Culture Young conservative women build an alternative to the manosphere - For years, conservative media was built by and for older men.

1.png
Joey Pfeifer/Semafor

The News​

On Jan. 30, the day the first episode of her new show dropped on YouTube, Brett Cooper threw a sold-out surprise live show in the basement of the Stand, a New York City comedy club near Union Square. Appearing onstage with no opener, Cooper admitted to the audience that she had never done anything like the appearance before, but was simply going to share what had been on her mind since she left the Daily Wire, Ben Shapiro’s powerhouse conservative media company.

For the next hour, Cooper kept the crowd of mostly young women’s rapt attention as she weighed in on the Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni scandal (she’s very skeptical of Lively’s complaints of misconduct), celebrated her own decision to get married young, and summarized her experience watching the American presidents interact at Jimmy Carter’s funeral earlier this year. The crowd cheered when she offered advice to an audience member looking for other gay conservative men in New York.

Cooper, 23, peppy, with a rapid-fire cadence, is one of the highest-profile faces of a new generation of creators on the right reaching out to younger women. These YouTubers and writers are often avatars for (or cheerleaders of) a “trad” lifestyle, espousing traditional gender and family values that are part nostalgia, part revolt against liberal feminist cultural views. They’re powered by social media algorithms on Instagram and TikTok, where young women are the dominant users.

This ecosystem of young conservative female voices fills space for a generation of women who are at least curious about some traditionally conservative views — but aren’t always interested in the entering the digital man cave that is the overwhelmingly male right-wing podcast space.

“For a long time there has been this conversation on the right that has been very male-centric,” Rachel Janfaza, a writer and researcher focused on emergent Gen Z political views, told Semafor. “There are a lot of values that women — young women, in particular — are espousing right now that do align with some of these more right-wing women. And I think a lot of that does stem from this nostalgia for the past, for a time period that many members of Gen Z never actually experienced themselves.”

Cooper, a former teen television actor, found her calling after her acting career ended when, at 19, she refused to take the COVID-19 vaccine. She’s garnered a massive YouTube following — 1.4 million subscribers across 10 episodes, resulting in 17 million views and counting — with videos unpacking celebrity scandals (How Blake Lively Ended Her Own Career) and arguments against progressive ideology in public schools and on college campuses (It’s Time to Abolish the Department of Education — Here’s Why).

Another major voice in the space is Alex Clark, the Turning Point USA influencer who’s dubbed her followers “cuteservatives.” She’s become a Make America Healthy Again influencer with her podcast Cultural Apothecary, where she weaves together interviews about the dangers of microplastics, hormonal birth control, nonstick pans, and anti-depressants with Bible teachings and the benefits of homeschooling. There are figures like Riley Gaines, the former NCAA athlete turned Daily Wire contributor, who hosts Outkick’s Gaines for Girls podcast, focusing on cultural issues around sports from a conservative woman’s perspective. Her relentless criticism of trans athletes on her show and others helped land her on the guest list for Trump’s speech to Congress last week.

There are older bloggers who’ve embraced the same model, like Jessica Reed Kraus, a suburban mother whose opposition to lockdowns in California during the Covid-19 pandemic supercharged her lifestyle “mommy blog,” House Inhabit, and who became a chronicler of the fashion, lifestyle, gossip, and vibes of MAHA, and later, MAGA. And there’s Evie Magazine, a digital tabloid that combines listicles like “The Cutest Spring Dresses for Every Occasion” with stories like “People Think Blake Lively’s CIA-Connected Hire Is Manipulating The TikTok Algorithm And Headlines” and “New Reports from Harvey Weinstein’s Trial Have People Questioning #MeToo All Over Again.”

For years, conservative media was built by and for older men. That’s the vein in which Fox News founder Roger Ailes reportedly directed a “leg cam” at his female hosts’ bodies. In the late 2000s, nearly 73% of radio mega-broadcaster Rush Limbaugh’s audience was male, as was much of Sean Hannity and Bill O’Reilly’s audience. A snapshot of news consumption in 2012 showed that while conservative media was largely the domain of older male audiences, women overwhelmingly made up the audiences for daytime television and networks like MSNBC.

By contrast, Cooper’s audience today is largely women. While her YouTube viewership skews male, among consumers on Spotify and Facebook, her audience is largely women: According to a spokesperson, it’s 60% female, 32% male, and 8% unspecified on Spotify, and 62% female, 38% male on Facebook.

