What conspiracy theories do you believe in? - Put your tinfoil hats on

Well Tucker Carlsons father was CIA. Joe Rogan was "former" CIA. Some believe Tate is Mossad/CIA. A former colleague of Shapiro said he's virtually Mossad. Pretty much anyone you see with any decent platform on TV or the internet is probably an agent or proxy of one intelligence agency or another. Remember what happened to Beanie Man, he started getting big so Daily Wire courted him. Same with Peterson.
i absolutely believe Tate is a plant

a random third worlder "suddenly" got rich and succesful through supposed smart work on his part, yet isn't smart enough not to chat shit right after he was magically handed all this success? and embodies all the traits of confident masculinity that our culture wants to vilify and destroy to such an absurd degree that he comes off as a cartoon caricature, making hating him as easy for the public as eating chips, no thoughts requires. you were supposed to hate him
he was absolutely propped up as someone's pet idiot and potentially a distraction from other world events at the time, he was a nobody and didn't earn his success which is why he made all the rookie mistakes that any random hood nigger makes when suddenly handed cash and fame, blows it on frivolous things, acts big and mighty, and commits crimes without being intelligent enough to hide them and do so elegantly
 
i absolutely believe Tate is a plant
Same. I vividly remember coming across one of his faggoty fucking videos, on youtube, long before he was ever talked about. And even back then it was clear the guy was some flavor of spook. The fact that he just randomly got dropped in the middle of everyone's radar one day out of the blue just confirmed it.
 
I know I've brought it up in the past, but I really do feel it is worth repeating:

Be very careful with how much of this topic you decide to become aware of, friends. If one is of decent moral standing, then the pedo/ritual abuse stuff is some of the most difficult knowledge one can know in this life. Extremely challenging to integrate without ending up deeply disturbed and emotionally scarred. You can walk away from a horror movie scared, but knowing it was just a movie. This is, however..very real.

Please use your discretion. Much love, friends.
Exactly. No one really wants to know how bad it is. So they'll do nothing. And things will continue on as they always have.
120tb.jpg
GkznlHmWAAIAW7A.jpgGkzufWHaoAU27Ci.jpg
GksjJwZWMAAd8zv.jpgGkzk2Y8WoAALIB-.jpg
 
@I'm a Silly

I just want to say you have a beautiful mind.
By which I mean you should take your schizo meds.
Schizos?
In the conspiracy theory thread?
No way.
Go back to sleep [and if you're jewish, please have nightmares].
pizza | gate | debunker
image_2025-02-27_144143070.png
and here's a literal psyop by the Trump Administration w/r/t the Epstein list
image_2025-02-27_144940370.pngimage_2025-02-27_150741102.png

Same. I vividly remember coming across one of his faggoty fucking videos, on youtube, long before he was ever talked about. And even back then it was clear the guy was some flavor of spook. The fact that he just randomly got dropped in the middle of everyone's radar one day out of the blue just confirmed it.
And who promoted him?
tucker m&m.pngg.g.g..png
 
  • Informative
Reactions: PhoBingas
Go back to sleep [and if you're jewish, please have nightmares].
pizza | gate | debunker
View attachment 7034763
and here's a literal psyop by the Trump Administration w/r/t the Epstein list
View attachment 7034788View attachment 7034863


And who promoted him?
View attachment 7034740View attachment 7034754
Listen bro, just because you may be right doesn’t give you license to disregard pleasant formatting.
Who, what, where, when, why; if you answer those questions succinctly people will go “damn, nigga has a point”, but when you just link random shit with no quotes or explanation people go “retard” and move on.
 
Go back to sleep
Go back to 4chan if you can't add anything to the images that you post. Do you have no thoughts of your own?

Also your images have so many inaccuracies. Slade Sohmer is charged with child porn, not "raping multiple toddlers and babies".

