Giving everyone the same outcome regardless of how hard they try means removing all incentives for good behavior. It's not theoretical since we all know how well it worked in the past.
I hope they absolutely wreck this fucking clown. They should put him away for life and it seems like there are a few potential ways to prosecute him.
Nice to see all those anti war folk suddenly be ome the most advent war hawks.
I liked this article. I think it accurately depicts the Right right now, as well as the underlying tensions that will definitely emerge as the years continue. On mobile so can't quite take snippets of the article that I like, but I highly recommend people read it. It's worth the minute.
If you are literally required to pay into something (on top of regular taxes) that you will only have access to when you retire. It is effectively a retirement program, and not just a welfare program. At which point why should someone be denied access when they've paid into it. Correct me if I'm wrong, but as far as I know you can't get benefits unless you've paid into it. Odd welfare program.
if America and Russia went to war there would be no winner because everyone would be dead. the principal of mutually assured destruction didn't go away because the Russians aren't soviets anymore, they still have nukes.
Obesity has been a problem in this country since at least the 1900s. Where have you guys been?
The reactions to a potential soda ban in this thread tells me that there's a lot of people who don't know about the realities of financial hardship or how SNAP/EBT works. They just see that blacks are on it, the "NIGGERS could be here" alarms in their heads go off, and then they start eating up every wrong conservative talking point about it.
Quit frankly I don't understand how the Dems haven't realized that focusing on the H1-B/Visa issue is the best way they have to breaking of the collation between MAGA and Big Tech.
Wasn't the biggest fan of hers but she has my respect for outliving her brain tumor prognosis by two years. So young to be hit with a tumor.
Multi stage gayops.
Think they could’ve been trying to flush out a leaker?
This is one of those things a bit of "malicious compliance" can solve pretty easily.
Most likely explanation is usually true, therefore this is probably a result of r/GlowieFeds trying to start something, but lacking funds(USAID) and the manpower to do anything better than a Nikolas Talbott tier "trust me bro" discord/whatever screenshots that can easily be faked.
I hope they parade him around and make their trial a living hell. Somebody needs to serve as an example.
It sounds like it was more "oh gosh darn we ACCIDENTALLY let this not-hostile journalist know we're about to (have already) bombed the shit out of a bunch of terrorists that have been attacking our assets and allies in the middle east in a cybersecurity incident for a chat program we don't administrate, darn it to heck, they'll have to just report on that thing we want people to know while we block this chat program that leakers abuse the shit out of that we don't control. Oh well, can't be helped, have to do it."
Sorry, is the volume too loud on mine? I could turn it down if it's bothering you. I don't even notice it anymore.
This is what they kept doing to Milo when he was doing his college tours, wasn't it? Just keep bringing up new, vague, expensive requirements until you successfully run out the clock and the event can't be held. But conservatives love muh principles more than they love losing, so I doubt you would see them push for that.
