Supreme Court has to be called upon to my understanding but there is a possibility if they go against Trump he may choose to go with a "Rubicon crossing" approach.
I had an argument a few years back about Afghanistan, which regardless of your opinion of gayops in the sandbox, this dumb pinko broad had literally no fucking clue that Afghanistan had a monarchy and just fucking assumed it had a Soviet-aligned communist government since antiquity I guess.
So basically, the "He was on our radar," meme.
No you didn't read it properly. The "un-people" refers to people they contract for special operations (which could include murder, espionage, spying, intelligence gathering). They're called "un-people" presumably because they're off the books and not officially employed (i.e. they're clandestine operatives).
All it takes is one major disaster in a different country for the public to push back on it, sadly.
So is this what Kennedy got whacked over? Wanting to reorganizing the CIA to serve the State Department? Giving it independent autonomy in the first place is how we got into this mess. If the State Department controlled the CIA and it's goals, personnel and operations but kept them as the clandestine undercover guys they were intended to be and are currently, not only would they serve our nation's actual foreign goals and national security, but we would also have a chance to change the agency with our votes. The doc is probably right that paramilitary warfare can hardly be considered a military weapon and would be better under a reformed intelligence agency rather than the DoD.
I got these results by feeding it to various AI.
the skill levels are off, but i think the best way to do it is
I knew it was fake the moment you made the wild claim someone surnamed Patel wasn't in the hotel business.
I want shit directly connecting the CIA to the Finders and Project Delta. I want that fucker Michael Aquino to hang.Probably, but I wonder if we'll see anything about Dimona or shenanigans with nuclear materials