The man wanted for questioning in the mccann case by the Portuguese police was wanted for questioning, not "for the abduction of madelien mccann". Considering the timing of the Podesta e-mails in the leak suggests a trip at exactly that time, so it is a very fishy link, and one of them may well have something to do with that. This is further made more likely in that the Mccann parents hired a washington DC PI firm to investigate, which seems an unlikely choice for an event that befell 2 people from the UK on a trip in Portugal. Also the sketches are 2 sketches of 1 man, not 2 sketches of 2 men.

Some people may not have noticed, but there was an incredibly increase in catching pedophiles and child porn places after Trump got in power. He was also one of the few that was willing to help law enforcement against Epstein, and also banned him from mar a lago. If anything the whole Epstein - Trump thing seems like a psyop to try and take down trump, maybe by blackrock like they tried with shooters, but it doesn't really work because there simply has been no evidence apart from very old pictures of them standing or laughing next to each other.

His shit taste seems to be porn stars and bimbo's instead. I'm open if you have any evidence, but I shouldn't ask because all you have shared so far is shitty disinfo pics and the more reliable ones I've seen you post are almost a decade old, so I've seen them before.
 
Last edited:
His shit taste seems to be porn stars and bimbo's instead. I'm open if you have any evidence, but I shouldn't ask because all you have shared so far is shitty disinfo pics and the more reliable ones I've seen you post are almost a decade old, so I've seen them before.
You don't get to the top without being compromised. They have something on him. Maybe even his own daughter.

“I’ve known Jeff [Epstein] for 15 years. Terrific guy,” Trump told New York magazine in 2002. “He’s a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side.”
tldskfh1.jpg38600559_1813712005384101_7295497917899472896_n.jpg
 
I know I posted something similar by this guy when Trump was shot at the first time. That was more of a conversation topic at the time, this is a fully edited video:
 
You don't get to the top without being compromised. They have something on him. Maybe even his own daughter.

“I’ve known Jeff [Epstein] for 15 years. Terrific guy,” Trump told New York magazine in 2002. “He’s a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side.”
As I said, I'm open if you have any evidence.

I'm not doing a blanket defence of Trump here. If you think that, read my posts in the Trump thread. I get the speculation, that's what this thread is for, but the link is weak if you consider that later Trump banned him from mar a lago and was one of the few that helped law enforcement against epstein.

Those are facts that you have to contend with. It would be like if james alefantis had helped catch a pedo at his pizza place. If you continue the conspiracy theory, you have to account for those facts in your theory.
 
Sometimes reading this thread makes me a bit thankful for having a government that, while evil, is too corrupt/incompetent/apathetic to have its own intrusive federal agencies with their tentacles reaching far and wide, "deep states" closely intertwined with foreign governments and individuals so wealthy AND influential they run depraved and insane schemes from the shadows, designed to demolish everything kind and holy that remains in their respective country.
 
As I said, I'm open if you have any evidence.
I'm not using evidence, I'm using logical deduction. Someone said it better than me:
They "released" the files, but it's either all stuff that had been out in the public before or heavily redacted.

Access to the files was given to Jews or shabbos goys who got invited to the White House in a pathetic media circus. There's allegedly more documents, pages numbering in the thousands, in the FBI office in NY, but instead of raiding it and arresting everyone they gave a stern warning to the FBI they had time until 08:00 today to do something about it - likely giving them enough time to destroy the most damning evidence.

It's blatantly obvious that the actual documents clearly prove it was a Mossad operation, and they're desperately trying to hide this.
Gk1V781XwAAr0lN.jpg
Gk1fTfjWkAAZY6r.jpg
Gk1PoVoXsAAaUQG.jpg

Do you think Zion-Don could've been involved with Mossad?
 
Do you think Zion-Don could've been involved with Mossad?
Of course. Why not?

I consider it very likely that the whole epstein thing was a mossad blackmail operation, as there are multiple reasons to consider both epstein and maxwell as working with mossad, from witness testimony, to family ties and so on.

