- Joined
- Feb 5, 2016
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This whole debacle is absurd. Milo was careless in a few comments, and the left is after him like ravenous dogs. He'll survive this.
The problem with Milo's argument is that anyone around the gay community knows that while "boys" in gay lingo means over-18 young men it also tends to mean anyone in the club with a fake ID that's horny. I don't think he was saying we need to screw 13 year olds but he both made it way too vague and he's being disingenuous about how frequently age is overlooked in the gay community. I'm very curious to see if Trump sticks by him because Trump is outspoken about being loyal to those who are loyal to him. I'd guess this would be too much for him to tolerate politically but it's been a weird election.
Is it accurate to say that he was basically trollshielding in regards to the pedo stuff then?
Unlike social justice circles, conservatives and trolls don't circle wagons around pedopiles.The old adage is that, in politics, you're screwed if they find you with a dead woman or a live boy.
I think Milo was right on the edge, and it was working for him- he was able to play the aggrieved free speech advocate. But he should have known better than to play his hand this way. Having your speeches cancelled because you're anti-SJW gives you credit from one side; but few want to defend someone who got their book cancelled because he sounds like he's dabbling in Nambla stuff.
On the one hand I sorta feel bad for Milo since he's kinda a funny guy and pissed a lot of people off but on the other I'm glad he's gone since dumb liberals can't make the argument that conservatives are okay with pedophilia. Though they will probably try to spin it that way.
Even though it's pretty much impossible to know what Milo actually believes in, when he repeats talking points that are literally used by NAMBLA he should not be acting surprised that a shit-tsunami crashes down on him.This whole debacle is absurd. Milo was careless in a few comments, and the left is after him like ravenous dogs. He'll survive this.
Argumenting that a child (I think Milo used "13-year-old") and an adult can have a consensual sexual relationship is, as far as I'm concerned, reprehensible at best - if not outright dangerous. When you're just beginning to mature and your brain is not even close to being fully developed, there is no way you can fuly grasp what is actually happening. Teens having sex with teens? That happens every day and is a normal part of sexual exploration, but a teen getting it on with a 40-something man?https://nambla.org/faq.html said:Q: Do you believe it’s possible for a boy and a man to have a close, even sexual relationship, without any harm?
A: Yes it’s possible, and it happens every day. Many studies have confirmed that the large majority of sexual contacts between boys and older partners are both consensual and harmless. See below for a listing of some of these published, peer-reviewed studies.
Gavin McInnes caused a protest by antifa in NYC. Even produced a video of a screeching banshee professor of the university there being outraged that the NYPD was arresting antifa and not McInnes... or something?Is there anyone else who causes campus chimpouts like Milo?