US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thousands protest Trump administration, Elon Musk in Boston
Boston Globe (archive.ph)
By Tonya Alanez, Chris Serres, Esmy Jimenez, Laura Crimaldi, Talia Lissauer, Haley Clough, Alexa Gagosz, Steven Porter and Amanda Gokee
2025-04-05 22:51:38GMT
bos01.jpg
Demonstrators waved signs and cheered during ‘Hands Off,’ an anti-Trump/Musk rally, at City Hall Plaza in Boston, MA.Craig F. Walker/Globe Staff

Mobilized by angst and dissatisfaction over the Trump administration’s handling of the nation, thousands of New Englanders took to Boston, Concord, N.H., and Providence’s streets in a national day of protest Saturday to chant down the president and his controversial billionaire ally, Elon Musk.

They rallied against the administration’s rollback of diversity, equity and inclusion programs, its targeting of gender-affirming care, and its immigration crackdown that has led to the detention of international students including a Tufts University graduate student. The protestors also spoke out against what they called the administration’s “illegal and unconstitutional power grabs.”

“This is a people’s March!” said Kate Merritt-O’Toole, a retired operating nurse at the Veterans Administration and an organizer who showed up early for the Boston event.

“It’s time for everybody to get up from the kitchen table and say ‘Hands off,‘” she said. “Hands off our government, hands off our constitution.”

bos02.jpg
Demonstrators waved signs and chanted during ‘Hands Off,’ an anti-Trump/Musk rally.Craig F. Walker/Globe Staff

A growing momentum of anti-Trump and anti-Musk sentiment spurred Saturday’s protest, making Boston’s turnout the largest in the city since Trump’s inauguration in January. Unlike Trump’s first term when public outcry hit a fever pitch, protests this time around have been fewer, smaller, and calmer — until recently.

On Saturday, over 10,000 people, amid American, Ukrainian, and trans pride flags, flowed from Boston Common to City Hall Plaza. The sound of drums echoed through the air. Despite chilly April temperatures, more than 10,000 people attended the rally with many coming from places outside the city. They flocked from Framingham, Franklin, Gloucester, Plymouth, and beyond, with homemade signs and umbrellas, prepared for a rainy afternoon.

Asked what brought her out, Laurie Irwin shouted, “Outrage.”

“Who is going to work if everybody is fired from the government?” Irwin asked.

The attendees were students and teachers, union leaders and laborers, first-time protesters and veteran marchers. At least one person was costumed as George Washington, another was recovering from recent knee surgery. They brought their youngsters in backpacks and strollers. Some brought their pets.

“Tax the rich,” they chanted. Reminiscent of the protest era of the 1960s, the sound of musicians strumming the folk anthem, “This Land Is Your Land,” wafted through the air.

Dave Creme and Courtney Hachey, of Waltham, came with their two children ― Rory, 9 and Teagan, 7. Creme held Teagan on his shoulders, who held a sign that said, “Fund our schools so I can learn.” Teagan had made the sign at home.

bos03.jpg
Demonstrators gathered at Market Square in Portsmouth, N.H., on Saturday.Steven Porter

“There is so much going on that you can feel helpless,” said Hachey, who works with children with autism. “It was also an opportunity for my children to learn to speak not just for themselves, but for others.”

Labor organizations turned out in force. Leaders from the Massachusetts American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations, and American Federation of Teachers Massachusetts took the stage.

“I’m here to say an immigrant is not the one taking jobs from people, a billionaire is,” said Chrissy Lynch, president of Massachusetts AFL-CIO.

Beth Lev, an organizer for the Massachusetts ‘Hands Off’ rally, said this was one of thousands of demonstrations happening in all 50 states and six countries, Canada, Mexico, England, France, Germany, and Portugal.

Saturday was predicted to be the largest single day of protest since Trump took office. The biggest rally was expected to happen on Washington’s National Mall. Trump was not scheduled in the nation’s capitol but rather at his Mar-a-Lago Club in Palm Beach, Fla.