In an interview with Semafor in February, Cooper said that although she didn’t initially care whether her audience skewed female or male when she started appearing in videos for the Daily Wire, she thought there was a space for younger voices, particularly those that espoused political viewpoints but were not “just making people angry.”

“I looked around me and I was like, ’Okay, I’m not crazy. There are no young women. And even with older women, they weren’t speaking to a younger generation,” Cooper said. Like Megyn Kelly, for example: “She’s great, she’s super powerful, her podcast has blown up. She was not on my radar when I was an 18-year-old.”

She added: “I started the show knowing that there were a lot of men out there, and they probably were older, they were in their 40s, but men had male voices to look up to,” she said. “As a woman that is more on the right, that was raised more right-leaning, I didn’t have that. And so in the back of my mind, I was always like, I could offer that to young women who were in the same position as me, who are just normal American girls who didn’t really fit in with this mainstream leftism that was becoming very, very pervasive in our pop culture and Hollywood and our schools.”

Know More​

While many new conservative creators don’t have much of a focus on the specifics of electoral politics, others are more explicitly aligned with the Republican Party.

The Conservateur, a small digital publication, was founded in 2020 by a group of former Fox News and Republican staffers. While publishes infrequently, its political views and connections within the party have resulted in impressive access to prominent conservative women. It has run interviews with Fox News host Ainsley Earhardt about her family, spoke to Cooper about her wedding, and carried pieces on Lara Trump’s workout and fitness fashion line.

Founder Jayme Franklin told Semafor that she launched the publication as a corrective to women’s magazines that have gone too far to the left.

“I grew up with fashion magazines stacked next to my bed. And I would open these magazines after Trump got elected and it was so off-putting. Not just politically — I feel like the message that they have for women, I just really disagreed with it,” Franklin said.

But like their counterparts in the “manosphere,” many of the new conservative media personalities appealing to younger women are not explicitly partisan or involved in electoral politics or wonky policy fights.

Cooper said that she didn’t grow up with conservative media, but started discovering right-leaning influencers in her later teenage years as she became increasingly alienated from classmates in LA who expressed views far to her left. While Cooper often talks about politics on her YouTube show, she is more interested in the personalities behind politics and how it impacts culture. (The most constant thread running through her show is “cultural trends,” she said.).

That mix wasn’t dissimilar to what Kraus, a new friend of Cooper’s, tends to focus on. When Semafor spoke with Kraus last year for her first profile with a major news organization, she also emphasized that although she was increasingly covering politics, she was more interested in the social scene than the nuts and bolts of policy, and if people wanted to consume that content they should read news outlets like Politico.

“I really focus more on humanizing them in a way that interests me,” Kraus told Semafor at the time. “I don’t feel like it’s my job to cover everything, and I’m not good at that. I know my limits.”

Max’s view​

Since the election, media critics have credited (or blamed) Donald Trump’s continued dominance to the newly-emergent “manosphere,” a loosely-affiliated network of podcasters, comedians, and thinkers who have found large, captive male audiences for anti-establishment content and views online. But as Joe Bernstein pointed out in The New York Times, that genre of men’s media has a long history. The “manosphere” that rocked the 2024 election may have featured some names that people over 40 hadn’t really heard of. But their freewheeling style and ideology would be familiar to the generation that made shock jocks like Don Imus and Howard Stern popular in the 90s.

As conservative talk radio and Fox emerged in the 1990s and 2000s, there were other conservative women in television and radio that understood that a large portion of their audience were women. Dr. Laura Schlessinger had a large radio audience among middle-aged women who she spoke to about political and cultural issues, while The View cast Elisabeth Hasselbeck to serve as the show’s conservative voice. There’s a long list of well-known conservative women who worked as political pundits and appeared on Fox and in political news magazines.

But none of those personalities reached younger women at the scale that this generation’s commentators do today. Both Cooper and Clark’s podcasts have put up numbers rivaling the biggest podcasts and YouTube shows in the country. Reed-Kraus, who writes for a slightly older audience, has had one of the most popular independent newsletters in the country for years.

Sitting in that basement near Union Square, I was struck by how many young womenwere there to see Cooper. This was a far cry from the male-dominated conservative media spaces I have spent time in, like the annual Conservative Political Action Conference, which always seemed to attract a lopsided number of younger male attendees. After Cooper’s appearance in New York, users on her very active Reddit page summarized the event, seeming more interested in the details of her personal family life and her views on celebrities and other conservative media personalities than her political positions.

