Official Kiwifarms Woman-Hate Thread - DO NOT post about OTHER USERS or OTHER THREADS from THIS WEBSITE.

A female coworker told me she got the "ick" from how a guy positioned his hand in an old Facebook post. The post was the guy and a couple of his friends leaned on a pier, nothing weird about it. Same woman puts off big time desparate vibes anytime dating comes up in conversation.
 
Insomniac thought. Dan Bilzerian illustrates why equality of the sexes is impossible:
1743755910862.png

I am hardly Dan Bilzerian's #1 fan or consider him the ultimate male role model. It's just that people talk about Dan Bilzerian and other rich womanizers. But you know what, they never talk about the women. There's no Dan Bilzerian without airhead twentysomethings being willing to sit on his dick. The point is after decades and decades of feminism, there are still literal boatloads of young women who just want to party with rich guys and sleep with them.

Sure, not all women are like that. And not all men are like Dan Bilzerian. Not even all rich men. But the point is, all the women in that photo chose to be there. They aren't slaves. They aren't trafficked. If none of those women would choose to be there, Dan Bilzerian as we know him would not exist.

Some feminists spin up the hamster wheel and try to rationalize that modern bimbos are somehow "empowered" in a way that the harlots of yesteryear weren't, but that's neither here nor there. What matters is that it's not equal, and the inequality arises from women's choices. The female equivalent of Dan Bilzerian, a rich guy who looks pretty danged good for his age, is Candace Bushnell.

1743756322523.png

Candace is a good-looking dame. Damn good looking for a woman in her 60s, and sure, she's had work, but she's been good-looking her whole life. But money and fame did not attract hordes of bachelors. She was married to a guy 10 years younger than her for 10 years, and he bounced once she got too old and gross. This broad is lonely, so lonely that she's said if she could do it all over, she'd trade in wealth and fame to have a husband and children.

You know what you have never heard a single rich guy in all of history ever say? "Damn, I wish I'd known that working hard at being rich means I get no bitches."

How many girls has this dork knocked up?
1743756604004.png

All you need are hair plugs, a personal trainer, and a stock scam, and you can't keep the women off your dick.

The point is not the Alpha Chad Maxx lifestyle or whatever. The point is that this woman exists, and all the Women in STEM recruiting programs in the world haven't stopped her from existing.
1743756937375.png

Each one of Leonardo Dicaprio's slam pieces chooses to be with him. Nobody can stop those women from wanting to keep his bed warm until they turn 26. Women are choosing their empowered choices.

What is the point? The point is that while you hear feminists and others wring their hands about the rich douchebags who are totally jerks to women and use them like objects, and the occasional philosophical nattering about how to stop them from existing (even Andrew Tate has fucked a model), nobody ever talks about how to stop the women from choosing to be with them. Here's how you stop Dan Bilzerian. You stop hot 25-year-olds from sucking his dick. That's it. You stop that, it's over.

You want equality in the workplace? Equal achievement? Then we need equal sexuality. Equal attraction. Women have to choose to stop rewarding men for getting rich and famous. Dan Bilzerian supposedly has a net worth of $100m. Do you think this bitch has $100m?

1743759294093.png

Fuck no. She's just some chick with a decent body and nice hair. But she's not out with some decent-bodied nice-haired guy who has the same net worth as her (probably $0). She's out with Dan Bilzerian. Really not doing much for equality, there, toots.

The point is that you see zero effort from feminists to stop these women from throwing themselves at rich guys. You see zero effort from feminists to convince women to stop being attracted to status and start being attracted to equality. But if women are going to be attracted to status, men are going to seek it. Women have to make different choices if they really want equality (they don't).
 
The point is that while you hear feminists and others wring their hands about the rich douchebags who are totally jerks to women and use them like objects, and the occasional philosophical nattering about how to stop them from existing (even Andrew Tate has fucked a model), nobody ever talks about how to stop the women from choosing to be with them.
Amen, nailed it in one.
 
Amen, nailed it in one.
It extends to regular dating too, not just the "rich douchebag thing". A lot of single women will complain about how all men are assholes, treat them badly etc etc. and refuse to acknowledge that they might be partly responsible.

Ask any of your single female friends to show your their matches on dating apps and you will immediately see the problem. They are all chasing model looking dudes who will be drowning in matches and in all likelihood not looking to settle down with a 40 something cat lady but obviously willing to entertain them for an easy fuck. Said woman then gets salty and comes to the conclusion that its actually all men who are bad, not just her poor decision making in choosing a potential partner that led her here.

I swear it feels like you are in the fucking twilight zone when you have a 38 year old woman whine to you that a guy 10 years her junior (whose dating app profile is just shirtless pictures of him on a beach) fucked her once and ghosted. What did you think was going to happen bro?
 
The point is that you see zero effort from feminists to stop these women from throwing themselves at rich guys. You see zero effort from feminists to convince women to stop being attracted to status and start being attracted to equality. But if women are going to be attracted to status, men are going to seek it. Women have to make different choices if they really want equality (they don't).
Because they know they'd throw themselves at those men at a moment's notice.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: Qonas
Because they know they'd throw themselves at those men at a moment's notice.
Even the wordiest feminist thinkers make no real attempt to square the circle of inequality being a product of patriarchy and women making very unequal choices. At the end of the day, logical consistency isn't something they care about. They just want what they want, and the proof that two things are consistent is they want both of them.
 
Anyone else's George Foids in their family currently sperging about Trump Tarifs and their effect on Shein and Temu?

When mine realized I caught the falling knife for her and she's far ahead of everyone else, she finally shut up, and then admitted she didn't want to know any more than that I did it.

Funny how that works. "I don't want to know how, just do it."
 
The point is that you see zero effort from feminists to stop these women from throwing themselves at rich guys. You see zero effort from feminists to convince women to stop being attracted to status and start being attracted to equality. But if women are going to be attracted to status, men are going to seek it. Women have to make different choices if they really want equality (they don't).
I seem to recall there were some feminists that did get after these types of women, though they were invariably either, women who knew they couldn't get Chad so they wanted to drag other women down, or old, busted sluts that became bitter once their looks faded.

And you can bet the first group would absolutely drop the act if they thought for a second that they had a shot.
 
I seem to recall there were some feminists that did get after these types of women, though they were invariably either, women who knew they couldn't get Chad so they wanted to drag other women down, or old, busted sluts that became bitter once their looks faded.

And you can bet the first group would absolutely drop the act if they thought for a second that they had a shot.
Both groups would.

There are really two attempts to deal with the eternal THOT in feminist "theory." One is to say these women haven't been properly liberated yet. They're suffering from false consciousness, still submitting themselves to the male gaze and the patriarchy. Problem is, of course, these women are very much consciously choosing to be gold-digging bimbos. You can offer them every opportunity in the world to go to college, get fat, major in women's studies, shave their heads, and become lesbians, and they still choose to be hot and party with rich guys. This is just the gender-critical version Marxism's classic problem of the proletariat rejecting communism. Even worse, many of them actually did learn about feminism, so you can't blame lack of education. They just picked the parts they liked, mostly the bits about women not having any accountability for their actions and being entitled to do as they want.

The other is to insist that thots are empowered and liberated, and it's the patriarchy being afraid of women's liberated sexuality that's the problem. This is self-defeating, of course, because as I posted above, women perpetuate inequality by showing sexual attention to rich bachelors and providing incentive to men to get rich that isn't reciprocated by men to women.
 
Back