OK, I kind of disagree with this. I don't think objection to "DEI" has value without any moral framework. It doesn't have to be Christian morality, but I see it as pointless if you're bathing in the things you're criticizing. Most people here would recognize this if we were talking about EFAP or Critical Drinker.
Well that's expected, its a fundamental belief. Otherwise there wouldn't be a disagreement. It might be a stream you can't cross.
Sometimes the addict is best person to show how bad the thing he addicted to is instead of someone who has no connection to the subject.
Sure, but I don't think that was the case with yesterday's stream. I think he starts talking about this 15 minutes in if you want to watch it.
I very well know that he panders to his degenerate audience, but I doubt he wants to project (promote) his fetishes onto the average population like most of vocal coomers. He also tends to separate this shit from the reviews. Most of the bad shit only happens on streams where biggest autists lie.
"just because" probably not. But unlike 90% of culture warriors active right now, Synth has actual gaming cred and reviews actual games.
I'll give my thoughts on this. I think Synthetic Man is a bad person. I don't speak for everyone, but I'm not aware of anyone who views Synth as a moral authority, not even some of his biggest fans like What the Egad think of him as a moral authority. I watch Synthetic man because I find him entertaining and I appreciate his honesty and his willingness to say what he really thinks. I do not have any problem with watching an entertainer who is a bad person because I am not responsible for his behavior, and I can separate the art from the artist. If Synth's content was inseparable from his behavior, I would find it very difficult to enjoy the things he puts out. If we compare to someone like Hbomberguy or Dick Masterson, Hbomberguy's content is inseparable from his extreme leftism, and Dick Masterson has made his content inseparable from defending pedophiles. If Synthetic Man were to do something equivalent, I would not continue watching him.
It's similar to Sam Hyde, but he made it clear that he doesn't like those "people" to say the least.
He isn't, Synth made that clear. But with his statement, lolifags are incentivized to throw money his way. "lol, I don't fucking care that pedophiles give me money", until every sane person has left his audience and he's forced to play jap games about fucking kids to not threaten his bottom line. If it's only about money, he can do it as much as he pleases, whatever. But then he shouldn't complain about being called a fucking grifter. He should simply say that this shit is unacceptable and is scaring away the rest of his audience.
I'm not a fan of his futa thing, but I can mostly tolerate it so long as it's kept to his streams however a few of his reviews made me genuinely MATI and this was one of them.
It was Arkoo, and yes, it was very much undeserved. He takes his contrarian personality to the extreme, and refuses to do what others suggest and believe anything that is not easily believable/trusted. And in his mind, the only possible explanation is that Arkoo is either lying or being a pedophiile (as I think he said he teached football to kids).
Sadly I think people will remind him of yesterday's stream for the rest of his life. He only has himself to blame for being this reckless.
What happened yesterday? I fell asleep and missed the end.
I've watched up until the superchats myself. I'm still referring to his reply to the drama from the start of the stream, it has already been clipped in other threads.
