Debate @COME ON OUT YOU RAPIST on the slippery slope of making loli porn illegal - At the user's own request.

Day of the Cope said:
No, I showed how your logic can apply to a similar illegal act and you responded with "but are they the same".
Click to expand...
Alright, I'm going to bite this arguments head off like Chronos did with Zeus.
I am not against artwork that depicts any manner of utterly depraved act, and in fact some of the shit that is considered taboo can make for some really good horror content.
I am explicitely against people fetishizing child rape.
I am also against people fetishizing child dismemberment.

CONTEXT MATTERS
INTENT MATTERS

A piece of art have both without it being fetishistic, but the people that get off to that content need to get help from a shrink, God, or a little piece of metal.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Magnificus's #1 Student, Staphylococcus aureus, Blackhole and 11 others
Day of the Cope said:
View attachment 7096919
I'm not spending another day doing this. Enjoy eating each other alive.
Click to expand...
chat, is it safe to call @Day of the Cope and @COME ON OUT YOU RAPIST pedophiles?
Lurker said:
:popcorn:
Click to expand...
are you enjoying this?

Gravemind said:
However, by refraining from answering, he makes himself seem like a pedophile with something to hide anyway, so I don't know what kind of game he thinks he's playing here.
Click to expand...
it's a CIA pedo-op and you're just playing into it
 
  • Agree
  • DRINK!
  • Feels
Reactions: Abella, Lurker, Gravemind and 2 others
Pro-Islam = Anti-Woman said:
Yeah, go for it dude
Click to expand...
I hate Wikipedia, but its article on illegal numbers is pretty good, I just checked it:

These are usually related to encryption and decryption, or cryptographic signatures. A related topic is the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) which makes it illegal to write software circumventing it. The primary purpose of the DMCA is to crush competition and control what people can do with private property:
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2014/03/how-do-you-drm-a-thing-like-a-coffee-pod/ (archive)
 
UERISIMILITUDO said:
I hate Wikipedia, but its article on illegal numbers is pretty good, I just checked it:

These are usually related to encryption and decryption, or cryptographic signatures. A related topic is the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) which makes it illegal to write software circumventing it. The primary purpose of the DMCA is to crush competition and control what people can do with private property:
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2014/03/how-do-you-drm-a-thing-like-a-coffee-pod/ (archive)
Click to expand...
If the number were illegal it wouldn't be on Wikipedia
 
  • Disagree
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Mike Matei's Penis and UERISIMILITUDO
pilesthebeaver said:
these images are used for EPI and worse by pedo groomers.
Click to expand...

Sorry to be a little off-topic, but this reminded me of a groomer case I saw (self-promo: that i wrote about) where the groomer was sending hentai (including supposedly loli) to the victm.
Tread Miller said:
The YouTuber censored the whole thing, but he described it as "super risque" and "something that starts with L and ends with I" :cryblood:
Click to expand...

Day of the Cope said:
"Have you stopped beat your wife, sir?"
Click to expand...
>stopped beat you wife, sir
1741272225660.png
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Gravemind and UERISIMILITUDO
FuluFuckwit said:
Alright, I'm going to bite this arguments head off like Chronos did with Zeus.
I am not against artwork that depicts any manner of utterly depraved act, and in fact some of the shit that is considered taboo can make for some really good horror content.
I am explicitely against people fetishizing child rape.
I am also against people fetishizing child dismemberment.

CONTEXT MATTERS
INTENT MATTERS

A piece of art have both without it being fetishistic, but the people that get off to that content need to get help from a shrink, God, or a little piece of metal.
Click to expand...
"But the government shouldn't get to decide what that context and intent is!"

And a known gathering of actual pedophiles should? How about when the average normie sees it and recoils in disgust because most people generally find the depiction of child sex and/or mutilation obscene and reprehensible?

Or are they wrong too because they "just don't get it, man"? If society should be the one to decide context and intent, then which part of society's input should be considered valid?
 
  • Winner
Reactions: Gunslinger Spawn
UERISIMILITUDO said:
I hate Wikipedia, but its article on illegal numbers is pretty good, I just checked it:

These are usually related to encryption and decryption, or cryptographic signatures. A related topic is the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) which makes it illegal to write software circumventing it. The primary purpose of the DMCA is to crush competition and control what people can do with private property:
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2014/03/how-do-you-drm-a-thing-like-a-coffee-pod/ (archive)
Click to expand...
so what does DMCA have to do with child porn
 
  • DRINK!
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Gravemind and UERISIMILITUDO
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back