Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 64 20.1%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.3%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 86 27.0%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 51 16.0%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 113 35.5%

  • Total voters
    318
Is that a reaction to this?

1741946842338.png

Nick's lying again if that makes you feel better.

Aaron has said he has 50/50 custody, which I believe is true on paper but is also an exaggeration in practicality.
What is this drunken fag trying to say?
2 weekends a month doesn't translate to 1 week a year.
I think he meant... two weekends a month, and then once a year he gets them for a whole week.
Guys, he's telling a joke... or trying to...

It went over your heads, but that's okay because it's a stupid ass joke, and some of you aren't American. I'll explain it:

He compares Aaron's parenting to that of a "reservist."

One weekend per month, and two weeks per year is your minimal service commitment if you are in the U.S. Army Reserve or National Guard (excepting actually getting called up for duty). They even use it as a sales pitch to get you to sign up.

The funny part is he reversed the weekend per month and weeks per year order. He can't even tell a lame joke right.
 
Guys, he's telling a joke... or trying to...

It went over your heads, but that's okay because it's a stupid ass joke, and some of you aren't American. I'll explain it:

He compares Aaron's parenting to that of a "reservist."

One weekend per month, and two weeks per year is your minimal service commitment if you are in the U.S. Army Reserve or National Guard (excepting actually getting called up for duty). They even use it as a sales pitch to get you to sign up.

The funny part is he reversed the weekend per month and weeks per year order. He can't even tell a lame joke right.
That joke is more convoluted than a Denny's menu.
 
Sounds like a "joke" only a homosexual skeleton who sucks lots and lots of penis could come up with.
That joke is more convoluted than a Denny's menu.
Like any joke, if you have to explain it, it's definitely not funny. And this one is also just not funny in general. I "got" it when I read it, and still didn't find it funny.

Nick is also in no position to criticize Aaron's parenting. I don't think Aaron's kids have ever been taken by CPS, nor has his daughter tested positive for coke.

Also, Aaron has partial custody because of a divorce. Divorces happen. If Kayla has any functioning braincells left, she should divorce Nick.
 
Does anyone remember the good old days when Nick and Drex would pretend to be on men's side against "Divorce Rape" and weekend custody? and how unfair it was that the mother always got the children etc. Is there a single principle or belief Nick hasn't turned his back on at this point?
Virtually no men who make that argument want or care about the kids. At best they worry women will take their money. They are also the type of men who would do the same thing that single moms do to their kids, which is to bludgeon them with guilt and sadness over their mother being a piece of shit. I get so tired of the bad faith from that side. Yes men often lose custody but on the flip side there are many, many men who abandon all responsibility for their children and leave it to the mother.

Nick would love nothing more than to only have to see his kids once a year. He probably envies Aaron.
 
Yeah, I believe they did the supervision for the full six months. In one capacity or another.

See, the thing is, Nick could prove otherwise by unsealing his case file, but I don't think he ever will. Because it probably looks like shit, and would not support any of his lies. What got out before it was sealed certainly wasn't good.

Opacity benefits Nick. Particular among the gullible. Transparency does not.
I think @Himedall All-seeing Waifu summary is most accurate on the facts.

The specifics are not worth arguing about because we'll never know until Kayla, April, one of the kids (one day), or a Woltjer/Sletta family member speaks up. (Someone will at some point, I'm sure.)

I believe that in mid-August a grandparent (probably Shari) moved in. As a registered foster parent, the State likely verified that she would be a responsible supervisor. The kids were home (per Nick) for either daytime hours or Mon-Fri and then went back to the grandparents for the weekends for church - we know the kids attended throughout the summer.

This allowed Nick and April to do their thing on weekends (many receipts on that). Pathetic when one considers the circumstances.

The kids returned full-time, relatively unsupervised by the State, starting in Nov.

I do not think that it would be an objectively good idea to release those family court documents and that they should stay private. But this absolute MONG decided to talk about it and claim to have evidence he would share, so here we are... The best thing he could do for his family is just... STOP!

To the point about a family member moving in to allow the children to live at home, I thought there was a rule against placing children to foster at the same address of removal because the potential negligent/abusive caretaker would have access? Yet another point of speculation that would not be an issue if Nick stopped running his gob.

Going by reasonable logic it would be another reason for his suicide baiting.

The dark side of my mind wonders if Nick has a new 'worst day' post 2024 compared to his Depp years...

I had always assumed he was taken care of by Ty's insurance and that's why everything was so cordial, but Vic clarifies that everything came out of the kick-fund-me or his pocket when he talks to Alex. I'm having trouble finding the clip where he talks about the lawsuit right now, its all the Nick one.