But is Trump tied to the lolita blackmail stuff? The evidence seems to be mote against this. He can be involved with Mossad without being involved with that part. He can be uninvolved with Mossad.

I'm not using evidence,
You should.

--

There's also evidence of Trump being more of a pawn. Take something like 9/11. Part of that was also a mossad operation. Yet Trump's statements in the past seem to be a countersignal to the narrative that was sold about 9/11 (without going into conspiracy territory on his part, I'm referring to his criticism of what was done with ground zero afterwards).

Of course that is also a long time ago and relationships and involvement may have changed.
 
Once upon a time on some forum I'd never heard of ("GLP" ?), there was a thread where an alleged "black sheep in wolf's clothing" of the Rothschild bloodline attempted to..educate..people through a loose Q&A thread which lasted until it apparently got removed. There was no notice given for the removal and supposedly it was never talked about again.
I recall reading this ages ago when it was still publicly available. Thread title was "I am a Rofschild, Axe me a question" [sic]. He said a lot of things, not all of which I remember. But I can give a quick rundown of a few things I do recall, in case anyone doesn't want to download it right away.

1) Relatively early in the discussion, someone asked a question about colonizing planets in space. His only response was a cryptic "That implies there are such a thing as 'other' planets!"

2) Someone asked about "lizard people" or "reptilians" or similar, and he got slightly defensive and asked not to use that term but IIRC didn't outright deny their existence or elaborate much.

3) A topic that he kept bringing up over and over, was the significance of bloodlines. He believed that genetics and ancestry were destiny, not just physically but also in some undefined spiritual way. He said something about how inbreeding wasn't a big deal because "it can cause bad genes to express themselves, but the good genes are not lost and can also be expressed".

4) Related to the previous point, he also claimed that reincarnation was real, and that you are essentially the reincarnation of your ancestor(s) and will be reincarnated as one of your descendant(s). (don't recall if he meant specific persons or the general meaning of inheriting genes). And he also said that was the real reason why elites were so careful about who they married, as they wanted to be reborn in the same bloodline in the future and still have wealth and status. His belief in the importance of bloodlines was something he repeated frequently throughout the questioning.

5) He talked a bit about the origins of Earth/humans, said that we were created by "non-humans" who no longer own the place but still have an interest in events on Earth. He also said that our creators were possibly expected to return in the near-ish future and try to retake control, and he simply said if that were to happen it would be "very interesting". He did seem to imply his family was not on their side and would not go down without a fight, but as usual he was brief and did not elaborate.

The above was all written off my own memory, apologies for any inaccuracies, and there certainly are many other topics mentioned- these are just the ones I happened to remember from a few years back.

Edited to not be a wall of text.
 
Last edited:
Related to the previous point, he also claimed that reincarnation was real, and that you are essentially the reincarnation of your ancestor(s) and will be reincarnated as one of your descendant(s).
I've heard this one from other wealthy people, too. Possible religious belief born from a fear of losing all they have on death?
 
2) Someone asked about "lizard people" or "reptilians" or similar, and he got slightly defensive and asked not to use that term but IIRC didn't outright deny their existence or elaborate much.
He mentioned it a few times, but trying to point out its not the simple "lizard is hiding in a human vision/skin/magic suit". People with strong and pure bloodlines are part the body and the soul, the soul being a legacy entity that lives on through the blood. People with disordered and chaotic bloodlines are just the body, as they have no real soul anymore as its been ruined. He mentioned a lot about how the soul and blood are not the same, but very closely tied together. Also was very interested in other cultures and their understanding of this, like how Indians (feather) had totem poles, which are genetic history markers before they likely understood exactly what that is. But they knew it was important without having to know the science and shit behind it. All powerful families across the world are very interested in bloodlines, and its for the very reason he laid out.

Most of it was kinda saying you are what you are born into, and all you can do is lightly guide it to a better place, or destroy it. So if you are a poor "chaotic bloodline", you can really not do much about that. But you can try to raise up your genetic stock and impart the importance onto your children of keeping it going forward. Kinda known to everyone anyway, its not that far fetched.

