Business America has lost its appetite for casual dining chains


By Nathaniel Meyersohn, CNN
Fri April 4, 2025

gettyimages-2200303175.webp
Hooters filed for bankruptcy this week, joining a growing list of chains.

Restaurant industry icons where Americans went out for decades for wings, dinner, and celebrations are facing a crisis.

Hooters filed for bankruptcy this week, the latest casual dining chain to go belly up. Red Lobster, TGI Fridays and Buca di Beppo also filed for bankruptcy in the last year. Meanwhile, sales at Denny’s, Applebee’s, Outback Steakhouse, Bonefish Grill, Red Robin and Cracker Barrel’s are dropping, and they are shuttering hundreds of restaurants.

Casual dining chains typically cater to lower and middle-income families looking for a sit-down meal, but diners are abandoning these companies as their disposable income shrinks. These restaurants have been hiking menu prices at the same time their customer base has been squeezed by the rising cost of living. Since 2019, restaurant prices have increased 34%, outpacing the overall growth of inflation during that same period, according to Bureau of Labor Statistics data.

“They’re trying to aim at the average middle consumer,” said Ernest Baskin, an associate professor of food marketing at Saint Joseph’s University. “When consumers start watching their budget, the middle shrinks.”

Instead, diners are choosing to cook dinner at home and are finding cheaper options to grab a meal. That includes frequenting fast-food chains such as Chick-fil-A and Raising Cane’s, and fast-casual restaurants like Chipotle and Cava.

In 2024, sales across the casual dining sector dropped 0.9%, while growing 0.6% at fast-casual chains and 1% at fast-food chains, according to data from Black Box Intelligence.

“In a time-starved world, people want something to be quick at an affordable price,” said Brian Vaccaro, an analyst at Raymond James.

Another sign of the consumer shift from sitting down for dinner at a restaurant to picking up a meal from a fast food or a fast-casual spot: When casual dining chains close, fast-food and fast-casual restaurants have been replacing them —usually with drive-thru stores. Chick-fil-A, for example, is taking over a shuttered Red Lobster in Naples, Florida.

Fast-casual is also more profitable to operate than sit-down restaurants. Chipotle and other fast-casual chains’ locations are smaller, and they require fewer workers and less maintenance to run than full-service restaurants.

Strategy mistakes​

The casual dining sector has also struggled because of companies’ own strategic mistakes — some under private equity ownership — and a lack of investment in table service and restaurant renovations.

Hooters was known for its all-female waitresses in revealing orange outfits and chicken wings, but Buffalo Wild Wings and Wingstop’s undercut Hooters’ wings’ prices, and its so-called “breastaurant” image became out of touch with modern consumers.

Hooters is planning a family-friendly makeover once it emerges from bankruptcy.

Red Lobster was driven into bankruptcy by mismanagement under a former owner, global shrimp supplier Thai Union. Thai Union cut Red Lobster’s longstanding suppliers, pushed out veteran employees and infamously made $20 endless shrimp a permanent menu item for the first time, hurting its profit margins. Red Lobster is attempting a comeback under new CEO Damola Adamolekun.

gettyimages-1909967134.webp
A permanently shuttered TGI Fridays in Islandia, New York, last year.

And Outback, which defined the casual dining steakhouse model in the United States, lost customers as it relied too heavily on promotions to draw diners and cut costs, while simultaneously hiking prices. Outback’s check average was $29 last year — $6 above rival Texas Roadhouse and $2.50 more than LongHorn Steakhouse.

“These brands got dated in terms of their menu offering, the look and feel of the restaurants, and how they reach consumers,” said Clarence Otis Jr., the former CEO of Darden Restaurants, which owns chains like Olive Garden and LongHorn.

Bucking the trend​

But there are some bright spots in casual dining. Chili’s, Texas Roadhouse and Olive Garden have bucked the slowdown.

These chains kept prices lower than rivals and invested heavily in labor and restaurant improvements, and they are currently reaping the payoffs from their investments.

Brinker, the parent company of Chili’s, has poured more than $400 million into simplifying Chili’s menu, adding more servers and bussers and renovating restaurants. That investment has allowed Chili’s to upgrade its French fry and chicken tender recipes and offer fast food-like prices. It’s subsequently gone viral on TikTok for videos of customers pulling apart its gooey mozzarella sticks.

Chili’s sales at restaurants open for at least a year increased a whopping 31% last quarter. It was Chili’s third-straight quarter of double-digit sales growth.

2wcf8ac-20250403132833243.webp
Some casual dining chains, such as Texas Roadhouse, have bucked the slowdown.

