US Trump announces sweeping new tariffs to promote US manufacturing, risking inflation and trade wars - President Donald Trump declared on Wednesday a 10% baseline tax on imports from all countries

1743629549137.png

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump declared on Wednesday a 10% baseline tax on imports from all countries and higher tariff rates on dozens of nations that run trade surpluses with the United States, threatening to upend much of the architecture of the global economy and trigger broader trade wars.

Trump held up a chart while speaking at the White House, showing the United States would charge a 34% tax on imports from China, a 20% tax on imports from the European Union, 25% on South Korea, 24% on Japan and 32% on Taiwan.

The president used aggressive rhetoric to describe a global trade system that the United States helped to build after World War II, saying “our country has been looted, pillaged, raped, plundered” by other nations.

Trump declared a national economic emergency to launch the tariffs, expected to produce hundreds of billions in annual revenues. He has promised that factory jobs will return back to the United States as a result of the taxes, but his policies risk a sudden economic slowdown as consumers and businesses could face sharp price hikes on autos, clothes and other goods.

“Taxpayers have been ripped off for more than 50 years,” Trump said in remarks at the White House. “But it is not going to happen anymore.”

Trump was fulfilling a key campaign promise as he imposed what he called “reciprocal” tariffs on trade partners, acting without Congress through the 1977 International Emergency Powers Act in an extraordinary attempt to both break and ultimately reshape America’s trading relationship with the world.

The president’s higher rates would hit foreign entities that sell more goods to the United States than they buy, meaning the tariffs could stay in place for some time as the administration expects other nations to lower their tariffs and other barriers to trade that it says have led to a $1.2 trillion trade imbalance last year.

The tariffs follow similar recent announcements of 25% taxes on auto imports; levies against China, Canada and Mexico; and expanded trade penalties on steel and aluminum. Trump has also imposed tariffs on countries that import oil from Venezuela and he plans separate import taxes on pharmaceutical drugs, lumber, copper and computer chips.

None of the warning signs about a falling stock market or consumer sentiment turning morose have caused the administration to publicly second-guess its strategy, despite the risk of political backlash as voters in last year’s election said they wanted Trump to combat inflation.

Senior administration officials, who insisted on anonymity to preview the new tariffs with reporters ahead of Trump’s speech, said the taxes would raise hundreds of billions of dollars annually in revenues. They said the 10% baseline rate existed to help ensure compliance, while the higher rates were based on the trade deficits run with other nations and then halved to reach the numbers that Trump presented in the Rose Garden.

In a follow-up series of questions by The Associated Press, the White House could not say whether the tariff exemptions on imports worth $800 or less would remain in place, possibly shielding some imports from the new taxes.

Based on the possibility of broad tariffs that have been floated by some White House aides, most outside analyses by banks and think tanks see an economy tarnished by higher prices and stagnating growth.

Trump would be applying these tariffs on his own; he has ways of doing so without congressional approval. That makes it easy for Democratic lawmakers and policymakers to criticize the administration if the uncertainty expressed by businesses and declining consumer sentiment are signs of trouble to come.

Heather Boushey, a member of the Biden White House’s Council of Economic Advisers, noted that the less aggressive tariffs Trump imposed during his first term failed to stir the manufacturing renaissance he promised voters.

“We are not seeing indications of the boom that the president promised,” Boushey said. “It’s a failed strategy.”

Rep. Suzan DelBene, D-Wash., said the tariffs are “part of the chaos and dysfunction” being generated across the Trump administration. The chair of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee stressed that Trump should not have the sole authority to raise taxes as he intends without getting lawmakers’ approval, saying that Republicans so far have been “blindly loyal.”

“The president shouldn’t be able to do that,” DelBene said. “This is a massive tax increase on American families, and it’s without a vote in Congress ... President Trump promised on the campaign trail that he would lower costs on day one. Now he says he doesn’t care if prices go up — he’s broken his promise.”

Even Republicans who trust Trump’s instincts have acknowledged that the tariffs could disrupt an economy with an otherwise healthy 4.1 % unemployment rate.

