US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm in favor of a new constitution that takes into account the most scientific and peer reviewed American worldview. With great power comes great responsibility. There are reasons Lawyers, doctors, CEOs, cops, and judges all rank high on terms of psychopathy and sociopathy. Yet only cops are deemed to need radical transparency with body cameras. NO PRIVACY FOR PSYCHOPATHS.
This is terrible cuz it's open for extreme abuse.
 
Yet only cops are deemed to need radical transparency with body cameras.
Ironically that was originally a demand by the black community because they wanted to prove all that "police brutality" they swore they were constantly being subjected to. Then body cameras became standard issue, and the very same black community is now screaming about how "racist" bodycams are ... because 99 times out of 100 they show how violent, stupid, and otherwise law-breaking (and racist) niggers really are.

It's almost as if the police don't beat people up as much as blacks claim they do.
 
>N.Y. Jews against deportation
I'd be surprised they would be against this specific deportation, if it wasn't for the fact that there's been a growing divide between the diaspora jews in the West and the Israeli jews.
Would love to see a concerted effort of people going out with signs saying "jews in support of" and coming up with the wildest and dumbest shit imaginable.
 
I tried to watch that shit and didn’t get 2 minutes in. Sam Satyr’s opening move was “I claim that Trump outlawing DEI is more about distracting us from him giving more power to corporations”, I was hoping someone would press him at all or ask him to be more expansive, but no, the first fucking retard goes up and accepts the premise of his question at face value and begins trying to argue from there. I hate these fucking videos. All it would take is one person being like ”But why? How is that true?” and it would be over.
And remember, Sam's the same person that criticizes Steven crowder for debating college students on his change my mind segments.
 
I don't know man, maybe I just need to get the paper Jew (Bachelor's Degree) just so I can *still* end up looking for a shitty job lol.
WGU my nigga.

I will also tell you, from multiple sources, the HR degree filter is back, baby. It excludes all the time wasting H1Bs. and makes managers coom their pants so it back on like its 2004. If you don't have some sort of higher degree, your resume very likely doesn't ever reach a human.
 
And remember, Sam's the same person that criticizes Steven crowder for debating college students on his change my mind segments.
The main thing you can use to prove that Sneeder is full of shit is this clip, and yes it's fucking Destiny the cocksucker but it really shows how much of an idiot Sneeder is.
 
My teacher went into explicit detail about a Nazi experiment where they put glass into jewmens dicks and then brought out a hot naked jewess to make their weniers hard which would break the glass in their dicks.

Looking back I don't think this really happened either. It's more likely my teacher was a pedophile telling us her kinks.
This is what Dean Corll did to his victims. So it’s like the Ed Gein thing where they took an example from a serial killer.
 
I know KF ain’t the best place to ask religious questions but what is the Christian way to handle this? How can good fight against such blatant and militant evil?
Destruction of something which is ontologically evil must by definition be good. Cold steel and righteous flame usually does the trick. Don't forget when you're done to burn their lairs and literature.
Maybe I'm wrong, but I had thought fascism was an Italian thing borne from Mussolini wanting a system that placed the head-of-state at the center of national interest. I'm not a particularly big politics buff. I'd like to be fact-checked on this.
Fascism is a form of government where the apparatus of the state/local governments, civil organizations, corporations, etc, are all bound together with the common goal of advancing the interests of a party (not political, but a group.) In the Italian Fascist school, all these groups were working to advance The State (Of Italy in this case), while the German/North European Fascism instead was advocating for a concept of Der Volk, the ethno-nationalist cultural group of its citizens. In either case, a strong economy through alignment of all its parts was core, either to make The State powerful and wealthy, or its ethnocultural group. Either system was also prone to authoritarianism, which is a component or character of a government system (not a system unto itself), but the Italian school especially since The State was primary and its citizens expected to sacrifice their lives and freedoms (slavery, essentially) for Italy, whereas the Northern European could be considered less so since a greater degree of individual liberty was integral to preserving the character of Der Volk.
Fascism is Italian in origin, yes and Mussolini wanted a strong government with a very powerful head of government. .....
Most people aren't interested in an actual conversation about what the ideology actually was, to them it's simply useful as an insult and little else.
I always find it tiresome, the Italians and Nordics wrote extensively on Fascism and the Volkish movement, with plenty of freely available translations of adequate quality (Many footnoted or with commentary). Most of the material isn't half as dense as modern academic dreck, and relatively easy to follow. (Even if the Italians have a bad habit of rambling.) A few hours of reading would equip even a casual layman with enough understanding to discuss the broad stroke intelligently, perhaps even dive into some of the nuanced parts.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back