“People said ‘casual dining is no good, and Chili’s is in trouble.’ And the reality is we flipped the script on that,” Brinker CEO Kevin Hochman said in an interview last year with CNN. “We’ve done that with the fundamentals of why people go out.”

Another casual chain, Texas Roadhouse, has thrived because of its lower prices. The chain has won over customers not only with its affordable steaks, but with lively, rodeo-style restaurants featuring wood-paneled walls, murals and upbeat country tunes.

Texas Roadhouse’s sales at restaurants open for at least a year increased 7.7% last quarter.

“There’s a widening gap between winners and losers in the casual dining category,” Brian Vaccaro said. “Brands that are investing in labor and the quality of guest experience are winning.”
 
I'm in a smaller town and they've actually built several new restaurants (and are building more) in the past couple years. They're casual dining, but not national chains, just local to the state and bordering states. And frankly, they kick the ass of any of the national chains. Just better service, food quality and atmosphere. I think the shorter supply chain and lack of franchise costs and rules allows them better quality at a similar price.
 
They haven't lost their appetite for it, it's that it's no longer a worthwhile value proposition.

The food isn't good enough compared to the cost. And tip culture has reached such an absurd point that dipshit waiters are practically angry if you don't give them 20 bucks for five minutes of total service.
 
I'm in a smaller town and they've actually built several new restaurants (and are building more) in the past couple years. They're casual dining, but not national chains, just local to the state and bordering states. And frankly, they kick the ass of any of the national chains. Just better service, food quality and atmosphere. I think the shorter supply chain and lack of franchise costs and rules allows them better quality at a similar price.

I also think this is a big factor. I think another contributing factor is Uber eats. If you’re going to order a meal, you can get something for a comparable price, from much better restaurants, that are also local. You’re not driving an extra 15 minutes, are not being bothered with having to find a parking spot or worse, pay for parking.

These corporate chain restaurants serve frozen slop, and even the quality and quantity of their frozen slop has dropped over the past few years, while increasing in price and poor service . Most people will spend a couple bucks more for much better food with higher quality ingredients.

Edit for spelling
 
Last edited:
If I'm going to spend $60 on a sit-down meal for two, I'm going for a local place where I know the people and I'm supporting a family.

The only chain restaurant of that ilk that I regularly patronize is Olive Garden's soup and salad, 'cause you can totally go full mukbang and inhale all of 750 calories at a sitting.
 
Don't normally eat slop but on my way home last night I stopped by KFC on a whim. I ordered a small tendies meal that ended up costing close to 13 bucks and it was incredibly salty

For that money I could have just made my own tendies and been way more satisfied with the end result. I actually feel stupid having paid for that.
 
The biggest bane of any restaurant is maintaining quality at scale. Sure you can get a Big Mac at any McDonalds in the world. But that Big Mac will be made by different PERSON at every McDonalds in the world. Also with a different supervisor, and possibly even a different franchise owner. The Burger Slingers can get away with this because they serve very basic things that are prepacked centrally with automated processes that basically just do all the cooking for the line cooks, whose extent of action in the process is pushing buttons and grabbing the finished product.

This is not something a Red Lobster or an Outback Steakhouse can do. Things are waaaaaaay more complicated here. With multiple different appetizers, entrees, and wat not. The people in the Kitchen actually have to know wtf they are doing. You can't just hire a retard off the street. But people who actually know wtf they are doing are expensive. So costs have to be cut somewhere else. Its the Good, Cheap and Fast conundrum. You can pick two of the three. McDonalds goes with Cheap and Fast. Everyone knows what they are going to get. It won't necessarily be Good, but it will be within your expectations. But at a casual dining joint where a party of two could be looking at a three figure bill if they do the Appetizer, Entree, Desert and Drinks thing. The food has to be Good. You also don't want to be sitting there for an hour while the one guy who is competent makes the dish. So they need multiple guys who make good food. So now you've picked Good and Fast. Which means it cannot be Cheap.

Meanwhile, a Local joint that independently owned and operated, has more control over the entire process. The restaurateur, even if he's not on the line, is there to make sure things go out right. Even if that means having to teach some retard off the street every month because he had to fire the previous line cook for being a fuck up. They have more flexibility. They can hit Good AND Cheap, while being reasonably quick too. If not Fast, then certainly not a disaster either. They also have waaaaaay less corporate overhead. Oftentimes the Owner/Operator is both his HR department, Payroll supervisor and General Manager. He doesn't collect a salary for any of these positions and instead gets paid only if the store turns a profit.

Which makes for a leaner and meaner operation that can keep costs down and maintain quality.
 
Back