Goonclown Steven Bonnell II / Destiny / Destiny.gg - Emotionally Unstable Manchild, Creeps on Teenagers, Incest Supporter, Degenerate Foot Sniffer, Cum Felcher, Gooner

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
ATTENTION
Special rules for the Destiny thread.
  • Don't engage footsoldiers. Whiteknights do not need 100 responses to every bait post; exercise restraint. Do not give attention to people who join and bomb the thread with negative reactions.
  • Practice harm reduction. Read our prudent poster's guide.
  • Don't write open letters to Destiny. It is very annoying attention seeking behavior. Just write normal posts.
TL;DR:

Deny.
Deny.
Deny

Here's the PDF as images.

17-1.png

Rest of the document:
17-2.png 17-3.png 17-4.png 17-5.png 17-6.png 17-7.png 17-8.png 17-9.png 17-10.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
What's funny about the "Hasan is a drama slop streamer because he brings up my personal life and I talk about his politics" criticism is that you could apply that exact same logic with Destiny/Ethan's relationship with Bad Empanada and it would be just as valid.

Almost all of Bad Empanada's content (whether you agree with it or not) is focused primarily on the points at hand and the "politics" of the people he's covering. Despite this, Destiny when talking about Empanada, only brings up his personal drama (which amounts to potentially in the past having had doxed people - something Destiny has a habit recently of doing).

There's also the obvious point that Destiny does bring up drama involving Hasan/others when it's convenient, or at least blurs the line of what is "Political" or not (Hasan's house, H3H3 vs Hasan, Finkelstein's court documents, etc)
 
Guilty
View attachment 7091352

(Sorry, couldn't figure out how to get the recording on here, but here ya go! The recording of the hookup where he is recording outside of the dudes apartment, no communication or request for consent)
Not true. This is confirmation evidence of him recording those that do not consent.

You can hear him walking up the steps to the apartment, the guy is talking with him the entire time and at no point does tiny ever actually mention that he's recording.

We do not need the man to come forward to provide further proof that 1. he records without consent and 2. he sends this to others.

It's fine if you want to say what you want, but if anyone can provide this for the case against him, say Chaeiry or Pxie, it is gathered evidence that he is doing this on a large scale, not just two or 4 women, but ANYONE he is having sexual meetings with.
Steven truly needs help. He’s suffering from severe anxiety, agoraphobia, and more. He’s lonely. I don’t share this because I hate him, on the contrary, I care about him deeply and he doesn’t believe he’s done any of this. But he has. He’s refused the world and wants to be seen.

I see you. Now Steven it’s time for you to admit what you’ve done. Face judgment. I’ll stand with you if you choose to be redeemable.
That audio was posted long ago.

Woman, aren't you like 30+ and with kids to take care off? Why are you still in this thread swooning over this sexpest, if you want to let him know that you can save him and will be there for him, then write him emails. We don't need to read your fantasy of somehow fixing his psychopathy while you have kids that need to be taken care of in the other room.
 
Oh look Destiny is going to blame KF again. Also you tend to put your strongest argument last, which means they think this is their strongest argument.
1741987175135.png

This is interesting. This hints that someone knows they are going to lose, or very least Destiny's legal team is covering all their bases in case of a loss.

I could imagine a scenario where Destiny wants a certain kind of filing(blames the Kiwifarms) but his lawyers don't think that is a good idea so they sneak these in. But I have absolutely NO evidence and that is entirely speculation.
1741987282623.png
1741987504554.png

This is probably the most interesting one if it is actually true Destiny shared it beforehand. That being said even if it is the case that he shared it before this law went into effect, I still think it could apply but I'll have to see.
1741987761032.png


I might go through the answer in more detail later and see if any of the things he has chosen to deny is interesting.
 
It will take an arrest to stop him from lying. He lies all the time, even about the most petty things. Remember when he couldn't find Israel on a map? That wasn't nearly as bad as when he later lied about it, pretending that the orientation of the map was so distinct that only a cartographer could identify it. Never mind that the orientation was literally the fucking same:
Trying to get Destiny to admit that he's ever gotten anything wrong is like pulling teeth. I genuinely can't remember a single time he's freely admitted to being wrong, he always needs to preface every mistake with a billion excuses for why this or that was unfair in how it was presented or how he basically got everything 99% correct but he missed out a tiny insignificant detail and everyone is just nitpicking him for no reason.

Most peple are bad at reading maps, just take the L, it's genuinely not a big deal. But he can't do it, he can't admit that he's simply bad with maps, it has to be the fault of the map and the gropyers and so on and so on.
 
Attached.

TL;DR:

Deny.
Deny.
Defendant lacks knowledge or information sufficient to admit or deny the allegation in this corresponding paragraph of the Complaint and on that basis denies the allegations.
Deny.

Continues to assert Pxie gave consent.
View attachment 7092705

Really getting his money's worth
WAIT WAIT WAIT
He is saying here that Pxie GAVE CONSENT.
But the other day he said it was only "implied consent", so which one is it?
 
this Pxie lie seems to have somewhat successfully spread. This is a comment chain from the h3h3 subreddit
I've been noticing on livestreamfails when diddygers argue about this case this is immediately where they go, while at the same time saying shit like "stop exaggerating, this isn't that big of a deal, he didn't publish anything, he only sent the videos to one person, pxie is just as bad." It's funny how these disgusting freaks think they are so morally and intellectually superior to everyone else.
 
