Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

When will the Judge issue a ruling regarding the Motion to Dismiss?

  • This Month

    Votes: 66 14.0%
  • Next Month

    Votes: 56 11.9%
  • This Year

    Votes: 74 15.7%
  • Next Year

    Votes: 160 34.0%
  • Whenever he issues an update to the sanctions

    Votes: 115 24.4%

  • Total voters
    471
View attachment 7067180
Pacer has been struggling to give me the docs for a few minutes now. I'll post an update when I can
attached

ded.png
This is an absolute banger of a paragraph
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Hardin obviously had fun with this filing:
1741394417982.png
But it always makes me nervous when his prose begins to get florid and sarcastic. It's great entertainment for us, but I recall the judge in the Melinda case not finding things funny as the electronic record continued to grow and grow and grow (as usual it was largely the judge's own fault for refusing to act, but whatevs).
 
I believe there is also a judicial review board that can occur if a judge sees too many successful appeals due to errors of procedure?
Full Article III federal judges generally can't be removed without impeachment and don't have a mandatory retirement age, but while older judges who are still mostly competent often just take "senior status" and keep taking cases (sometimes at a reduced volume).

How they deal with it when a judge is obviously impaired is if they won't voluntarily retire, they just quit giving them cases. There usually isn't some official "senile fuck" finding.

That said, there are definitely judges who should no longer be on the bench.
 
I've now seen "complete fabrication unmoored from reality" enough times to think it must be a legal term of art.

If so, it was custom-built for this case.
How they deal with it when a judge is obviously impaired is if they won't voluntarily retire, they just quit giving them cases. There usually isn't some official "senile fuck" finding.

IIRC there's been more than one case of dottering old judges wandering the courts with a clerk basically marshaling them - no cases for years, but they still haunt the place. Sometimes discussions would wander to what happens if he's the only one around, and what weird hijynx could result.
 
Hardin does not hold back saying that Greer is a fucking liar

View attachment 7067258

View attachment 7067272
I have a pretty good vocab, but I had not run across "seriatim" before.

Full Article III federal judges generally can't be removed without impeachment and don't have a mandatory retirement age, but while older judges who are still mostly competent often just take "senior status" and keep taking cases (sometimes at a reduced volume).

How they deal with it when a judge is obviously impaired is if they won't voluntarily retire, they just quit giving them cases. There usually isn't some official "senile fuck" finding.

That said, there are definitely judges who should no longer be on the bench.
And then there was the guy who came out of retirement once a year just to force that consent degree against the Republican Party from the 60s to continue in perpetuity.
 
God I hope Greer feels compelled to respond to this. The "NO U" levels will be off the charts.
I kinda think Hardin filed this late on a Friday specifically so it could piss Greer off the whole weekend. That should give Greer plenty of time and motivation to come up with a banger by Monday.
 
Very interesting citation by Mr. Hardin, especially if the second discovery motion is granted. There is some very harsh language in that case that may be of use

Oh myyyyyyy. Justia summary of that case (from the Holy Tenth Circuit!):

Plaintiffs Markyl Lee and Promises to Keep, LLC, failed to produce documents in response to a discovery request. They then proceeded to violate two judicial orders compelling production of those documents. After “patiently affording the plaintiffs chance after chance,” the district court dismissed the case as a sanction against Plaintiffs. Plaintiffs appealed the dismissal. The Tenth Circuit held that “[o]ur justice system has a strong preference for resolving cases on their merits whenever possible, but no one. . .should count on more than three chances to make good a discovery obligation.” The Court affirmed the lower court’s dismissal of Plaintiffs’ case.

(Emphasis mine.) This might be worth a lazy weekend read indeed.
 
The world has gone to hell in a hand basket since we stopped forcing the clever kids to learn Latin in high school.
*raises hand* Three years of High school Latin reporting for duty! Put me in coach! Villa est villa Romana. Villa lacunem habet.
 
Back