While some of what stars like Cooper talk about is expressly partisan, some of the content also calls back to an older, more traditional kind of women’s media.

The generation of women’s blogs and publications that grew out of the 2000s, like Jezebel, Vice’s Broadly, and New York’s The Cut, among others, brought contemporary feminism to mainstream audiences and acted as a counterweight to legacy commercial magazines aimed at women.

“Traditional women’s media, from the 70s and 80s until riot grrrl, was culturally conservative whether or not we would call it that,” Stella Bugbee, the former Cut editor who now runs the Style Section at The New York Times, told Semafor. “Magazines that focused on how to get a man, how to lose weight — that’s Cosmo. What we experienced in the last 15 years, with The Cut and Jezebel and Bustle, to a certain extent were the aberrations.”

Indeed, the backlash to feminist values that these creators believe are reflected in mainstream media is part of their success. In some ways, their new-media content is a callback to the long-ago era that these legacy women’s publications left behind.

“The fact that these creators present themselves as having these heterodox views is, I think, what is really appealing to the young women who are consuming this content,” Janfaza said. “And when I hear young women tell me that they follow or subscribe or regularly watch or listen to any of these creators, the reasons why they say they do is because they like the fact that they’re pushing against the grain and giving them an alternative perspective that they’re not really seeing in mainstream media.”


Notable​

  • Cooper told Bloomberg (and us) that she sees herself more like Call Her Daddy’s Alex Cooper (no relation) than anyone in conservative media.
  • Some publications have found backing from prominent conservative public figures. Rolling Stone reported in 2023 that the founder of Evie Magazine had been linked to Peter Thiel.
  • Clark, who told the Washington Post she grew up dreaming of working at Teen Vogue, became one of the most well-known MAHA influencers last year despite her lack of a medical background and her penchant for sharing unsupported and dubious health claims. “Alex is able to create trust with young women because of this parasocial relationship,” a health expert told the Post, “even when she’s spreading absolute nonsense.”
Article Link

Archive
 
Cooper told Bloomberg (and us) that she sees herself more like Call Her Daddy’s Alex Cooper (no relation) than anyone in conservative media
Probably because they both got their start at big media companies led by one big male personality, then set out on their own and found even more success.

Journos are so dishonest.
 
"Conservative" women online are so fake and idiotic. I listened to some random YouTube video with these two women who spent and entire episode complaining about musk. When I noticed the constant kvetching, I stopped working and looked at their channel. The entire channel was random famous or semi famous dudes and how awful they are.

Just two miserable cunts, rubbing their three braincells together as hard as possible to make shitty femcel sounding content.
 
"Conservative" women online are so fake and idiotic. I listened to some random YouTube video with these two women who spent and entire episode complaining about musk. When I noticed the constant kvetching, I stopped working and looked at their channel. The entire channel was random famous or semi famous dudes and how awful they are.

Just two miserable cunts, rubbing their three braincells together as hard as possible to make shitty femcel sounding content.
It's either that or they do the fake-trad bullshit, all wearing the same floral dress that still shows their tramp tattoos.
 
Good luck. The manosphere is quite explosive nowadays because of the loneliness epidemic on the men's side of things. Its not difficult to be part of that sphere if you have the talking points right. (System favors women heavily, sexual revolution was a mistake, etc.)

Just see Racket's black friend Drexel who managed to build an audience. Or Hell, Juju the cow.

But if I had to bet, these girls aren't even gonna address that and do what women are doing with men's issues. Yell at the sky.
 
New York City
Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni scandal
watching the American presidents interact
audience member looking for other gay conservative men
Instagram and TikTok
videos unpacking celebrity scandals
her very active Reddit page
I guess it's a step in the right direction and a moving of the Overton Window so I don't want to blackpill, but the urbanite yas-kwayne gossip stuff shows how much work remains to be done.

Stella Bugbee, the former Cut editor who now runs the Style Section at The New York Times, told Semafor.
“What we experienced in the last 15 years, with The Cut and Jezebel and Bustle, to a certain extent were the aberrations.”
This Regime propagandist is lying through her teeth. Those publications embraced and pushed every Globohomo talking point, completely indistinguishable from a corporate HR department.
 
