US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm still waiting for literally any proof they rigged any elections.
I know it's for derail bait but even shitlibs have been going "Where did all the voters go?" after losing while posting this graph that was used to prove something was fucky, absent mindedly getting so so close to getting it yet so far away.

Voters.jpg

That and on election night recently we saw several county attempts to upside L pattern biden blast boost but they made everyone paranoid and ravenous and we had more poll watchers and volunteers than ever, they got out maneuvered and outvooted.

That and the hood classic of burst water mains, AM votes and even people live on air "Uhhhing" over the numbers being that disparate, covering up the office windows, the boxes of ballots being scooted from under desks. At this point if you don't think something is up you're not paying attention or intentionally acting dumb.

You're never going to get a 9th circus judge and some major authority going "Lol we cheated" in writing.

There's been literally dozens of lawsuits and all of them were dismissed. There was no rigging.
In the same courts begging to un-deport already deported gang members too right? :story:
 
Edit: I invite any zoomers to share other things I have maybe missed.
Something I haven't seen mentioned is that there is no practical way to fix it as an individual.
Time and time again I see some of my peers spin the dating roulette. They go the full hog, new clothes, spruce up their profiles, try and find hobbies women also do. And at the end of the day they get nothing. While some lucky shmuck just stumbles into a relationship.
There feels as if there is 0 control. The only thing you can do is not make mistakes. But making mistakes doesn't affect your odds just how you feel about yourself.
 
I like these ones. They're cheap enough, need no prep, and one can of each gets you 100% of your protein in a day at only ~400 calories. Store easy in a glovebox too, so real easy for work breaks.
View attachment 7121926
I don't really like big fish in cans, tuna is an amazing fish, shitty once it's in a can. Prefer herring or anchovy for cans.
 
Why didn't they appeal it to the SCOTUS? Again, there was literally no proof presented. "Less people voted" and "line look funny" is not proof. Sorry retard.
This little game you're playing reminds me of smugglypuff.

"I didn't SEE anything, officer."

(Come to think of it, that's another good example of the shit eating "I just got away with something" grin females get, as discussed before this latest derail. Bonus observation: Know Your Meme censored any video links giving out Smuglgypuff's name -- Valerie "Theo" (yes, she's a pooner) Williamson --and explicitly doesn't name her in the page on the meme.)
 
Why didn't they appeal it to the SCOTUS? Again, there was literally no proof presented. "Less people voted" and "line look funny" is not proof. Sorry retard.
Absolute incontrovertible proof is not even the standard used in criminal trials, because it makes corruption easier by making destruction of evidence a winning move. You can't just ignore circumstantial evidence like in a TV court show
 
and 42% of never-married singles under 40 say they’ve never had a relationship at all.
that sounds harder to believe tbqh, because everyone blames dating apps, but its not like tinder existed in 2009.
Do we have any sort of historical comparison for this?
no, but thats because up until the internet you were stuck being forced to go to bars and parties and interact with people, both men and women, so eventually a woman would end up with a dude they didn't really like too much but she was getting old. Marty is a great film about this, Ernest Borgnine was one of the fattest men in movies back then, the equivalent of a 400 lb dude today, and he was still able to find a woman eventually. its like Rocky a generation later, even if you talk and look like a retard, eventually you'll find a woman just as retarded to marry.

the internet changed that, which is why the women in situationships is a lot higher than the dudes in relationships, women yearn to be part of a harem the way the children yearn for the mines. they prefer being one of a dozen women in a fuckboy's phone than being one dude's wife. but before smartphones that ability was very rare for women. now tons of women are basically living the life of those cunts in Alfie. just like how the internet means every indian can apply to every job in america leading to hundreds of applications for every job, these ladies get constant attention from the internet and all it takes is a good looking enough dude sliding into DMs and they'll fuck anywhere at anytime. Someone showed that the dating market for men, if it was an economy would be on par with south africa, AKA if you're in the top 10% of dudes, its like living in a porno, you can ask any woman on the street to get in your bus and bang, you can fuck any chick at any time, the gym, the grocery store, at work, at resturants, etc. for the rest of men you're lucky if a 300 lb woman will flirt with you.

The worst part is how often women online will say literally any retarded opinion on dating but if you call them out on it they're like "obviously i didn't mean what i just said" meaning even they know they're full of shit whenever you ask them anything. And your chance of getting called a rapist is linked strongly to how she feels about you, meaning if you piss her off in any way, such as disagreeing on politics or not letting her win a video game or correcting her on what goes good with white wine. you're getting called a rapist. I literally saw this happen a few months back, because her man didn't let her win a card game some girl straight up accused her soyboi husband of rape. thankfully because this happened IRL around friends it didn't matter, but if this bitch had an online presence him and their kids would have been fucked. And this woman isn't some cluster b type, literally just the average white woman.

ironically enough rape accusations are thrown around like party favors, look how they fucked over harry sisson. up until a decade ago it was considered a norm for men to fuck up in the dating scene, for men to do some cringe stuff they'll beat themselves up over later, now you can't be like that. that channel5 guy had a similar thing, he was a rising star on the left, then a woman felt a need to make him suffer because he didn't respond to a DM after a hook up, we honestly need to go back to 1980s style laws on rape, especially marital rape or else this shit will keep happening. People forget a decade ago a "rape accusation" was literally being drugged and then waking up to a guy fucking you, now its "he was DMing other girls"
Tate is a faggot who talks all about 'warrior this' and 'warrior that' but probably crossed the street to avoid the recruiters office for the twenty year long war he was perfectly eligible to take part in.
you could say the same thing about BAP, (but won't) and as we saw from how the US treated 'Nam veterans its obvious why no bronze age warrior mindset dude would join the military.
No wonder he shoots women.
he married a latina* (i know) what did he expect. a white woman wouldn't have stuck around after he murdered a bitch, especially with 6 kids.
 
