State of Minnesota v. Nicholas Rekieta, Kayla Rekieta, April Imholte

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

Will Nicholas Rekieta take the plea deal offered to him?


  • Total voters
    1,268
  • Poll closed .
No doc attached. Nothing in the events gives me any idea what this is about. Maybe pre-sentencing investigation was finished, and the Judge decided something?
Screenshot 2025-02-06 043413.png
@Null could you have Mr. Hardin make a motion to have it released? Seems like it could be worthwhile
 
Nothing in the events gives me any idea what this is about. Maybe pre-sentencing investigation was finished, and the Judge decided something?
View attachment 6947346
@Null could you have Mr. Hardin make a motion to have it released? Seems like it could be worthwhile
I know this is speculative territory, but if this was a decision related to the pre-sentencing investigation, is it normal for it not to be accessible to the public? Or does it mean that the pre-sentencing investigation found a particular finding that would make it sealed?
 
Last edited:
That was my thought also. This is related to CPS findings and the safety plan that has been put in place by that agency.
OR
Perhaps it is related to Kayla's dismissal. Could there be requirements that Kayla must abide by in order for the dismissal to be enacted? Say, a treatment center, or ongoing psych care? For that matter, the treatment requirements could have been suggested or required by CPS, and the court is just acknowledging the plan of care in order to not duplicate it...
I am assuming that regardless of who this order concerns, it involves medical info of some type, thereby falls under confidential info.
 
Going over the transcript, I noticed something I found funny and weird(tm).

On stream: Safe? I don't know what safe. They haven't even told me what safe they were talking about. Was there a safe? I don't even know what safe they could mean. What's a safe?

At the bitchup: My safe. The drug safe. The safe I kept my drugs in. The safe only I could retrieve the drugs from, where I stored my drugs.

It seems like the streamer who was always honest with his audience might have been fibbing. Quelle suprise!
 
Yeah one thing that bothered me with Kayla and April getting off scott-free is... They were still drugged out of their gourds and around the kids. Presumably the CPS case got Kayla "clean", but no such luck with April.

So now either (or both) can just go back to abusing drugs without a prior?
 
View attachment 6947346
@Null could you have Mr. Hardin make a motion to have it released? Seems like it could be worthwhile
That'd likely piss off the judge. They don't tend to go round stamping shit confidental for no reason.
And though there's no particular need to stay in the judges good graces in this case ... I want Rackets punished for his kid's sake.
Yeah, I'm a prude.
 
I know this is speculative territory, but if this was a decision related to the pre-sentencing investigation, is it normal for it not to be accessible to the public? Or does it mean that the pre-sentencing investigation found a particular finding that would make it sealed?
I tend to agree with @Useful_Mistake that it is likely to be something investigatory about Nick.
Since they discussed including Nick's previous drug tests, which can be flagged as private/non-public or might even fall under HIPPA as medical files, it would make sense for a file containing that information to not be public.

I would still think they should release it, redacting the private information before doing so.
 
Nick:
View attachment 6947137
No doc attached. Nothing in the events gives me any idea what this is about. Maybe pre-sentencing investigation was finished, and the Judge decided something?
I tend to agree with @Useful_Mistake that it is likely to be something investigatory about Nick.
Since they discussed including Nick's previous drug tests, which can be flagged as private/non-public or might even fall under HIPPA as medical files, it would make sense for a file containing that information to not be public.

I would still think they should release it, redacting the private information before doing so.

A secret source told me that Nick has been found to be LEGALLY GAY AND RETARDED!
 
Putting this here for posterity. We've long been confused as to why Nick has ignored his many traffic violations along with leaked documents.

There's a Woltjer who works at the Kandyohi DMV as a clerk.

Big Disclaimer: This is a branch of the Woltjer family that seems fairly uninvolved with Kayla & Nick. They attend a different church. Brittany's online friends and likes show no evidence of Kayla or most of Kayla's relations (bio sibs, step-sibs, foster sibs, parents, etc.).

Brittany Schow nee Woltjer:
Screenshot 2025-02-15 at 1.34.51 PM.pngScreenshot 2025-02-15 at 1.37.41 PM.png
Screenshot 2025-02-15 at 1.57.15 PM.pngScreenshot 2025-02-15 at 1.57.27 PM.png

I'd be the first to say if this smelled of evidence of corruption. There's none that I can find. I do wonder what kind of access to information she may have in this small town, however.
 
I'd be the first to say if this smelled of evidence of corruption. There's none that I can find. I do wonder what kind of access to information she may have in this small town, however.
I bet it's just routine bureaucratic laziness. Shit that's supposed to happen often just doesn't. There are counties all over the country where there have been active warrants on someone for years, they know where they live, and just haven't bothered.

Maricopa County under Joe Arpaio (and probably since then) had literally thousands, some for serious crimes, despite his bullshit clown act as some tough on crime sheriff.
 
On Nick's Melton appearance, crossposting from the main thread because it got into discovery and the bodycam:

He admitted that the bullet coke was NOT in the safe based on the body cam and that there is MORE than may have been accounted for. He has also admitted that 2 ounces of coke in a bullet was out in the open for any wondering kid to find.
 
