Post videos of people dying - Self explanatory really

I got a frame or so after with annotations (which may not be 100% accurate). The image your commenting on is a blur of the suspect raising a weapon with his right hand.

20250321_172352.jpg
 
That peaked my curiosity, how can you tell it's airsoft?

-The "wreckage" they walk up on looks like 50 year old farm equipment.
-singleshot take down, doesn't sound right, all shots sound the same as if they were added in post processing. No crack of whizzing bullets (rounds still make the crack and whizz sound if they go into and/or through a body, the pitch just changes letting you know something was hit). No change in sound when shooting in a different direction.
-I can't even tell if camera guy is actually armed which ... redditors are stupid to go to a battlefield, they aren't that stupid to go unarmed.
Regardless of the issues with it not sounding or looking real...

You have 2 guys walking up on a pristine wreckage that looks 50 years old, no sign of anyone being there at all, no signs of war, looks like a Robert Frost poem. They get ambushed by a single gunman who is able to one tap both of them. One thinks to run off in a direction he didn't come from (fight or flight response... flight usually means laying down and escaping into your head, if you do run it's in a direction your mind subconsciously thinks is safe, I shit you not watch people who go into flight response, it almost always includes retracing their steps, you see a video of a shooting in the street, motherfuckers will run past the shooter back in the direction of their home. That's true fear). Regardless the shooter then breaks cover to anchor shoot the runner without even looking at the camera guy even though the camera guy would be the obvious threat. Etc etc etc, you shoot someone from a concealed position and you wait for their friends to panic and try to get to them and you shoot their friends... also the way the camera man flops to the ground when being "finished off" looks like acting.
Also lol at the person coming out with just a pistol, looking like the cleanest fresh off the boat warfighter ever.

The video is an approximation of what redditors/teenagers think war/being shot at is like.
 
I'll bite. What does the website you linked says

"....Easy Example: Coin Flip

Let’s bet; I’ll flip a coin. If it lands heads, then I pay you $200. If it lands tails, then you pay me $100. This clearly favors you."

Oh wow. The author doesn't understand that getting an extra $100 doesn't increase your betting favorablility just the reward money. They must be a huge retard like you.

The reason people don't give a shit he was executed on the spot is because of people like yourself. Any time a criminal of some kind gets arrested and isn't put into a comfy cozy robe and hoisted up like a child into a cop car it's police brutality. We don't live in a high trust society and when trust breaks down you get shit like this.
 
Oh wow. The author doesn't understand that getting an extra $100 doesn't increase your betting favorablility just the reward money. They must be a huge retard like you.
Getting the extra $100 increases your +EV, not the odds you will win. He isn't suggesting otherwise, you invalid. You have to continue reading, although I suspect the kind of person who uses a single sentence to extrapolate incorrectly isn't much of a deep thinker.
The reason people don't give a shit he was executed on the spot is because of people like yourself. Any time a criminal of some kind gets arrested and isn't put into a comfy cozy robe and hoisted up like a child into a cop car it's police brutality. We don't live in a high trust society and when trust breaks down you get shit like this.
Double-digit IQ take. Not unexpected given your poor understanding of the linked content, though. The entire point is that outcomes of specific scenarios shouldn't retroactively change your strategy. Sometimes the shittiest planning has a great outcome, but that great outcome doesn't prove the strategy wise. Sometimes the most optimal strategy results in the worst outcome, but assigning fault to the strategy is misguided.

The reason people like you don't give a shit about him being executed on the spot is because you're unintelligent. The reason people like me care about it is because these fucking losers run into the wrong houses and do shit like this to regular people far too often. It's not forgettable because they happened to hit a chomo this time, dipshit.

Unfortunately, these concepts seem beyond your grasp. A cop could run in blindfolded or drop a piano off building like an ACME cartoon, but as long as it happened to land on a pedophile by luck, it's a brilliant strategy to you. It's the same logic drunk drivers use by referencing how many times they've safely gotten home after last call.
 
Last edited:
Getting the extra $100 increases your +EV, not the odds you will win. He isn't suggesting otherwise, you invalid. You have to continue reading, although I suspect the kind of person who uses a single sentence to extrapolate incorrectly isn't much of a deep thinker.
It doesn't, but, I appreciate the midwit explanation of the paragraph. Unfortunately you've triggered your midwit Achilles heel, thinking you're smarter than you actually are.
Double-digit IQ take. Not unexpected given your poor understanding of the linked content, though. The entire point is that outcomes of specific scenarios shouldn't retroactively change your strategy. Sometimes the shittiest planning has a great outcome, but the great outcome shouldn't prevent improvement. Sometimes the most optimal strategy results in the worst outcome, so assigning fault to the strategy is mimisguided.
How would you improve? You don't seem to understand basic human instincts and emotions during a fight or flight situation.
The reason people like you don't give a shit about him being executed on the spot is because you're an unintelligent moron. The reason people like me care about it is because these fucking losers run into the wrong houses and do this shit on regular people far too often. Unfortunately, these concepts seem beyond your grasp. A cop could run in blindfolded or drop a piano on some house like a cartoon, but as long as it happened to land on a pedophile in that instance, it's a brilliant strategy to you.
But they weren't at the wrong house. The reason we have such an increase in negative police interactions is because people like you think this can be solved with social workers. Sure, cops can fuck up but how often does that really happen where they show up to the wrong house? Do you have a rational argument outside of feminine shrieking and emotional blackmail?
 
It doesn't, but, I appreciate the midwit explanation of the paragraph.
It does. When your odds are 50/50, but someone wagers $100 to your $50, you're getting better than 1:1 on your money. This is a +EV scenario. Losing the coin flip doesn't mean it was bad to place the bet. But you are too stupid to recognize this.
But they weren't at the wrong house.
🤦‍♂️ Thank you for proving my point, buddy. You are too stupid to understand the perils of results-oriented thinking. I won't be responding anymore.
 
It does. When your odds are 50/50, but someone wagers $100 to your $50, you're getting better than 1:1 on your money. This is a +EV scenario. Losing the coin flip doesn't mean it was bad to place the bet. But you are too stupid to recognize this.
This is what you tell gamblers to keep them gambling
🤦‍♂️ Thank you for proving my point, buddy. You are too stupid to understand the perils of results-oriented thinking. I won't be responding ananymore
Jesus Christ you are dunning Kruger incarnate. Yes, I get it. No, that's not a good reason. Again, you're the problem with society right now and your lack of response is just you taking your L. Noted.
 
Back