Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 62 15.4%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 6 1.5%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 101 25.1%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 72 17.9%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 162 40.2%

  • Total voters
    403
The person in this particular case (Michael Weigel) made a plea deal, had two felony charges dropped and received a stayed sentence on the third that would drop from felony to misdemeanor after doing the other parts of the sentence. As far as I can tell, the case never went to trial and the privacy issues around the case were never litigated. The guy in question was a total mess for many other reasons and after sentencing was repeatedly brought back to court for probation violations. The person in question also made a statement to police that the photos were already on the internet, but I could not find anything to say if what he had asserted was found to be true or false.

I dont think the privacy issues have been litigated much in Minnesota, but I generally think it would be a bad defense to use in court and would only be used if nothing better were available.
There's something else about the Weigel story.

This is from a much better article on twincities.com:

Screenshot_20250223-220846 (1).png
He shared these images on the public Facebook page of her new bf. What an absolute piece of shit.

Screenshot_20250223-222236~2.png
I agree.

Here's my problem: I don't get to the same place from Aaron sharing an image with Geno. This goes to the distinction between the felony, which requires harassment and harm, and the misdemeanor.

Am I wrong?

Article: https://www.twincities.com/2017/10/...ks-down-on-first-ex-boyfriend-sentenced-jail/

Archive: https://archive.is/7TqVF

He was on coke on stream at 2am. Of course theyre in the premise. Or is he implying he sent them to the woods at midnight first? :story:
Knowing him, he'd probably claim they were at their 1:30am quantum physics lessons.

(I do love how this thread has come up with so many joke activities that Nick has to drive his kids to and from. I should compile them all into a list).
 
>your honour, we subpoenaed everyone in Minnesota and obtained over 5.8 million slatternly photos, they are collated for your viewing pleasure
>This is why the court prepared vomit buckets for this occasion
>Your honour, are you able to determine which one my defendant shared?
:really: >thanks for the bucket, your honour, I need it for another reason *zipping sounds*
>I would like to sentence the state of Minnesota to a nuclear holocaust

In the police report, he says the image in question was shared by Kayla via Signal.

However, he has since said that Aaron took the photo himself.
It could be that Aaron took the slatternly snaps with Our Wife's phone and she shared it.

That’s so retarded
So his defense is that the cocaine was in his room while the kids were safely playing next room? Are we supposed to argue what the phrase “drugs around kids” means semantically?
God what an insufferable cuck faggot
But the kids were never near cocaine!
 
Hope Geno shows up and starts describing a picture from the locals chat because it's the funniest thing I can think of.
"A very dainty, delicate figure. Crazy, vacant eyes with nothing behind them. Incredibly feminine features. Loose anus from the constant penetration-"
"Mr. Bisconte, we don't need you to describe Mrs. Rekieta's body in such graphic detail."
"Mrs. Rekieta? I was talking about Nick!"
 
Last edited:
Based on his past behavior, I wouldn't be surprised if Nick sent "Mandy" both his and Kayla's nudes to try and convince him to a 3some at a meetup

Probably the same thing to actual ethots too
I wouldn't be surprised if that was his opening gambit, here's an artist's rendition of that.
opener.png
 
Last edited:
The person in this particular case (Michael Weigel) made a plea deal, had two felony charges dropped and received a stayed sentence on the third that would drop from felony to misdemeanor after doing the other parts of the sentence. As far as I can tell, the case never went to trial and the privacy issues around the case were never litigated. The guy in question was a total mess for many other reasons and after sentencing was repeatedly brought back to court for probation violations. The person in question also made a statement to police that the photos were already on the internet, but I could not find anything to say if what he had asserted was found to be true or false.

I dont think the privacy issues have been litigated much in Minnesota, but I generally think it would be a bad defense to use in court and would only be used if nothing better were available.
Yep - there's a reason I only included that line from a news story (not a court opinion) and as a side comment - more for amusement than anyghing, with the swinger angle. I do not believe a shared group text among a quad of lovers would at all suggest not having an expectation of privacy given the cases that touch on it (or common sense), but there isn't much out there sharpening the line.
 
I find it extremely unlikely that Kayla wants to be pursuing this criminal case against Aaron. Whereas for Nick it’s probably one of the few things that gets his dick hard these days. The fact he can’t see how these public revelations have exposed her to even more humiliation and loss of dignity — completely avoidably — says a lot about his mental and spiritual state.

