This is almost certainly going to get lost in events but still I will answer with a less abridged version:
Political inauthenticity has always been an unavoidable problem int he democratic system once you go above a certain size. A politician cannot appeal to everyone and nor is it possible for any one human to care for literally thousands of people as individuals. So, Politicians always tailored themselves to where they were. presenting an ultimately inauthentic view of themselves to the larger public. Still, they were able to be people and be more sincere when they were working with smaller crowds of likeminded people. This ability to occasionally "drop the mask" so to speak usually leaked into their more generic performances to the masses giving each unique flavor and at the same time instilling a base level of honesty.
The internet ruined this.
Now, any moment of honesty would be broadcasted to everyone and everywhere. They could never be candid, or so they convinced themselves, and so must always wear the mask. Eventually, they became the mask. Wholey insincere, a smiling face with nothing behind it, they just -fucking forgot- how to be people. This has only gotten worse with time as well. Each passing decade seeing them become more and more hollow as they buy into their own idea of inauthenticity.
This came out 3 days ago, and I imagine over the weekend the FBI and SS probably investigated it and found hard evidence.
It did not come out three days ago, it was rumored -back as it happened-. Hell I am pretty sure I offhandedly mentioned it once or twice back then. It was well known Biden wasn't signing everything himself and most people assumed he didn't even know about anything other than the Hunter Biden pardon.
Technically I don't think he has undone any pardons.
He is not undoing or cancelling any pardons. The entire premise is that the pardons never happened in the first place.
That is a very important distinction.
This is exactly the argument. not that a pardon is being undone but that -it was never done in the first place-. The paper we have was never actually signed by the President and therefore holds no legal weight at all. It may as well not even exist. This is a thorny thing to do but... Trump may actually have a smoking gun...
Consider the following:
- It was rumored well in advance that Biden was not signing these documents himself
- It was similarly rumored Biden was not even aware of these.
- Assuming 1 and 2, it is -very likely- mentioned in communication between staffers.
- If mentioned, then it becomes an easy task to compare when something was signed to Biden's location. If there is even a slight mismatch:
- It can not only be argued but it logically follows, it was signed without his knowledge.
The evidence is circumstantial.... but it is solid enough to go forward on if we assume one last thing.
6: The only way to then disprove this evidence, is for Biden to testify under oath is is not true.
And that opens up a ton of worms related to whether he is fit to... or even would.
