They have a special term for this, created during GamerGate: Sea Lioning, from some overhyped webcomic. Demanding they explain themselves or address a logical inconsistency instead of just shouting their virtuous beliefs and then expecting asspats updoots and social credit points to flow is "harassment."
So this is what it's going to be like these next 4 years?
2 years at least, yes. They have nothing else. They CANNOT let him succeed, they CANNOT let him undo their long march through the institutions. If they can kill him they will. If they can kill his cabinet members they will. Until then, they're going to do whatever they can to slow him down until they can get a replacement for the USAID slush fund and grift machine going and pray they can rig 2028.
I doubt it. Eventually the SCOTUS will begrudgingly step in and slap this stupid practice down (it's threatened to do so during Obama's and Biden's terms, not just Trump's), and if it doesn't, eventually the executive will just stop paying any attention to the orders and pull an Andrew Jackson ("let them enforce it"), relying on support from the legislature to avoid punishment. There isn't enough support in Congress to impeach Trump at the moment, much less actually convict and remove him, and enough congresscritters are nervous about this judicial overreach that it's unlikely Congress would actually remove Trump from office for ignoring these retarded decisions.
Gonna be tough to get their bills signed if they don't back him on this one. But yeah, I expect foot dragging all around. There seems to be an eagerness to kick the can down the road rather than actually lock horns and "settle" this nonsense directly. Makes sense they'd want Trump to stop "threatening" courts. If he cranks up the rhetoric they might actually have to deal with it sooner rather than later.
92% of injunctions against Trump came from Democrat appointed judges.
Democracies* plan until the next election, it is one of their major downsides. Countries like Russia and China can afford to be a little more forward thinking because their leadership isn't changing every decade or so. Granted being able to plan ahead doesn't mean those plans will be good or fool proof either.
Because they think the working class are retards who need to be saved from themselves with globohomo, and instead of adjusting to the growing nationalist-populist attitudes of union voters they simply need to double down until the plebs finally get it
I feel like so many people forgot the fact that Biden embrace court packing, and Supreme Court limits, because he kept getting stomped in the courts. Now they have a problem with Trump attacking the judiciary? It''s funny. Its the same thing with the filibuster too.
I just want to see the Democrats tie themselves into a knot by attacking unions for not representing the working class for not going along with their beliefs. The self-inflicted schadenfreude is fascinating to me.(‿ˠ‿) ԅ(≖‿≖ԅ) said:
Is that the one where they gravely insult a Sea Lion and one overhears and politely but firmly asks them what their problem is? If it was a bigger they would've just been shot.
None of that matters. It's just like them saying Biden was one of the most pro-union presidents even though he shat all over the railroad workers.
That's the one!
Well you have to consider the normie POV: A man you may or may not even like is proposing something none of the presidents in the last 20 years have tried, or even considered. They're skeptical. People don't react well to status quo changes
ANTS HAVE RIGHTS TOO, you bigot!
But yeah, I only had a shitty copy of it. Thanks for finding a better one.