Fuck me! If you can stumble across it, please link it to me. That makes things a lot worse. I assumed Beard and his group were incompetent and underqualified, at worst, but essentially good people with the grace to take their stand at the public pillory. This would explain the hasty retreat beaten from social media. We will probably never know the details, but it does not look good at all!

Nick bringing up Vic's case when he guested n that stream a few days ago made be legitimately MATI for a minute, but it sounds like this goes a lot deeper.

I don't believe it's a Nick Rekieta joke, he mentions a deadbeat dad and didn't make even a passing reference to black people.

If it doesn't mention Stephen Hawking and how he is crippled, is it even a joke?
 
I do not think that it would be an objectively good idea to release those family court documents and that they should stay private. But this absolute MONG decided to talk about it and claim to have evidence he would share, so here we are... The best thing he could do for his family is just... STOP!
OF COURSE it would be an objectively bad idea to release any of it, but because of the stuff that already leaked, Nick is in a bad position where he had to have it sealed and adopt a "trust me, bro" position. He is a known pathological liar, and his word engenders zero confidence.

"No no no... the drug test was completely wrong, my kids were returned like like six weeks, CPS apologized and groveled, Alicia Sweep was executed, and the entire state of Minnesota applauded."
:really:

Like, get the fuck out of here with that nonsense you skeletal piece of shit. Nobody believes you. Absolute faggot.

I intend to hold this over his head forever. I'll stop just short of calling him an outright child abuser, but damn if it isn't razor close. He's a neglectful and unfit father whose children deserve better.

Nick bringing up Vic's case when he guested n that stream a few days ago made be legitimately MATI for a minute, but it sounds like this goes a lot deeper.
Mate, I was there from the very beginning. How do you think I feel?

I'm just glad Vic didn't kill himself. Everybody except his actual fans fucked him in the end.
 
I do not think that it would be an objectively good idea to release those family court documents and that they should stay private.
I think if court records of the same type are public in other cases, or accessible with redactions, then that should also apply in this case.
Anything specifically about the kids should be reasonably redacted to protect their privacy, which is absolutely the right thing to do.

But the information pertaining Nick and Kayla should absolutely be public, just so the faggot Skelly Junkie cannot keep lying.
There is a reason why court documents are generally public, and he is singlehandedly demonstrating one reason for it.
 
It's impossible to know what happened in the Rekieta household. It is an absolute certainty that it wasn't Nick's fault.
Archive/Link
2025-03-14 - 19_26_57 - Posts with replies by Rekieta Law (@RekietaLaw) _ X.png
 
It's impossible to know what happened in the Rekieta household. It is an absolute certainty that it wasn't Nick's fault.
Archive/Link
View attachment 7092219
> No one can say definitively what happened but also know what didn't happen :drink: :really:

lolwut? if "no one" apparently knows what happened, your included in that equation…Nick you fucking retard.
 
It's impossible to know what happened in the Rekieta household. It is an absolute certainty that it wasn't Nick's fault.
This impossibility is known as an information paradox, a term used in theoretical physics to describe events at the edge of, and within a black hole. A black hole such as the depths of the Balldo Bunker. Such is the gravity of the situation, the seriousness of the events alleged, it was thought that no information, not even light, could escape from the Nick’s dark energy.
 
> No one can say definitively what happened but also know what didn't happen :drink: :really:

lolwut? if "no one" apparently knows what happened, your included in that equation…Nick you fucking retard.
100% Nick knows because he either gave it to her or some dumb technicality like he told April to give it to her or something
 
It's impossible to know what happened in the Rekieta household. It is an absolute certainty that it wasn't Nick's fault.
Archive/Link
View attachment 7092219
Nick is under the very mistaken impression that continually saying "no one really knows what happened" about the things that go on under his own roof t'ain't the own he thinks it is. It just demonstrates how little he cares about his own household, if that's the excuse he uses.

Of course, he knows what happened, I'm just pissin' in the wind.
 
This impossibility is known as an information paradox, a term used in theoretical physics to describe events at the edge of, and within a black hole. A black hole such as the depths of the Balldo Bunker. Such is the gravity of the situation, the seriousness of the events alleged, it was thought that no information, not even light, could escape this darkness.
Unlike the black hole, Nick does not have a paradox. By releasing the bodycam we can see what conditions did or did not exist in the Balldobunker. Nick, being the lying liar who lies, wants everyone to believe differently.
 
Back