- Joined
- Mar 1, 2017
Mullets, because you don't have to pay a Supercuts employee twenty bucks to remove a fedora
Fedoras, Mullets, or Bowlcuts? - Which are worse?
- Thread starter GlassesWearingGenie
- Start date
-
🔧 At about Midnight EST I am going to completely fuck up the site trying to fix something.
- Joined
- May 30, 2014
A fedora. A fedora is an active choice, you decide you want to be a living breathing neckbeard stereotype.
Meanwhile, inbred rednecks can't help being inbred rednecks. It's in their genetics.
Meanwhile, inbred rednecks can't help being inbred rednecks. It's in their genetics.
- Joined
- May 25, 2015
Mullets can infact be worn quite well.
If you're a genetic clone of the worlds best soldier, or are said soldier.
If you're a genetic clone of the worlds best soldier, or are said soldier.
- Joined
- May 13, 2016
Clearly the OP has shopped at Wal-Mart recently.
Varg Did Nothing Wrong
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2016
The fedora is worse because when it's worn, it's by someone trying to be something and failing hard (trying to be stylish, suave and sophisticated and coming off like a pimply gangly toolbag). The mullet has zero pretense. There is nothing stylish about the mullet. The guys who wear mullets don't wear them because they think they look cool with them.
Witner04
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2014
The mullet is a humble haircut. It's like a modern day, lower class tonsure, and a rite of passage qualifying the person for the benefits of the meth lab.
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
Most "fedoras" worn by neckbeards are $10 trilbies from Target and shit like that.
- Joined
- Aug 20, 2014
I wish there was a voting option for BOTH, honestly. Would make this thread even better and more inviting.
It's very easy to spot people likely to shoot up places with that "haircut". In short, not the worst, if only because it makes doing law enforcement's job easy for anyone not part of it. See someone with that haircut? Definitely a criminal.
It's very easy to spot people likely to shoot up places with that "haircut". In short, not the worst, if only because it makes doing law enforcement's job easy for anyone not part of it. See someone with that haircut? Definitely a criminal.
- Joined
- Mar 1, 2017
Trilby is a made up word neckbeards use to hide the fact they wear fedoras.
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2017
Well mullets remind me of a time when David Spade wasn't painfully unfunny, so I'm obviously picking fedoras.
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
No, it's that narrow-brimmed piece of shit that isn't a fedora.
- Joined
- Mar 1, 2017
Upon closer inspection, it seems that the name fedora gets a bad reputation being mistaken for an inferior headwear.
Therefore, it is clear that mullets are clearly worse.
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2017
This guy gets it.
- Joined
- Mar 1, 2017
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2017
As someone who grew up in rural Appalachia in the 90's, I can say with good authority that the mullet is worse than the fedora. The trilby is awful, but a proper fedora can be worn and look good if worn in the proper context (such as with certain types of formal or semi-formal wear), unlike the mullet. And as terrible as the trilby can be on guys, women can wear a trilby and not look like a total douchebag loser. The same cannot be said for the mullet.
People may mock the fedora now (mainly due to the trilby crowd) but actual fedoras were once respectable and cool. Mullets may have been popular in the 80's and 90's, but they were always seen as a white trash haircut even at the height of popularity.
Let me put it this way: Frank Sinatra wore a fedora, Jeff Foxworthy wore a mullet. That pretty much says it all.
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2016
Bowl cuts? Either a mass shooter has one, or every Asian ever, growing up.
- Joined
- Mar 1, 2017
Why do I feel that bowlcut vs. mullet would have been a more sensible topic?
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2016
Aesthetically, the bowl cut looks about 3% nicer than a mullet cut, but they're still both poor choices. Idk, the mullet isn't even a thing anymore really, it was pretty rare to site one back in 2000 when people were first starting to sperg about them online, now they're almost extinct.
As far as mullets and bowl cuts though, that mullet hairdo was actually considered cool at one point. Teen idols had them and nobody batted an eyelash. Sure, it didn't last too long as a popular hairdo, but it was somewhat cool for a minute. The bowl cut was never cool, or considered fashionable by anyone, anywhere, ever. The bowl cut is what a mother gives her child with the weird shaped head or shitty hair that you can't do anything else with.
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2017
Not to mention that a bowlcut makes you look like you have a penis for a head. Idk, I think that might just be slightly worse than looking like a white trash redneck, or someone who's just stuck in the 80s.
Where do you think I get my blackface oops....I mean Mr. Popo make up from? BOING!!!
Where do you think I get my blackface oops....I mean Mr. Popo make up from? BOING!!!
Last edited:
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
Mullets are like '70s fashion, in that maybe they looked good at the time, but they've looked ridiculous since. Bowl cuts never had their moment in time, though, and are mainly associated with poverty or mental deficiency. They're the kind of haircut your mom gave you because anyone can do a bowl cut. Bowl over head, cut. The mullet reeks of white trash and jean jackets and bad metal, but the bowl cut reeks of government cheese and food stamps.