Regarding Pxie, this is Destiny’s biggest risk. If the case does not get thrown out on these grounds it will likely lead to a settlement.

Everything else is salvageable reputation wise.
I want to agree and it is the smart thing to do.

However has Destiny made smart well considered decisions recently?

I think Destiny might fight this lawsuit until the bitter end
 
"stop exaggerating, this isn't that big of a deal, he didn't publish anything, he only sent the videos to one person, pxie is just as bad."
I always found this one funny because where is the line exactly? Is it ok if I don't "publish" it but instead send it "privately" to 1000 people? 100? 50? 20? At what point does it start being a real problem and you start being responsible for one of those people "leaking it" out to the world?
It really shouldn't matter how many people he sent it to, once it its out of the hands of "authorized" people its over and anything can happen.
 
He actually waited right until the end to respond to it :story: he's such a piece of shit. People were quick to point out he didn't use the term "implied consent" in his manifesto, but it's good to know that this is actually his legal defence:
1741990800719.png
"Didn't you see what she was wearing? That implies consent!"
1741991039537.png
"She was asking for it bro"
this Pxie lie seems to have somewhat successfully spread. This is a comment chain from the h3h3 subreddit
The amount of people who have 0 idea what's actually happened is insane. So many people, including retards making Youtube videos about this, get basic shit wrong. A lot of people are still covering for him. There must be women who know he shared videos of them without their consent and have chosen to stay silent. I don't expect all of them to go down the legal/police route, but quietly unfollowing him, saying nothing, and hoping it all blows over while he continues attacking his victims is pretty cowardly, imo.

I would like to highlight, again, that the actual schizo retard shitting up the thread and has been banned from KF twice was DMing Destiny in January.
1741991187342.png
It is extremely clear that this person is mentally unwell, but Destiny was DMing her in January 2025. Vyvanse fixed him though guys!

Again, revisiting older things again now we have more info:
1741991735156.png
We don't know what this is, right? It could be the grindr audio I guess but I'm not sure.
 
I think this one is particularly amusing because the line of attack will be: she didn't give explicit consent and "let" me think it was implied.

But then you end up in the quandary that sets explicit consent as the standard of behavior.

He'll also go with the bit in his manifesto where he says Pxie is making her videos more public by suing him ergo she must not be that embarrassed ergo she's doing this to herself. He was going to let her keep her GiveSendGo money, it was a sweet deal!
 
We don't know what this is, right? It could be the grindr audio I guess but I'm not sure.
StrangerMe said they messaged with someone who had DMs from Destiny admitting that he recorded audio without consent. BabyPeach also made this claim in her leaked DMs. If I had to guess it's DMs from Destiny sending audio and explicitly stating it was recorded without consent.
 
View attachment 7092763
"Having a publicly accessible google drive where you share dozens of women's private sex videos with random 17-year old groyper-discord-kittens you're trying to groom is not reckless at all" - Famous pedo lawyer, Andrew Brettler
Don't know anything about law, but unless Destiny somehow has an ace up his sleeve, don't see how this narrative doesn't immediately collapse in discovery.
Destiny was sharing those videos and audios like candy, even if you take Destiny's and his lawyers deranged characterization of Pxie, if you present all the evidence to the average person they will all come up with the correct assumption that Destiny is a sex addicted freak, with no impulse control, who was spreading sexual content of multiple parties without their consent like they were candies.

I'm sure that Destiny has already contacted Rose and she will completely back Destiny's characterization that Solo was a hacker, who wasn't her boyfriend, that they weren't Groypers/Nick Fuentes fans, that she wasn't underaged at the time of the sexting, and that Solo had no connection to her whatsoever!
Come on guys, who do you think Destiny is? he couldn't have sent all those things, including Lauren Southern's (his twin flame) rape story at the hands of Andrew Tate to an underaged girl, right? It's not like who Destiny thinks her bf was is alleging that he never verified her age, right?

It is extremely clear that this person is mentally unwell, but Destiny was DMing her in January 2025. Vyvanse fixed him though guys!
Reminder that Destiny's justification for not liking prostitutes/escorts is because you have to pay for sex, so they aren't really into it, therefore making the sex "not real". But sexting, and very likely having sex with, actual schizos who DM him (Jelly_Bean, and Squiddlyyy) is completely fine, nothing says "real sex" and "real consent" as having sex with a person who might as well think we are on Pluto.

I genuinely do not understand how any of his fans can listen to his takes on minors and adults having sex (from his Turkey Tom talk) and think this nigga actually understands consent in any way, he's genuinely just a predator in every way.
 
Last edited:
I always found this one funny because where is the line exactly? Is it ok if I don't "publish" it but instead send it "privately" to 1000 people? 100? 50? 20? At what point does it start being a real problem and you start being responsible for one of those people "leaking it" out to the world?
It really shouldn't matter how many people he sent it to, once it its out of the hands of "authorized" people its over and anything can happen.
I wonder how they would respond to this if you ask them how is a public google drive different from an unsearchable pornhub video. Would they still be defending this if he just posted it on pornhub where it only had 10, 50, or 100 views?
 
"stop exaggerating, this isn't that big of a deal, he didn't publish anything, he only sent the videos to one person, pxie is just as bad."
I always found this one funny because where is the line exactly? Is ok if I don't "publish" it but instead send it "privately" to 1000 people? 100? 50? 20? At what point does it start being a real problem?
To me it seems like you either leaked it or you didn't, it doesn't matter if you sent it "privately" and that person you sent it to leaked it, you are still the original leaker.
 
Back