Massachusetts Senator Edward J. Markey joined in the march down Tremont Street.

“I believe it’s the people who lead, it’s the people who tell Washington what’s [happening],” the senator said.

At City Hall Plaza, Markey was the first of several official speakers. The finale, an acoustic set from Boston’s beloved Irish punk band, the Dropkick Murphy’s, came amid a downpour.

bos04.jpg
Ken Casey and Dropkick Murphys energized demonstrators during ‘Hands Off,’ an anti-Trump/Musk, rally at City Hall Plaza.Craig F. Walker/Globe Staff

Markey was greeted with energetic applause, whistles and chants of “Markey!”

“This is the energy we need and Boston is going to ignite that energy across the nation,” Markey said. “We aren’t going to take it anymore.”

Markey also urged the crowd to come together to accomplish three essential things: block Trump in the courts, get out and vote, and stand up like Senator Cory Booker.”

Boston Mayor Michelle Wu was emphatic in her denunciation of the Trump administration. She led the crowd in a “Hands off Boston” chant.

“This is about the world we want our children to grow up in,” Wu said. “This is our city and you will never break us.”

Boston mayoral hopeful Josh Kraft also joined the downtown march.

“I’m out here with all these people standing up to Donald Trump, the Trump administration, Elon Musk, DOGE,” Kraft told the Globe.

In Providence, about 8,000 people marched from Hope High School to Kennedy Plaza in downtown.

Wearing a hot pink pussy hat, Joyce Ward, denounced a proposed $510 million in funding cuts to Brown University as “ill-advised” and “retribution.”

“He’s saying he’s going after these colleges because of antisemitism. It’s not true. It’s just more gangster government,” said Ward, 71, of Providence.

Rhode Island state Representative Karen Alzate, who previously told the Globe how she had grown up in the shadow of deportation because her parents were undocumented, told the crowd she is introducing a local bill that will tax the rich.

“The economy is for us. And we’re here to tell this administration that you will not continue to tax our money to use it for your game,” Alzate said. “You will not continue to deport my family, my friends, my neighbors.”

In Portsmouth, N.H., Paul L. Gilbert protested outside of a Tesla dealership showroom. His handheld sign said, “I didn’t vote for Musk!”

“Only Congress can dictate where funds are spent and not spent, and he’s overridden that,” Gilbert said, as passing motorists on US Route 1 honked their horns in support. “It’s just frustrating that the Republicans don’t seem to be challenging that.”

Undeterred by rain in Concord, N.H., Heidi Preuss, a 64-year-old retiree, brought her 8-year-old Great Dane, Leila, along for the protest. Both sported homemade signs.

Preuss said she’s stressed out about the current state of the nation, from drops in the stock market to Trump’s immigration policies.

“Disappearing people off the street is just insane,” she said. “It is absolutely the most un-American thing. It’s the things that make us American that are being attacked.”

Retired veteran and first-time protester, Ken Cowan, of Wilmot, N.H., said, “I didn’t fight for our country for this.”

Cowan, 67, called Trump’s presidency “a coup in progress.”

“I think if we can all stand up and voice our opinions, he can’t take over this country,” Cowan added.
Mass Protests Across the Country Show Resistance to Trump
The New York Times (archive.ph)
By Shaila Dewan
2025-04-05 22:34:28GMT
nyt01.jpg
Protesters rallying against President Trump and Elon Musk on Saturday in Manhattan.Credit...Adam Gray for The New York Times

They came out in defense of national parks and small businesses, public education and health care for veterans, abortion rights and fair elections. They marched against tariffs and oligarchs, dark money and fascism, the deportation of legal immigrants and the Department of Government Efficiency.