The Democrats have never polled this bad in decades and yet the only response they have is to triple down on everything.
Eh it's more complicated than that. Neither party is monolithic, obviously. The GOP is, on average I'd say, more unified, but both parties are broad coalitions. The GOP is a coalition of traditional deregulatory business heads, social conservatives, small government libertarians, evangelicals, and assorted far right wing groups. The Democrats are made up of a significantly more diverse crowd, including social liberals, social progressives, traditional socialists, neoliberals, mixed-economy socialists, greens, and even some communists.

For a while the left wing of the Democratic party has been running the show because they were doing pretty well in elections, which was reason enough for the Democrats closer to the center to play ball. Now that they've been swept and are polling like dog shit, you're seeing the cracks along those coalition lines, with the centrists in open revolt as the left wing desperately tries to maintain power by deploying the usual bullshit at their own that they've been flinging at the right for the last decade.

There's still tension between the different groups in the GOP, but we're seeing a lot less of it because there's a central authority figure and the GOP is polling very well and is doing well in elections, so there's no incentive to shake up the leadership or message.

Anyway, I don't see this as some death knell for the Democratic party, but I do think they're going to be significantly less competitive for the next decade as they reorganize around another caucus in the coalition. I'm very curious to see who ends up in charge of the party at the end of this, because I think that's what will determine how effective they'll be in future elections. Personally I can't stand Schumer, but I give him credit for realizing that he had no cards and deciding to eat crow and sign on to support the CR, but if they really do oust him and replace him with a hardliner, it's virtually guaranteed electoral suicide for 2026 and 2028.
 
Edit: I invite any zoomers to share other things I have maybe missed.
I think the disillusionment goes way understated here as well.
Based on the messaging we see, at least for the male side of the issue

Women not only do not need us, it appears they do not want us either
If she does want us, it is just so that we can furnish her with a lifestyle and children
We feel that we must sacrifice everything and be the perfect wealthy, sucessful, traditional man for any proverbial wife, we she can do basically whatever she wants and we cannot judge or criticize
If we get into a relationship, it will likely end shortly for things outside of our control anyway
If it lasts longer, that only means it will be more damaging when it ends

TL;DR The messaging out there makes it feel like dating/marriage is an unfair unwinnable game that no one wants us in anyway.
 
I’d say just by observations there’s a couple drivers:
-The right-left divide where men have been left behind
-The men hate that started in the 2010s
-The Covid arc where everyone was taught by screens and had stunted social development. Younger zoomers have limited social interaction. They are terrified of taking to a real person.
- dating culture expectations: men are encouraged to find a trad wife (think Andrew Tate ideas) and women expect men to spend $500 on a date and if they don’t then they are not worth their time.
- Dating apps: FOMO. My friend in NYC says ‘normal’ dates are harder to find then hookups. Everyone thinks their perfect, wealthy dream partner is just a swipe away, so they never actually end up dating anyone because they think they can get better (this applies to both sexes).
- Social media/ influencers: a ton of content on Instagram and TikTok is scripted so ‘couples content’ gives people skewed ideas about what a relationship should entail.

If I had to summarize, zoomers have had little organic social interaction with not just opposite genders but with each other.

Don’t drag me into retarded debates about gender, I’m just generalizing and sharing my observations over the past 15 years.

Edit: I invite any zoomers to share other things I have maybe missed.
After college, I've never met another zoomer IRL when they aren't working, it's crazy. All of our social circles begin and end online, and I blame the government lockdown for killing nacent Zoomer social circles. Besides, most things we enjoy like video games actually require that you aren't together and are in your own homes.
 
Why didn't they appeal it to the SCOTUS? Again, there was literally no proof presented. "Less people voted" and "line look funny" is not proof. Sorry retard.
-Susan Crawford was fired and under investigation for using dead voters identity during the elections.
-Claire Woodall-Vogg printed 64 000 ballots and filled them in back room of the city hall (Milwaukee)
For the Nov 3rd 2020 election. She had city employees and others (CTCL) fill some of those out on the 4th, 6th and other floors of city hall. Then kicked out observers around 10-10:30pm on Nov 3rd. Then brought in large amounts of ballots at 1:15am on Nov 4th. All illegal, unconstitutional - number one way however the liberals stole the Presidential election in 2020.
1742645601237.png
1742645923024.png

-Tina Peters is being prosecuted in Colorado for flipping votes on the dominion's machines
-Rachel Rodrigez is being prosecuted in Texas
Sir there was fucking rigging you have to be retarded or blind to not see it. In some cases, both.
 
It's because normies view things exclusively through the lens of media. You have people who are incapable of talking about current events without referencing Star Wars or Harry Potter. She views herself as the main character of the story. People are over-media-ized, for want of a better term. They don't understand reality.
People have always related to things through stories. But we purged our culture of religious myth, since it was superstition, and of historical stories, since the men of the past weren't woke, and so now all we have are Harry Potter and Iron Man.
 
Back