All of the studies show that liberal women are miserable and overwhelmingly have mental disabilities. You would think conservative women could focus on this data and say "see ladies, this shit is making you nuts. There is a better way.."
Or they weren't conservative to begin with. I would've expected a conservative movement to make feminism actually be about feminine qualities rather than masculine ones and to dump the equality shit.
 
Margaret Thatcher was a female conservative. Jeane Kirkpatrick was a female conservative. Dr Condi Rice is a female conservative.

Being a female on the Left is easy. Any female idiot can do it. Angela Davis, Joy Behar and Joy Reid are Leftists.

Leftists are liars, thieves, hypocrites and bullies. They don't play nice either. To be anyone opposed to these grifting scum means having the intellectual firepower to fight back.
 
I can't believe so many people are falling for it.
these girls aren't even gonna address that and do what women are doing with men's issues
You would think conservative women could focus on this data and say "see ladies, this shit is making you nuts. There is a better way.."
the urbanite yas-kwayne gossip stuff shows how much work remains to be done.
make feminism actually be about feminine qualities rather than masculine ones and to dump the equality shit.
These touch on most of the reasons this grift isn't going to meaningfully work.

One thing we know quite a lot about in 2025 is the science of marketing to women. it has been extensively studied, practised, studied again and tweaked over... well, over the entire time that advertising has existed and people have been able to make money by marketing and advertising correctly to their desired consumers.

There are some agreed findings which are generally value-neutral. By value-neutral, I mean that successful marketing to women involves absolutely nothing of deciding "what women SHOULD want" or "what men think women should want" or "what men would like women to be interested in". If you want to successfully sell anything to women, you have to put allllll that shit on the side. You cannot proselytise successfully to the female consumer.

(You actually can't proselytise to women all that well, full stop. This is the reasoning behind proselytising religions focusing on the male family head, and the oft quoted maxim about the majority of families joining a religion doing so only when the male head does so. "Lucy Harris smart smart smart, Martin Harris dumb" hits very near the knuckle.)

What we know works is to market to women aspirationally. Women do not want to be blackpilled or lectured, we know that kills mainstream women's publications stone dead. Women respond to aspirational content. The really big mommy blogs of the 2000s boom were all aspirational.

The marketing truths hold, no matter how you feel about this and there is no point sperging about it because this is just how the fuck it is and those who disagree go out of business, that women aspire to be three and a half things in life. They want to be rich, beautiful and popular. The order of importance depends on the woman and to some degree to her age and stage in life. The half thing is that a large subsection of women want to be funny or clever or a combination of both.

All the big content producers - mainstream women's publications, TV aimed at women, even the big internet blogs and channels aimed at women - show aspirational content based on these three and a half things, mixed up to varying degrees.

See:
- mommy blogging explosion of the 2000s. Dooce made millions from being the popular girl who was "funny and relatable" and also quickly being aspirationally rich. Rockstar Diaries (later Love Taza) was beautiful and also rich. The huge mommy blogs sell aspiration. The houses are beautiful, the kids importantly are beautiful (see the entire Ruby Franke saga and the pimping of Chad), the women themselves are either beautiful or very much improved in that direction. These people live rich lives full of lovely things that look cool and effortless and everyone loves them. They are fucking popular. This is what hooked their audiences in. This is why when a mommy blogger fucked up and got cancelled, and was no longer popular, her audience deserted her in droves. Women do not subscribe to the Geek Social Fallacies and they do not associate with unpopular losers.
- Alexandra Shulman's disastrous pilot of British Vogue into socially aware fashion and commentary. No one but no one has ever bought Vogue to learn a single fucking thing about the plight of Bangladeshi slave garment workers, Lagerfeld being a racist, or the hospitalisation of anorexic models and John Casablancas basically running a rape gang out of Elite. Women buy Vogue to look at improbably beautiful women being improbably thin and wearing improbably but absolutely aspirationally rich clothing and accessories. Women are not buying that to look at the stuff and read about how it's all made of blood diamonds and dead small Thai factory kids. We know and we don't care. We can see the models are starving themselves to death. We know and we don't care.
Kate and Kristin and KitKat, all things I like looking at
In comparison Anna Wintour ran American Vogue with not a single fuck to give about The Message and it was the greatest fashion magazine in the world. Anna Wintour well understand women are opening Vogue to engage in aspirational fantasy. In aspirational fantasy we have half a mil to drop on a necklace and everything fits because we are size 00. No poors and no fatties here.
- "Fourth wave" and late third wave 'internet feminism' became big-ish and got book deals by cashing in hard on the subsector of women who wanted to be clever and funny by the most successful writers giving off that impression and strongly pushing that people who were clever and funny were in Their Gang. The big blogs had regular offline meetups, the commentariat were mostly regulars across the big blogs and had near daily interactions with each other, strong deliberate efforts were made to build community. Not just for the commentariat so that they could feel part of things and popular, but also amongst the big-name bloggers there was very clear manoeuvering for social position and clout. The important thing was to appear popular and that people who hung with you online were also popular. This was why the repeated cancelling of Amanda Marcotte piloted her career into a ditch; it was infra dig to take Amanda's side and therefore she was dumped. Women do not associate with unpopular losers.

