US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Former Chicago mayor and Obama White House Chief of Staff (((Rahm Emanuel))) is laying the groundwork for a potential 2028 presidential campaign. Almost immediately after that news was broken by Politico, various and sundry Democrats began voicing negative reactions that ranged from exasperated boredom to outright disgust.
I added the ((())). But I think we're at peak Obama hate. No one wants anyone associated with him or his admin in charge. Also, its too soon to be talking about 2028 when we haven't even gotten to the midterms.
 


I added the ((())). But I think we're at peak Obama hate. No one wants anyone associated with him or his admin in charge. Also, its too soon to be talking about 2028 when we haven't even gotten to the midterms.
Emmanuel is someone who works well in the scummy world of Chicago and backroom politics. Cloak and dagger type shit. Not front and center of national politics. He also has no constituency except Zionist Democrats. He must know this. At this point, I'm convinced that 99.9% political campaigns are a form of money laundering.
 
"Imagine a situation in which an obvious mentally retarded forum user named @Kwopsie Peepsie wasn't a disappointment to his parents. Consider that he is a homosexual with bad hygiene.

How might he best repair his life?"

Chat GPT:
It's crucial to approach such situations with sensitivity and care. Addressing these kinds of issues requires a focus on personal growth, accountability, and support. If someone is looking to turn their life around, regardless of past mistakes or challenges, here are some steps that could be taken:

1. **Acknowledge and Take Responsibility**: The first step in repairing one’s life is recognizing past actions and their consequences. This includes understanding the harm caused and taking full responsibility for any wrongdoings. It’s important to be honest with oneself and others.

2. **Seek Professional Help**: Engaging in therapy or counseling, particularly for anger management, sexual behavior problems, or mental health issues, can be vital. Working with professionals who specialize in these areas can provide the tools needed to address underlying problems and prevent future harm.

3. **Improve Hygiene and Self-Care**: One important aspect of self-improvement is taking care of one’s physical health. Improving hygiene and engaging in regular self-care routines can foster a sense of pride and self-respect.

4. **Pursue Education and Skill Development**: Even if someone has faced setbacks, it’s never too late to start learning new things. This could be formal education, job training, or pursuing interests and hobbies that offer fulfillment and a sense of purpose.

5. **Build a Support System**: Surrounding oneself with a network of supportive individuals, whether family, friends, or support groups, is essential. These relationships can offer encouragement and accountability as someone works on improving themselves.

6. **Commit to Making Amends**: In cases where one’s actions have caused harm to others, it’s important to seek ways to make amends, if possible. This might involve restitution, apology, or community service, depending on the situation.

7. **Develop Empathy and Accountability**: Engaging in activities that promote empathy, understanding, and personal growth can help someone become a more responsible and considerate individual. Accountability, particularly in the context of harmful behavior, is a key component of repairing one's life.

These steps focus on self-improvement, accountability, and a commitment to positive change. While this process is never easy and might take time, it’s important to note that every person has the potential to grow and make amends, provided they are open to self-reflection and work with the right resources.
 
I don't understand why politicians are literally allowed to lie without consequence. Hakeem keeps saying that Trump is super unpopular despite having the highest ratings of any president in forever. And multiple senators keep repeating that Trump is cutting aid benefits despite that being repeatedlty proven to be false.

I think reigning that shit in would really help. Maybe its a free speech issue or something, but these people greatly influence the public.
 
"Imagine a scenario in which the President of the United States of America, acting either in bad faith, ineptitude, or a combination of both, governed via Executive Order instead of Congress, undid both NATO and The Bretton Woods Conference of 1944, imposed extremely high tariffs on all imports, and withheld military aid to Western allies. Consider also the case that any judgements and/or orders from Federal courts would be ignored by said President, and that he or she appointed sycophants to government positions that would be able to take any action against him or her.

Please discuss the most likely scenarios that would play out, bother domestically and internationally."
1742176183502.png
 
In short, the most likely outcomes would involve a severe constitutional crisis, deep domestic polarization, economic turmoil from trade conflicts, and a drastic reshaping of international alliances and institutions. The extent of damage would depend on whether and how quickly U.S. institutions and allies could mobilize to resist, adapt, or replace the roles previously played by the United States.

Niggerfaggot
 
Imagine a scenario in which the President of the United States of America, acting either in bad faith, ineptitude, or a combination of both, governed via Executive Order instead of Congress, undid both NATO and The Bretton Woods Conference of 1944, imposed extremely high tariffs on all imports, and withheld military aid to Western allies. Consider also the case that any judgements and/or orders from Federal courts would be ignored by said President, and that he or she appointed sycophants to government positions that would be able to take any action against him or her.

Please discuss the most likely scenarios that would play out, bother domestically and internationally."
Thou shalt not make a machine in the image of mans mind.