He honestly didn't say that much that was crazy other than a few little bits that were interesting. He said none of the powerful people in his own family, or the others that he knew took any drugs, and alcohol ONLY if it was ceremonial and in very small amounts. No smoking either. He said food was a big issue, they avoided anything impure, and avoided animal for the most part. Seemed to point out that what you eat you take on when its an animal, and thats a bad thing for some reason. Very health conscious, to an extreme many would say.

It was an interesting read to say the least, if anyone is interested in it they should spend a bit of time reading it all. Maybe its just some very good larper, or perhaps a non-mainline member of one of the most powerful families having a bit of fun with the proles. Either way, its kinda interesting.
 
Appreciate you taking the time to read it and clarify some things. As I said it was several years since I read it and maybe didn't remember all of it accurately.

The whole genetics/bloodline subject is a rabbithole that deserves its own post, which I might do here in the future. All I'll say for now is that if the elites put so much emphasis on it in their own belief system, there is probably a reason. And I don't think it's an accident that the same elites push the "blank-slate" belief in modern society, they are likely trying to intellectually kneecap the proles for their own benefit.

He honestly didn't say that much that was crazy other than a few little bits that were interesting. He said none of the powerful people in his own family, or the others that he knew took any drugs, and alcohol ONLY if it was ceremonial and in very small amounts. No smoking either. He said food was a big issue, they avoided anything impure, and avoided animal for the most part. Seemed to point out that what you eat you take on when its an animal, and thats a bad thing for some reason.
No drugs makes sense, most of them tend to harm you one way or another, and even the "consciousness-expanding" ones like psychedelics that have a good reputation among certain spiritual circles, always seemed to me, a replication of states that can be achieved with sufficient fasting, mediation, and prayer. To use an analogy, reading the answers to a math problem might seem easier but it causes you to be reliant on the answer book instead of actually understanding how the equation works. To me, psychedelics always seemed like the equivalent of "reading the math answer book", might be useful for checking something occasionally, but jumping straight to the answers without doing the work is not real learning, and causes one to miss important principles.

Limiting alcohol also makes sense. You will hear people say their lives improved when they started going to the gym, or joined a religion, or a social group, or whatever, but nobody ever says "my life got better when I started drinking". Also weird to me that alcohol is one of the only drugs that is not only accepted but encouraged in modern culture.

Absorbing the traits of meat you eat is a thought I have heard before and am open to, but don't have a strong opinion on.
It was an interesting read to say the least, if anyone is interested in it they should spend a bit of time reading it all. Maybe its just some very good larper, or perhaps a non-mainline member of one of the most powerful families having a bit of fun with the proles. Either way, its kinda interesting.
If it's a larp, it's a very good one. This might seem odd, but I do hold good larps to have some value, as to be a good larper you have to thoroughly understand both the subject and the type of person you are impersonating. At a certain point that does make the larper a decent source of info, assuming he is not trying to be misleading.

But yes, the vibe I got was that he was a lesser member of a powerful family talking to proles for fun. For some reason I got the sense he was on the younger side, maybe even a teenager.
 
Seemed to point out that what you eat you take on when its an animal, and thats a bad thing for some reason.
Ah, another fun conspiracy topic!

Without going down the rather polarizing topic of diet and what the True and Honest™ path would be? I would simply point out that your forum name has part of the answer to that. To anyone who would like to do some further research, I would suggest finding places where people discuss 3-7 day (longer term) fasting. Their testimonies may sometimes include..'discharging' varying amounts of an unknown dark/black substance.

There are actual health benefits to the fasting process. The body can survive many, many days without food just fine if one builds up to it. Things relying on one to continue stuffing their face will apparently not, however..

Edit: Just to add another layer on that for funsies - remember when Ivermectin was demonized by healthcare SCIENCE!™? Guess what curious property that drug also has?
 
Last edited:
Back