and also makes posts about violence which is perhaps not the best idea.
Nothing I have said on this forum falls outside of constitutionally protected speech.
And if you have ever advocated for:
The military
The death penalty
2A protection expansions
Harsher policing
Military intervention
You're an advocate for violence. Just, y'know, only at the hands of government workers on fellow citizens or random foreigners. Like a shitlib, gun control for the former and Ukraine War madness for the latter.
To change gears, merely talking about the subject or even saying stuff that I have purposefully never said, like:
Every Jew and nigger must die.
is constitutionally protected speech.
Any time anyone here has ever hinted at the 2A being used for its intended purpose? Also a violence advocate.
I'll just say that people seemingly miss the fact that if you neuter people such that they don't take advantage of the 1st Amendment, the 2nd never will be used. Which is why I have, well as stated in a different thread:
I'm tired of seeing people stick their balls in their own mouth and chomp any time they get anywhere near the topic of violence as a part of politics.
Cut the qualifiers. If someone needs to explicitly be told you're not advocating violence the problem is the reader not the speaker, you pussified dipshit.
And because I want to just cross-post from that thread the post I made on the topic of 'putting qualifiers on constitutionally protected speech':
Niggercattle unironically believe all violence is equitable to nigger behavior whilst championing:
Harsher policing
Expanded Second Amendment protections (which is directly against this idea that the only legitimate usage of force is from government workers)
Harsher foreign military interventions
More military funding
The American Revolutionary War
The American Civil War's victors
Veterans of every American-involved conflict regardless of its legitimacy since... the first
If you are genuinely of the opinion that all violence is bad you're a fucking niggercow brainwashed to believe that collective action is bad when non-niggers accomplish it because it's of infinite value to shitty governments to ensure you don't moo too loud lest be taken to a slaughterhouse.
And if for some reason someone wants a qualifier on this post you're not getting one. It's not necessary.
No,
it's not a 'bad idea' to exercise your right to free speech. I cannot and will not stress that enough until people stop acting like mentioning violence that isn't directly related to tomahawk-bombing random retarded hijabis for Israel or cops shooting felonious niggers is somehow 'bad' or worse yet, not
constitutionally protected speech.