Demonstrators had no shortage of causes as they gathered in towns and cities across the country on Saturday to protest President Trump’s agenda. Rallies were planned in all 50 states, and images posted on social media showed crowds in places like St. Augustine, Fla., and Franklin, N.C., and rainy Frankfort, Ky.

nyt02.jpg
The crowds stretched for nearly 20 blocks in Manhattan.Credit...Adam Gray for The New York Times
nyt03.jpg
Protestors at the National Mall in Washington on Saturday.Credit...Haiyun Jiang for The New York Times
nyt04.jpg
Protestors in Atlanta.Credit...Audra Melton for The New York Times

“Pouring rain, 43 degrees, biting wind, and people are still here in Albany in the thousands,” said Ron Marz, a comic book writer who posted a photo on X of the scene at the New York State Capitol.

While crowd sizes are difficult to estimate, organizers said that more than 600,000 people had signed up to participate. On Fifth Avenue in Manhattan, the protest stretched for nearly 20 blocks. In Chicago, several thousand people flooded Daley Plaza and adjacent streets, while in the nation’s capital tens of thousands surrounded the Washington Monument. In Atlanta, the police estimated the crowd marching to the gold-domed statehouse at over 20,000.

Some demonstrators waved American flags, occasionally turned upside down to signal distress. Many, especially federal workers and college students, were afraid to speak on the record for fear of retaliation.

nyt05.jpg
Marching in midtown Atlanta on Saturday.Credit...Audra Melton for The New York Times
nyt06.jpg
A demonstrator in New York City.Credit...Adam Gray for The New York Times

The mass action, “Hands Off!,” was planned at a time when many have bemoaned what they see as a lack of strong resistance to Mr. Trump. The president has moved aggressively to punish people and institutions he views as out of step with his ideology.

The rallies were organized by Indivisible, MoveOn and several other groups that led protests about abortion rights, gun violence and racial justice during the first Trump administration. Organizers said they hoped to shift the emphasis to pocketbook issues like health care and Social Security, with the message that Mr. Trump is making life harder for the average American while benefiting his richest friends.

They also moved away from focusing on massive demonstrations, like the 2017 Women’s March on Washington, to instead plan hundreds of local gatherings in communities large and small.

Some demonstrators had specific issues, while others opposed the Trump administration and MAGA movement in general. “Hands off my money, rights, democracy,” one sign proclaimed. “Make lying wrong again,” said another.

In Chicago, Glynn Tipton, a 45-year-old pharmaceutical professional, said he was attending to make friends feel safer.

nyt07.jpg
Daley Plaza in Chicago on Saturday.Credit...Vincent Alban for The New York Times
nyt08.jpg
Several thousand people protested in Chicago.Credit...Vincent Alban for The New York Times

“I’m a generic white guy, so they aren’t coming for me,” he said. “There’s a lot of my friends who are Jewish, trans, in the military or sick, and they’re not doing OK. It’s OK for me to stand out here, so I should for the ones who are afraid.”

Karen Fitzgerald, a 71-year-old retired teacher from Naperville, Ill., said she was most concerned about veterans and the environment.

“I’m disgusted and sad that we have to do this,” she said. “A country that doesn’t take care of its veterans is not a place to be proud of.”

Among the demonstrators in New York City was Melissa Jackson, 41, a former special education teacher and the mother of a 3-year-old on a specialized learning plan for students with disabilities.

“I think it’s ridiculous. New York, the United States, is the melting pot. Like, what do we want? Like, not diversity, not inclusion?” she said, adding that she was also concerned about cuts to public education. “This is just a step backwards. We’ve come too far to take so many steps back.”

In Atlanta, Johnny Johnson, 34, said he had been hired by the Internal Revenue Service, moved, fired and rehired in a matter of months.

nyt09.jpg
A demonstrator in New York.Credit...Adam Gray for The New York Times
nyt10.jpg
A rally in Phoenix. Many people attending Saturday’s rallies carried American flags, and several displayed them upside down in protest. Credit...Adriana Zehbrauskas for The New York Times

“I dipped into my 401(k) because I didn’t know what was going to happen,” he said.

In Denver, veteran Trump protesters said there was a noticeably smaller Latino presence on Saturday than there had been at demonstrations during the first Trump term. “You notice there’s not a lot of Chicano people out here? It’s cause people are scared,” said Brian Loma, 49, an environmental organizer who set up a tent in the snow selling hot chocolate. The government seemed to be “ripping up green cards,” he said. “It’s crazy.”

