Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[Belgians in the Congo]

and vagueposts a defamation case.

Please sue Crackieta, it would be so incredibly funny that you lose every single defamation lolsuit you're a part of no matter if on the defense, offense or vague counsel.

 

[Strix454]

1) Another useless reminder to Nick that its not a good idea to make public comments about a potential area of criminal or civil litigation. Every word you say about anything to do with hacking can and will be used against you later.

2) Minnesota as anti-SLAPP now. You may want to think about that before thinking about a defamation action against anyone. Drug addicts whose young children test positive for drug use don't usually do well trying to defend their good name in front of a jury. A jury might also tend to think that a guy who fucked your wife and did drugs for a long time with you might be competent to be able to conclude if you are doing drugs again. And if you bring the action in your home county, the judge in the case would either be judge "pussy liquor" who you have insulted, the judge who is about to sentence you on drug charges or the third judge which is the only one you have not been in front of yet.

 

[Obnoxious Asshole]

Fucking Faggot Crackets thinking he has ANY moral high ground here is infurating. Faggot FED HIS OWN KID COCAINE and thinks he can look down on anyone? Fuck that fucking faggot until he prolapses.

 

[Sneed Force One]

I think Aaron's telling the truth about the FBI investigation. Whether they actually decide to prosecute or not is something else entirely, but if the investigation has really been going on for months it would seem like they intend to. I just don't see him making up something as ridiculous as an FBI investigation if it isn't true. He's not Patrick Tomlinson or whatever that moron's name is.

I agree with this, and the timeframe of investigation makes sense. It takes fucking ages for subpoenas for Xwitter, Discord and whatever else to be processed and the requested evidence to be handed back to authorities. I think Aaron makes the process seem more urgent to fuck with Dabbleverse pedophiles by making them shit their pants and cope, producing content for his show, but I think overall there is an investigation in progress that he is receiving updates for.

Edit:
It seems Aaron himself agrees with my assessment

 

[StannisTheMannis]

I think Aaron makes the process seem more urgent to fuck with Dabbleverse pedophiles by making them shit their pants and cope, producing content for his show, but I think overall there is an investigation in progress that he is receiving updates for.

Aaron being his natural babbling retard self keeps goading the likes of Nick and dabbleverse nonces into committing more brazen gay ops, which gets you into situations like this, whether it be true, false or exaggerated.

 

[AnOminous]

I’d love to hear Nick explain how Casey Kolb is somehow unethical for simply doing his job and mounting a solid defence for his client.

He's a shitty lawyer because he won. Nick is operating on Greer logic at this point. He should have been a "neutral party" and gotten the result Nick wanted. Imagine this smoldering trash heap of a failure criticizing anyone else's acumen at law.

 

[Kipersonapiscesotter]

In the comments of Steel Toe: Cyber crimes case update - 4/8/25" by Stallyn19
Nick directly comments on Aaron's allegations of illicit access to confidential data and vagueposts a defamation case.

"I couldn't represent her". Nick is, once again, playing semantics games.
We all know you probably gave her informal advice ala amicus curiae or simply doing all the legwork for April to present pro se.
April probably betrayed this information back to Aaron when she flew from the Balldo-nest. That's likely why Aaron has said what he has today.
View attachment 7194480
Take Nick's defence that he never hacked Aaron with a lot of salt. Remember, once upon a time, Nick once said the following:
View attachment 7194496
I would be highly surprised that Aaron would wholesale lie about being asked who various people are by authorities. It seems to me there is indeed an active investigation.
Nick regularly lies and later backtracks when found out. The FBI saga is still on-course.

Nick's expert legal take. N8ck, you've repeatedly admitted doing drugs. The state found you with drugs. It's quite reasonable for someone to assume you are still doing drugs and hundreds of people are stating it. You have zero chance in a defamation case.

 

[Sneed Force One]

He's a shitty lawyer because he won. Nick is operating on Greer logic at this point. He should have been a "neutral party" and gotten the result Nick wanted. Imagine this smoldering trash heap of a failure criticizing anyone else's acumen at law.

> "Casey Colb is a shitty unethical lawyer"
> "I wasn't involved in April's divorce"

Which one is it Nick?
How could you know enough to make that disparaging statement, if you weren't assisting her?

 

[Maraschino]

IIRC, when the news of alleged hacking broke back when BBN revealed DMs between themselves and Aaron, our resident lawyer Sean spun up a stream where he was PISSED that Nick had possibly committed intrusion of confidential data. He went on this odd tangent where he speculated something like "if Nick read confidential emails between two people giving legal advice", he would be a "fucking snake".
To me, he was insinuating that he KNEW Nick had read the emails between himself and Aaron.

The insinuation was obvious because (at least at this point) Nick has yet to be convicted of invading someone's personal accounts to break another person's attorney client privilege. It's "It would be a real shame if..." language. When Sean did his conversation with Chud Logic, he mentioned he doesn't like Nick. Wonder why?