“We’ll see how it all develops,” said House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La. “It may be rocky in the beginning. But I think that this will make sense for Americans and help all Americans.”

Longtime trading partners are preparing their own countermeasures. Canada has imposed some in response to the 25% tariffs that Trump tied to the trafficking of fentanyl. The European Union, in response to the steel and aluminum tariffs, put taxes on 26 billion euros’ worth ($28 billion) of U.S. goods, including on bourbon, which prompted Trump to threaten a 200% tariff on European alcohol.

Many allies feel they have been reluctantly drawn into a confrontation by Trump, who routinely says America’s friends and foes have essentially ripped off the United States with a mix of tariffs and other trade barriers.

The flip side is that Americans also have the incomes to choose to buy designer gowns by French fashion houses and autos from German manufacturers, whereas World Bank data show the EU has lower incomes per capita than the U.S.

“Europe has not started this confrontation,” said European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen. “We do not necessarily want to retaliate but, if it is necessary, we have a strong plan to retaliate and we will use it.”

Italy’s premier, Giorgia Meloni, on Wednesday reiterated her call to avoid an EU-US trade war, saying it would harm both sides and would have “heavy” consequences for her country’s economy.

Because Trump had hyped his tariffs without providing specifics until Wednesday, he provided a deeper sense of uncertainty for the world, a sign that the economic slowdown could possibly extend beyond U.S. borders to other nations that would see one person to blame.

Ray Sparnaay, general manager of JE Fixture & Tool, a Canadian tool and die business that sits across the Detroit River, said the uncertainty has crushed his company’s ability to make plans.

“There’s going to be tariffs implemented. We just don’t know at this point,” he said Monday. “That’s one of the biggest problems we’ve had probably the last — well, since November — is the uncertainty. It’s basically slowed all of our quoting processes, business that we hope to secure has been stalled.”

https://apnews.com/article/trump-tariffs-liberation-day-2a031b3c16120a5672a6ddd01da09933 (Archive)
 
@More AWS-8Q Than You , it’s not letting me reply for some reason.

Based off logic. Do you think that we’re going to be able to produce materials as effectively & cost-efficient as China when they have 10x the workforce as indentured servitude, living in actual fucking cages getting paid 4¢ for each SHEIN dress they put together, when their American counterparts are looking to make $25 an hour with medical for the same job? It’s not going to happen. Math isn’t going to stop existing and make the big number smaller than the small number.

The rust belters aren’t going to be saved by manufacturing refrigerator parts; they’re going to be mistreated and underpaid for greater profits by the same people backing your guy. You think these other billionaires are investing so much money because they just love America that much? No, they’re investing money because they know how this will play out and are hoping to cash out on their new crop of quasi-slaves.

You’re arguing completely based off emotion, and Trump’s done a very good job of playing into this jingoistic sentiment and fool you all into believing he’s your guy, when in fact, he would sell you to the Chinese in a heartbeat if it benefitted him. He’s a celebrity politician billionaire, literally the 0.1% of the 0.1% and you guys think he’s a midwestern folk hero because he called Hilary a retard nine years ago.
Dude you dont even know how to reply to posts stfu
 
China has retaliated

China strikes back at Trump with 34 percent tariff — bans some rare earth exports to the U.S.​

This week, President Donald Trump imposed at least 54% tariffs on nearly all imported Chinese goods, and Beijing hit back with 34% duties for goods from the U.S. In addition to these taxes, Bloomberg reported that China is restricting the export of seven rare earth metals as part of its move against Washington.

The Ministry of Commerce for the People’s Republic of Chinais sanctioning the following materials: samarium, gadolinium, terbium, dysprosium, lutetium, scandium, and yttrium. Although these resources aren’t widely known to the public, they’re crucial for producing some of our most advanced technologies. For example, some of these materials are used in the magnets found in the motors of electric vehicles, while others are used for creating superconductors. Some are also used in storage media to improve efficiency and performance, and several more are found in nuclear reactors.
 
