JamFlowMan
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2017
Not a good look to have a puppet as one of your main attractionsDabbleverse needs to rebrand soon into Diddleverse.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not a good look to have a puppet as one of your main attractionsDabbleverse needs to rebrand soon into Diddleverse.
What is this drunken fag trying to say?
2 weekends a month doesn't translate to 1 week a year.
Guys, he's telling a joke... or trying to...I think he meant... two weekends a month, and then once a year he gets them for a whole week.
Sounds like a "joke" only a homosexual skeleton who sucks lots and lots of penis could come up with.Guys, he's telling a joke... or trying to...
Have you ever heard of a little place called Denny’s?Sounds like a "joke" only a homosexual skeleton who sucks lots and lots of penis could come up with.
That joke is more convoluted than a Denny's menu.Guys, he's telling a joke... or trying to...
It went over your heads, but that's okay because it's a stupid ass joke, and some of you aren't American. I'll explain it:
He compares Aaron's parenting to that of a "reservist."
One weekend per month, and two weeks per year is your minimal service commitment if you are in the U.S. Army Reserve or National Guard (excepting actually getting called up for duty). They even use it as a sales pitch to get you to sign up.
The funny part is he reversed the weekend per month and weeks per year order. He can't even tell a lame joke right.
I don't believe it's a Nick Rekieta joke, he mentions a deadbeat dad and didn't make even a passing reference to black people.That joke is more convoluted than a Denny's menu.
Sounds like a "joke" only a homosexual skeleton who sucks lots and lots of penis could come up with.
Like any joke, if you have to explain it, it's definitely not funny. And this one is also just not funny in general. I "got" it when I read it, and still didn't find it funny.That joke is more convoluted than a Denny's menu.
Virtually no men who make that argument want or care about the kids. At best they worry women will take their money. They are also the type of men who would do the same thing that single moms do to their kids, which is to bludgeon them with guilt and sadness over their mother being a piece of shit. I get so tired of the bad faith from that side. Yes men often lose custody but on the flip side there are many, many men who abandon all responsibility for their children and leave it to the mother.Does anyone remember the good old days when Nick and Drex would pretend to be on men's side against "Divorce Rape" and weekend custody? and how unfair it was that the mother always got the children etc. Is there a single principle or belief Nick hasn't turned his back on at this point?
Yeah, I believe they did the supervision for the full six months. In one capacity or another.
See, the thing is, Nick could prove otherwise by unsealing his case file, but I don't think he ever will. Because it probably looks like shit, and would not support any of his lies. What got out before it was sealed certainly wasn't good.
Opacity benefits Nick. Particular among the gullible. Transparency does not.
I think @Himedall All-seeing Waifu summary is most accurate on the facts.
The specifics are not worth arguing about because we'll never know until Kayla, April, one of the kids (one day), or a Woltjer/Sletta family member speaks up. (Someone will at some point, I'm sure.)
I believe that in mid-August a grandparent (probably Shari) moved in. As a registered foster parent, the State likely verified that she would be a responsible supervisor. The kids were home (per Nick) for either daytime hours or Mon-Fri and then went back to the grandparents for the weekends for church - we know the kids attended throughout the summer.
This allowed Nick and April to do their thing on weekends (many receipts on that). Pathetic when one considers the circumstances.
The kids returned full-time, relatively unsupervised by the State, starting in Nov.
Going by reasonable logic it would be another reason for his suicide baiting.
I had always assumed he was taken care of by Ty's insurance and that's why everything was so cordial, but Vic clarifies that everything came out of the kick-fund-me or his pocket when he talks to Alex. I'm having trouble finding the clip where he talks about the lawsuit right now, its all the Nick one.
I don't believe it's a Nick Rekieta joke, he mentions a deadbeat dad and didn't make even a passing reference to black people.
OF COURSE it would be an objectively bad idea to release any of it, but because of the stuff that already leaked, Nick is in a bad position where he had to have it sealed and adopt a "trust me, bro" position. He is a known pathological liar, and his word engenders zero confidence.I do not think that it would be an objectively good idea to release those family court documents and that they should stay private. But this absolute MONG decided to talk about it and claim to have evidence he would share, so here we are... The best thing he could do for his family is just... STOP!
Mate, I was there from the very beginning. How do you think I feel?Nick bringing up Vic's case when he guested n that stream a few days ago made be legitimately MATI for a minute, but it sounds like this goes a lot deeper.
I think if court records of the same type are public in other cases, or accessible with redactions, then that should also apply in this case.I do not think that it would be an objectively good idea to release those family court documents and that they should stay private.
GODDAMNIT! Every day Nick finds a way to become even more unlikeable as a person.It's impossible to know what happened in the Rekieta household. It is an absolute certainty that it wasn't Nick's fault.
Archive/Link
View attachment 7092219
> No one can say definitively what happened but also know what didn't happenIt's impossible to know what happened in the Rekieta household. It is an absolute certainty that it wasn't Nick's fault.
Archive/Link
View attachment 7092219
This impossibility is known as an information paradox, a term used in theoretical physics to describe events at the edge of, and within a black hole. A black hole such as the depths of the Balldo Bunker. Such is the gravity of the situation, the seriousness of the events alleged, it was thought that no information, not even light, could escape from the Nick’s dark energy.It's impossible to know what happened in the Rekieta household. It is an absolute certainty that it wasn't Nick's fault.
100% Nick knows because he either gave it to her or some dumb technicality like he told April to give it to her or something> No one can say definitively what happened but also know what didn't happen![]()
lolwut? if "no one" apparently knows what happened, your included in that equation…Nick you fucking retard.
Nick is under the very mistaken impression that continually saying "no one really knows what happened" about the things that go on under his own roof t'ain't the own he thinks it is. It just demonstrates how little he cares about his own household, if that's the excuse he uses.It's impossible to know what happened in the Rekieta household. It is an absolute certainty that it wasn't Nick's fault.
Archive/Link
View attachment 7092219
Unlike the black hole, Nick does not have a paradox. By releasing the bodycam we can see what conditions did or did not exist in the Balldobunker. Nick, being the lying liar who lies, wants everyone to believe differently.This impossibility is known as an information paradox, a term used in theoretical physics to describe events at the edge of, and within a black hole. A black hole such as the depths of the Balldo Bunker. Such is the gravity of the situation, the seriousness of the events alleged, it was thought that no information, not even light, could escape this darkness.
Unlike the black hole, Nick does not have a paradox. By releasing the bodycam we can see what conditions did or did not exist in the Balldobunker.