Ian Mains, a cybersecurity consultant and former Army warrant officer from Aurora, Colo., said he was protesting for the first time. He said he had never noticed migrants causing trouble in his community, but he decried that “they’re being demonized right now.”

He added that the deportation of migrants to El Salvador — “without any accountability whatsoever, it makes me wanna puke.”
 
It's Columbia. She was the first symbol for America prior to Uncle Sam taking the role. Columbia is a based goddess of fortune and power, and manifest destiny. She represents everything that led to the Founders fighting the British Empire to create us in the first place.
Uncle Sam was created during the rumblings of divisions between the states so the North could shame and infantilize Southern states with their big Uncle Sam telling these unruly toddlers to behave.
This cartoon is just showing America's military might, conveying that "Columbia" (America was also considered to be called Columbia at first) who is a stand in for America itself, has put on massive new military powers like a hat.
I explain because Columbia is to me what aged starlets are to you, buddy.
Do you think Columbia gives good head?
 
My bet is most of these protests flop but that won't stop the drones and MSM from screaming at the top of their lungs how strong and powerful and massive these protest were.
From my brief perusal of Twitter, the only protests that had any significant attendance were the ones in DC and in blue megacities like NYC, Chicago, and Boston. Every other city had very few people show up.
 
She went from representing Freedom, Liberty, American expansion and excellence to being shown giving protection to jews and chinese and blacks from the evil tyranny of the racist southern business heads who wanted to keep them building railroads.

What Southern railroads?

Will they try a soft coup? For sure but I think the nu-Left lacks the balls to do an all out war. Anti-fags only fight in safe zones, can you imagine the average bug-hiver soy boy picking up a weapon to fight? Look at this lame "fuck Musk" movement, it's sad and ridiculous and well..pathetic. A bunch of weak ass soy boys hitting cars when their owners a away and tossing firebombs in the middle of the night at unguarded targets and still getting caught anyway. This is the people you fear?

You cannot pull off a civil war unless you have a disaffected chunk of military-trained young men to fight it and leadership to tell them where to go. Let's just say, hypothetically, that several movers and shakers on the left decided it was Happening Time. California and a number of other states decide to secede. They could get quite a few flag officers to join them, maybe even some who aren't completely incompetent, like Mark Milley.

But where are they going to get trigger-pullers? The foaming-at-the-mouth lefties in the Army, the kind who'd be willing to kill somebody for trannies and niggers, are POGs. The ones you actually have to be scared of are the ones who are loyal to America.
 
More Than 500 Law Firms Back Perkins Coie in Fight With Trump
The New York Times (archive.ph)
By Ben Protess
2025-04-04 21:22:48GMT

The firms signed a legal brief supporting Perkins Coie, calling the president’s actions a threat “to the rule of law.” The largest firms declined to sign.
More than 500 law firms on Friday threw their support behind some of their embattled peers, declaring that President Trump’s recent crackdown on the law firm industry poses “a grave threat to our system of constitutional governance and to the rule of law itself.”

The firms, 504 in all, signed a so-called friend of the court brief that was filed on behalf of Perkins Coie, the first firm to receive an executive order restricting its business.

Perkins Coie sued the Trump administration, and a judge has temporarily blocked the president’s order, which jeopardized its ability to represent government contractors and limited its access to federal buildings. While the judge weighs whether to permanently block the order, a wide-ranging effort has been underway to collect signatures for the brief.

The New York Times reported this week that none of the nation’s top 10 revenue-generating firms signed the brief before a soft deadline on Tuesday, and that remained the case on Friday. In fact, not a single top 20 firm by revenue, as ranked by American Lawyer, signed, including Kirkland & Ellis, Latham & Watkins or Gibson Dunn.