2 ounces.. in a bullet.. you mean 2 grams, right? 2 ounces would be 56 grams. It would be a mortar casing not a bullet
NICK SAID "2 ounces". I just reported it based on the YT transcript and what anyone can watch at around 1:08:00.

We're all assuming he meant 2 grams.

...We all understand misstatement, but you'd think on this matter he'd be careful
 
Last edited:
Let's assume what Nick is saying is true. There are 2+ people NOT related to the church who reported the drug use in addition to the church congregants...

Who are the other "people" (yes, plural) who reported the DRUGS that Pomplun is supposedly protecting?
I think Nick may have told on himself. The issue is that Nick combines truth and lies.

These are Nick's statements from Coomalot's stream in question:

1) "The initial stories that were in the search warrant um... People think they're from our church congregation. They're not. They use that as a cover to, like, keep the people anonymous." [Note the plural.]

2) "Many of the people who reported us, many of them, there was, like, four, they weren't from our church at all uh but they just they said that they were Church congregants to obscure their identities but their identities are revealed in all the recorded interviews so like I know who it was I know who said everything ."

Full Coomalot stream here. Timestamp: 20:18. Elissa clip of this statement is here.
Full statement (edited for readability) below for those who like the written word, these are Nick's words:
The initial stories that were in the search warrant um... People think they're from our church congregation. They're not. They use that as a cover to, like, keep the people anonymous and I'll eventually, like, talk about who all of it was but what they did was... They had no idea about drugs at all. None of them did but they saw us hanging around with Aaron and April and they got like, uh, they didn't like the idea that there was a relationship going on. They didn't know anything about it but they, like, 'oh this is inappropriate' and so then they went and they took real events that happened and then stretched the stories out and added stuff but you could tell, like, they're all nerds because they're like 'oh yeah he he uh was doing something and then got lethargic'. I'm, like, that's not cocaine at all. Like, you don't know. I live my life lethargic.

[Cecil jokes about them being "squares".]

No, many of the people who reported us, many of them, there was like four they weren't from our church at all uh but they just they said that they were Church congregants to obscure their identities but their identities are revealed in all the recorded interviews so like I know who it was I know who said everything um and it's it's all interesting because the way it gets presented to the public is different than what happened and so for a while like it was really hard to go into that church because we thought everybody there was judging us everybody there was super nice.

[Camelot jokes about it being a ruse.]

A small group of people uh from our personal lives who didn't approve of something they weren't even sure was going on they're like we have to get the children up but they had no idea about the drugs that was all a surprise. Like, wait, so what'you report us for you reported us for sinning?

{Note: I started this post yesterday but I noticed on Meme Copium stream this morning that he and @Potentially Criminal are similarly baffled, chalking it up to Nick's dumb lies. Okay, fine, but I think there's more here. Nick has a habit of mixing lies with truths, so what's the truth?}

Here's a quick refresher:

The church congregants who reported for the CPS case DID report substance abuse to Pastor Melin, who reported to Sergeant Nester, and it was then cited in Detective Pomplun's search warrant:

1741360315257.png
Link to Search Warrant
(From MNPublicRecords, we know those people - all church congregants - to be Paula Holmen, JaymeLee Wright (Kayla's sister), Chaney Bitzan (the real nanny), and a fourth who is unknown. (I think it's possibly Jessica or Caleb Hadfield or Matthew Woltjer.)
....

If Nick is to be believed, at least two OTHER people reported the drugs. He claims he will reveal who they are.

Some speculation on the plural other "people":
  • Aaron, obviously. Nick is so blinded by his hate for Aaron that he is adding more people to the list that has been reported. He thinks that making Aaron a snitch is some kind of win.
  • The rest is anyone's guess: Anonymous viewers of the 5/22 stream? His "friends" who were planning an intervention (Drex, Coomalot, Megan Fox are who I remember)? Devout enemies (list is too long to name, starting with Maddox or Keffals)? Friends turned enemies (also a long list, including Sean and Null but neither of them would do that)?
On that latter point, I would think that the cops would want specific information (versus a random viewer). This begs the question of who, besides Aaron, knew about the coke abuse?
 
Last edited:
On that latter point, I would think that the cops would want specific information (versus a random viewer). This begs the question of who, besides Aaron, knew about the coke abuse?
If the cocaine use stretches as far back as we assume, then the list could be excessively long.
Geno, Keanu come to mind who will likely have known about it, Chrissy Mayr likely also knew, since Nick supposedly tried to talked her into having sex with him. Then there are a multitude of other people Nick has hung out with over the last 2 years and likely did drugs and/or had sex with.

Anyone of those could have called the police and reported his unhinged Stream.

Then every local from the St. Cloud area who watches STMS who has some personal connection to April (who was known to be living with Nick at the time) or to Nick/Kayla and/or their children could have called Kandiyohi county police after seeing Aaron discuss the coke stream on the next day during his morning show.

The list of POSSIBLE people to have known about the drug use and have had the motivation to either harm Nick because of personal animosity OR people legitimately concerned for the wellbeing of the children in that house is VERY excessive.

I would be surprised if the total number of people who reported Nick wasn't higher than the supposed 4+2 we are now at.
Also of note is that Aaron was NOT one of the reporters, but was interviewed after they saw his stream and figured out he had personal and DIRECT knowledge of the situation, resulting in contacting him as a witness.
 
Back