US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
AFAIK Mexico doesn’t have an official language, but they have a list of like 80 recognized languages and most of them are Injun shit nobody knows how to speak.
What are you talking about? Everyone speaks Tzhitcluatzltizcian. No but seriously those languages give fucking Polish a run for it's money in pure retardation levels. Sounds like a broken microwave.
 
Kash is the only one in this free of taint. This shit happened before he was in office, and only now actually involves him. I am leery of the jeet too but this one has nothing to do with him until now.
This is what blows my mind about the doomers: the FBI did all this sketchy shit before Kash took over and now he's getting the blame for it instead of Christopher Wray, Paul Abbate, or Brian Driscoll.
 
How selling out the future? Stuff is cyclical there. Winter, summer then construction are the three seasons there and like I said it does get paid back. It's better to have a weird cycle like that than be destitute like other states.
Governments- local or otherwise- with very few exceptions like building malls or zoning new areas aren’t like businesses in which you can raise capital to expand or improve and get a positive ROI. Governments are there to manage, provide essential services, upkeep infrastructure and occasionally give grants to promising enterprises or charitable causes. The money they spend almost never leads to increased tax revenue from increased economic activity, especially in this case where you have dilapidated but functional roads going from 99% utility to 100%.
This means that governments have a mostly fixed income year over year, and supposedly have the task of making it go as far as possible. Raising debt eats into that money in the future far more than just delaying slightly and having the money on hand to do it would cause things to worsen. Any debt would not be raised without interest, and interest is only worth it with a good ROI, which isn’t the government’s job.
Left to fester, you end up with, for example in the federal government, a $38T national debt and more spent on debt servicing than is spent on the military. (It’s slightly different with them as they can just print more, but printing causes even more problems.)
Voting gibs into existence now is a failing prospect. Excepting specific economic development plans.
 
Last edited:
This is what blows my mind about the doomers: the FBI did all this sketchy shit before Kash took over and now he's getting the blame for it instead of Christopher Wray, Paul Abbate, or Brian Driscoll.
That's part of why they did it. For the leftists, doomers, and retards to enjoy a lil slop and finally have a tiny W they could wave around. Their ops aren't working anymore and people can't be as easily influenced now
 
That's part of why they did it. For the leftists, doomers, and retards to enjoy a lil slop and finally have a tiny W they could wave around. Their ops aren't working anymore and people can't be as easily influenced now
Reminds me of all the anti-Indian shit that people were posting around the time of the H1-B controversy. It's all whisper campaign bullshit to try and hurt Trump.
 
Being critical does not equal being a doomer. You don't want to bury your head in the sand and pretend everything is always fine like the idiotic Democrats.

I don't feel like Pam's fuck up is the end of the world. I do think it was a terrible look and a blow to Trump's momentum, not to mention a blow to the people's trust. This should be rightfully called out and they should fear upsetting their voter base.
 
Agree with this because if we want less or no abortion, single mothers are it if whoever they breed with isn’t willing to step up to the table.

You can’t put the genie back in the bottle, you can either abort it or support it being as least fucked up mentally and socially as possible.
Fuck no. I'm perfectly fine with banning abortion and banning support for single mothers that aren't veterans or widows. Unless your husband is actually dead, you do not deserve any societal support. Spreading your legs for Tyroneus Maximus and taking his creampies does not fucking entitle you to my God damn tax dollars. It is not my fucking responsibility of to put a roof over Aiden's fucking head and it shouldn't be societies responsibility. Have a little fucking accountability and stop letting losers nut in you. Stop fucking men who have no interest in sticking around beyond getting you to spread your legs. It's not that difficult to tell the difference between a man who loves and will support you, than a man who just wants to smash and dash.

If you want a middle ground, here it is. No more gibs for single moms. Instead, we fuck Chad in his wallet even harder. 65% of all his income until the child turns 18. If you try to go out for milk? You get to work a remote job from prison and you're locked up for all 18 years. That's how you fix society. Force women to choose men who want to stay with them long term and further incentivize men to not want to leave. If you combine this with attacking dating apps and the aspects of our culture who encourage and promote promiscuity, we can fix this.

This is fucking retarded if you want to limit or even ban abortion. You’re giving the left talking points. If there is one class of people that should be taken care of its mothers. We’ve had the left beaming anti-natalist propaganda into people’s heads for decades.
I'm perfectly fine with support for mothers. For married mothers with husbands/partners. I think we should give tax credits to families. AND ONLY TO FAMILIES. Stop fucking rewarding single mothers. When we have literal songs being written that refers to being knocked up as "making money moves", we've gone too far. Believe it or not, you can have both. You can limit abortion and ban gibs for single moms and still fix our birth rate. People are choosing short term fixes and hook ups because there's no incentive to stay in long term relationships. If we make long term relationships more secure and make consequences for hook ups harsher, then we can solve our problems. It's not that fucking difficult.
 
Being critical does not equal being a doomer. You don't want to bury your head in the sand and pretend everything is always fine like the idiotic Democrats.

I don't feel like Pam's fuck up is the end of the world. I do think it was a terrible look and a blow to Trump's momentum, not to mention a blow to the people's trust. This should be rightfully called out and they should fear upsetting their voter base.
There's nothing wrong with calling out missteps but that's a lot different than harping on this and trying to turn the first L of the presidency into a historic blunder.
 
Being critical does not equal being a doomer. You don't want to bury your head in the sand and pretend everything is always fine like the idiotic Democrats.

I don't feel like Pam's fuck up is the end of the world. I do think it was a terrible look and a blow to Trump's momentum, not to mention a blow to the people's trust. This should be rightfully called out and they should fear upsetting their voter base.
I get vibes are important because conservatives are addicted to losing, but some people here can’t really fathom that Trump isn’t the TND savior they want him to be and that he can fuck up.

You make fun of how Democrats went from “Biden is as sharp as ever” to “umm it’s ackshually good that Biden is old and clueless and he’s a hero” yet youll twist yourselves to defend the Andrew Tate shit because it’s owning the libs.
 
Unless your husband is actually dead, you do not deserve any societal support.
This mindset isn't relevant anymore. Concepts like this and child support come from an era where women were incapable of supporting themselves. Not only is that era gone, but we're in the reverse with women making up the majority of students in higher education. They're crushing men in the highest paying, non-trade jobs and have been for a few years. They even get preferential treatment for shit like police and fire fighting which were traditionally places where any man with a strong back could find gainful employment.

Let's stop pretending women are helpless and need to be cut a check from daddy every month. Independent woman who don't need no man, or helpless princess that need saving. Pick one. You can't have both.
 
I'd argue that his wins actually don't matter past this point now that the GOP has completely tanked its own reputation within a single day. The next several elections are most likely going to be blue waves.
We're autistic politspergs. Just because we're freaking out about the list does not mean Joe Public gives a shit or that it will change everyone's mind about nigger trannies being faggots.
 
Back