China has retaliated

China strikes back at Trump with 34 percent tariff — bans some rare earth exports to the U.S.​

This week, President Donald Trump imposed at least 54% tariffs on nearly all imported Chinese goods, and Beijing hit back with 34% duties for goods from the U.S. In addition to these taxes, Bloomberg reported that China is restricting the export of seven rare earth metals as part of its move against Washington.

The Ministry of Commerce for the People’s Republic of Chinais sanctioning the following materials: samarium, gadolinium, terbium, dysprosium, lutetium, scandium, and yttrium. Although these resources aren’t widely known to the public, they’re crucial for producing some of our most advanced technologies. For example, some of these materials are used in the magnets found in the motors of electric vehicles, while others are used for creating superconductors. Some are also used in storage media to improve efficiency and performance, and several more are found in nuclear reactors.
Oops maybe we shouldn't have outsourced all of our manufacturing capabilities for crucial things like superconductors and magents to a hostile foreign power just to take advantage of their slave labor. Who knew?

You figured retards would have learned about how bad it was to let China do all of this shit for them when COVID hit but I guess people are even bigger gorilla niggers than I previously thought possible.

The sooner America is off of China's tit completely, the better.
 
Oops maybe we shouldn't have outsourced all of our manufacturing capabilities for crucial things like superconductors and magents to a hostile foreign power just to take advantage of their slave labor. Who knew?

You figured retards would have learned about how bad it was to let China do all of this shit for them when COVID hit but I guess people are even bigger gorilla niggers than I previously thought possible.

The sooner America is off of China's tit completely, the better.
Uhh this doesn't impact us on the importing side at all, only the exporting side.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: IAmNotAlpharius
Uhh this doesn't impact us on the importing side at all, only the exporting side.
"In addition to these taxes, Bloomberg reported that China is restricting the export of seven rare earth metals as part of its move against Washington.

The Ministry of Commerce for the People’s Republic of Chinais sanctioning the following materials: samarium, gadolinium, terbium, dysprosium, lutetium, scandium, and yttrium. Although these resources aren’t widely known to the public, they’re crucial for producing some of our most advanced technologies. For example, some of these materials are used in the magnets found in the motors of electric vehicles, while others are used for creating superconductors. Some are also used in storage media to improve efficiency and performance, and several more are found in nuclear reactors."
What do you call it when you buy something being exported from another country?
 
India can build their roads out of whatever fortified shit they manage to come up with. Who cares what they do? We could do a lot worse as Americans than having everything our houses are made of be made in America by Americans. This is called "retaining value in your economy" rather than "subsidizing foreign economies." We are not a small island nation lacking for resources, nor a third-world backwater with too low an IQ and work ethic to do anything. Give people a profit incentive and cut the red tape, watch those factories spawn in. Fifty years of offshoring damage could be undone in another fifty years, rather than never. America could have actual careers again other than programmer, lobbyist, drill rapper.
The world is big. This idea America is the most advanced and biggest and best…that’s just national pride; stats tell another tale.

It isn’t about whether you have all the natural resources you need or not - that’s not why we export products and services. If we don’t export products and services we shrink.

When you realize the truth that we are a small part of something much larger, the requirement to act as a member becomes clear.

You can shrink your export and import markets if you want to; but it leads to lesser standards of living and economic wealth, not more.

When you study industry and realize what goes into making simple products from the very start to the finish even a coffee maker is a trillion dollar manufacturing industry.

If tomorrow we stopped importing as a hypothetical, we would need 10-20 trillion dollars to establish the industries needed to make all the products we are accustomed to.

He isn’t after Greenland for no reason. We have resources but not as much as what you might think. And we import a lot because we need it; not because we have it laying around here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: babadook
Or in the USA because we aren't dumb we invent a machine that lets that laborer churn out eleven cars for every car that Chinese laborer makes.
So no new jobs?
I expect Americans to work for themselves and to own their own productive capital. Ours should be a nation of mostly small businesses that buy and sell locally. Better for the environment, better for the average American.