Spare a prayer for the Rekieta children, especially the oldest who goes to private school where his fellow students no doubt know all about the lifestyle to which his degenerate parents have subjected him. The fact that Nick and Kayla can offer him up for even more shame and ridicule tells me all I need to know about them as parents and humans.
 
I find it extremely unlikely that Kayla wants to be pursuing this criminal case against Aaron. Whereas for Nick it’s probably one of the few things that gets his dick hard these days. The fact he can’t see how these public revelations have exposed her to even more humiliation and loss of dignity — completely avoidably — says a lot about his mental and spiritual state.
I can't get over how he's not even really bothering to pretend this is about defending his wife's honor. Faggot needs a PR person or something. A real one. Not a unpaid trailer park retard like Grifty.

There's no faux "Look at how his bastard hurt my wife!"

Instead, it's "Hurr durr... Aaron ate my goo."

Of course this is vengeance against his former homosexual lover. Everything Nick has said and done points in that direction.
 
Faggot needs a PR person or something. A real one. Not an unpaid trailer park retard like Grifty.
Any decent PR pro or firm would tell him to STFU, among other advice that Nick would never take.

Nick thinks he knows best and possesses zero humility. Nick is not open to any feedback or correction. This is why his life is a fucking embarrassing shambles.

Lolcows NEVER learn.
 
Any decent PR pro or firm would tell him to STFU, among other advice that Nick would never take.

Nick thinks he knows best and possesses zero humility. Nick is not open to any feedback or correction. This is why his life is a fucking embarrassing shambles.

Lolcows NEVER learn.
Anyone would say that just shut up about whole thing. Ignore any comments. And talk about anything else but drugs, orgies and cucking.

Even most idiotic political opinions would be better...
 
How long has it been since Nicko's last stream?
33 days.

Any opinions why? Some possibilities:
1. Lazy
2. Uncharacteristically cautious about the pre-sentencing investigation
3. Taking full advantage of not being drug tested
4. Not happy with how his first attempt at a comeback stream went
5. Still searching for the magic words that will restore his career
6. Seething too much to risk it
7. Checked out of the streaming game
...
 
Last edited:
I assume a nice plea deal has been made, but Aaron didn't take it because if he admits guilt, then he is civilly liable for some vexatious bullshit Nick wants to file against him.
Regardless of the outcome of Aaron RP case, W or L. Junkie and wife will NEVER be able to win a civil lawsuit against Aaron due to THEIR own statements in Aaron RP charges and affidavit [the fact peeps are parsing what was said in the charge vs the affidavit is just wild to me] AND their own individual criminal arrests.

Cannot make a polycule Drug addict look worse AFTER they already got arrested.

QUESTION:
Pix shared with a lover=private

But

Did polycule become legal?
When was this?
I thought even mormons could not make it legal, ergo, pix shared to a group/polycule, etc...not legal sooooo....

I admit I could be wrong, but muti-marriage partners in a group is not legal, so how is sharing nekid pix to a group somehow equate to privacy allowed to lovers? Ya know, like doing something criminal makes an NDA void kinda thing. Seems just common sense. Did I miss where polycule is legal or is it orgy that is legal...? Doubt it. They just kick you out of the orgy, no legal ramifications as far as I ever heard. But...minnesota is different OR junkie is just dumb as is this DA apparently.

Who in their right mind would take a plea deal over these facts?

Seriously. You are a moron.
 
Last edited:
Regardless of the outcome of Aaron RP case, W or L. Junkie and wife will NEVER be able to win a civil lawsuit against Aaron due to THEIR own statements in Aaron RP charges and affidavit [the fact peeps are parsing what was said in the charge vs the affidavit is just wild to me] AND their own individual criminal arrests.

Cannot make a polycule Drug addict look worse AFTER they already got arrested.

QUESTION:
Pix shared with a lover=private

But

Did polycule become legal?
When was this?
I thought even mormons could not make it legal, ergo, pix shared to a group/polycule, etc...not legal sooooo....

I admit I could be wrong, but muti-marriage partners in a group is not legal, so how is sharing nekid pix to a group somehow equate to privacy allowed to lovers? Ya know, like doing something criminal makes an NDA void kinda thing. Seems just common sense. Did I miss where polycule is legal or is it orgy that is legal...? Doubt it. They just kick you out of the orgy, no legal ramifications as far as I ever heard. But...minnesota is different OR junkie is just dumb as is this DA apparently.

