Liz Fong-Jones vs. Kiwi Farms (Round 3) - "End Networked Harassment" Edition

Trans qxeens won btw, the pissbaby clittycelfarms lost.
chad-giga-chad.gif
 
I wish LFJ would do what he did to that celebration cake during his solo protest at Cloudfare AU offices during DropKiwiFarms (thrown in the trash).

Kermit needs to give it up already.
Lfj is retarded. But the personal grudge aside, figuring out a way to admonish and ruin people you disagree with is magnitudes more important than any personal beef. Once you successfully win at a trial court level, even if it's never appealed and upheld properly, you can always point to that case when arguing in the future. It would solidify LFJ as an internet fixer and every fuckmonkey with money would trod that outline for the next decade until the appeals hit Supreme Court, who aren't obligated to rule on cases when they don't want to.

Double unfortunately, a loss for LFJ at lower court doesn't disqualify him from just trying over and over till he's financially ruined.
 
It would turn out that LFJ's friends had inured $350,000 from the suicide prevention charity, as described in an IRS filing from Trans LifeLine signed under penalty of perjury by new management.[3]
Not that it matters a great deal, but Trans Lifeline's tax filing from the following year (Greta and Nina ran TLL for about two months of 2018 before they were ousted) took the officially acknowledged total they stole up over $400,000.
 
They couldn't win the first two times, what makes them believe they'll win this time?
 
Liz Fong-Jones is an ex-Google transgender ideology extremist who was a notable embarassment for Google after it was discovered he was one of several "plurals", or "multiple systems": a now-dead fad for transgenders like Liz Fong-Jones to pretend they were multiple people within a single human body which could "front" as different personalities at different times. He even wrote handbooks as a primer for his coworkers on how to treat him, such as by asking "who is fronting currently, and what are their pronouns?"[1]
I absolutely never understood this and or why it was ever tolerated. It reads like textbook mental illness, like someone that needs a nice padded cell and a nice white coat kind of crazy. Maybe some *ahem* attendants as well.
 
Back