Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[USAroXX]

Junkie on social media these days is just like GROUNDHOGs DAY movie, he relives the same lying claims over n over, like he is making the claim anew, each time.

 

[Melty Butter]

It continues.
Keanu and Geno! You've been warned!

Archive
Is it just me or does it sound like he's coping and worried?

 

[ddlloo]

It continues.
Keanu and Geno! You've been warned!
View attachment 7035538
Archive
Is it just me or does it sound like he's coping and worried?

Oh there's cope alright. I don't think he's worried though, I think he's in damage control.

 

[Strix454]

It continues.
Keanu and Geno! You've been warned!
View attachment 7035538
Is it just me or does it sound like he's coping and worried?

Well

- Nick first claims that because the criminal witnesses are friendly with the defendant, that somehow the 6th Amendment and the right to confrontation of witnesses in criminal trials does not apply in this particular case. That hearsay can be presented at trial in the absence of the witnesses because they get along with Aaron. Probably not.

- Nick next cites 804(b)(6) and seems to be indirectly (improperly causing a witness to not appear) saying seemingly that Aaron intends to engage in witness tampering in the case which is a crime.

Its worth reviewing 804(b)(6) from the minnesota state site: LINK To Minnesota Rule 804

The text is: "Forfeiture by wrongdoing. A statement offered against a party who wrongfully caused or acquiesced in wrongfully causing the declarant's unavailability as a witness and did so intending that result."

The thing about "wrongdoing" is that it itself has to be proved in court. I think you would have to convict Aaron of Witness tampering (or at least get a finding to that effect) in order to invoke the rule and have Geno's hearsay statements can be brought into the revenge porn case.

 

[Gobermental Supervisor]

It continues.
Keanu and Geno! You've been warned!
View attachment 7035538
Archive
Is it just me or does it sound like he's coping and worried?

First he tried to make Aaron accept a plea deal, because he promised his wife and the gullible retard witnesses that it will never go to trial.
Now he is trying to threaten the state witnesses into showing up.

Two time, back to back, Lolcow of the Year winner Nick Rekieta!

[EDIT] Below part to avoid double post.

The text is: "Forfeiture by wrongdoing. A statement offered against a party who wrongfully caused or acquiesced in wrongfully causing the declarant's unavailability as a witness and did so intending that result."

The thing about "wrongdoing" is that it itself has to be proved in court. I think you would have to convict Aaron of Witness tampering (or at least get a finding to that effect) in order to invoke the rule and have Geno's hearsay statements brought into the revenge porn case.

This also requires a lot more than just some retard on the internet saying "wouldn't it be great if these people who are scheduled to testify against me would not show up??".

Unless Aaron paid them or told them "do not show up OR ELSE!", Nick can go shove a Balldo up his ass and spin. As productive as the bullshit he is writing. His understanding of the law remains unique.

 

[200MB]

I guess the case against Aaron isn't going too well
Link/Archive
View attachment 7034109

I guess in Nick's mind it's better to be known as a wife swapping, child drugging, wet brained faggot than it is to be forgotten.

When is his next court thing again? I thought it was this month.

 

[AnOminous]

I dunno how much Nick abandoned Vic, but he was really resentful of the fact Vic didn't come on his show aside from that one time (was it twice?) and, after the arrest, Vic announced that he was cutting all contact with Nick.

The only silver lining about that whole situation is that is I'm fairly certain the money he got from "helping" Vic is all gone now. Snorted up his nose, and swallowed up by legal fees.

That's an example. Nick completely lost his shit and flipped out when Vic wasn't completely on team and didn't want to appear on his at that point already-failing show.

Remember when he threw a total tantrum at Vic?

This thread, including me, cut him some completely undeserved slack.

Vic, however, was entirely correct to keep this worthless, useless, drug addicted, child abusing lunatic at a distance. We all know that now.

 

[AncientPhosphur]

It continues.
Keanu and Geno! You've been warned!
View attachment 7035538
Archive
Is it just me or does it sound like he's coping and worried?

Oh man is this the Frank’s hearing all over again?

 

[Captain Manning]

It continues.
Keanu and Geno! You've been warned!
View attachment 7035538
Archive
Is it just me or does it sound like he's coping and worried?

What he's referring to is this section of FRE (the Minnesota rule is identical):

https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rule_804

But if Geno and Keanu no-show, I would assume the burden of proving it's because of Aaron would be on the party invoking the rule. They'd have to prove Aaron was engaging in witness tampering, and that tampering caused Geno and Keanu to be unavailable.

EDIT: Strix beat me to it!

When is his next court thing again? I thought it was this month.

Sentencing is April 18th.

 

[Zbk3VmLfujjzjxBd43tL]

Heartbroken is a strange way of putting it. By the accounts we have, he was pissed.

This is what Nick does. He gets it in his head that he provided you some profound help you will never be able to repay, and if you don't remain loyal to him no matter what, he loses his shit.

I.e. Nick is a friendless loser cuck who has to buy friendship. Sad!

 

[Watching Rekieta]

Vic, however, was entirely correct to keep this worthless, useless, drug addicted, child abusing lunatic at a distance.

And Vic knows firsthand of how shitty of a magic-word speaking non-lawyer skelly Nick is. Franks idiocy followed by nonsensical interpretation of the rules of criminal procedure. IANAL but I'm better at it than Nick. Is the Minnesota Bar that easy to pass? Can I take it without a degree from the lowest rated law school in the country?

What's going to be funny is watching Nick jump up during Aaron's trial making motions like the prosecutor. It will be redeux of his family court.

