- Joined
- Apr 17, 2023
The Netherlands is LGBT central. Literally the gayest and most-gay affirming country I've ever visited. If he's not happy there, then nothing will ever be enough.
Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.
- Thread starter Real Mayun
- Start date
-
🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Dolly Brooks
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2024
Yeah, I don’t agree with her calling herself a detransitioner just because she was on birth control. It’s too much of a stretch. However, she’s also really good at describing this horrifying “gender-affirming” care to normies. I swear she almost made Peter Boghossian puke during that interview.
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2021
They will eat, and continue to do so, even as the hunger beckons at their own body and spirit.
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2021
Oh this one, the Tranny L's, and the Tranny Legislation threads have been fucking glorious since Jan 20. The Troons are realizing they have passed beyond the FA phase and are firmly in the FO Zone.
Their reactions have been fun to watch as their Cults power is dismantled and all the astroturfed "support" they thought they had has turned out to be an illusion, as even the MSM that used to push their madness has stayed mostly silent.
People tried to warn them this would happen and everytime they just doubled down and demanded society open wide for their girldicks.
Now we have someone in the White House that doesn't gargle Tranny dick between eating ice cream and sleeping it's all coming apart for them and it's fucking great to watch them scream into the void and double down, which only peaks people all the more.
Ave Imperator.
Finally some fucking sense.
- Joined
- Mar 20, 2024
Seize the day, or the pendulum will swing right back even farther in 20 years, and before you know it the only thing conservatives will be conserving are tranny rights while liberals push pedo rights.
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2022
It's another episode of 'troons need to sexualise everything all the time': ESO players wishing each other 'gg', or 'good game' in chat. AGP needs to jump in and remind everyone that 'gg' stands for 'Good Girl'. Vomit.
I am so troon fatigued it is unreal.
I am so troon fatigued it is unreal.
- Joined
- Mar 20, 2024
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2013
Hopefully to be used on themselves one day.
- Joined
- May 7, 2021
Stumbled across a vtuber tranny that has set up a website and YouTube channel solely to preach the virtues of North Korean Juche and the eternal wisdom of Kim Il Sung.
studyjuche.com
Edit: PIPPA NOOO
studyjuche.com
Edit: PIPPA NOOO
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jun 4, 2015
This is like an advanced and somehow even more fucked up version of the islamification troons.
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2017
Real Juche has never been tried!
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2022
You can bet too, that when they're not fapping over their "da booba" in the bathrooms (JFC) they're snooping on citizens. Probably looking for skin walking or stalking candidates and to dox terfs.
- Joined
- Jul 6, 2022
Hate to derail, but I have to ask the opinion of you good folx.
That essay I put up on Substack has gotten a little traction (not a flex, seriously) to where I've engaged with those who've commented. One of whom was an individual who claims to be a male feminist (first red flag). He came off as cordial, a bit pretentious (gave me Redditor vibes) but we otherwise had a positive introductory encounter.
He also stated that he was a gender abolitionist. Never heard of the term before then, so I had to educate myself. For the uninitiated, they are a contingency within the radical feminist sphere that call for the complete elimination of gender roles and gender based norms. It seems to be mostly supported by lesbians (those who I feel have no stake in men whatsoever) as a way to dismantle some of the more regressive elements of gender norms for women.
Notwithstanding the proponents, I can get with this to an extent. However, as I discovered with my chat with Harvey Ansari, this is past normalizing the notion that it's okay boys cry, can be dressmakers, and like the color pink, but to where they can present full RuPaul and that's okay.
I said in so many words that the concept (at least for men) was a slippery slope fallacy, and this concession is what got us here today. Mind you, he mostly agreed with the thrust of my essay (i.e., Troons are a step too far), but he kept asserting his position and implying (one too many times for my tolerance) that I was too low IQ to even understand.
That's about where the conversation diverged, where I eventually called him a cuttlefish, and peaced out of the conversation.
My question to you is: Had you ever heard of gender abolition before, and if so, do I have it all wrong? What is your take on gender roles? Should there be status quo? Some? None?
