2025-03-26 - OFCOM: "Advisory Letter: illegal content risk assessments - your duties under the Online Safety Act 2023"

[atomizer]

Can't they seek cross-border enforcement of fines? Very unlikely to occur, but on the off chance it did it could put tremendous pressure on the site.

 

[ToroidalBoat]

the UK government regularly allows Middle Eastern men to gangrape white girls

If you point out the "two-tiered justice system" BS -- or even just repost a post of someone else pointing such out -- you could get in trouble for "hate speech" in the UK.

 

[Mad Mamba]

Mr? Nigger doesn't even deserve the title. Just call him Queer Starmtrooper like the fucking rest of us.

Fair point. I keep forgetting whether the treacherous kike's name is spelled "Kier" or "Keir". His head belongs on a spike regardless.

 

[A.P. Hill]

Gaz and Baz should go shove that loicence up the inspector's arse.

 

[VientreGordo3000]

sorry to be retarded, but what the hell is the context

 

[AnOminous]

Trans "women" are men and usually child molesters.

British politicians should be dancing on gibbets.

Pakis are rape gangsters.

OFCOM is a batch of pig fucking pederasts.

Rule Britannia!

 

[urr13 account]

It's such a shame we won't go to war with the U.K. I wish Trump would do something cool like carpet bomb London.

 

[Hooked on phobics]

Remember, UK govt people are subhuman with less innate value than mice.

 

[Joe Swanson]

Can't they seek cross-border enforcement of fines? Very unlikely to occur, but on the off chance it did it could put tremendous pressure on the site.

EUtard ignorant to the fact that the world doesn't operate like his faggy wannabe superstate

 

[F40PH]

Very expected, but I'm glad to see you told the cunts at Ofcom to fuck off with as much hatred as I expected from you on this specific issue.

People outside of the UK won't be aware of this, but since the Online Safety Act was passed this month, several very old small to medium sized communities have completely shut up shop because they just do not have the means to fall within compliance of what these tyrannical little dickheads are asking for. As far as the OSA is concerned, a forum ran by some random dude with 10 people on it who talk about nothing but their favourite moth species falls within the same scope as Facebook or Twitter, and will be treated as exactly the same thing. Fucking lunacy.

I fucking hate the UK government more than any other group of so-called "people" on the planet. If they reach out to you again, send them the entirety of gap.zip and tell them to suck shit. Fuck these sandnigger loving faggots.

 

[Vibe_Guy]

Can't they seek cross-border enforcement of fines?

To Sao Tome? An African country that never had contact with the UK trough history, even during colonial times?
Nah.

 

[AnOminous]

So that is the reason ovarit closed

I'm sure it had something to do with it. A number of other sites I use or have used in the past have closed too, some citing this imbecilic law. The fact is the only way to comply with this bureaucratic nightmare is to have a legal team to do it. All the oligopoly companies like your Google/Twitter/Facebook types can afford to comply or suck up a fine.

Little mom and pop type sites? They can't afford it. And with effectively unlimited fines, shit like £18m fines (which can be imposed over and over without limit), they can just financially obliterate any company. Basically an instant death penalty.

It's enough to make you nostalgic for the guillotine. And perhaps neckties can come back into fashion.

 

[Beautiful Border]

The UK loves doing this. Passing laws because they sound good, and then quickly discovering they're unenforceable (I suspect the Tobacco and Vapes Bill will be a similar shitshow when that comes into effect). The large social media sites this bill was written in mind to target aren't based in the UK and have enough money and power to simply tell Ofcom to fuck off. The only websites that are really fucked over by this legislation are small, independent forums based in the UK. Places like forums for hamster owners:

Dozens of small internet forums have blocked British users or shut down as new online safety laws come into effect, with one comparing the new regime to a British version of China’s “great firewall”.

Several smaller community-led sites have stopped operating or restricted services, blaming new illegal harms duties enforced by Ofcom from Monday.

They range from a hamster owners’ forum, a local group for residents of the Oxfordshire town of Charlbury, and a large cycling forum.

“While this forum has always been perfectly safe, we were unable to meet [the compliance requirements of the Act],” wrote the operators of The Hamster Forum, which describes itself as “the home of all things hamstery”.

Richard Fairhurst, the administrator of the “Charlbury in the Cotswolds” forum, wrote that the Act was “a huge issue for small sites, both in terms of the hoops that site admins have to jump through, and potential liability”.

These are the sites that don't have the money or power to resist laws like this. Not the giants.

So good job, Westminster. You've protected our children from the pernicious influence of... the forum for local residents of Charlbury. Brilliant use of Parliamentary time and resources right there.

 

[Kiwi Andy]

lol niggers

 

[AnOminous]

@Null Britbong is claiming that he is the one responsible for this.

I don't see this myself as Britbong doesn't have the intelligence to pull something like this off. All Britbong can do is lust after underage children like his current underage internet girlfriend.


Edit:

View attachment 7139368

I'd be shocked if that tea nigger was the only one. They were going to do it anyway. I was wondering when.

 

[Statix_Shark]

Britain couldn't be more of a faggot nation than they already are. Fuck the Crown, fuck the "King" and fuck their pozzed populace.

 

[Major]

Null should've just written NIGGER 500 times in his reply

 

[skunt]

Did they not link or give examples to such material?

They're hardly going to email every single website on the internet so why did they email you?

 

[Gruntgar The Indentured]

The lunacy of their request will be null and void once dear leader (stickers be upon him) is nominated for head of the FCC.

 

[AnOminous]

I have a feeling that here in Burgerland any pretense of the 1st Amendment is also going to vanish in the next few years thanks to the alphabet agencies that really run our government regardless of the fucktard puppet who sits on office as "president".

Say what you like about our elected idiots, but the First Amendment is still strong. And also say what you like about the current composition of the Supreme Court, but its current First Amendment positions are as rock solid as they have been in decades.

The main real danger currently is Section 230.