Defense attorney: "Mr. Bisconte, are you able to testify that the nude picture sent to you by the defendant was Kayla Rekieta?"
Bisconte: "I've never seen Kayla naked so no, I cannot say that picture is her."
Nick from the gallery: "Objection!! Move to strike! Everyone knows that's my whore wife. To make sure there is no doubt about who that is, I have printed signed copies for everyone here including personal notes added for the judge, jury, and prosecutor. But no pictures for Aaron because he'll share them. These pictures are only for you."

Later after the dismissal w/ prejudice, the prosecutor asks Nick why he objected and try to hand out photos, Nick responds that it was because the prosecutor wasn't objecting and the prosecutor's lack of objections was why Aaron was acquitted.

Later, it's revealed that 5,000 copies of the photo Aaron sent to Geno will be signed and sent out as the 5k locals gift.

 

[AltisticRight]

No Nick, cocaine and fucking your BPD slampig came first.

It's like a cop ordering at Denny's, what comes first, the fries or the burger?

 

[Captain Manning]

Oh man is this the Frank’s hearing all over again?

For the moment, no, because even though Aaron's case is super weird, Nick isn't the State, and I will presume the Stern's Co. attorney is still smarter than Nick. Nick's argument isn't necessarily the State's.

Also, this is a premature discussion in general because there's no actual indication Geanu intends to ignore a subpoena. For whatever it's worth, Keanu told Ralph if they are subpoenaed, they will comply.

I think this is just Nick flinging shit at Aaron by saying that if Geanu doesn't show it must be because Aaron threatened to make Geno sleep with the fishes. It's completely baseless.

 

[The Internet Dick]

Keanu and Geno! You've been warned!

Knowing in some detail Rekieta's brief and dismal history as a failed strip mall attorney, it's hard to take his lawyerly moments seriously. My legal background consists of sporadically watching Law & Order re-runs and I'd trust me over him as counsel in a legal dispute. At least I wouldn't be high.

 

[Watching Rekieta]

But if Geno and Keanu no-show, I would assume the burden of proving it's because of Aaron would be on the party invoking the rule. They'd have to prove Aaron was engaging in witness tampering, and that tampering caused Geno and Keanu to be unavailable.

Isn't this all a moot exercise? Don't all these rules concern prior sworn statements such as testimony in other trials rather than the random shit said on the internet? I thought the whole purpose of these were for witnesses testifying in, say, a civil case where testifying benefits them but not showing up in a criminal case where it doesn't. Even getting sworn testimony provided during a civil jury trial admitted as evidence in a criminal trial w/o cross examination of the witness would be hurdle. Nick wants his retarded audience to believe statements on a podcast will make it though.

I don't think Geno bleating on the internet is a "prior statement" for the purposes of the rule. Remember, Nick is not a lawyer.

 

[Melty Butter]

An hour-ish ago:



First of all, gross. Nick sounds like he's into Geno being excited by looking at Kayla. (I don't recall that, btw. I remember him laughing.)

Second, a ridiculous threat of a civil suit against Geno.

Context:


There are so many tweets that it's worth some bulk archiving. I'll try to do it in the AM.

 

[Mr. Manchester]

Vic, however, was entirely correct to keep this worthless, useless, drug addicted, child abusing lunatic at a distance. We all know that now.

Vic seemed like a genuinely nice person who probably did see Nick as a friend at some point, for a guy like that to cut off somebody completely shows how big of an asshole Nick truly is.

An hour-ish ago:

View attachment 7036134

First of all, gross. Nick sounds like he's into Geno being excited by looking at Kayla. (I don't recall that, btw. I remember him laughing.)

Second, a ridiculous threat of a civil suit against Geno.

Context:
View attachment 7036147

There are so many tweets that it's worth some bulk archiving. I'll try to do it in the AM.

I continue to be a layman and I can tell that Nick is just talking out of his ass. Go ahead Nick, start some lolsuit while you're currently in the middle of losing yours to Monty. Paying for two lolsuits at the same time shouldn't be so bad, he's got a whole other house he can sell to cover it. Worked out for Maddox after all.

When's the next update on Monty's case anyway?

 

[Father Balldo]

When Nick said "I have worked the most cases in the county of anyone" or whatever I'm pretty sure he was talking about people on the internet talking about the case, not that he is the hardest working lawyer in the county. And he's not incorrect.

I hate Nick and yes he's a liar and a narcissist, but I think many people read things in specifically a-loggy ways when the truth is much more mundane.

 

[Hamburger Detractor]

It's like a cop ordering at Denny's, what comes first, the fries or the burger?

How about if you picked up April at a Denny's, would she be a Grand Slampig? (I couldn't find anything close to a chip so pretend it's a spicy nacho dorito)

 

[Captain Manning]

Isn't this all a moot exercise? Don't all these rules concern prior sworn statements such as testimony in other trials rather than the random shit said on the internet?

What's going on here is this:

- Nick is talking about a hypothetical situation where Geanu doesn't show. Whereupon the State might still try get the statements they gave to police and/prosecutors (I dunno if they're sworn or unsworn), that attest that Aaron sent Geno a nudie of Kayla, into evidence anyways.

- Aaron's attorney would (rightfully) challenge that on Sixth Amendment grounds. Aaron has a Constitutional right to confront witnesses against him. In this case, Geanu.

- Nick claims the State could try to get around the confrontation clause by invoking Rule 804(b)(6), but what he doesn't really mention is that would require a showing that Geanu are unavailable to testify because of a wrongful act on Aaron's part. Nick merely supposes that if Geanu doesn't show, it must be Aaron's fault. Because, of course, everything is Aaron's fault much in the same way that nothing is ever Nick's fault.

It's a hypothetical built on top of another hypothetical. Geanu hasn't yet refused to show, or failed to show, and logically Aaron can't be responsible for something that hasn't even happened yet.

He's bloviating. He needs to log off and feed his kids (not coke) and make sure they have clean clothes.