 paypal, venmo, cashapp tax.)
 
Democrats are back to square one.

"No one likes trannies, let's go back to 90s-era guilting the working class about Native Americans."

View attachment 7000315
It’s effectively just unsalted Salmon, native root vegetables, wood onions, and venison. Native Americans had shit-tier cuisine. They unironically did not season their food. Louis and Clark actually complained about this.
 
More importantly if you're over oh, 35-40 or so, IVF is the only way a woman is having a baby without a completely insane lucky roll of the dice.

This isn't accurate at all.

The average age of final childbearing for your great grandmother's generation was in the 42-45 range.

Chances of a chromosome abnormality are only 1-2% even at the high end of that range.

It's absolutely insane how many people think the "geriatric pregnancy" thing is actually about your chances of getting pregnant after 35. It's not.

"Geriatric pregnancy" and the 35 cutoff pertains to one specific issue that mattered a lot to insurance in the 1990s: amniocentesis, a procedure where a sample of amniotic fluid is tested to see if the baby has the usual number of chromosomes or not.

Amniocentesis is not without risk. In roughly 1 in 200 cases, it causes "spontaneous abortion" aka miscarriage. Therefore, it wasn't worth it to do amnio to evaluate Down Syndrome risk on anyone for whom the risk of miscarriage from the amnio was higher than the risk of DS. It just so happens that at age 35, your DS risk is 1 in 200, rising to double that by 40, and quadruple by 45. But a good supermajority of pregnancies even by "super-geriatric" moms are of healthy normal kids. "Higher chance of defects" doesn't mean "you're more likely than not to have a disabled kid." Defects are rare.

Now, women get NIPTs and only use amnio to confirm, so it's a different ballgame, but the anti-natalists have loved (loved!) the narrowing of the age range for "acceptable" pregnancy so the myth continues. The actual hit to your fertility is quite slow, and for women with PCOS (a lot of women nowadays since it's associated with being fat) the fertility decline starts significantly later, with fertility as high in the late 30s as in the early 20s. With most people's family size ideals nowadays being 1-2 kids, you have a better than 50/50 chance of having your full ideal complement of children even if you get started at 37.

Go look at your own ancestry. Guaranteed your great aunts and great great grandmas were dropping babies all over the place in their 40s, just like mine and all the others. Like I said, the average age for final childbirth was in the 40s, a solid majority of women were doing it.

Interestingly, though...it's much easier to get pregnant and stay pregnant in your late 30s or ESPECIALLY in your 40s if you've already carried one pregnancy all the way through to a live birth. If you try to have your very first baby at the age when grandma had her last one, you may be in for a rude awakening. But if you're a mom of three in her early 40s whose kids are now all in school and you wish you could be a mom of four (or more), you'll probably do fine.

Anti-natalists want everyone to believe no one should have babies until they've discovered themselves and are at least 28-30, but also don't have any after 35 because you're probably doomed and the kid will be deformed. Hell of a way to bring the population numbers down, but it's based on myths.

Maybe I'll go make a late-in-life baby just to show you how it's done.
 
Last edited:
CHINA and Russia are both allied because they want less influence from people who are not themselves. In this case, the WEST!!!.

BRICS is trying to create a system so that economic pressure from the US will not matter.
America is pressuring countries not to export critical infrastructure for advanced chip sets so that China can not compete with US companies and protect the US market.
Why would anyone follow America's lead if you can guarantee sales using a secondary system?
I don’t care about being the most importantest hugest country or whatever, I just want to benefit from the fruits of my labors, so that fag rhetoric isn’t working here

My point is, Russia and China can’t be besties unless they have a malignant US to drive them into eachother’s arms
 
I've been watching Black Star Network's meltdown on election night in a compilation that was put out a few days ago. There really is an untapped treasure trove of TDS in this footage. I've timestamped the link to where the sheboons start unironically talking about committing suicide.

https://youtu.be/BnZvjN_kHds?si=4V5su3qlzROD7ysa&t=3034
 
It opens up a ton of can of worms but the big ones is it will allow women over the age of 40-45 to have kids, will allow LGBT couples to "have" kids (as the stem cell can come from a male), and the stem cell DNA can come from any source (so stealing DNA from celebs or corporations selling prime pre-screened DNA will quickly become a thing). But it beats letting the Jews replace us with infinity jeets and sandniggers, so...
Blade Runner territory and a lot of religious opposition as well.
 
It's not going to work. All one would have to do is pull up footage of old animated shows that show them owning all the casinos and then people will go "oh wait, they're doing fine, nevermind".
In other news, new archival footage of Liz Warren has surfaced, proving once and for all that she’s an Indian too


But for real, why are you all projecting on natives that they want something from you? That entire narrative came from democrats paying a couple of them to say it. Forget about it.

If I strain a muscle putting everything I know about natives together, it would be like this:

The big ask is “stop making it weird.”

White guilt is white people’s problem. Stop trying to make natives fix it.

You don’t have to kiss their ass, and you don’t have to go crazy calling them shit to prove how much you don’t want to kiss their ass. You could just be like “hey dude, what’s up”
 
I'd set a 24 hour ultimatum to this clown. Either come to the negotiating table or all Ukraine funding and military aid is cutoff effective immediately.
Even his allies in the EU are going to tell him "Look dude, I know we said we had your back but actually we just do it for the updoots, you better talk with Trump soon".

I almost want them to do it, to keep it up even with the withdrawal of the US. Almost.

Imagine badmouthing the only guy preventing them from grinding you into paste.
 
When George Washington fought in the French and Indian War, during the Battle of Monongahela, Washington miraculously survived without a wound- his horse was shot out from under him, and multiple bullets passed through his jacket, but Washington was untouched. Seeing this, the Indian Chieftain there prophesied that “he [George Washington] will become the chief of nations, and a people yet unborn, will hail him as the father of a mighty empire!”
Were men just way more bad ass back then or what?

Even Trump is basically from a different time period at this point.
 
It is arguable that they were inbred from the start. There are theories that all pre-1492 people of the Americas descend from 70 ancestors. I don't buy it because there is a good shot that people sailed across the Pacific and not all humans in the Americas came from the Bering Strait, but it's food for thought.

The Cahokian mounds, Hopi people, the Toltecs, Aztecs, and Incas would all like a word with you.
The "70 ancestors" theory is a horoscope-tier theory. The Americas feature multiple completely unrelated language groups, unrelated like German and Chinese are unrelated (the Mayans and Aztecs are from different language families despite living side by side), and genetic distances on par with Asia. A plausible explanation is there were actually multiple waves that came over from Asia, with earlier groups heading further south before settling because it was colder.
 
CHINA and Russia are both allied because they want less influence from people who are not themselves. In this case, the WEST!!!.
Wrong, China allies to reduce western reliance, Russia is allied because it has no choice but to be a junior partner. It needs China with Western trade increasingly cut off, and can't afford to now go against its now main importer of technological, industrial, and consumer goods, and its main export partner for natural resources. China much less so, which is why the Russians do nothing when China reverse engineers their jet engines and creates their own for J-20s or it nudges into its sphere of influence in Central Asia.
 
Back