US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Most of my packages are split between UPS and USPS. Incoming, both are fine; USPS tracking is a bit shit but they tend to get stuff here in the early parts of the day, UPS tracking is better but it might as well be nighttime by the time they arrive.

FedEx is only used for the EXTREMELY cheap fuckers like Google, and it's literally a gamble if you even see the package, if it hasn't been opened and emptied out, et cetera. Take a look at Google Fi's reddit, they even have a FAQ about it. tldr: Don't allow Google to ship directly to you, ship to a FedEx pickup location and receive AND OPEN the package in front of a manager, on camera if possible, as otherwise FedEx will swear that their negros never touched the package even with Google's security tape on the damned thing and that you must be trying to pull a fast one on Google and poor, innocent, FedEx.

The reason is FedEx is two companies using the FedEx name, FedEx and FedEx Ground, and FedEx Ground is basically ran by felons.

I shipped some shit a few months back. UPS wanted $38 to send 3 music CDs to rural, literally not on Google Streetview, Arkansas. USPS wanted like $8.
Use pirateship.com, they have some agreement that lets you save a ton of money. I had a 70 dollar shipment be discounted to 20 dollars.
 
i believe i speak for everyone when i say this makes complete sense
I mean if makes sense if you auto translate, like “guard rails against bias” means “underperforming blacks are prevented from facing consequences”

The worst thing you can do for black people is put them in petty positions of power and make them immune from consequences.

It’s still welfare, but it goes to less people, gives them six figure salaries at taxpayer expense and then they take the money and move to the suburbs

Edit: this post is like a half hour old already but I’ve been thinking about it and want to add.

It’s funny because the importance of establishing a black middle class is an example that the left really does believe in trickle down economics. How is it supposed to be important, if the money isn’t supposed to circulate through black communities?

But it won’t, because it’s not taking a unified black ecology and pumping it up. Instead it’s creating a black bourgeoisie class who love to flex and will immediately separate themselves to be seen as “superior.” They’re not going to the neighborhood fried chicken restaurant anymore, they’re pretending they like sushi.

And there’s no “hard work pays off” message. It’s just “buy lefty bullshit and redeem your lottery ticket so you can leave the mess behind and make a new one”
 
Last edited:
When I moved across the country before, I fedex’d my shit in moving boxes to my new address and flew myself. Guess things used to be better or I got lucky
It must really depend on the area and the local processing centers and drivers. I’ve never had an issue with FedEx, and I use them about once a week between work and hobbies. They’re the only carrier who will ship live snakes, and they’ve taken great care with the animals I’ve bought from out of state while in transit.

The closest thing I’ve had to an issue is the local delivery driver dropping my packages at the wrong house based on the map pin and not the actual house number, but after I called and said “hey retards I live over here, stop doing this” it hasn’t happened since.
 
Breaking my no-posting streak just to let you know you have got it completely wrong.

The Serbian president is the globohomo, he is the president of the Serbian Progressive Party, with a lesbian prime minister. Their corruption absolutely is responsible for the death of those people, and you shouldn't ironically quote "student protests" as if those students are some EU-backed actors. The protests include both the far left, AND the far right people of Serbia, and you can only guess how incompetent and corrupt you have to be to have all sides of the spectrum hating your guts.

EDIT:
I don't intend to derail the thread dedicated to US politics with the politics of an irrelevant shithole- just keep in you mind that the media shouldn't be trusted anywhere in the world.
I don't think it is necessarily globohomo, but I'm worried about that. I put "student protests" in quotes to make the point that that is the only way I see it referred to in Western media. It was facetious, the same way I would say the "People's" Republic of China. I think it is organic, but I worry it is not. There are cops protesting, there are all sorts of people protesting. Shit, I joined a friend to Novi Sad to pick up a bunch of kids and bring them back after the march from Belgrade to NS. He's a banker there. We picked up his kid, a his friend, and some tax dude. It's worrying, though. The EU flexes pretty hard, and the declaration that they wouldn't admit any more Balkan countries until things settle there last year definitely gives a reason for people who aren't exactly friends to Serbia to mess with things and interfere.