That essay I put up on Substack has gotten a little traction (not a flex, seriously) to where I've engaged with those who've commented. One of whom was an individual who claims to be a male feminist (first red flag). He came off as cordial, a bit pretentious (gave me Redditor vibes) but we otherwise had a positive introductory encounter.
He also stated that he was a gender abolitionist. Never heard of the term before then, so I had to educate myself. For the uninitiated, they are a contingency within the radical feminist sphere that call for the complete elimination of gender roles and gender based norms. It seems to be mostly supported by lesbians (those who I feel have no stake in men whatsoever) as a way to dismantle some of the more regressive elements of gender norms for women.
Notwithstanding the proponents, I can get with this to an extent. However, as I discovered with my chat with Harvey Ansari, this is past normalizing the notion that it's okay boys cry, can be dressmakers, and like the color pink, but to where they can present full RuPaul and that's okay.
I said in so many words that the concept (at least for men) was a slippery slope fallacy, and this concession is what got us here today. Mind you, he mostly agreed with the thrust of my essay (i.e., Troons are a step too far), but he kept asserting his position and implying (one too many times for my tolerance) that I was too low IQ to even understand.
That's about where the conversation diverged, where I eventually called him a cuttlefish, and peaced out of the conversation.
My question to you is: Had you ever heard of gender abolition before, and if so, do I have it all wrong? What is your take on gender roles? Should there be status quo? Some? None?
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2017
It sounds like a new way to destroy society because some feminists aren't happy with how it's going this time around. One hundred years of feminism coalescing into a movement to put men above women will never not be funny from a pure irony standpoint. I guess that's what happens when you adopt the musings of post modern communist retards instead of concentrating on shit that matters.
I'm sure it will go better next time. Just leave it to the academics, activists, and NGOs.
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2021
It's just a facet of Ideological Subversion, just renamed with a pretty "hip" sounding name to distract from its intent.
All this bullshit is just about subverting and destabilizing traditional values and morals and demoralizing the people who hold them.
They're not even worth engaging with imo, they're so contaminated by ideology they are incapable of accepting any facts that contradict the worldview they have been indoctrinated into believing.
Useful idiots.
- Joined
- Sep 23, 2018
Yes, it was fairly common concept at least in the early 2000s, where people actively seeked to REMOVE any labels, instead of the current year fad of labeling every single sub-sub-sub-subgroup. Nowadays they are at best tolerated within the alphabet "community" and at worst lumped in with the TERFs because for the troons, terfs and abolitionists have the same effect, denying them their labels.
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2023
Gender as separate from sex isn't real, so no, you cannot abolish it.
- Joined
- Oct 29, 2020
It's something I associate with the early 2000's like @Kiislova said. It's not something I've encountered much now. Most gender crit's tend to be of the opinion that men and women are different and that instead of shoehorning them into stereotypes like the troons it's OK to not be the manliest man or the most feminine woman but that we are inherently different and there's a reason we evolved the stereotypes as we did.
- Joined
- Jul 27, 2020
A lot of gender abolition ideology is based upon the idea that the concept of gender should be ignored in lieu of focusing exclusively on sex, i.e. sex-based oppression. I've basically only ever heard it used by feminists who think the only definition of woman should be adult, human female.
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2025
I don't get it, why can't a boy go "full rupaul" if he wants to? What does that even mean? (Not a rhetorical question, please explain) As long as nobody cuts his dick off an claims to be a woman? Sounds fine. I thought this very kind of freedom is what we fought the nazis and commies over, no? Gender abolition is of course bullshit, because women and men aren't the same, there NEED to be different rules when it comes to both - I for example don't think that a man has any right to pester an ob-gyn about his imaginary vagina like just happened in france, where they suspended a doc for refusing service to a tranny. But I am really struggling to find reasons besides providing private female spaces, with no male access and such things - the whole dress=sex thing IS really retarded, I do think that's bull shit - rupaul isn't my vibe but I have no problem with guys running around as gaudy as many a 50 something karen is allowed to on her job. Gender abolitionism sounds almost based, but I've grown weary of anything gender and absolutist sounding.
Last edited: