US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
My proposal is that SNAP only covers food and drink items that are 2 ingredients or less.
All fresh meats (beef, chicken, pork, etc) or frozen meat so long as it's plain
All fresh or frozen vegetables
All fresh or frozen fruit
Flour, sugar, butter, milk, eggs, single ingredient Seasonings and salt
Plain water, or unflavored sparkling water, tea bags, coffee grounds, milk.

Everything else is not purchasable. The reason for two ingredients instead of one is it allows items like butter which may be salted, or yogurt which may have bacterial cultures as an ingredient.

Unfortunately, this would cut some decent items like sausage, bacon, deli meat, bread, condiments, and some other items but I would consider it a necessary evil. Plus plain meats are way cheaper anyway and any luxury item they can purchase on their own dime.

This would avoid the problem of trying to decide what's healthy or not while completely excluding any and all processed foods including soda and candy.

You can compose a whole diet from only items made up of two ingredients, you can bake your own cookies and desserts if you want a treat, but you cannot buy processed foods or sugary drinks.

Individuals can decide for themselves what their diet should look like, and what they consider healthy. The government doesn't have a good track record for deciding this, and some may have special dietary needs they need to account for anyway. So this should be a decent compromise.

A bunch of meat and cheese and eggs? Fine. Rice and beans and a little bit of fish? Whatever. Vegetarian or plant-based? Have at it. But no processed foods.

Would this necessarily force people to be healthy? Probably not because they could just buy sugar dump it in water and guzzle that down. But I'm betting it would help because most would be too lazy to make cookies or cake and what they make wouldn't be as addicting and easy to access as doritos and snack cakes.

Main point. If you want pop tarts or candy or soda or whatever else get a fucking job and buy it yourself.
 
People ranting about soda being on food stamps and how poor people and niggers don’t need to be drinking soda. And I’m over here thinking, how the fuck are we honestly doing better. Grocery stores are just massive feeding pens for the cattle that is the is the US population. And the worst part is it’s not a problem you can just solve by “making healthier choices”, even those alternatives are so full of shit that it would be banned in most other countries. Yeah we can keep on ranting about how niggers eat themselves into an early grave eating junk food and soda using government food stamps, and then go to white communities where everyone still look like massive fucking meatballs.
Edit:And people saying “pay for it with your own money”, that’s fair, but it’s not addressing what frankly is probably one of the biggest fucking problems in the US. Obesity in this country is no fucking joke, and it’s getting to a level where “muh freedom” needs to stop being an argument to excuse and allow this self harm
 
Just the usual problem of people who bitch that it's impossible to eat this way because it's more than miserable soylent slop and that seems to be their frame of reference for eating anything that wasn't premade in a box.
Funny thing is that I just remembered I'm not even ON SNAP. I just don't cook a lot.
 
  • Horrifying
Reactions: Mr. 0
The only issue I have with the government saying that SNAP should be used on "healthy food" is that I'm old enough to remember when The Experts said margarine was healthier than butter while being unable to decide if eggs were good for you. That's not even getting into things like Nutri-Score which just seems to make shit up as they go along.
I'm remembering awhile ago they talked about banning bacon and pork from prison food, because the studies they looked at said fatty foods like those were unhealthy amd made you sick. By that same logic, you could have those meats removed from SNAP benefits as well.

Between misunderstood diet information like this and other misaligned projects like the Michelle's school lunch disaster and banning paper straws, the real problem I think is there is just not enough social trust now to allow anyone to fuck with these programs, even for good intentiorisk You are asking to ban a product on the grounds of a health risk thats proudly drunk in every shot by our high energy president that showed the world he brushed off a bullet wound. They need to build up that social trust to do that. At the very least letting the first rouds of tax apology checks through from the DOGE cuts.
 
"Fight Oligarchy" they are never going to realize how much money Bernie has are they
It's all a bullshit façade.

Why are they so frantic about Donald Trump becoming president, to the point of comparing him to Hitler, his supporters to Italian Fascists and German Nazis? How did all these nobody Antifa fags show up from the ether to start throwing riots in key cities, why do they show up to every protest that isn't a left-wing interest to disrupt the existing protest, and why are they never arrested for domestic terrorism? Why did all the Antifa riots stop in the wake of the Biden admin, only to erupt again immediately after Trump won a second turn and start destroying Teslas nation wide? Why did Democrats rush into a spending spree with big bullshit pork spending bills as soon as Biden got into office? Why did so many American taxpayer dollars disappear into the ether when it was donated to the Ukraine war front instead of being spent on weapons and vehicle manufacturing?

Why did Bernie say nobody should be a millionaire while being a multi-millionaire?

Because it's all one huge grift, the whole political machine as we know it is a giant fuck-off kickback laundering scam the likes of which would make Smedley Butler blush. They sell you an image of being progressive, espousing half-facts or mirroring your political views because the vote is their ticket to payday.

This is the reason why Youtubers and TikTokers are now called "influencers", because their job is not to be a public entertainer who receives money from an audience, their job is to be a proxy on tap for monied interests. It's the reason why retards like Vaush, Destiny and Dylan Mulvaney were invited to the White House, because they're a bridge between the old crusty bastards nobody likes to the youth. Influencers are the means of the establishment con artist uniparty to continue greasing their grift machine.

The reason why they hate Donald Trump and his cohorts so much is nothing to do with any notions of principled positions or a dearly held belief in a defensive democracy, it's because Donald Trump is a wild card outsider who may potentially shut off the money hose.

It's all about the fuckin' money.
 
And I’m over here thinking, how the fuck are we honestly doing better.
Even if I accept your entire argument as fact, as presented, "Normal people are capable of being as stupid as the niggers are being" is not really any reason to stop measures that might restrain the niggers from being stupid. If anything, social pressures being what they are might just shock normal people into behaving sensibly if the Niggers end up healthy and capable of cooking real food. Imagine being an HR wine aunt on social media, and you're being outclassed by every single peon under you in the "post your dinner" threads. They'll be out making wellingtons within a week.
 
Even if I accept your entire argument as fact, as presented, "Normal people are capable of being as stupid as the niggers are being" is not really any reason to stop measures that might restrain the niggers from being stupid. If anything, social pressures being what they are might just shock normal people into behaving sensibly if the Niggers end up healthy and capable of cooking real food. Imagine being an HR wine aunt on social media, and you're being outclassed by every single peon under you in the "post your dinner" threads. They'll be out making wellingtons within a week.
You have more faith than I do. And part of the issue is that so much food is basically laced with shit that gets people addicted to it. You can ban food stamps being used on it but niggers will still use the little money they have on junk food because of that. Not to sound like a commie, but these food companies are pure fucking evil with the shit they try to pull
Edit: to add to my point if the food being laced with addictive chemicals, think about this for a second. Both niggers on food stamps and whites with disposable income are eating the same fucking food. If that doesn’t smell of some bullshittery being pulled I don’t know what does
 
Actual question, if inmigration causes crime, why are current studies skewed to say otherwise? Is it faulty methodology, or the statistics themselves are cooked?
Since no one has actually answered this, in 50 pages, the reason the studies are skewed is because the data is garbage. Every major municipality stopped recording immigration status data when making arrests. So according to their data, there are exactly zero crimes committed by immigrants in New York city, despite immigrant gangs robbing stores to the point that the shelves are baren, and then selling the stolen goods on the streets right outside the stores they've just robbed. It's some Soviet level nonsense.
 
I'm remembering awhile ago they talked about banning bacon and pork from prison food, because the studies they looked at said fatty foods like those were unhealthy amd made you sick. By that same logic, you could have those meats removed from SNAP benefits as well.

Between misunderstood diet information like this and other misaligned projects like the Michelle's school lunch disaster and banning paper straws, the real problem I think is there is just not enough social trust now to allow anyone to fuck with these programs, even for good intentiorisk You are asking to ban a product on the grounds of a health risk thats proudly drunk in every shot by our high energy president that showed the world he brushed off a bullet wound. They need to build up that social trust to do that. At the very least letting the first rouds of tax apology checks through from the DOGE cuts.
It’s not being banned it’s being removed from eligibility to be purchased with government money for food for the poor. Alll that will change is that soda addicts will have to pay for it even if they are poor.
Edit: fuck double posted saved by the page split.
 
It’s not being banned it’s being removed from eligibility to be purchased with government money for food for the poor. Alll that will change is that soda addicts will have to pay for it even if they are poor.
Edit: fuck double posted saved by the page split.
How about this.

Soda can be taken off but hot foods should be added in.
 
Maybe we should have another thread for it instead of here like we did with the jfk files…..
A separate thread was made for the JFK files because they wanted interest in it to die, because Israel is complicit in the murder of JFK. Ever jew-loving JIDF poster made sure to deflect and muddle the topic in this thread.
JFK - change my mind.jpg
 
They seem to have this idea in their heads that what they get to have is some Oliver Twist colorless gruel, when in reality with a few dollars on some simple greens and meats you can make damn near anything you please. I say this as somebody who's had to live on unemployment and make every cent count.
Walmart is the largest grocery store in the fucking world and it's not e'en close. They sell everything you could reasonably want, and have a shit-ton of discount, healthy, even organic shit. If you can't eat well and cheaply from Walmart, you're not fucking trying.
What bureaucracy? EBT is a gift card that only works on certain items and is automatically applied by the register. All it takes to restrict a new item is a new entry in a database.
What's funny is we already have WIC which is usually administered separately from EBT, and is very VERY anal about what you can buy, at least in most states. Like "this month you can get 3 gallons of whole milk and 10 gallons of skim milk" anal.

There were many attempts over the years to "destigmatize EBT" which included things like letting some treats like soda be bought by it.

But I think we need to go back to multiple tiers of EBT, the "this is to help you working poors" EBT which is restricted/limited (but perhaps not as much as WIC, and a wider "you're so fucked up EBT is all you get" which allows a bit more niceties.

But making it so EBT couldn't buy products with HFCS in it would solve America's obesity epidemic almost overnight.

Oh, and the X% of employees are on SNAP? That shit is basically just "these employees have kids" - you can qualify for SNAP for some DAMN HIGH income levels if you have enough crotchfruit.
  • 5 people
    $6098 / month or 73,176 / year
  • Real median household income was $80,610 in 2023
Natch.
 
its an open secret that the government paying for EBT basically subsidizes the existence of frito lay and coca cola as a projection of american soft power globally. the problem is that the system has existed for long enough for those companies to get complacent and forget about their end of the bargain, and the government in usual fashion stopped tightening the reigns because it makes corruption easier. at this point they aren't even projecting american culture anymore and the entire system can probably be gutted without any real consequence to american hegemony. it might force poor people to pay $8 for a 12 pack of soda in this economy themselves instead of us giving it to them for free though, and that's also the democrats core voter base

im crankin out tears over this, for sure
 
Back