But anyhow, you're right, this is a US politics thread.
 
i believe i speak for everyone when i say this makes complete sense
i speak with the federal government through three different branches nearly weekly. the vast majority of federal workers are black women, from my personal experience. it's not always terrible, a lot of them actually do manage to do their jobs just fine, and they're plenty polite and personable on the phone, but you can tell just from their voice they're black.
 
Good morning, USPG! I bring a fun article from The Hill.

"Angry Democratic donors turn off the flow of money" (archive)
Democrats are anxious to rebuild their party on the heels of President Trump’s victory in November. But they have a major problem as they try to refashion their brand: The money isn’t there.

Democratic donors — from bundlers to small dollar donors — say they are still angry about the election results and uninspired by anything their side has put forward since then.

“I’ll be blunt here: The Democratic Party is f‑‑‑ing terrible. Plain and simple,” said one major Democratic donor. “In fact, it doesn’t get much worse.”

A second donor was equally as pointed. “They want us to spend money and for what? For no message, no organization, no forward thinking,” the donor said. “The thing that’s clear to a lot of us is that the party never really learned its lesson in 2016. They worked off the same playbook and the same ineffective strategies and to what end?”

Much of the consternation among the donor community stems from the unprecedented 2024 election cycle, where many felt misled by the party and former President Biden’s reelection campaign. Until the Democratic debate in June, donors and fundraisers were led to believe that Biden could once again defeat Trump, even as many had serious reservations about it.

When Biden badly botched the debate, inflaming fears about his age, donors felt like the campaign continued to hoodwink them, despite outwardly expressing their concerns to aides.

And even when former Vice President Kamala Harris took the reins as the Democratic nominee, donors say, they poured gobs of money into what was ultimately a campaign that ran an outdated strategy.

Then Harris lost. And morale among Democrats has been in the gutter ever since.

“This is worse than 2016,” the first Democratic donor said. “Our party is so weak and so diminished.”

Democratic strategist Steve Schale, who served as the director of the pro-Biden super PAC ‘Unite the Country,’ attributed some of the donor reluctance to fatigue, which he said happens after every election.

But, Schale acknowledged, “There is genuine frustration.”

“I’ve talked to a number of donors who just don’t have a lot of confidence after 2024 and want to see how people are thinking about issues differently,” he said.

While he said donors are taking calls, they are “asking harder questions which I think is a good thing.”

“Frankly a lot of donors I’ve talked to don’t think their voice mattered in 2024, so I’ve been doing more listening than talking,” Schale added.

Douglas Wilson, a North Carolina-based political consultant who has worked on fundraising for Democratic races, said donors have been “semi on the fence” over whether to contribute again so freely. Because Democrats are out of power, there’s little that they can do but fight from a disadvantaged position. And some donors, Wilson said, don’t feel like Democratic leaders on Capitol Hill are “fighting back hard enough” for larger-scale reforms.

“This is having a trickle down effect,” Wilson said. “Grassroots donors want to see more fight and less text message requests asking for contributions.”

Another veteran campaign strategist who works closely with the Democratic National Committee said there’s a general uncertainty about the direction the party is going to go in order to start winning.

High-level donors are less likely, the strategist said, to give when they’re not sure what the plan is. Some have said that they don’t believe Democrats can win against Trump-style candidates, so they’re sitting things out for now.

“Folks are saying right now ‘what’s the Democratic Party to me as an investment?’ I’m hearing from [DNC] members, they don’t really believe where we’re at right now. They don’t believe that we can counter Trump, so why lose dollars?” said the strategist.