How did Nick know Sean and Elissa was assisting Aaron?
They wouldn't have told him. They likely wouldn't have told others who would've leaked it to him.
Illicitly accessing Aaron's confidential emails and discovering it himself is the logical conclusion.

When Sean says that any conversations you have with him are confidential, and that he will take any secrets you give him to the grave, I believe him.

So yes, not only would Sean not have told him (because it's none of Nick's business), I don't think Sean could even tell him without breaking A-C privilege. If there was ever a reason for an attorney like Sean to just admit outright he dislikes Nick, it'd be because he intruded on someone else's private conversations when the two people who would hypothetically be involved (Aaron and Sean) would have every reason not to reveal anything, "like a fucking snake." But he sounds really confident he knows something, but he shouldn't be, so he'd have to have done something to get access to those conversations. The only option at that stage is something illegal.

At this step I'm fairly sure Sean wasn't just consulting for Aaron, I think he's actively assisting law enforcement build a case against Nick for this, because this shit is that serious. Nick takes nothing seriously (except drug abuse and having sex with women who aren't his wife), but I bet Sean does. But I'm not going to ask him to confirm or deny my theory, because why would he tell me?

Elissa just replied to a comment on her clip of Aaron claiming Nick is being investigated by the FBI and said she has 100% confidence he had some level of access to Aaron's email. That looks extra bad.

The dumbest choice I think will happen (because Nick's that fucking stupid) is Nick's going to claim "I just guessed Aaron had private legal conversations with Sean, and had communicated with Elissa, it's not illegal to guess and be right." I don't believe they'll accept that argument because of tweets like the one above. And it'll all be because Nick won't stop being smug for 5 seconds and can't shut the fuck up.

If Nick is charged, it will be the death-knell to the vaguest concept he could ever practice law again. Breaking into confidential communication of another person, let alone the defendant of your wife's complaint, I can't imagine anything but lifelong disbarment.

Five states treat all disbarment as permanent: Ohio, Oregon, New Jersey, Kentucky, and Indiana. Eight states can allow the disciplinary committees to request permanent disbarment for egregious cases: California, Louisiana, Alabama, Arkansas, Minnesota, Florida, Illinois, and West Virginia.

I don't think Nick will actually receive a recommendation for permanent disbarment (even though he deserves one), but I think it'll be treated as effectively permanent. The reason being I don't believe Nick would ever attempt to regain a law license if he lost it through disbarment even if he's in a jurisdiction where you can, which usually requires a minimum waiting period of five years.

He's too lazy and the shame would be too much for him to do it.

 

[AnOminous]

Aaron's claiming the FBI is investigating Balldoman on the cybercrimes??? OH SHIT

Yeah I'll believe it when I see the DOJ press release on their website announcing his indictment for felony cuckoldry. If he is under investigation, way to tip him off, asshat.

If Nick gets arrested on federal hacking charges I will vote for him every lolcow of the year every year forever, even if he's not a nominee

It'll remind me of the old Bloom County arc where Steve Dallas gets framed for hacking and gets beaten up by the nerd kids in the "hacker tank" when they figure out he's way too stupid to be a hacker.

 

[waffle]

To this day I don't know if they actually ran that part of the prison as a gravel operation or just did it to punish the prisoners, maybe a bit of both.

Both,

There's like 3 or 4 federal prisons all in a complex there and you do not want to go to military prison at all, the "old man camp" is a whole different animal and that's where Nick would likely end up. I think there's a similar place in like Alabama which is supposed to be newer but is swelteringly hot like 9 months a year instead of 3.

 

[Sneed Force One]

The plot thickens as @elb states in the comments of "STMS: Rekieta Law Under Investigation by the FBI - Xitter Spergouts & Cyber Crimes (Apr 8, 2025)" to the comment by StabbyMcStabwood "I will never stop laughing if Nick gets charged and convicted for this." , she replies "He can’t comment on this topic here, not that he really comments here anyway, because he knows it’s his own fault that I can say with 100% confidence he had some level of access to Aaron’s email"

Talk around Nick’s potential CFAA violations is heating up fast.

The segment "because he knows it’s his own fault that I can say with 100% confidence" is a PARTICULARLY interesting statement.

So here’s the question: How is Elissa Clips so absolutely certain that she knows Nick knows that she knows he accessed Aaron’s emails?
Was Elissa on the receiving end of a yet-to-be publicly known shower call? Maybe when Nick hacked Aaron's account, he found communication between herself and Aaron and proceeded to privately sperg out at her in DMs? Did Nick, in his spastic rage, reveal how he knew they were communicating? Does Elissa have written proof of illicit access?
Nick has slipped up in the past revealing sources, such as telling Null the CPS leaks were real.

@elb would you care for additional comment? Do you have any further disclosure to the public?

 

[AnOminous]

Nick uses his law license as a credential to "prove" he's smarter and better than other people, so him losing it publicly in a disgraceful way (because I don't see how you couldn't lose your license from this amount of misconduct) would be much worse than any amount of prison.