Yet in recent days, a few large firms did add their signatures, including Covington & Burling, No. 28 in American Lawyer’s rankings; and Arnold & Porter, No. 47. Two other big firms that received executive orders and are also challenging them in court, WilmerHale and Jenner & Block, also signed. All told, nearly 10 firms in the top 100 signed the brief.

Other friend of the court briefs were also filed in support of Perkins Coie, including one signed by both the A.C.L.U. and the Cato Institute, the Washington-based libertarian think tank.

In a statement, Perkins Coie said it was “grateful for the support” in its “challenge to the unconstitutional executive order and the threat it poses to the rule of law.”

The brief filed by the law firms similarly argued that Mr. Trump’s orders ran afoul of the Constitution, violating the First, Fifth and Sixth Amendments.

“The judiciary should act with resolve — now — to ensure that this abuse of executive power ceases,” said the brief, which was drafted by Donald B. Verrilli Jr., a solicitor general during President Barack Obama’s administration. “Whatever short-term advantage an administration may gain from exercising power in this way, the rule of law cannot long endure in the climate of fear that such actions create.”

Mr. Verrilli is now a partner at Munger, Tolles & Olson, a firm that is well-known but not among the nation’s top revenue generators.

Law firm size and ranking were not the only factors in signing. Geography also appeared to play a determining role: Signatures came from top firms in Washington and Chicago, but not New York.

Sullivan & Cromwell did not sign, nor did Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, which recently struck a deal with Mr. Trump to avoid an executive order. Paul Weiss, which was the target of an executive order before it reached a deal of its own, did not sign either.

The big New York firms that withheld their signatures were not necessarily opposed, according to people with knowledge of the matter. They quietly support the principle of it, but are concerned that signing the document would draw Mr. Trump’s ire and cost them clients, or that signing would not meaningfully help Perkins Coie.

Some firms that did not sign are nonetheless supporting firms that Mr. Trump targeted. Williams & Connolly is representing Perkins Coie, while Cooley is representing Jenner & Block, another firm that chose to fight Mr. Trump’s order in court. WilmerHale is represented by a prominent conservative litigator, Paul Clement.

In all three cases, judges have temporarily blocked the key elements of the president’s orders.

In each of those cases, firms that received an executive order had ties to the investigation into Russia’s support for Mr. Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign.

Perkins Coie was involved in a dossier compiled during the 2016 campaign about Mr. Trump’s potential ties to Russia. WilmerHale once employed Robert Mueller III, the former F.B.I. director who served as the special counsel leading that investigation. And Jenner & Block was home to a top prosecutor who worked with Mr. Mueller.

Other firms chose to cave to Mr. Trump’s demands before being hit with an executive order. Over the last week, Willkie Farr & Gallagher and Milbank both cut deals promising to dedicate $100 million of pro bono work to causes that Mr. Trump supports.

While the firms avoided protracted battles with Mr. Trump, the deals have drawn widespread condemnation in the legal community. And they appeared to embolden Mr. Trump, who has hinted that additional law firms are in his sights.

Mr. Verrilli’s brief, which was co-written by Nathan P. Eimer, a Chicago litigator, warned about the perils of the executive orders and called on judges to intervene.

“Unless the judiciary acts decisively now, what was once beyond the pale will in short order become a stark reality,” the brief said. “Corporations and individuals alike will risk losing their right to be represented by the law firms of their choice and a profound chill will be cast over the First Amendment right to petition the courts for redress.”
Hundreds of law firms back Perkins Coie in fight against Trump sanctions
The Washington Post (archive.ph)
By Mark Berman
2025-04-05 01:56:40GMT

But the largest U.S. firms did not join a court filing supporting Perkins Coie and denouncing the president’s orders targeting law firms.
More than 500 law firms on Friday denounced President Donald Trump’s campaign to punish individual firms, calling his actions abuses of power that endanger the rule of law.

The firms said in a court filing that Trump’s orders are potentially devastating for any firm he targets and appear intended to intimidate others so that they do not challenge his administration. The filing was not signed by any of the 20 largest firms nationwide, as measured by revenue.

