US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Older appliances even encouraged repair, you were able to order replacement parts and there was repair manuals and diagrams available from the manufacturers.

I fucking DESPISE disposable culture.

This is largely a consequence of many of these appliances becoming incredibly cheap and labor more expensive. For example, I can buy a cheap electric blender for around $35 based on what's listed on Amazon. Back in the 1930s around the time the electric blender was invented, I would have to spend about $30 based on information I found about them. Of course that's $30 in 1937 dollars. Adjusting for inflation, that's $675 dollars today. Most people will pay to have a $600 appliance repaired, but a $30 appliance will be thrown out because the labor cost to fix it likely exceed the cost of replacing it. Even if a person were to repair it themselves, it would likely take longer to receive replacement parts than to buy a replacement.

One way to get rid of "disposable culture" you'd be better of requiring companies to warranty all products for at least seven years. That would ensure that no one would creating the cheap products that break after a few years, but the side effect of this is that most things would cost more. The blender I have now cost a few hundred dollars, but I'll probably have it for life because it's built from quality parts. Not everyone could afford to own a blender if they had to pay that much for it. In the past they might have owned a less expensive appliance that required manual labor to operate.

I expect that in the future we'll have high quality products that cost about the same (adjusting for inflation) as what the cheap crap costs now. However, that just means the cheap crap will be even cheaper and therefor even easier to dispose of. When I first left home I was glad to have the option to buy cheap appliances. I didn't use most of them that much and I couldn't afford something better. Once I was more established I grew tired of replacing cheap crap and started buying quality products that would last because I could afford them. I think this behavior is a consequence of economics as opposed to any changes in culture or human nature.
 
Hey Google, are protests legally allowed to be disruptive?

View attachment 7056070

Okay. So what's allowed?

View attachment 7056080

And what isn't allowed?

View attachment 7056083

>no intentional violence
Oh...

>no inciting violence; no destruction to public property
Oh no no no...

>no obstructing passageways (i.e. hallways, roads, etc.); no unreasonable noise (i.e. typical nigger screeching)
OOOOOH BOY...

View attachment 7056110

Yes! Yes, please! Mog Trump! Disruptionmaxx and skibbidi rizz Ohio whatever nigger speak you plan on doing. I swear to God, if one of these dumb motherfuckers actually does something funny and gets Floyd'd on live television, please somebody clip it.
That doesn't apply in the Capitol. People get dragged out of committee hearings all the time for protesting shit.
View attachment 7056124
There was a remarkably unflattering shot of an audience member in a hot pink suit with the 14th Amendment on the sleeve.
Is the hot pink supposed to be a protest thing? It seems like a lot of women are wearing it.
View attachment 7056134
Probably some dumb abortion shit. Honestly the notion that the 14th Amendment guarantees abortion rights is retarded. Not even Ginsburg was happy with the legal reasoning behind Roe v Wade.
 
Is the hot pink supposed to be a protest thing? It seems like a lot of women are wearing it.
Zoom in: Some groups of Democrats plan to mount more traditional protests through the use of color coordination in their wardrobe choices.
  • Pink: The Democratic Women's Caucus wants all their members to wear pink in a unified display of defiance to a president many of them despise.
  • Black: Female members of the Congressional Black Caucus have separately discussed donning black to more accurately capture the party's somber mood.
  • Blue and yellow: Ukraine Caucus co-chair Marcy Kaptur (D-Ohio) will distribute ties and scarves with the colors of Ukraine's flag to signal support for President Volodymyr Zelensky.
 
The sooner neocons like Mark Levin are no longer relevant the better. He opened tonight's show with shilling for NATO, saying it exists because smaller European countries cannot defend themselves. He also stoked fear about China with saying they're building their military and are on the move like the Axis powers from ninety years ago. Mark took shots at Republican Senators Lee and Paul for their isolationist stance, comparing them to Americans of the past who didn't want to get involved in World War 2 before Pearl Harbor happened.
 
One of the sad thing about Canada completely fucking itself over is that it will force the US to take steps to protect their northern border.

Both sides used to brag that the US/Can border was the largest unguarded border in the world but I guess those days are gone now that Canada has decided to import 50% of India to provide slave labor for the elites.

I'm old enough to remember when all you needed to go to the US from Canada was your drivers license and they'd wave you through.

Thanks Trudeau for destroy one of the closest and longest national relationships in history just because Orange Man Bad.

I hope your WEF masters reward you well Trudy for what you did to Canada.
IIRC, I think Canada forced passports in the late 2000s. Before Castro Jr. got into office. When he was still a teacher.
 