An offense like this wouldn't just be some random thing like a DUI or a drug bust. It would be a "crime of moral turpitude" that would warrant severe discipline. It's possible even Minnesota would outright disbar over something like that, because more than being morally repulsive, intercepting attorney/client communications illegally and disseminating them is directly relevant to his moral fitness to practice law (don't laugh).

He already can't handle when his critics say, "Your daughter tested positive for cocaine." Do you think he's going to accept, "You literally lost your law license, you're a criminal, immoral, and your legal opinions are worthless," any better? He might actually livestream his fucking suicide.

This is probably why Balldo is terrified to do his CLE and turn his license back on. He realizes they might just let it slide if he cucks out and never tries to practice law again, something he barely ever did anyway, but if he gets his license back they might wake up and open a can of whoopass on him.

Nick pretends to be Johnny Cochran

More like Johnny Cocksleeve.

 

[Watching Rekieta]

Yeah I'll believe it when I see the DOJ press release on their website announcing his indictment for felony cuckoldry. If he is under investigation, way to tip him off, asshat.

I suspect Aaron is confusing "taking a report" with investigating.

FBI just isn't going to involve itself unless one of the following happens:
1) Public corruption
2) Fraud over $10 million
3) Child pornography
4) Interstate financial crimes
5) Interstate kidnapping

Low level email hacking without damages has a nil chance of being investigated. Aaron's best bet is they view this as trying to corrupt the judicial process or they found Melton's CP stash.

 

[AnOminous]

Nick says he'll be streaming on the 19th.

Yeah right, sure thing, Balldo.

"I couldn't represent her". Nick is, once again, playing semantics games.
We all know you probably gave her informal advice ala amicus curiae or simply doing all the legwork for April to present pro se.

I'd assume he unethically gave her self-serving "advice" that benefited only him and his beef with Aaron, the gay lover who hilted him and jilted him.

 

[Vibralldo]

1) Another useless reminder to Nick that its not a good idea to make public comments about a potential area of criminal or civil litigation. Every word you say about anything to do with hacking can and will be used against you later.

2) Minnesota as anti-SLAPP now. You may want to think about that before thinking about a defamation action against anyone. Drug addicts whose young children test positive for drug use don't usually do well trying to defend their good name in front of a jury. A jury might also tend to think that a guy who fucked your wife and did drugs for a long time with you might be competent to be able to conclude if you are doing drugs again. And if you bring the action in your home county, the judge in the case would either be judge "pussy liquor" who you have insulted, the judge who is about to sentence you on drug charges or the third judge which is the only one you have not been in front of yet.

I disagree
Keep going, Nick, you're doing great!

 

[Maraschino]

An offense like this wouldn't just be some random thing like a DUI or a drug bust. It would be a "crime of moral turpitude" that would warrant severe discipline.

You might've misread what I said. I was agreeing that with what Nick might've done with hacking Aaron to break A-C privilege to give it to other people and try to intimidate/humiliate Aaron into silence, he absolutely should be disbarred for it. It's so serious I do see why disbarment at a minimum is part of the appropriate outcome, in addition to whatever other penalties he receives for the crime itself.

It's fine though, you can just call Nick a cocaine dosing cocksucker who can't cook and it'll all be forgiven, because it's true.

 

[elb]

The plot thickens as @elb states in the comments of "STMS: Rekieta Law Under Investigation by the FBI - Xitter Spergouts & Cyber Crimes (Apr 8, 2025)" to the comment by StabbyMcStabwood "I will never stop laughing if Nick gets charged and convicted for this.", replying "He can’t comment on this topic here, not that he really comments here anyway, because he knows it’s his own fault that I can say with 100% confidence he had some level of access to Aaron’s email"
View attachment 7194647
It seems discussion around Nick's CFAA violations is rapidly increasing.
@elb would you care for additional comment? Do you have any further disclosure to the public?

Nick sent me a dm seething about a confidential email I’d sent a couple of days earlier to Aaron for his attorney. Nick absolutely had access, and if he didn’t want to get caught he should’ve practiced some self control

Edit to add screenshots

 

[not william stenchever]

And if you bring the action in your home county, the judge in the case would either be judge "pussy liquor" who you have insulted, the judge who is about to sentence you on drug charges or the third judge which is the only one you have not been in front of yet.

Fuck it, why not go for the trifecta and piss off the third one too?

 

[AnOminous]

Dude in my Army company back in the day committed aggravated assault, nearly beating another soldier to death in a bar fight on post--put the man in a coma for weeks. He did (I think) three years hard labor in Leavenworth.

Different Leavenworth. The military one is United States Disciplinary Barracks (and connected facilities of lower security) and the civilian one is Leavenworth-FCI (a medium security prison but OP was talking about the minimum security satellite).

The former is basically Hell. The latter is the definition of Club Fed, a white collar resort prison. It is literally the prison that is the opposite Federal Pound Me In The Ass Prison. I don't know what they do there. Play shuffleboard and shit I guess.

I think Aaron's telling the truth about the FBI investigation.

If he is, I hope they show up to his house, bitch slap him, and tell him to STFU.