“Whatever short-term advantage an administration may gain from exercising power in this way, the rule of law cannot long endure in the climate of fear that such actions create,” the group objecting to Trump’s orders wrote in the filing.

Trump has issued orders castigating several prominent law firms, citing their connections to some of his perceived foes and directing that they face significant consequences. The punishments have included losing government contracts and being blocked from federal buildings or interacting with government employees, which firms describe as catastrophic for their operations.

His orders have caused a sharp divide within the legal community, with firms and attorneys split on whether to fight.

Some firms have reached deals with the Trump administration to avoid punishment, agreeing in some cases to provide up to $100 million in pro bono work for causes the president supports. Three firms targeted by Trump — Perkins Coie, Jenner & Block and WilmerHale — instead sued to fight the orders, and federal judges at least temporarily blocked many of the penalties they faced.

The court filing submitted Friday was signed by hundreds of firms backing Perkins Coie in its lawsuit. The filing — known as an amicus, or friend of the court, brief — appeared to be a show of support from across the legal profession, with signatures from large firms with hundreds of employees as well as smaller, boutique operations. Three firms targeted by Trump — WilmerHale, Jenner & Block and Covington & Burling — were among those that signed.

“We are grateful for the support of over 500 law firms, as well as numerous other amici, in our challenge to the unconstitutional Executive Order and the threat it poses to the rule of law,” Perkins Coie said in a statement.

It was not immediately clear whether the largest firms that did not sign had all been contacted about the filing or offered a chance to sign on before it was submitted. The Washington Post contacted all 20 firms before the brief was submitted and again after it was filed. Most firms did not immediately respond to either query.

Senior partners from Keker, Van Nest & Peters publicly said days earlier that they had signed on to it and urged big firms to follow their lead.

Trump began targeting firms in February, taking aim at several that employed people who had investigated him or had other ties to his foes. He assailed Perkins Coie for representing Hillary Clinton, his opponent in the 2016 presidential race, and punished Covington & Burling for its representation of Jack Smith, the former special counsel who oversaw federal indictments against Trump.

In the brief, the firms backing Perkins Coie said Trump’s orders “seek to cow every other firm, large and small, into submission.” The firms said the orders posed a “looming threat” that any attorney or firm challenging the administration could face “the risk of devastating retaliation.” Challenging government overreach is a core part of what lawyers and law firms do, they added, something that invariably brings them into conflict with the government.

The firms also expressed “particularly acute concern” about the portions of Trump’s executive orders criticizing firms for their pro bono work, saying attorneys have to be able to advocate for all clients, “large and small, rich and poor.”

The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment about the filing Friday.

Trump’s order said Perkins Coie carried out “dishonest and dangerous activity.” In its lawsuit fighting the order, the firm called it “an affront to the Constitution” and said Trump’s actions were aimed at bullying those who run afoul of the administration. The firm also said Trump’s actions quickly cost it clients and revenue.

U.S. District Judge Beryl A. Howell agreed on March 12 to temporarily block much of Trump’s order, saying, “It sends little chills down my spine.”

The Justice Department has said in court filings that Trump had issued “a straightforward — and straightforwardly legal — Executive Order,” all within the bounds of his power, and it urged Howell to dismiss Perkins Coie’s case.

The Justice Department also unsuccessfully sought to have Howell removed from the case, accusing her of being “insufficiently impartial.” She rejected the request.

Other groups and individuals have also submitted briefs supporting Perkins Coie. One brief, signed by the American Civil Liberties Union and the Cato Institute, said Trump’s actions violated the First Amendment and, if left unchecked, could have dire consequences for Americans’ abilities to obtain legal representation and speak freely.

Another filing was submitted by former presidents of the D.C. Bar, an association that handles discipline for lawyers licensed in the District. The filing called Trump’s actions “not merely an attack on a single law firm (or small handful of major firms) but an assault on the vital underpinnings of the American legal process itself.”

Patrick McGlone, one of the former D.C. Bar presidents who signed the brief, said he was appalled by Trump’s executive order targeting Perkins Coie.