Perpetuating a state of affairs where the vast majority of the American people are employed by someone else is part of why our freedoms are being eroded. "Do what we say or we'll come for your job" is a lot harder to pull off when you own your own business that sells primarily to those around you.
I don’t know how to explain to you and everyone else in this thread that you’re all being sold a pipe dream. I really want you to think about this: is the elite billionaire celebrity politician tanking America’s economy for the foreseeable future for the sliver of a chance it benefits its people (which has historically not been the case), or is he doing it to enrich him and his friends, which is historically proven to be a result of massive tariff spikes on this scale?

The average small business barely gets by today with low prices as a benefit of global trade and competition. It’ll take (very optimistically) at least a couple of years for American manufacturers to catch up to demand, and I’d be willing to bet 90% of the mom and pop shops that are being used as political pawns will not weather the storm. You know who will? The mega-corporations that can eat costs for as long as it takes because they have billions in cash reserves. This is why massive tariff spikes have largely benefitted the elite.

And you know what happens when mom and pop shops shut down and billionaires are able to consolidate power in an economic downturn? It won’t be most people that will be employed by someone else, it’ll be virtually all of them.

You all say you know what’s up and “fuck the elite”, yet you’re all falling for the words of a celebrity billionaire politician just because he pretends he’s one of you. I can’t believe it’s genuinely a hot take to say that a politician is lying to you in this forum nowadays.

@More AWS-8Q Than You

I just want to ask: why is it necessary to go scorched earth with these tariffs when it’s fully known that this move will tank America’s economy? Is this really the only way to solve America’s reliance on imports? I just want to know if this is genuinely the best you believe an administration could come up with: buttfucking our trade partners with tariffs.
 
I just want to ask: why is it necessary to go scorched earth with these tariffs when it’s fully known that this move will tank America’s economy? Is this really the only way to solve America’s reliance on imports? I just want to know if this is genuinely the best you believe an administration could come up with: buttfucking our trade partners with tariffs.
It's not scorched earth, if you actually look at where the tariffs are going, they're mostly aimed at things America is actually making. Japan's aluminum, steel, and cars, for example. Indochina is getting slapped because the Chinese often use them as a passthrough. These are targeted, the Chinese are going scorched earth because the tiny dicked Han Shinajin's cultural arrogance and narcissism make them do stupid shit when people don't treat them like the center of the world. Also, China has to save face in front of its own people, once they've done that to their satisfaction, they'll come to the table. Also, everyone else uses tariffs, and often very steep ones, are they buttfucking their trading partners?

Also, known by who? The same people who sat and watched over the greatest transfer of wealth in history during COVID? Jim Cramer and Paul Krugman, men who are wrong so consistently that you can use them as an anti-compass? The people getting smacked with tariffs, because they're certainly neutral parties in all of this? After COVID, just shouting that the "Experts say so," doesn't get traction with me.
 
This tariff shit is making my fellow Canadians insufferable (more than usual).

All this "elbows up" "Canada strong" bullshit, and faggots posting their grocery lists for asspats showing they have nothing that was imported from the US that week. People concern posting about how we are all in this together and there are groups and sites to go to to check and make sure products are not American. Advertainment bullshit about great places in Canada to vacation instead of the US. Stupid cartoons of Beavers stomping on eagles. references to 1812. There's endless retardation going on.

The mind-numbingl stupidity and fervour is off the charts. I only see it from people over 40, at least, so there is that. Certainly people in their teens and twenties I know don't seem to care.
 
I don’t know how to explain to you and everyone else in this thread that you’re all being sold a pipe dream. I really want you to think about this: is the elite billionaire celebrity politician tanking America’s economy for the foreseeable future for the sliver of a chance it benefits its people (which has historically not been the case), or is he doing it to enrich him and his friends, which is historically proven to be a result of massive tariff spikes on this scale?
I'm honestly tired of faggots like you. Always wanting to cry but offering no solutions reeks of shill behavior and considering your faggot ass made your account a mere 2 days ago means you wanted nothing be to be obtuse and disingenuous. According to your faggot ass, we should do nothing and just accept getting fucked.
 
