- Joined
- Jun 1, 2020
I have no reason to believe or reject the notion. I'm a "cross that bridge when we get there" kind of guy.
I'll second Bay's assertion there. Lolicons have a track record of being so outspoken in defense of their fetish that they'll rabidly defend even actual pedophiles tooth and nail out of stubbornness due to their persecution complex. I have yet to see a single lolicon who, when revealed that they've been defending an actual pedo, will own up to having done so or express any sense of shame or humility over it. The most they'll do is shut up and try like hell to sweep it under the rug, and whenever anyone brings it up, they'll still act very dismissive and try to deny any culpability (i.e., "Yeah, that guy I was defending turned out to be an actual pedo. Fuck him. Wow, why are you all trying to hold me to an honest mistake? You fucking haters need to get a life", etc).Proven time and time again they keep crossing the bridge and even when they don't most of them guntguard the outed suspects like the bitty situation. Out of stupidity or intentionally, it doesn't matter. They are already walking on a thin line and doing that kind of retardness doesn't help their case.
I feel inclined to reiterate and stress that, to date, I have never seen a single self-professed lolicon/"cunnyposter" EVER humble themselves when they've been caught out on something.