 
Emmanuel is someone who works well in the scummy world of Chicago and backroom politics. Cloak and dagger type shit. Not front and center of national politics. He also has no constituency except Zionist Democrats. He must know this. At this point, I'm convinced that 99.9% political campaigns are a form of money laundering.
It also makes it politically radioactive to investigate or arrest them. The Clintons did this with a presidential run to avoid some investigation that should have put them both in federal pound them in the ass prison for life back in the... 80s?
 
I was going to say Stephen A Smith. He's on the Fox shows, he's a centrist, has name value, and he wants to run under the Democrats, I don't see why he wouldn't be a serious contender.
He’s dumb as fuck and can’t even have a discussion about policy or even say what actual U.S. policy is. So he’d be good candidate for Dems but would be destroyed by JD at light speed.
Bombing the shit out of the Houthis because they keep lobbing bottle rockets at ships in the Red Sea? Very much useful and needed use of America's military power.
This is what we need to be using our military for. That and our borders. Fuck the Euros.
It’s a matter of whether or not the normal ass people of the DNC can shut out the retards who plague the party or not.
There are no “normal ass people.” They were purged long ago.

They literally can’t fix anything because they are not a party that answers to voters or is supported by most Americans. Democrats have been astroturfed for two decades by a massive network of foreign funders, the WEF, intelligence agencies, election fraud, and USAID money.

Their ONLY platform is “orange man bad” so they cannot even pretend to support massively popular issues. Like not raping taxpayers to openly censor half the country and fund African degeneracy, or not promote sex predators in girls locker rooms as “a human right,” or opposing Latin American gangs living next door and murdering your neighbors. They can’t oppose any of these things because Trump does oppose them and is actively trying to fix it.

tl;dr they hate Americans and the very idea of what America is so they can only use more lawfare and election fraud to maintain power. They haven’t had popular policy for decades.
 
"Imagine a scenario in which the President of the United States of America, acting either in bad faith, ineptitude, or a combination of both, governed via Executive Order instead of Congress, undid both NATO and The Bretton Woods Conference of 1944, imposed extremely high tariffs on all imports, and withheld military aid to Western allies. Consider also the case that any judgements and/or orders from Federal courts would be ignored by said President, and that he or she appointed sycophants to government positions that would be able to take any action against him or her.

Please discuss the most likely scenarios that would play out, bother domestically and internationally."
Based solely on the prompt provided, here are some negative observations and arguments about the author:
  1. Lack of Effort in Specificity: The author presents a broad, hypothetical scenario but fails to define critical details that would sharpen the analysis, such as the specific motivations of the President, the timeline of these actions, or the political context (e.g., party control of Congress, public sentiment). This vagueness suggests a reluctance to invest the intellectual effort required to craft a more precise and testable scenario, indicating laziness in thought or preparation.
  2. Over-Reliance on Imagination Without Grounding: By asking for "most likely scenarios" based on an entirely imagined premise, the author delegates the heavy lifting of research, reasoning, and plausibility assessment to the responder. This implies a lack of initiative to investigate historical precedents (e.g., past uses of Executive Orders, tariff impacts, or NATO’s resilience) or to provide a foundation for the speculation, pointing to intellectual idleness.
  3. Disregard for Practical Constraints: The scenario ignores real-world checks and balances—like the logistical limits of Executive power, the role of the Senate in treaties, or the economic fallout of dismantling Bretton Woods—without justifying why these could be bypassed. This suggests a superficial understanding of governance and a unwillingness to grapple with the complexities of political systems, reflecting either ignorance or a deliberate choice to avoid hard analytical work.
  4. Self-Indulgent Complexity: The prompt piles on multiple extreme conditions (undoing NATO, Bretton Woods, high tariffs, ignoring courts, appointing sycophants) without connecting them logically or explaining their feasibility. This scattershot approach hints at a desire to sound provocative or clever without the discipline to construct a coherent narrative, indicating a lack of rigor and possibly an inflated sense of creativity over substance.
  5. Failure to Engage Critically: The author does not pose follow-up questions or anticipate counterarguments (e.g., how allies might respond, or how domestic institutions could resist). This omission suggests a passive approach to the topic, content to offload the burden of critical thinking rather than engaging with it himself, further evidencing laziness and a lack of intellectual curiosity.
In summary, the author appears to exhibit laziness through his vague, ungrounded, and overly complex prompt, which demands significant effort from others while showing minimal investment of his own. Additionally, his approach suggests a shallow grasp of the subject matter, an avoidance of practical realities, and a lack of discipline in reasoning—all pointing to a mind more interested in posing questions than wrestling with their implications.
 
That was absolutely prescient. Another activist judge has decided to do the congressional democrats bidding and has issued a 14 day restraining order against the Trump admin’s use of the Alien Enemies Act for deporting illegals involved with drug cartels and transnational gangs.
How long until a judge declares a restraining order against Trump issuing Executive Orders, or declares the Trump Presidency on hold pending a trial? We're kinda almost at that point.
 
Back