US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You guys are pussies no better than liberals who live in “safe space” echo chambers if the moment a troll, a doomer or a retard disagrees with you—no matter how stupid or solid their argument is—you have to pile on them and repeat your winning mantras so you don’t have a mental breakdown.

Trump is a gay nigger faggot etc etc. If you read these words here don’t try to overdose in whitepills and repeat to yourself that everything is perfect. Grow a fucking spine for once.
The problem for me is that John used to be one of us and, somewhere along the line, he decided to do this bit. I don't want to put him on Ignore because he's not truly a Badman. He used to make interesting and fun posts. His stuff about Fogbank and other secret US engineering programs was fantastic.
 
You guys are pussies no better than liberals who live in “safe space” echo chambers if the moment a troll, a doomer or a retard disagrees with you—no matter how stupid or solid their argument is—you have to pile on them and repeat your winning mantras so you don’t have a mental breakdown.

Trump is a gay nigger faggot etc etc. If you read these words here don’t try to overdose in whitepills and repeat to yourself that everything is perfect. Grow a fucking spine for once.
I think everyone is being equally retarded in this, because it's one guy who made a stupid decision by placing all his eggs into one basket vs a bunch of fags defending every action one president makes. However, there is a point to be made where you can get thread banned if you went into the other camp's "safe space". And this thread would be relentlessly boring if people DIDN'T respond to bait or arguments over not appearing as "pussies who are no better than liberals".

The most that this place is would be is an echo chamber. But not a "safe space" by any means, since this is meant to be a place of open discussion. A "safe space" would imply you couldn't interact with the thread without being heavily censored or punished. You do not get punished for making arguments, bait, or anything against the current sitting president & his administration. If you actually believe that this is somehow a safe space, then you may not understand the concept of "safe space". A bunch of autists screeching at you, and giving you le negative karma, is not the same as being censored for having dissenting opinion.
 
Last edited:
When America annexes Canada if it tries to bring it's political parties, would the liberal vote get split between the Democrats, the Liberals, the NDP, and the "Conservatives"?
 
Just ignore the judges! What are the neocons and Dems gonna do, cry?
That's a bit extreme, and very short-sighted. It's been done before, by Andrew Jackson, most famously when Indian Removal got struck down by the SCOTUS. He just said fuck it and did it anyway, since it was his job to enforce the ruling and he decided to ignore it. There's also the case where FDR attempted to increase the number of justices to make it so he could continue to implement unconstitutional legislation in the New Deal by artificially giving himself a majority. This ended in failure. The checks and balances on this country exist for good reason, the fact that the president has had power creep over the years is something that's far from a good thing. It sets a bad precedent. One of the Democrats' biggest flaws is that they wield power like they will be in power forever, and never consider it won't be used against them. Don't fall into the same pitfall.
 
Apparently there was a Dem meeting before the speech where leadership instructed fellow Dems to NOT protest the speech, don't use props, and don't make it about themselves. Had they restrained themselves the rebuttal and plea from the moderate might've actually hit. Instead the grifters got their photo op. I almost feel bad for Dem leadership.

I don't. They enabled these people for something like 20 years. They praised them, promoted them, gave them money and resources. They made their bed, now they get to lay on it.
 
As a final remark, I will mention that I usually find Robert Barnes to be a blowhard asshole, but I'll give him credit. Amy Coney Barrett was a huge mistake and I hope that she departs the Court along with the obvious Marxists. God have mercy on us all.
Again, @Schwarzwald nailed it. ACB is an AWFL in "conservative" clothing.
 
The problem for me is that John used to be one of us and, somewhere along the line, he decided to do this bit. I don't want to put him on Ignore because he's not truly a Badman. He used to make interesting and fun posts. His stuff about Fogbank and other secret US engineering programs was fantastic.
Oh I agree that John Badman is being a niggerfaggot. But I often have contrarian opinions as well and I’m dogpiled with replies as to how my “dooming” is destroying the Western civilization or some shit.

If I have a retarded negative-IQ take I prefer it if you just rate me autistic or ignore me. You can still reply to me, but I have no interest in debating gay crusaders who need to gaslight themselves that Trump can’t make any mistakes.
 
Back