Debate @COME ON OUT YOU RAPIST on the slippery slope of making loli porn illegal - At the user's own request.

draggs said:
Days since multiple pedophiles outed themselves on Kiwi Farms: 0
Click to expand...
what the flying fuck.png

It's all so tiresome.
 
  • Feels
  • Winner
  • DRINK!
Reactions: Po's Cootah, Adachi The Lurker, Captain Manning and 7 others
Polyarmory said:
While this is true 99% of the time, I would argue that the occasional sex scandal among officials should be possible to verify. For example, if there was footage of Xi Jinping plowing Kamala Harris, that's a national security concern that the nation has a right to know, and we shouldn't have to take a politician's word for it that that's what happened. Independent observers should be able to verify it.

But in spirit, I agree.
Click to expand...
I guess that would have to be considering context as well. I recall looking at the internet history of one of the computers at my old job and it had videos of women driving but the FOV is at their feet using the pedals. These videos were on youtube and were entirely benign at a glance.

My dense ass took like a day to figure out that it was a fetish thing lol. Since I didn't see it as porn, to me it wasn't porn. Perspective is weird man.
 
  • Like
Reactions: i440BX, UERISIMILITUDO, CeleryBread and 1 other person
Ultrapenguin said:
As for the law I guess I'm not certain what the underlying point is. Normally the reason child porn is an issue is because it involves the victimization (and monetization of victimization) of a child, so what's the conceit here?
Like is it just supposed to be social cleansing because it's repulsive, and nobody likes people who jerk off to cartoon porn of children? If so then that's pretty bold and I respect it, but I don't assume being mean to gross people is becoming an establishment process at this point.
Click to expand...
what did he mean by this

because it sure seems like an i was just pretending to be retarded thing to say tbh. whether something is worthwhile depending on muh establishment? :story: "normally" the reason child porn is an issue? :story: what's the conceit here? well you answered what the conceit is, though calling it a conceit is sus af
Ultrapenguin said:
So is the idea that it could lead to consuming the real thing down the line? That's probably true, but getting into regulation over "____ could lead to something criminal down the line" is an idea that opens up a lot of doors.
That's the same reasoning that nonsense like stochastic terrorism is based upon, and it doesn't matter how disgusting something is, it doesn't change the underlying principles of it.
Click to expand...
reminder that this muh slippery slope argument is a standard pedo go-to line
Ultrapenguin said:
Experience also suggests that the government doesn't actually give a fuck about pedophiles for the most part, because they're easy to control and don't threaten the status quo. The powers that be seem WAY more interested in figuring out ways to reinterpret laws to toss people they don't like in prison, exactly like they did with their "child protection" laws in New Zealand.
Click to expand...
another standard pedo go-to line. it's always the same noncense. every. single. time
Ultrapenguin said:
Basically I'm not especially offended by the law, but I had similar thoughts.
Click to expand...
being offended at all by the law :story:
 
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: Dagger Dragger, lolcow yoghurt, Polyarmory and 1 other person
COME ON OUT YOU RAPIST said:
17th century Christian art would be considered CSAM under that new Texan law, by the way.
View attachment 7093732
Click to expand...
Bro, I don't think the point of this painting was ever to arouse or serve as a masturbatory aid. Anyways, this entire thread is a good demonstration of the 'security vs freedom' debate. Make note that I am not making any differentiation between 'good' and 'bad' freedom when I say freedom.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Po's Cootah, Dagger Dragger, lolcow yoghurt and 7 others
I'd like to know more about @COME ON OUT YOU RAPIST stance on Jews. How do the jews figure into all this? How are the perversions of old japanese men preferable to the perversions of old jewish men? Are we to understand your stance on lolicon as representative of all racially conscious White men? Redpill me on all that. I'd really like to know your thoughts.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Dagger Dragger, fake farts, Mike Matei's Penis and 2 others
He kind of comes off as missing the point, like yeah, theoretically, banning one type of expression could lead to more restrictions, but do we really want to die on this hill? Defending the right to draw little anime girls getting raped just makes people look like creeps, and it's weird how some of these guys can't grasp why the average person doesn't want to be associated with that. Also, comparing loli bans to the Patriot Act is insane levels of reaching.
 
  • Agree
  • DRINK!
  • Mad at the Internet
Reactions: Drip irrigation, fake farts, Tablet County and 2 others
bear hammer said:
He kind of comes off as missing the point, like yeah, theoretically, banning one type of expression could lead to more restrictions, but do we really want to die on this hill? Defending the right to draw little anime girls getting raped just makes people look like creeps, and it's weird how some of these guys can't grasp why the average person doesn't want to be associated with that. Also, comparing loli bans to the Patriot Act is insane levels of reaching.
Click to expand...
I get the point you're trying to make, but in the current zeitgeist: the "average" person sees no issue taking their children to increasing degenerate "Gay Pride" parades, drag time story hours, and turning Little Timmy into Little Tammy. It's only the past few months that there's been any kind of shift of opinion... probably because the average person is a coward that "goes with the flow".
 
  • Agree
  • DRINK!
  • Autistic
Reactions: Gravemind, UERISIMILITUDO and Baguette Child
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back