Others have suggested that Democrats need to rely less on big donors and more on small donations in order to have credibility with the constituents they’re trying to win over. The working class coalition many say they need to court has shown a distaste for corporate spending, and even some moderates have suggested that the small dollar model popularized by Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) could be the best path forward next cycle.

“If corporations and big donors are now rejecting the party, where else can they go for money if they’re not doing it the Bernie Sanders way?,” the strategist said.

Schale predicted the future of fundraising will look different from how it has in the past few cycles.

He said it’s “not so much that there is a moment when the spigot turns on for the DNC or a chosen super PAC.

“I believe we will see more groups raising smaller numbers, as donors look to invest in different things,” Schale said. “I think this is healthy, as we learned in 2020 when a ton of groups were at the table.”

Democratic strategist Jamal Simmons said donors will also gravitate back to the fold organically, when they see Trump increasingly hostile to progressive values. But for now, Simmons said, the donors are still grappling with the aftermath of an emotional and tumultuous campaign.

“For a lot of Democrats, it’s like we had a heartbreak and one way to deal with heartbreak is to curl up on your couch and eat ice cream,” he said. “But one way that will help them get over the heartbreak is how infuriating the new guy is.

And as the 2026 cycle inches closer, Simmons said he expects donors to rally again.

“Democrats like to be inspired so having more inspirational candidates will make that easier,” he said.
 
great to see it, tim apple. thank you for bringing your fruit money back here to invest.

weren't people saying just a month ago that tariffs would drive every corporation out of america, with no exceptions? i'm beginning to think that these people might not be economists.

doesn't this achieve the opposite of their stated goal? their plan has been, visibly and openly since the inauguration; donald trump is a nazi, we must impeach him and restore democracy to the country the way we restored democracy to the democrat primaries. how are they supposed to be confident about midterms next year when the campaign for midterms should be starting a month ago?
 
doesn't this achieve the opposite of their stated goal? their plan has been, visibly and openly since the inauguration; donald trump is a nazi, we must impeach him and restore democracy to the country the way we restored democracy to the democrat primaries. how are they supposed to be confident about midterms next year when the campaign for midterms should be starting a month ago?
Dems are just imploding so hard that their platform is “we have to waste money and trans the kids,” so it’s hopeless. Not giving them money means “try something else, retards”
 
It must really depend on the area and the local processing centers and drivers. I’ve never had an issue with FedEx, and I use them about once a week between work and hobbies. They’re the only carrier who will ship live snakes, and they’ve taken great care with the animals I’ve bought from out of state while in transit.
Apparently the big problem with FedEx is theft; I don't think they're trying to steal your snakes.
 
Easier to read with the default font. Someone suggested doing it when bolding text and I think it does help. Am I wrong?

Nah. Don't let some faggot shame you for putting in effort. "Trying and giving a damn is cringe" is the most retarded thing zoomers have come up with.

It's far easier to tell apart than a full paragraph of randomly interspersed bolding and no formatting, and I like it. Just don't overdo it in one post.
All of you gooners need to stop using fag dark mode. Dark text, light background or GTFO zoomer. What's next, you need to have the thread pop up the text for you as its narrated like the toddler education TV that raised you?

(fun fact the yellow text turns to just black/bold in the correct Light style)

For real though the zoomers see the colored text and thats ALL they can read, as they are trained from kids tv shows where they learned to read. The people complaining are probably watching tv with the closed captioning for the dopamine rush of recognizing words as they are spoken.
 
weren't people saying just a month ago that tariffs would drive every corporation out of america, with no exceptions? i'm beginning to think that these people might not be economists.
1740406712985.png
For people who are not good with math, that's $1.6 trillion worth of investments. And we're barely over a month in.
O.K.

They're still an anti-consumer company that makes shit products that forces people to buy the next model for "upgrade" reasons. Gonna take more than "APPLE = TEAM USA YAY!" to convince me they've really changed.

also lol at "TEN CENTS".
1740407114357.png
 
Back