Who in their right mind would take a plea deal over these facts?

Seriously. You are a moron.
Never underestimate the stupidity of lawyers. They are the brain-dead vultures of the world.
 
At this point I'd pay anything to be a fly on the wall while Kayla throws her subpoena in Nick's face and slaps him for goading her into instigating this mess in the first place, and screams at him to "fix this" before her fragile mental state gets shattered on the stand contrary to Nick's big-brained lawyer promises that a quick plea deal would surely spare her that trauma. She only has him to blame for handing Aaron this chance to air out even more of their degeneracy in open court for all of her extended family and church to read in black and white, contrary to Nick's "heartfelt assurances" to her that they will live in quiet privacy once again.
This is why I believe Nick is sperging about the topic so much recently.
He repeatedly claimed they had Aaron "dead to rights", but I think he was trying to talk Aaron into believing that, because an actual trial is an absolute disaster for Nick.

He already said that Kayla does not want to testify, but she will likely be served a subpoena anyway, because this case is all about her, her habit of sharing nudes and how much privacy she can expect.

She is very important to contextualize her as a person and contrast her behavior as a swinging whore and latent exhibitionist and pill/drug addict against what a NORMAL Scandinavian prude in the jury would expect a respectable mother should be like.

I think Nick expected Aaron to plead out at the first chance and he sold it that way to Geanu and Kayla, who are now all confronted with an actual trial taking place and being served subpoenas, ignoring of which could result in real legal trouble. Not to mention that Kayla really would not want to be questioned under oath about any of this. I think Aaron's lawyer will have to be very careful how to go about it, but I think there is a good chance that Aaron knows enough background information about Kayla that they can ask very specific questions about Kayla that could undermine the states claim of expected privacy.

[EDIT] Typos.
 
Last edited:
We know Nick is a textbook case of confession through projection. I bet the story Nick "shared" about Aaron sharing nudes at a restaurant with randos, was actually Nick doing it at a restaurant, sharing nudes of Kayla or April with randos. Which, if true, would further go to diminish the expectation of privacy if Aaron knew it.

Most likely though, it was just a galaxy-gas-brained delusion. Hope you enjoyed those couple of creative brain cells before you suffocated them, Balldoman!
Edit: fixed spelling errors
 
Last edited:
I’ve grown bored with Rekieta but I think his current pathetic life is very similar to what his life was like before internet fame.

I think Nick is just a socially maladjusted guy who can’t cope with life. He’s been able to live 20 plus years like this because his parents subsidize it. When he failed at one career path, they paid for him to get a law degree, then he failed at that before stumbling onto streaming. Their money Nick got a wife, thanks to mom he could afford five kids, a big house, etc… but he’s earned nothing until streaming and then he learned nothing.

Without Nick’s maternal grandpa’s wealth he would one of the adult weirdos that spends all their time in Patrick Melton’s chat and still lives in their mom’s (or dead grandma’s) house. He would either have had a series of jobs from retail to office he could never manage to keep or at a decade plus as car salesman that has worked every lot in 100 miles.

Nick got famous because a smarmy libertarian that spent an inordinate amount of time online yapping and drinking, who appeared to be a successful lawyer with a wife, large family and nice house was an anomaly. Those things don’t usually go together. Successful lawyers don’t usually spend hours online everyday. Hard drinking libertarians don’t tend to have stable family lives. A married father of five minor kids, or even small town lawyers, don’t tend to engage in parasocial online relationships because their actual IRL social lives are busy.

When Nick began streaming he was a rare bird because the majority of streamers were either autistic weirdos, people hoping “entertainment careers”, grifters or people under 25. The potential audience for streamers was much bigger than the normal demo for autistic weirdos, ppl under 25 and those who can tolerate failed comedians for more than ten minutes. A seemingly responsible adult man, and lawyer, spending his free time to have a drink while talking about legal matters and life was unique. It attracted a large demographic of non-zoomers. How did a “regular successful normal guy” have time to hang out and be a streamer? He didn’t. He was just another asocial weirdo that tricked people into buying into a facade.

I think this is why Nick has crumbled so badly and will never come back. His streaming relied on people believing he was a “successful small town attorney” and now that that’s been stripped away and the real Nick has been laid bare he will never have the guts to stream. It’s all been liquid courage and BS. He would also have to accept very few people are interested in a trust fund libertarian coke head giving his deep insights on life and law.
 
Back