“Our judges rely on lawyers being able to capably and zealously represent their clients,” McGlone said in an interview. “The potential for interference with the rule of law is pretty vast if this kind of conduct isn’t curtailed, and I’m certainly hopeful that it will be.”
James Carville compares law firms, powerful groups cooperating with Trump to Nazi collaborators
FOX News (archive.ph)
By Gabriel Hays
2025-04-05 12:23:21GMT
Democratic strategist James Carville warned on Friday that those who cooperate with President Donald Trump’s administration may be treated the way Nazi collaborators were at the end of World War II.

The former Bill Clinton adviser made the comparison during a recent segment of his "Politicon" podcast, noting that the humiliating treatment that the Europeans who helped Hitler’s forces faced at the end of the war may be instructive as a historical comparison. Carville singled out influential Americans and institutions aiding the Trump administration.

"I'm not saying that these people should be placed in pajamas and have their head shaved, marched down Pennsylvania Avenue and spit on. I'm not saying that, but I'm saying that that did happen," Carville said.

Speculating about the future, he wondered, "Do you know… what the country is going to feel toward collaborators with this regime?"

The strategist began by railing against Trump’s agenda, calling it a "nightmare" and hoping for its end. He called Trump officials "anti-patriotic," "a bunch of grifters," and went on to tar and feather the law firms and corporations that have been cooperating with the administration.

The Trump administration has applied pressure on multiple major law firms allegedly linked to the Democratic Party and anti-Trump causes. Trump signed an executive order last month that called for the employees of the Perkins Coie law firm to be stripped of their security clearances and banned from accessing government buildings. It also called for the termination of the firm's existing contracts with government clients.

While Perkins Coie has sued Trump over the executive order, other firms have sought to strike deals with Trump over the pressure. New York ‘s Paul Weiss firm met with the president in March and agreed to pledging $40 million worth of legal work to support administration causes to be spared from executive penalty, the AP reported.

Carville viewed such efforts to work with Trump as capitulation to his agenda.

"How disgraced must these law firms feel now? How disgraced must these companies that are sucking up to him – that are giving him tens of millions of dollars for ‘access.’ Do you know what’s going to happen? Do you know how this ends," he asked, before making his historical comparison.

"Do you know… what the country is going to feel towards collaborators with this regime? Maybe you need to go in history and see what happened in August of 1944 after Paris was liberated. They didn't take very kindly to the collaborators. No. It was not a very pretty sight in the streets of Paris."

Carville continued, clarifying that he isn’t endorsing this treatment but noting it did happen and it could happen to Trump cooperators, who, he added, have betrayed America.

"But I’m saying that that did happen. And I’m saying that these people betrayed the French nation in the same way that I think that these law firms and these giant corporate conglomerates are betraying the United States," he declared, though he added he doesn’t know what their "comeuppance" should be and advised people not to assault anyone.

Carville called Amazon founder Jeff Bezos a "collaborator" last month, after the business mogul pledged to work with the Trump administration. "This guy's not going to be remembered as the greatest retailer who ever lived, of which he is," Carville said. "He's going to be remembered as a collaborator. And he will never ever wash that stench off of him."
 
You know what's super funny about Eurofaggots? They go on and on and on about how much they hate America and how glad they are to be European but if you ask the average Frenchman or Germanfag or whatever what defines them or what they're proud of all they talk about is how much they love BLM/George Floyd/troons/feminism ect.

They never talk about anything from their own cultures. Everything they define themselves by is a social or political movement exported from the U.S
 
Last edited:
Trump needs to explain his national security firings
The Washington Post (archive.ph)
By The Editorial Board
2025-04-05 22:40:17GMT

If they were done on the advice of a conspiracy theorist, voters have reason to worry.
wapo01.jpg
Laura Loomer shows her support for Donald Trump outside a campaign event for Ron DeSantis in October 2023. (Joe Raedle/Getty Images)

If not for President Donald Trump’s self-inflicted wounds from the tariffs he unveiled on Wednesday, the biggest White House story this past week might have been his purge of six National Security Council staffers and the top two officials at the National Security Agency.