I was having a conversation with a Canadian about the ongoing crisis and I pointed out that Canada tariffed American dairy. He said that those tariffs were necessary to protect Canadians from drinking poisoned milk made with growth hormones. I pointed out that nobody would be forced to buy American milk if tariffs against it were dropped, it would just become cheaper. He then lost his mind and started saying I was demanding that he eat the bugs and live in the pod by asking him to drop tariffs on US dairy.

That's the level of thought that the average Canadian has put into this trade war. They one hundred percent believe their tariffs are justified and American tariffs are imperialism despite the fact that dropping their tariffs would have zero negative affects on them beyond crashing their dairy industry. Which is, of course, the kind of blatant protectionism the world is accusing the US of.

The world believes the US has an obligation to be stolen from.
 
From the people who brought you “we fired 10,000 HHS workers, but now we need them all back—oops!” comes “we tanked your investment account but trust us there’s some ideological reason and we promise we figured out global economics better than we figured out cost reduction efficiency!”

I’m not at the “anyone who supports this is a fucking moron who deserves the rope for being offensively retarded and a useless sheep” but we’re getting close.
 
China, Mexico and especially third world slave labor states makes perfect sense. As well as some industries we do have. But I still cannot for the life of me understand what the fuck he is aiming for with these tariffs against core 1st world friends. (Japan, Korea, Taiwan, UK and others in the 1st world.) Especially the ones who supply things we no longer have industries for. You don't create industries this way, you protect ones that already exist. You need to spend and rebuild locally before you worry about tariffs to protect them. Maybe if they planned on using the money to help build and rebuild our industries it might make sense. A round about way to fund it publicly without directly taxing. But the neo-con/establishment libertardian ghouls are largely still in control of those aspects of government needed for anything like that. So good luck even preventing reduction in spending and building projects. ffs -_-

The neo-con libertardian parts of the party can't die off and retire soon enough.. We really need to treat it like a witch hunt.. getting them out. While we still have a functioning country.

The stuff about "staring trade wars" is ridiculous though. We were the only country not using them, not protecting itself or it's industries. And in modern America it shows.
 
Last edited:
From the people who brought you “we fired 10,000 HHS workers, but now we need them all back—oops!” comes “we tanked your investment account but trust us there’s some ideological reason and we promise we figured out global economics better than we figured out cost reduction efficiency!”

I’m not at the “anyone who supports this is a fucking moron who deserves the rope for being offensively retarded and a useless sheep” but we’re getting close.
It's better to fire 100 000 workers and finding out that 10 000 of them were essential workers that need to be re hired or have their position filled, than it is to keep 90 000 parasites on the government dole.
 
What I was really curious about was how we were getting tariffs like this without a vote in Congress:

The International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), Title II of Pub. L. 95–223, 91 Stat. 1626, enacted October 28, 1977, is a United States federal law authorizing the president to regulate international commerce after declaring a national emergency in response to any unusual and extraordinary threat to the United States which has its source in whole or substantial part outside the United States.[1] The act was signed by President Jimmy Carter on December 28, 1977.[2]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Emergency_Economic_Powers_Acthttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Emergency_Economic_Powers_Act
In the past it was used for things like this:
Unlike TWEA, IEEPA was drafted to permit presidential emergency declarations only in response to threats originating outside the United States.[4] Beginning with Jimmy Carter in response to the Iran Hostage Crisis, presidents have invoked IEEPA to safeguard U.S. national security interests by freezing or "blocking" assets of belligerent foreign governments,[13] or certain foreign nationals abroad.[14]
"Iran Hostage Crisis" emergency versus "Americans are buying to much stuff from China" 'emergency' in just 46 years is pretty impressive. Also, I guess we've expanded "belligerent foreign governments" to "All of them."

I look forward to my Top Hats, but it seems to me when King George did this we dumped the tea he did it to in the harbor.
 
Back