Now, back to these niggerettes above. The first problem is immediately apparent; these lassies are howlers. It does not matter a fuck how clever and funny a woman appears to other women as soon as she is unmasked as ugly AF. Jill Marcotte was never a better writer than Kate Harding, but crucially she was thin and beautiful in some measure and Kate was Kate. The same problem is applied to the conserva lassies. They are not beautiful.

No one watched Ballerina Farm to actually watch Hannah's dreams and sanity die in real time. Nor did they watch for homemaking tips. The watched because Hannah and her children are aspirationally beautiful. If they wanted actual cooking advice, there are many excellent youtube channels made by other homesteaders, all of whom work like dogs on good content and all of whom have 10k subs max because these lassies are plain and kinda fat. No woman aspires to be plain and fat and working like a dog making her own bread. The sweetener for that shitpill that makes it aspirational is you will also be a beautiful ex ballerina with very expensive cooking equipment because your captor-husband is rich AF and his daddy owned an airline. If your nigel installs air conditioners suddenly this looks a lot more BS and your audience isn't everywoman, but other skint housewives. They don't tend to attract brand deals for their influencers because they have no fucking money to spend.

None of the conservas look rich, either. They could do a lot if they grab a man who has maybe a milly to put down on a house and another 250, 500k to do it up with the finest and most tasteful remodelling and consumer goods. Women will tolerate a certain amount of natural ugliness in someone they admire if their aesthetic choices are otherwise immaculate. Wintour has looked since she was comparatively young like she sucks wasps, and Donatella... looks like Donatella. The only chance these lassies have of success is to start looking rich and fast.

As for popular, they can attract a measure of that as long as being a pickme conserva carries some sort of clout or aura of being in A Gang but A Dangerous Cool Naughty Gang. As soon as being young female and batting for the Republicans isn't viewed as countercultural by their audience, they will be dumped on their arse. They must maintain their countercultural status to remain popular. You can see the ex editor of The Cut successfully put her finger on that in the article. When riot grrrl aesthetic went full mainstream around 2008, 2010, it stopped being popular and no one was interested any more. The problem for these lassies is that the window of this biz being counter cultural may close on them quickly before they've cashed in and made plenty moolah.

Clever and funny are blown from the off. Women who identify as clever or funny or want to be are not wanting any content that is full of manosphere bantz about how women are stupid, shouldn't go to college, only need to stay in the home, have forced men out of jobs, blah blah. That chat about hoes down bros up is fine for manosphere content because that's marketed to men. You can't market STFU MAKE ME TENDIES to women. There's fuck all aspirational about that. That is not the stuff of romantasy.

In conclusion of this essay, this 'movement' isn't going to take off in terms of 'omg gosh my book deal muh brand partnerships' because no one is buying what these lassies have to sell. Pandering to what a male audience might want won't work, because men do not want to be talked to by women. They do not want lifestyle content from women. They do not want political opinions from women. They are not influenced by women. Men are motivated by the approval of other men. This has been extensively studied and is not in dispute and only a retard who wants to go out of business tomorrow is going to try and have women sell men their opinions about anything. The only thing they will buy from women is bobs and vagene and none of these girls are doing OnlyFans on the side, which might actually be their best shot at making money off their internet presence.

A grift doesn't work unless someone along the line is going to open a wallet. That's the blackpill for these lassies. But again, there is always OnlyFans.
 
That's just Ben Shapiro in a wig and you can't convince me otherwise. I can't believe so many people are falling for it.
Tell me one woman the lot of you like who is normal. You gals complain all day about how men are bad and pickmes are bad but then you turn around and endorse literal psychotics. Id be very surprised if you can name one woman who is liked and normal.
 
Back