The sooner neocons like Mark Levin are no longer relevant the better. He opened tonight's show with shilling for NATO, saying it exists because smaller European countries cannot defend themselves. He also stoked fear about China with saying they're building their military and are on the move like the Axis powers from ninety years ago. Mark took shots at Republican Senators Lee and Paul for their isolationist stance, comparing them to Americans of the past who didn't want to get involved in World War 2 before Pearl Harbor happened.
Fdr knew pearl harbor would happen and used it as an excuse to go to war
 
Last edited:
BlackRock strikes deal to bring ports on both sides of Panama Canal under American control
Associated Press (archive.ph)
By Didi Tang and Alex Veiga
2025-03-04 20:44:41GMT
More on that:

Behind BlackRock Play for Panama Canal, a Direct Line to Trump
Bloomberg (archive.ph)
By Silla Brush and Dinesh Nair
2025-03-05 01:35:20GMT
Donald Trump promised on Day 1 to seize the Panama Canal.

“We’re taking it back,” the US president declared in his inaugural address.

Within weeks, Wall Street billionaire Larry Fink was on the line with the White House.

His pitch: Fink’s investment company, BlackRock Inc., was interested in buying the ports on either side of waterway, shifting them into American hands, according to people familiar with the discussion. And with that, there would be no need to have the US take the century-old canal by force.

So went days of whirlwind negotiations that now are set to deliver control of those ports to a consortium led by BlackRock, the $11.6 trillion investment giant Fink has run for almost four decades.

The deal, which will hand the seller $19 billion, reflects an extraordinary confluence of Trump’s America First vision and Wall Street’s globe-spanning quest for profit.

Trump has repeatedly expressed his desire to regain US ownership of the Panama Canal, which he has claimed, without evidence, is run by China.

Fink capitalized on that desire to secure the biggest infrastructure deal in BlackRock’s history – handing Trump a win as the president flexes over international trade, the wars in Ukraine and Gaza, NATO and more.

The deal is also a sign of Fink’s and BlackRock’s ambitions to clinch major deals in far-flung private markets and compete with the biggest alternative asset managers. In a statement

announcing the transaction Tuesday, he boasted of BlackRock’s ties to companies and governments around the world, noting: “We are increasingly the first call.”

Dozens of Ports
BlackRock said it agreed to buy the two ports in Panama and more than 40 others around the world from CK Hutchison Holdings Ltd., the sprawling conglomerate controlled by the Li family, one of Asia’s richest clans. In recent months, the Hong Kong family found itself thrust into the center of a political firestorm over who controls the crucial waterway and key ports.

For Trump, having a US investment company take over the ports would reduce China’s influence in the region, according to people familiar with the talks, who like others spoke on the condition of anonymity given the delicate diplomacy. The deal wouldn’t have come together without Trump’s support, these people said.

BlackRock is acquiring the operations with Global Infrastructure Partners, an infrastructure firm it bought last year and is headed by Adebayo Ogunlesi. Other investors include Terminal Investment Ltd., which operates ports served by the world’s largest shipping company, Mediterranean Shipping.

Fink has moved in Trump’s circles for years, and people close to the deal say his personal involvement was crucial. In recent days, Fink briefed Trump as the talks quickly unfolded. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Secretary of State Marco Rubio were also kept in the loop.

In a statement, Frank Sixt, co-managing director of CK Hutchison, said the deal resulted from a “rapid, discrete but competitive” process — and was unrelated to politics. Blackstone Inc. and KKR & Co. also considered bids, according to people with knowledge of the matter. Representatives for both firms declined to comment. The White House didn’t respond to a request for comment.

Panama will review the transaction and an audit of the Panama Ports contract will continue, according to a statement posted on Panama President Jose Raul Mulino’s account on X.

‘Purely Commercial’
Under terms disclosed Tuesday, BlackRock, GIP and Terminal Investment will acquire units that hold 80% of the Hutchison Ports group. The consortium will also acquire 90% of Panama Ports Co., which operates the two ports in Balboa and Cristobal, on either side of the Panama Canal.

“We’ll probably have ownership of the Panama Canal ones very shortly,” Fink told a financial industry conference Tuesday.

As Trump publicly complained about China’s influence over the canal, Panama’s government weighed whether to cancel its contract with CK Hutchison to operate the ports, Bloomberg reported last month.

That arose even though CK Hutchison is based in Hong Kong, a Chinese territory with its own borders, currency and legal system. Beijing has clamped down on the former British colony since 2020 when it imposed a broad national security law that paved the way for a crackdown on dissent.

Reached Wednesday morning in Asia, CK Hutchison referred to Sixt’s earlier statement. In it, he said, “I would like to stress that the transaction is purely commercial in nature and wholly unrelated to recent political news reports concerning the Panama Ports.”
 
Anyone notice which cabinet member is missing? They are the designated survivor.
Secretary of Veterans Affairs Doug Collins will be the designated survivor during President Donald Trump’s joint address to Congress, according to two White House officials, taking on a decades-old role as the official in line for the presidency who is not at the Capitol in case the unthinkable occurs.
 
Back