The ax fell on Thursday, a day after Trump met with far-right conspiracy theorist Laura Loomer. In the Oval Office, she urged the president to fire the staffers on the dubious grounds that they were insufficiently loyal. Trump acknowledged that Loomer gives him personnel advice — and “sometimes I listen to those recommendations” — but denied doing so in this case. Loomer, however, claimed credit.

Trump says he wants to be known as the most transparent president in U.S. history. In that case, he should explain to Americans why so many political appointees whom he placed in critical security jobs only three months ago needed to be fired so soon. Loomer suggested there had been a “vetting failure.”

If so, it would cast doubt on the competence of Sergio Gor, the director of the presidential office of personnel, who joined Trump’s roughly 30-minute meeting with Loomer, along with Vice President JD Vance and Chief of Staff Susie Wiles. If Trump agrees with Loomer’s explanation, then what changes will he institute to prevent such hiring mistakes from being repeated? Americans have a right to know. Obviously, this is not an optimal way to effectively lead a government amid so much global chaos.

Loomer does not seem to be a particularly trustworthy adviser to the president. She has amplified a conspiracy theory on social media claiming that the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, were an inside job. She has described her beliefs as “pro-white nationalism.” During the Republican presidential primary, she falsely accused Casey DeSantis, wife of Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, of faking her breast cancer. In 2023, Trump moved to give her a role on his campaign but backed off after some of his most loyal supporters, including Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Georgia), protested.

National security adviser Michael Waltz also joined the Oval Office meeting with Trump and Loomer toward its end, but he has little power to protect his employees, having been weakened by his blunder last month, when he accidentally added a magazine editor to a high-level Signal chat.

Flying to a golf tournament in Florida on Thursday, Trump told reporters on Air Force One that he’s “always going to let go of people — people we don’t like, or people that take advantage of, or people that may have loyalties to someone else.” But this doesn’t explain his rationale for getting rid of the NSC officials — each of whom appears to have a solid record in government:

David Feith, a former Wall Street Journal editorial writer who served in the State Department during Trump’s first term, was a senior director for technology and national security working on export controls. Thomas Boodry, Waltz’s legislative director during his last term in the House and a former Senate aide to Marco Rubio, was senior director for legislative affairs. Brian Walsh, another former Rubio employee who served as staff director on the Senate Intelligence Committee, was a director for intelligence on the NSC.

Trump at least resisted Loomer’s push to fire the principal deputy national security adviser, Alex Wong, whose wife Loomer has disparaged for working as a career Justice Department lawyer during the Biden, Obama and first Trump administrations.

Loomer claims that she also successfully prodded Trump to fire Gen. Timothy Haugh as director of both the National Security Agency and U.S. Cyber Command because he got those jobs in 2023 when Gen. Mark A. Milley, now retired, was chairman of the Joint Chief of Staff.

Sen. Mark R. Warner (D-Virginia), the vice chair of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, noted that Haugh has served in uniform with honor and distinction for more than 30 years. The senator wondered, in a statement: “At a time when the United States is facing unprecedented cyberthreats, as the Salt Typhoon cyberattack from China has so clearly underscored, how does firing him make Americans any safer?” Trump needs to answer this question.
 
AI-modified JD Vance portrait makes an appearance at the pro-Palestine protest in DC.

“Izwael first” a chubby Vance says on the poster, while wielding a lollipop.

View attachment 7181681
I can't wait till we get past the moral fagging over AI art. People clutch their pearls over it but they're fine using it when it's to make fun of someone they hate.

Also, did Vance ever do anything weird? First they called him "weird", then they accuse him of fucking couches, now the AI art. Has he actually done anything malevolent or they just hope something sticks? People say they're afraid of a Vance presidency but he's one of the few I've seen in Trump's den of snakes who's willing to speak his mind against Trump's policy.
 
Back